Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1773774776778779943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,914 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    That's why I said a Utopia, I know that it more than likely won't happen, it doesn't mean that is shouldn't be seen as part of the solution. It's a ingrained thing in our Irish culture, you never sell the family home which is not a view shared throughout many other European countries.

    To most it doesn't occur to them until unfortunately something happens that affects their health or mobility and a single storey dwelling suits their new circumstances far better. My own grandad lost his leg and instead of downsizing to a more suitable property the family built a massive extension to have a bathroom and bedroom downstairs leaving 3 double rooms upstairs vacant 99% of the year. Logically this is nonsensical. A 2 bed apartment would have suited him far better and the house that didn't need to be fully renovated could have been purchased by a family of 4 but again "you don't sell the family home".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    Was chatting about this with my own mum who's in her late 70s. I asked her if she'd be happy to downsize to a hypothetical well-built 2br apartment in a block that was in the same estate (where she's lived for 40 years) - she said absolutely, no hesitation. I think a lot of the resistance to downsizing is just liking the comfort and routine of your own neighbourhood that you've invested decades into. It's a shocker that we don't have these kind of mixed uses in residential estates, such a no-brainer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Writing was on the wall when there was that 26% write-down of property values on Grafton Street back in 2021. Insistance of an 18-month lockdown coming home to roost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,014 ✭✭✭Greyian


    The issue with simple scenarios is that they rarely work in complex realities. Nothing about the real world and balancing the needs of millions of people is simple.

    Property is Ireland is used inefficiently, that is without doubt, but even if it was utilised in the optimal manner, we would still have supply shortages.
    Any expectation of property use being perfectly optimal isn't realistic either. We can and should aim to improve it, but there will never be perfection.

    Less than 100 metres from my house, there is a 5-bed house with 6 young professional men living in it. They've converted one of the two living rooms into an extra bedroom.
    There's no efficient reallocation of existing supply that sees those 6 young men getting to have their own places, unless there's a family with 4 young kids with each of the six (2 parents, 4 children) living in their own 1-bed apartments (which hardly seems a likely scenario).

    With family sizes getting smaller, the natural outcome is that each property will house a lower number of people. Naturally it follows that this means that housing the same number of people requires extra properties (and housing more people requires an even greater increase in total supply of properties).

    In previous posts, you've said "So they're to calculate the housing deficit in April 2022, a point in time when they had an accurate figure of a) population, b) habitable housing stock and c) average household size."
    The issue with this is if you were to look at population, housing stock and average household size, supply would always appear to be perfectly delivered, because average household size is determined by the population and the housing stock.
    The problem is that to identify the number of properties required, you need to divide the population by the number of "family units" (where a family unit is a person or group of persons who want to live in their own household).
    Our average household size is higher than it would be if there was adequate supply, as there are a huge number of younger person continuing to live with their parents or in overcrowded rental accommodation specifically because there is not enough supply for them to be able to leave their existing household and start their own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    I dunno, the supposed "utopia" where family sizes are matched to houses with the correct number of bedrooms is very non-sensical to me.

    It's based on there being swathes of empty, unused bedrooms across the country, and people eager to match the number of people in a house with the number of bedrooms it offers, which is just not true. I'm sure many spare bedrooms are home offices, hobby rooms, gyms, yoga studios, dens, second living rooms etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The issue with this is if you were to look at population, housing stock and average household size, supply would always appear to be perfectly delivered, because average household size is determined by the population and the housing stock

    Average household size is actually determined by the occupied housing stock not the total housing stock. That's a fairly critical difference when estimating any deficit or surplus, but unfortunately we're not allowed to discuss that distinction here, so we'll have to leave that particular argument there.

    Our average household size is higher than it would be if there was adequate supply

    This as another bit of the narrative that is widely believed but doesn't really stand up to scrutiny.

    We're the led to believe that the high average household size - 2.75 - compared to our European neighbours is evidence that we don't have enough houses.

    You can only start to make an argument that we have a shortage of stock if you assume that our preferred household size is about 2.4.

    So obviously you just need to blame supply for the fact that our household size is 2.75 and not 2.4, if only we had enough houses it would be 2.4. And hey presto, we have a deficit of 250,000 houses.

    The ESRI took a close look at why we are an outlier last year and found:

    Using cross country data from the EU-SILC survey, the research presents a range of stylised facts regarding how Ireland differs from other countries and attempts to explore what might explain the variation. We find that Ireland has a high average household size on a cross-country basis. However, this appears to be strongly influenced by demographics, with high fertility rate, younger population and thus high share of households with children important factors in explaining the cross country trends. Indeed, a majority of the differences between Ireland and other countries disappear in a regression setting when socio-demographic and basic economic factors are controlled for.

    So basically they found that our household size is higher because we have younger population who have more children.

    They also considered the potential impact of increased housing supply and found it would be fairly negligible relative to demographics:

    As housing supply rises (as proxied by a higher housing stock per capita) by one per cent, the growth in household size declines by 0.083 per cent.

    https://www.esri.ie/publications/household-size-in-ireland-stylised-facts-and-cross-country-trends



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I suspect most Irish people would not have too far to look outside their own circles to identify older relatives living in homes far beyond their needs - ‘in case the grandkids come to stay’…while the grandkids are rammed into a much smaller house with mum and dad day in, day out

    In fact I’d say it’s more unusual for an older person to NOT be living in a house beyond their needs.

    Ireland is a global outlier on this. There is definitely a cultural aspect and also housing stock composition issues which would be difficult to tackle, but there is also economic reasons

    1. Gains in the value of family home are exempt from CGT, giving it tax advantages over any other investment
    2. Investment literacy is poor in Ireland so older people releasing capital by downsizing would on average put it to poor use
    3. Property taxes are exceptionally low by global standards so there is no ‘stick’ to downsize
    4. There are weird inheritance tax rules which allow passing down of very valuable property tax free under certain conditions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,769 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Lyons has also made good points that much of the housing built in the Tiger was in the wrong places.

    I think that accounts for some of his aggressiveness in the targets.

    I’d note he hasn’t really brought that up (and that report might not be the best place for it), but I’d also say that WFH culture has given at least a short term reprieve from that (whilst simultaneously driving prices up outside of Dublin).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,769 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Well that was a point I raised earlier.

    We have supposedly more empty nesters than the rest of Europe but also a housing size that is too high.

    The logical conclusion to that is that you don’t need to just look at the number of units per 1,000. We have to consider the size of the houses we have and there is low hanging fruit in terms of releasing some of this under occupied housing.

    The answer here is the same, build more studios, 1 beds and 2 beds.

    But if our housing size is really going to go towards 2 by 2050, we need a sea change in culture. That includes a tolerance for Swedish and Finnish sized studios. I personally think that there needs to be a push from policy makers on this. Most people from the country have no issue with moving out at 18 for college and also getting a driving licence at 17. It’s a necessity. There’s a bit of a culture thing in Dublin against that. I think if you started seeing €400-€500 per month studios that you might see an attitude change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,769 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I went to view one of those a few weeks ago. They are beautiful and a lovely part of Greystones, the right side of town for me and close enough (a lot of the developments out there are too far from town for my tastes).

    That’s a massive house to be frank. Bit odd that they are using the 3 bed duplex photos there for that house though.

    That said, I struggle with Greystones given the connections. You are really out there once you get out there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Noise from the dart line is the only drawback and suspect you would soon get over that.

    I think it looks relatively good value vs some similarly priced houses in the area such as the Archers Wood equivalent or similar sized but older houses in Woodlands. A great builder also so you know quality will be there. Would definitely be considering it if we hadn’t bought already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,769 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I think it will ultimately hold its value. I agree on the location here vs. other ones in the locality.

    If you are someone from Dublin though, you aren’t moving here to be in touching distance. You are just really committed to Greystones (until the day that they really improve DART services), which is fine. Lovely part of the world and a great place to raise a family.

    Everyone has different preferences though so I don’t like to criticise. I see so much of that from older folks on social media running down new developments (and the prices!). The vast majority of new builds are a significant step up in quality on what was built even 15 years ago. The amount of older folk going on like they’re old squires of the land when they bought a cookie cutter semi D in 1992.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭amacca


    Agreed...who the **** would want to rent with overholding being such a risk

    You cant shift problem tenants for way way too long or have a realistic mechanism to deter the wrong kind of tenant thrashing a property or pursue for damages

    And of course they did away with bedsits without any alternatives.…a big part of the problem is successive policy/ideology failures



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    We took the plunge a few years ago and moved out (with a fair bit of trepidation) having spent most of our adult life in SCD. Couldn’t pay me to move back in to Dublin now. Probably too far out for a 5 day per week office commute to town though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,549 ✭✭✭arctictree


    Maybe it's just me but I'm still amazed by the price. I mean even half that is one heck of a wedge of money. During the last recession it was these highly priced properties that lost the largest percentage. Its a huge risk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    A UK subsidiary/branch of an Irish company gets a large contract (happens regularly enough) so what impact does that have on Irish housing market? It’s got its workforce in the UK already and as the UK have similar housing shortages to Ireland and trades people in high demand.

    unless they have personal reasons to move to Ireland there is no incentive as they have plenty of work in UK.

    Do you think Ireland is the only country that has a housing shortage and a shortage of trades people? It’s the same story in nearly all western countries at present.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Revealing Interview with Michael O Flynn on the Housing Commission report



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,620 ✭✭✭combat14


    sounds like housing commission want to up rents to attract more landlords

    what are the chances that the government will abolish RPZs before the next general election - unless they are mad to lose a ton of votes and have a ton of protesters out on the streets all over ireland absolutely none



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    4 minutes belly aching the Minister hasn’t immediately accepted all recommendations. Spoke about a particularly key recommendation in circles but gave absolutely zero insight into how this oversight body would operate or be effective

    1 minute getting the public onside saying developers don’t want high prices.

    2 minutes saying developers can’t make any profit even at current prices.

    The rest lobbying for more taxpayer subsidies by eliminating VAT on building and to zone more land (i.e. lower my input costs please…promise we’ll sell cheaper houses then).

    I’m a fan of O’Flynn but thought this was a particularly poor interview. His views on the right to housing referendum were the only interesting bit for me. The rest was very banal and predictable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,224 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Sisk are specialist infrastructure builders and have worked in the UK for ages. Built the recent Blackpool tram extension.

    The actual builders are unlikely to be the same people as Irish house builders need



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    They would be better off overhauling the RTB, pulling the claims procedures out of the courts and making the rights of landlords and tenants more equal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The 4 minutes was frustration with the minister saying he was implementing 75% of the commissions findings. If the minister said he and predecessors were responsible for 75% of the problems, we would be closer to the truth. But the minister has form in this regard. Agreed he went of in a tangent with 1 aspect which the listener will be no wiser

    1 minute if you make a product unaffordable you price yourself out of the market and work = everybody looses

    2 minutes saying developers can't get funding unless they can show a significant margin, therefore need to look at the funding model. This is a little different to saying can't make a profit

    He mentioned vat was 3% when he started business now, It's 13, The cost of housing provision/services to the state is recurring not one off. Need to find a way to remove this tax from new supply and make it an annual tax amongst all households without the developers pocketing it

    His views on right to housing referendum only reinforced mine. I would expect a rejection greater than the last 2 referendum. Further waste of time and money.

    It's just interesting hearing it coming from a developer who could make a killing if it was introduced



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I disagree on removing vat all that would happen is builders would rise house prices by 10%. In reality government has removed vat on new builds it called HTB. It paid directly to FTB. Even if government tried to remove vat its quite possible the EU commission would prevent it. We need to sit and wait 2 years as supply will ramp up IMO.

    The refurbishment, HTB and shared equity are all kicking in, it time we need now to see the results.

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭amacca




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 93 ✭✭Middleage Fanclub


    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/ballygannon-kilcoole-wicklow/4799989

    So I've bought new builds, 100+ year old houses and renovated old houses to modern standards and for me, this represents value. A big A rated house on a big plot with very well maintained garden. The fantasy theme wouldn't be too hard to erase but would probably put off a few buyers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 405 ✭✭markw7


    It's very reassuring when people are posting that houses on the market for a million euro represent value.

    I'm not even going to bother with viewings anymore... cannot wait for this house of cards to collapse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves




Advertisement
Advertisement