Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

1400401403405406410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,243 ✭✭✭golfball37


    United were impressed with Tuchel when they met over the weekend. Not sure if it was reciprocated



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,981 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Well I put up a couple of stories that were running at the same time and they all were nearly certain about what was happening at United and of course all different. All to do with the next manager and current one. I believe it was ETH staying and Poch getting the job and Southgate. Tuchel's name was being bandied about then too and McKenna, I even heard a ridiculous one about Zidane.



  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The guardian reporting Tuchel is out of the running for the Utd job after meeting Radcliffe.

    Boards posters may have better contacts though!

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/football/article/2024/jun/10/thomas-tuchel-manchester-united-out-of-running-talks-ratcliffe-manager



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,120 ✭✭✭jacool


    The article could have been typed better because if you read this, as I do

    "Sir Jim Ratcliffe held exploratory discussions with Thomas Tuchel last week regarding potentially replacing Erik ten Hag as Manchester United’s manager but has ruled himself out of the job."

    it implies that Jim has ruled himself out, not Thomas.



  • Posts: 1,045 ✭✭✭ Van Tall Cemetery


    Pretty sure Jackson is still banned from old Trafford.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Lol. Yeah, well spotted.

    Jim is out. Perhaps Tuchel still has a chance 😁



  • Posts: 1,045 ✭✭✭ Van Tall Cemetery


    It's the usual from the rags. One person writes an article and everyone copies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,883 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Yes. you posted a few links of stories from the Irish Mirror (citing Jason McAteer as a source), Sportmax & Teamtalk with every sort of clickbait rubbish. And then one link to a reputable source saying that Man Utd wanted to talk to Tuchel, as he is the number 1 target.

    And guess which one happened. It was the reputable source.

    It wasn't the clickbait stuff that a lot of United fans seem to get hung up on. This narrative amongst Man Utd fans that everything written about Man Utd in the media is wrong is weird, just because clickbait sites churn out nonsense. Not everything is wrong. It's pretty obvious that they are trying to get a new manager since before the FA Cup final.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,981 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    They are all crap. It's the offseason and even the media sites that normally are very good during the season are doing everything to keep their subscribers reading, watching etc,



  • Posts: 1,045 ✭✭✭ Van Tall Cemetery


    Yeah. You would think people would understand by now



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,353 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    United = fan engagement, both United fans and rival fans.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭davemckenna25


    Why do you say its obvious... because the media says so?.

    Because none of us actually know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,883 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Lots of fan complaints about how bad a season it was from ETH in terms of tactical set ups & performance. More engaged football people involved in the club will also have seen this, hence the new manager search.

    Lots of fan complains around squad harmony and player fall outs. More engaged football people involved in the club will also have seen this, hence the new manager search.

    More fall outs with players that a club will admit to caring about, and failing to keep this in-house.

    Man Utd having a history of sacking managers in the last 15 years.

    And most importantly a crap league season glossed over by a once off game. The talk of sacking him came about well before this once off game, and is what prompted the new manager search.

    But if ye want to keep yer heads buried in the sand and that ETH is great and Man Utd definitely are not actively searching for a new manager and everything is all made up by the big bad nasty media, then be my guest. I'd actually love that to happen tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,160 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    The last 15 years? Tell me what manager did Utd sack in 2009? What manager did Utd sack in 2010? What manager did they sack in 2011? And what manager did they sack in 2012?

    As for the rest of your post there's plenty of fan noise that want to keep ETH and plenty that want him sack. That's modern day football. Some would argue that Ratcliffe/INEOS meeting with Tuchel, McKenna, Frank is disgraceful and disrespectful. Some would argue its forward planning for potentially replacing ETH next summer. The point being that you will find arguments on every side of anything that does or doesn't happen and newspapers won't refuse ink and websites will seek clicks.

    Rival fans being so engaged with Utd is nothing new tbf. It's just funny when you consider ETH has won more in his first two years than some managers managed in double that time in other top clubs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    I'm sorry but how can Jim rule himself out for Thomas..

    ones-self can only be done by the person, not someone else …

    I know you said the article is badly written, but I'm lost…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,981 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Who are these 'more engaged football people' you speak of?

    It sounds like the crap articles you see in the mirror.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,883 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Forgive me, it's less than 15 years. I got my years mixed up for when Moyes was given the boot.

    In the last 12 years, it's been 5 long term managers sacked. Potentially 6 with ETH. All in, in that 12 year period, there's been 8 different managers in different guises. Carrick & Giggs were short term in fairness. That's a big turnover or managers and proves a history of changing quickly.

    Forward planning? Lol I wouldn't believe that considering how reactionary some of the decision making has been in the past. OGS getting the job full time being one, and then sacking him again without a plan in place being another, hence why Carrick had to get the job. The club planning on signings but then ETH wanting a different player so going that route instead. Might be irrelevant but wasn't there a fan revolt against the club signing Arnautovic, and so the club pulled out? Reactionary again. ETH keeping his job past FA cup weekend is reactionary as he was set to be sacked that weekend.

    IMO, Tuchel is a good fit. Cup manager suits a cup team. Southgate might actually work but everyone s***s on Southgate because of his stagnant style of football that he employs with a wealth of attacking talent. But that's international football. To me, Jim wants a British core to his club and so it's possible that he could try get a British manager.

    Websites certainly won't refuse clicks when it comes to Man Utd is right. The thing is to click on the reputable people / sites, which goes over the head of many. I only listen to a handful of people when it comes to my own club, maybe 3/4/5 people/sources only. The example above of someone using made up websites as stories regarding Man Utd manager this summer. It's obvious which ones were clickbait from the outset. Everyone in their right mind should be ignoring them.

    There is clearly made up stuff alright and then there is stuff that is happening and is being reported on. But just because the media says something does not make it untrue. It's not a blanket false. I remember a couple posters refusing to believe the Rashford going on the piss in Belfast story a few months ago for example. And it was mainly because of the narrative of 'big bad media make up stories about us'.

    I remember this example well but a few summers ago, Talksport(!!!) said one Sunday morning (again!!!) that Man Utd wanted to sign Oxlade Chamberlain from Liverpool as he was cheap and he would help their HG quota. It was absolutely bull s**t of a highest order. But guess what. People fell for it and clicked on the 'story'. Later on that year, there was some sort of negative story about player unrest in the Man Utd camp. Leaked stories, cryptic Twitter posts, you know the sort. But, the Ox transfer was used as an example of why you shouldn't believe the story of player unrest because 'the media make stories up about us' and that whole narrative. 'Sure what would they know, they linked us to 80 players last summer and we signed 0' etc etc. all because they believed the Talksport crap. But used it as a reason to not believe a different story.

    As I said above, I wouldn't believe most of the stories alright but there has been a consistent link with Tuchel for a couple months now, and it does look very much like there was a meeting some time recently and the interview didn't go well. But of course, lots refuse to believe it because the whole media is always all wrong using Jason McAteer said something else to the Irish Mirror as the example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭davemckenna25


    So just your opinion and media/fans saying things.

    It's not about having your head in the sand, it's about not believing what you read/hear on social media/media.

    The only actual response about next season has been ETH saying that he has been involved in the planning for preseason and next season.

    Beyong that, none of us have a clue.

    But you keep believing you have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,160 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    So many words to say absolutely nothing. It's quite clear you're just looking for a way to get as many digs in at Utd as possible "a cup manager for a cup team"

    For all you've said, how many Manchester United managers have INEOS sacked? How many have they hired? So because there was no forward planning under the previous regime, that have all been replaced as I'm sure your aware of considering how on top of all things Utd you are, that means the new footballing management team also won't plan in advance and speak to managers, agents, coaches to feel people out, get their opinions etc.

    Also there was no revolt or anything like it re Arnautovic but for the LOLs I'm sure you can show me some proof of this revolt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,981 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Sorry but the Southgate thing. People seen him as a club manager at Middlesbrough. They were a mid table team when he took over there and they just got worse and worse and were eventually relegated under him.

    He's had England teams with incredible talent for years and all he's done is hold them back.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,883 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Man Utd absolutely are a cup team now. That's not a dig, it's just realism.

    You were on about trophies earlier. It's all domestic cups that Man Utd are winning since Ferguson left. When is the last time Man Utd were actually involved in a title race, versus how many cup runs have they been involved in the last decade?

    5 cup wins (4 domestic) in the last 12 seasons. 2 other cup finals. 4 more semi finals. That's a fair chunk of cup runs, basically one every season. How many realistic league challenges have been in that time? Finishing 2nd but 19 points away from 1st place doesn't count as it wasn't really a title challenge. I'd say 0.

    1 cup run vs 0 league challenge every season. I've every right to say Man Utd are a cup team now.

    No INEOS haven't hired or sacked a manager, yet. But that won't last long IMO. Is Ashworth even allowed to work yet, or is that his role to sort it out? Is it Wilcox or what's his role? Why is there constant talk of a new manager? Why did Jim avoid questions on ETH's future after the FA cup final? Why have the club not briefed their local journos that ETH is staying, definitely? Maybe it's because he banned them all, or maybe cos he is not. Ye seem to think it's all fake news about ETH leaving, so who knows.

    As for Arnautovic, there are quotes here from the Bologna sporting director about Man Utd's bid. I'm sure you can remember the potential transfer at the time, and how Twitter was rife with criticism from Man Utd fans at the time. Di Viao actually mentioned in another interview that Man Utd didn't pull out of of the deal because of the fan backlash, it was because Arnautovic felt more valued at Bologna.....But why even mention that without some sort of simmering element of truth to it in the first place.

    And then Reddy mentions that it was a combination of the fan revolt and Man Utd deciding to not increase the offer.

    The BBC also reported the same here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,981 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Just because United haven't been contenders for the league for the last twelve doesn't mean they never will be again. If they sort all the issues out at the club and make it to the Champions league the season after next they could be contenders in 25/26.

    I'm not saying that's going to happen but United have the wealth to make it happen if they become a Champions league team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 197 ✭✭Wolftown


    Thats an unhealthy obsession you've got yourself there. As mentioned, an awful lot of words with nothing really said.

    In the last four seasons, United have finished ahead of Liverpool in the league twice.

    In that time United have one FA cup and one league cup.

    Liverpool have one FA cup and two league cups.

    But one is just a cup team and the other is the best team eva...have I got that right?

    Gas stuff 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,160 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    So you have the Bologna sporting director saying the deal didn't go through because Arnautovic felt more valued at Bologna and then multiple sources saying there was a difference in valuation but because "Twitter" complained you think that's the reason it didn't go through.

    As pointed out above Utd have finished above the greatest team of all time and the saviors of all that is pure twice in recent seasons but sure Utd are a cup team and the other is the only team capable of stopping City



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,506 ✭✭✭BenK


    Apart from City, everyone's a cup team these days!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,883 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Well firstly, I have no idea what relevance Liverpool have to the opinion that Man Utd being a cup team now. But ye seem determined to make the comparison.

    The fact ye seem to celebrate finishing ahead of Liverpool in the league (in their worst league season in about 8 years), while actually being nowhere in the actual league title race as some sort of achievement says it all really and where the club is now. And the fact that Man Utd beat Liverpool last minute in the cup 1/4 final and then Man City in the final, while finishing 22 & 31 points behind both teams in the league while while they were actually involved in the title race only emphasizes my point. Ye can't get close to the league title but celebrate beating the other teams in the cups. A cup team. Never making an impact on the league title.

    But yeah the not so subtle digs around best team ever etc. Ye said it, not me, so there must be some sort of unconscious insecurity there!

    Anyways I'm not so sure what relevance that has to the big bad media constantly making everything up about Man Utd and so therefore everything written is untrue, so I'll leave it there. Maybe I'm part of the big bad media too so!

    IMG_20240611_084928.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,812 ✭✭✭DellyBelly


    That's exactly it. Who is else can win the league over the next few years. People can say Arsenal but it won't happen. City are too good. That may change if Pep leaves but until then everyone else will be second best. Even if they are pipped you just know it will be just a one off title win



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭davemckenna25


    Calm down Fitzy.

    Noone has said to not believe anything in the media, just to stop believing the majority of what you read.

    A broken clock is right twice in 24hrs so they will get some correct along with the odd media briefing.

    Man utd are the biggest club in the UK, one of the biggest in Europe. With that will come alot of media attention. You just just hope people have the maturity to not get taken in by it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,692 ✭✭✭doc_17


    In the last 7 years, they’ve been the only team to stop City.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,197 ✭✭✭ronjo


    In the last 7 years also there are only 2 teams that have remotely challenged City



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement