Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

19339349369389391415

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,356 ✭✭✭OldRio


    I find it baffling that Frawley wasn't playing at 10 v Ulster. A 6 2 split and no recent minutes for your back up. Utter madness.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Lia Sweet Racist


    It's another absolutely sickening defeat. Last year was still the worst one, for a combination of reasons, but what is so bad about this one was there were so many times during the game where I felt we're the better side, we're playing more rugby and putting them under pressure, and they are requiring miraculous turnovers or balls not going to hand to survive here.

    For the actual life of me I cannot understand why we haven't learned the lesson to just kick every good opportunity for points you get. I've almost never seen this strategy not work in finals/knock out rugby, yet for reasons completely unknown to me Leinster have decided to shun this strategy on multiple occasions now.

    I hate saying this - but I do feel Carley had a massive, outsized impact on this game. It was harder to tell at the game, but watching it back last night some incidents are even more baffling to me.

    The really significant ones were:

    (i) 14 mins - Ntamack's rip in the tackle, which immediately led to Joe McCarthy picking the ball up and scoring. It was as clear and obvious a rip as you'll ever see - and the laws on this are really clear:

    Law 11.5
    The ball is not knocked-on, and play continues, if:
    A player knocks the ball forward immediately after an opponent has kicked it (charge down).
    A player rips or knocks the ball from an opponent and the ball goes forward from the opponent’s hand or arm.
    [source:  ] https://www.world.rugby/the-game/laws/law/11

    Why TF Carley refuses to even check this, and see if he's maybe gotten it wrong is beyond me.

    (ii) 28 mins - Sheehan's break, the penalty given to Dupont essentially on the Toulouse try line. There is no lift from Dupont, and he then just flops over the ruck onto the Leinster side. It should have been a penalty and YC to Dupont, which would have been a massive, game changing decision. As other's have pointed out, the distinction between this penalty and the one where Sheehan is on the ball around halfway for what felt like a half an hour is so stark.

    (iii) 40 mins - calls the knock on against Leinster at the ruck, and immediately whistles play dead, despite Leinster having penalty advantage. Clear from the replays the ball comes off a foot and isn't a knock on. Why didn't he let that sequence play out?

    (iv) 67 mins - one of the arguably most blatant and most frustrating - the Willis pick up. Setting aside the fact that it's a ruck at that point and you're not allowed to just pick up the ball, he's also very clearly in from the side. There is absolutely no way that ball was out by comparison to virtually any other ruck in the game. It was an easy and obvious penalty to Leinster from straight in front, with 10 mins to go, that would have seen Leinster go to in front 15-12, instead Toulouse attack from it.

    The Roumat/Lowe comparison is a farce. I don't think either player actually was deliberately trying to knock it on or slap it out of play, both just instinctively put an arm up. It strikes Lowe on the upper arm and goes up in the air. How one incident can be a play on, nothing to see here, and the other a penalty and YC is a **** joke.

    There were a multitude of other small offenses throughout, but those four were utterly egregious IMO. I've heard people claim Toulouse could probably list a litany of similar issues, and I watched the game last night to see if there were incidents like that but there aren't. Feel free to list them if there are. All of the big controversial moments in the game went against Leinster, 100%.

    Not taking anything away from a superb Toulouse side, Dupont and Willis were sublime. Their defence was utterly incredible, but I fundamentally believe Carley got those decisions above 100% wrong, and that it absolutely decided the outcome of this game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 712 ✭✭✭jonok28


    Leinster's attack this season has been mechanical. There rarely is any flow to the movements and it is easier for good teams to shut down the attack. The sense of urgency inside the oppositions 22 has been their undoing, especially in the final. I don't think it can be underestimated how important Garry Ringrose is to making the Leinster midfield tick. Osborne and Henshaw are very similar ball carriers and don't offer the same variation as Ringrose does in attack.

    Ross wasn't the problem in the final. Neither was Frawley. Dupont played like the best player in the World. Leinster are going to be stronger in many ways next season but they are also going to be significantly weaker.

    Snyman and Barrett are going to offer huge World Class options. But the loss of Ala'alatoa, the aging of Cian Healy and with Luke McGrath falling off a cliff in terms of his on field abilities. Michael Milne and Jack Boyle are not ready to step into the 17 Jersey. Tom Clarkson and Rory McGuire are not ready to step into the 18 jersey and Fintan Gunne and Foley aren't yet ready to take the back up scrum half position. they are all around 12 months away. Boyle is 12 months away from legitimately pushing Porter for the jersey. I'm not sure Clarkson or McGuire will get close to Furlong level and Gunne is about 12-18 months away from being ready.

    it is a bit of a travesty that the IRFU has stepped in and stopped Leinster from going out and getting a NIQ TH. They have been to the last 3 finals and are competing against French teams who can bring in as much international talent as they want.

    Jack Boyle will be 2nd choice LH by about the midway point of next season and will be a factor in Europe but Gunne, Foley, Clarkson and McGuire are a ways away.

    I'd love to bring Kieran Marmion in for the year to step in as back up scrum half and then Leinster need to make another go at getting a quality back up Tighthead. We can't expect to play Furlong 75 plus minutes if Leo or Jacque don't trust the replacement like they do with Luke McGrath.

    In 12 to 18 months time Leinster will be in a seriously strong position of strength but it would be extremely poor team management by Leinster and neglectful of the IRFU to leave Leinster short at positions of serious need in the short term.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,215 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Your point about the backup SH is true, but you should also consider that JGP is 32, and there is a good chance this was his peak. He has single handedly carried Leinster through so many times this season, is he going to be able to do that again? At some point he will start to slide, it's inevitable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 674 ✭✭✭Chico Flores


    I think every province can make the case of help in the front row is the thing, certainly feel with Leinster and Munster in particular, a strong back up at Leinster and starter for Munster, will seriously hurt in the big boy games of rugby

    Think you're giving Ross an easy pass, Ringrose or not, no movement, just planting his feet and passing isn't good enough at this level. Henshaw played really well but cause Byrne was so deep he had two defenders on him and only 5 yards away. We were a few metres away from winning with a drop goal due to the injection of pace that Frawley brought. Im not trying to be wise after the fact, we would have all started Ross in the game but it didn't click, like it didn't click v Northampton and in particular on Byrne when we were going for the corner, he wasn't getting us to the 5m line - we were 8/9m out

    I would be a little worried about the strike moves we had, nothing more than screen passes too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'd agree with a lot of this tbh. It's really harsh on Byrne, but his lack of line threat is a real problem.

    There was one turnover early in the game (I think it was the 2nd Toulouse penalty that they kicked) where Osborne was getting criticism on comm's for getting isolated and turning it over, but I thought it was really harsh.

    He received it with the defence on top of him, and a large part of that was because 2 passes earlier, Byrne was super-deep, turned sideways very early and passed. The defence could push off him and line things up outside him. Now, other players definitely could've done things better, but that was the origins of the turnover for me.

    Toulouse were able to push off very early pretty frequently throughout the full 60-odd minutes Byrne was on, and that went some way towards way Leinster's attack in phase play looked blunt.



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I thought that was Henshaw's fault - he ran a support line where he was never going to receive an offload and took himself out of the game so nobody was there to clear the ruck..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,219 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    We were absolutely robbed by Carley. A disgraceful game from him and his ARs.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 443 ✭✭Skyfloater


    How people can say that RB's inability to run is not an issue baffles me. It puts huge pressure on those outside him, as he can't 'fix' any defenders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I thought the same, and also think Keenan and Connors (I think) could've also done a better job at the ruck. It's not all on Byrne. But I still feel the origin was how deep and sideways Byrne was. It just takes away that extra half-second that could make all the difference to the outside backs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 440 ✭✭conquestscarer


    Fortunately we don't need Clarkson to hit Furlongs level, we need him to hit Alla'altoa's Scrummaging level. I'm not sure he's too far away from that now.

    What I think will suffer will be further down the line, we will need to take 2 academy tightheads this year and hopefully another one next year. If Clarkson can break out and be a competent scrummager there's a risk he gets into Ireland squads and we are left with a couple of academy tightheads to fill a gap. That's a problem at the moment considering we only have McGuire in the academy at the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,219 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    On Joe's disallowed try, I think it was the correct call. Leinster lost the ball foward. The law is meant to stop cases where the ball goes forward in relation to the person ripping it. In this case it went backwards from their point of view, but forward from ours, so knock-on.

    The others I 100% agree with. The Lowe yellow was a complete farce. I'm sure they also missed a knock on by Toulouse just before their red card incident. So many calls went against us.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,621 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Hard to win with 3s. Leinster also got slated for taking 3s against LR 2 years ago.

    I think the issue here is that in both those games, Leinster seem to have decided (most likely the coaches) what they were going to do with penalties in the opposition half before the game. It seems to have been prescribed and with little flexibility. Instead of assessing the situation (position of kick, flow of the game, results of previous decisions, etc.), it seemed predetermined rather than trusting onfield decisions. "Trust the system" makes it almost impossible for someone to point out when it isn't working.

    Som seem to think kicking to the corner is the SA approach or the Nienaber influence but I don't think that is accurate.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Lia Sweet Racist


    No, even with the rip / knock on, the World Rugby guidance on this is crystal clear, have a look at the first video here and the World Rugby clarification:

    https://www.world.rugby/the-game/laws/guidelines/5/?highlight=rip

    He hadn't blown the whistle before Joe scores so he should have reviewed this and awarded the try, or alternatively, it would be great if you could expect the TMO to know the **** rules and apply them correctly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,219 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    I did not know that. I'm sure I've seen that given as a knock on loads of times.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Lia Sweet Racist


    It is, but always frustratingly incorrect. They published that second video because there was confusion around it, but the guidance couldn't be clearer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 712 ✭✭✭jonok28


    I still think he has a fair amount in his tank but he can't be playing a full 80 minutes next season. Leinster need to be able to trust their bench and right now, at scrum half they don't.

    I have given Ross a bit of a pass but he wasn't the reason we lost, I think Ross is going to be a placeholder fly half until Sam Prendergast is ready. Leinster are close to being absolutely fine across the board but they are a year away. Boyle is going to be a beast, Gunne really looks like a top prospect and Sam Prendergast is a potentially generational fly half. Frawley is the ideal utility back off the bench.

    If Leinster can bring in a scrum half for a year and a NIQ TH for two, Leinster will be firing on all fronts.

    Clarkson does need to get to Ala'alatoa levels but I just don't have much faith in his scrummaging, the same with Milne on the far side. Both very handy with ball in hand but just don't trust them fully in the scrum.

    Leinster would be so silly not to replace Ala'alatoa.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 674 ✭✭✭Chico Flores


    My worry is we have brought in two of the best players in the world already, I don't see us being able to get anyone of note/level, so will be a case of make do/adapt.

    I don't think there is a singular reason we lost, but I give Ross the bulk of that blame on the playing front. Tactics, panic in their 22, lack of execution etc all there too, plus some silly penalties, even with ref being on a weird one.

    If Munster were told seemingly they cannot get a NIQ TH or front row at all, seems little to no chance we will get one to be a sub, so it has to be Clarkson. I am not as high on Boyle as you are, I think the front row talents are developing quick enough to be near ready.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Lia Sweet Racist


    We simply do not have enough THPs though. At the moment, going into next season we'll have two total, and one in the academy. We'll likely add at least one more to the academy, but he/they won't be ready to contribute next season.

    That means all of our THPs have to be in each and every single squad (and McGuire always has to be on hand in the event of a late injury).

    When you bring in the fact that Furlong has at a minimum x amount of weeks of mandatory rest, it simply doesn't work.

    One way or another we'll be bringing in an NIQ - either now, or one week into the season as a medical joker, so makes more sense to just do it now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 674 ✭✭✭Chico Flores


    I dont doubt we will add a tight head - I worry it will be a journeyman type signing and not the first cousin Ala'alatoa's level.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Lia Sweet Racist




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah There isn't a top tier TH coming. Nor is there a scrum half or out half coming to the rescue. Leinster will have to develop the players they have in those positions. And that will take a year or more likely two years.

    I don't want to be captain hindsight and pretend it was obvious they should have dropped Healy, Mcgrath or the Byrnes. The alternatives are very young at scrum half. Foley is 24 so he probably could have been fast tracked, but he was injured for a lot of last year if I remember correctly.

    Scrum half

    They have tried Nick McCarthy, and Paddy Patterson but they didn't work out.

    Out half

    Harry Byrne was supposed to be the next alternative but that didn't work out. And they've divided tge time between Ross and Frawley with Sexton dominating the Jersey for big games until this year.

    Loosehead

    They've tried Ed Byrne and Dooley at loosehead and they weren't good enough either.

    So they have tried to develop 9s and 10 Looseheads, and there hasn't really been a top option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I think so, but it was ballsy, to say the least. Fair play to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 712 ✭✭✭jonok28


    At this stage, I would go after Kieran Brookes from Toulon who is 33 and has played for England before but is Irish qualified. I would even take Marty Moore at this stage. Leinster just need depth at the Tighthead position, they don't have to be world class talents, they just need to be experienced, capable of playing 30 minutes a game and good scrummagers.

    Spend the NIQ on a one year deal for a scrum half.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Could not agree more with this.

    The strategy of taking the 3s was working 2 years ago. The problem was that when LAR were given a warning for persistent infringing, that was the time to go to the corner and squeeze them. Instead we kicked 3 and the ref completely forgot about his warning.

    On Saturday it should have been clear after 20 mins that this was going to be a super tight, defensive game and we should take the points. Our first couple penalties were taken after wasting 5-10 min as well, which were huge fillups for Toulouse.

    The consistent theme is just poor on-field decision making.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,621 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Well, my main point was that it is not necessarily on-field decision making, I assume these decisions are largely predetermined. There seems to be limited space for on-field decision making. The gameplan seems to have been to go to the corner rather than take 3, similar to Ireland v SA at the RWC.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Sure, I suppose my point is that the on-field decision making should adapt to the circumstances and know when to change.
    If the orders are coming from on high and they are not allowed change them or are encouraged not to then that is a big problem also. At the end of the day though, it's a final. If Doris sees they aren't getting anywhere he should throw the gameplan in the garbage and that didn't happen.

    There is fault with both the on-field decision making and the coaching, how much blame goes in each direction is impossible to know from the outside.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I can't speak of this game, but for Ulster game at least, James Ryan was quoted as saying they went for the line as it was very much a feel thing. That would suggest they have some leeway, but it's difficult to know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    I don't think the first pass from Byrne was great and Jamie's wasn't great either.

    And passing a rugby with slightly less speed, accuracy, tempo can make massive differences. Doing under more pressure is even harder and think Frawley is a better passer than both to be honest.



Advertisement
Advertisement