Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

1385386388390391410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,208 ✭✭✭Talisman


    The aiScout app that Burnley uses to find kids for their academy is a data gathering tool. It's used by clubs all over the world.

    PlayerLens is a glorified search engine for finding players. Agents and clubs can advertise players that are available for transfer or loan.

    TransferLab is another recruitment tool that is data-driven.

    Alan Pace made a big deal out of how using such tools as these was going to give Burnley an edge. In reality it hasn't yet done so and the club is not alone in using such tools.

    Paying Man City a club record fee for James Trafford last summer would suggest that the club's recruitment decisions have been made by people and not a computer algorithm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,164 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Been genuinely searching for links to Alan Pace (Burnley owner/chairman) saying the signings are entirely decided by AI… no such luck so far.

    Closest I can get is that they engaged in a bit of a gimmick thing a few years back, where 6 premier league clubs invited young lads to apply for trials via an app with their data, and then those clubs brought in the 50 highest scorers to have a look, but Burnley didn't sign anyone through that.

    Otherwise, he's just talked a bit about using AI as a tool for greater insight; "Let me be clear, this isn’t about playing ‘Moneyball’ or using data to identify low-cost, high-return solutions, but being insight-led and using the technology at our disposal to make smarter decisions that will carry long-term benefits."

    All sounds pretty normal tbh, and what you'd expect clubs to be doing. And certainly doesn't sound anything even remotely like "the owner claims players are decided upon by AI".

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Talking about the success of the transfer of a 21 year old goalkeeper in the here and now is probably not that wise.


    People (correctly) refer to Caoimhin Kelleher as a young goalkeeper, and he’s 4 years younger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,164 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Yeah, we've no idea how that transfer really is yet - still early days, and at ~15m wasn't a totally crazy fee for an English player. As the highest profile young English goalkeeper around, U21 Euro champion and in the team of the tournament, it's also not exactly a 'diamond in the rough' sort of a one either though. Just good 'ol buying the shiniest thing and hoping he comes good.

    There's no worse sort of a team for a keeper to come into than a promoted side in the Prem, you're just gonna be getting battered week in week out - we'll get a better sense of him next year.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,208 ✭✭✭Talisman


    James Trafford wasn't ready to be the first choice keeper for a club at Premier League level. Burnley won 10 of their 24 points total in the final 10 games of the season, which supports the argument that he wasn't the best option for the position. It was a massive step up from playing for Bolton in League One the previous season.

    It's the kind of decision that would lead me to believe that the objective of the club's owner may be to bring in young players, showcase them and sell them on for profit rather than use more experienced players with a view to keeping the club in the Premier League.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,898 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Ironically, if he had spent the money on Kelleher instead of going for an unproven player from his old club, he might not have got relegated. They would probably have been around the same price except Kelleher had PL experience and Trafford had a very small amount of experience a few divisions below.

    That's just one example.

    Post edited by Fitz* on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Not here to tell you guys that James Trafford is unquestionably a starting level PL goalkeeper or anything, but I think talk about the goalkeeper position being one of the deciding factors in their relegation, is a bit off.


    You’d imagine scoring only 41 goals (and it’s not as if they had this massive xG that indicated they were being awfully unlucky in front or goal) had far more to do with it. Even from a goal conceded perspective, they conceded very very close to what they were expected to.


    Burnley got relegated because they were really really bad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,915 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    One thing I have wondered about Kompany, and would wonder about Maresca or McKenna if they stay at their clubs next season is how much the do or might adapt to problems in the league vs sticking with their way of playing.

    Like they all got plaudits for how their teams played, the style of football, as well as success/promotion.

    If they come into the PL and survive by playing a direct, defensive, game does that continue to elevate them for top jobs or does the new style of play damage them. Conversely, if they get relegated while trying to maintain their style and play pretty football - do they get (undeserved?) praise for being 'brave' and 'sticking to their principles'?

    Can there be a danger of selfishness to dogmatically sticking to an attacking game because it is better for the rep of the manager? Particularly if playing a stodgy defensive style might still see them get relegated?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    I think it just pushes the value further of those stepping stone jobs where you can actually play that kind of football properly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,341 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    More and more teams are like this now.
    Their first objective is to be seen to be playing "good football".

    It makes the game easier on the eye for sure but it leads to the gap between the better and the lesser team being shown up far more often.

    Looking at the 3 teams that went down this year none of them got more than 26 points. 6 wins, 5 wins and 3 wins for them. Shocking effort.

    Is there an away day in the PL now like what going to Stoke was a few years ago. Where you knew it was a nasty team that would make the game tough? Ask questions of your team that they don't get asked every week. Nobody seems to want to be that team anymore.

    They all want the ball on the ground and to play out from the back for the most part.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    You’d have to think a lot of it is managers wanting to put themselves in the shop window. And eh recent developments (or at least for now rumours) would suggest that it’s working for them (if not always their clubs).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,130 ✭✭✭jacool


    Latest I heard, Farke was at a big club, with realistic ambitions, and being quite successful.

    Doesn't need to join a club that believes it has a divine right to trophies and can't tolerate/handle it when they don't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    And yet probably currently a game away from the sack all the same (or alternatively a game away from putting his name in history)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,130 ✭✭✭jacool


    I can't see him being fired. As for Sunday, it is the ultimate 50-50 tie. Too close to call, nails ready to be bitten to the quick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,341 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    I suppose when you see the view the likes of Allardyce was held in and how Dyche and Moyes are viewed now then maybe it is a fair point.

    They are seen as managers who can do a job to save a team in trouble but those teams then quickly look to move on to another manager who will play "better football.

    We are seeing this with Moyes at West Ham now. West Ham have been a team who have very recently been in the championship. Who hired Moyes, and sacked Moyes to move to a better style. Then had to bring back Moyes to save them again and now are once again back looking for a manager with a better style.

    West Ham win nothing. They haven't for decades but Moyes got them a European trophy just 12 months ago. He delivered what a lot of their fans would have been praying they'd see before they die and now a season later is being moved on for not playing sexy enough football.

    I suppose a young up and coming manager has to look at that and think there's no way for them to make it to the top unless they develop a certain style.

    Even managers like Jose are seen as a relic of the past now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,154 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    I was thinking about this in the context of where Moyes goes next. He's a very good manager, and in times gone by he'd have walked into a mid-table PL job but clubs all want progressive young managers who play attacking technical football, and Moyes doesn't fit the bill.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,208 ✭✭✭Talisman


    If the club's objective was to stay in the Premier League, they recruited very badly last summer. They spent £97M on 13 players, only three of whom had previous Premier League experience, and two that were over the age of 24. They also added a sprinkling of loanees to the mix.

    They signed two young left wing players and brought in two more players on loan with an obligation to buy that play the same position. Weghorst was sent on loan to Hoffenheim to facilitate the deal for one of the players, Brunn Larsen. The other, Mike Tresor didn't contribute a single goal or assist. Hopefully somebody at Burnley had the foresight to put a clause in the loan/transfer agreement that the obligation to buy would only activate if they retained their Premier League status, otherwise the club is on the hook for a £16M transfer this summer.

    The decision to spend over £16M on Zeki Amdouni to replace Weghorst was questionable. FC Basel had the player on loan with an obligation to buy, they completed the €4M transfer in early July and within two weeks he went to Burnley for €18M. He was a 1 goal in 3 games player in the Swiss league, it was doubtful that was going to be the case in the Premier League. He scored 5 goals and had 1 assist, Brunn Larsen was the top scorer with 6 goals.

    Burnley began the season with essentially a new team, the only position for which there wasn't a new player signed was left back. Similar to Chelsea, it was going to take time for things to gel and get some cohesion to form a team.

    James Trafford was on a hiding to nothing given that he was playing behind a group of individuals and not a defensive unit. An experienced keeper would have had the authority to organise the defenders to give himself more protection rather than being focused on not messing up himself.

    Close to a third of the transfer spend went on two players for the most vital positions in the team. Given their level of experience, neither was up to the level required for Burnley to survive in the league.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,898 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Maybe Brentford are the closest to that? A really physical team who will always try and out-work you first, and then target counter attacks and set pieces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,130 ✭✭✭jacool


    I would argue that Brentford are a lot more easy on the eye than Everton.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,208 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    I watch a bit of the championship and it's a very entertaining league, lots of sides play high pressing attacking football. The jump up to the premier league is huge though and if you don't adapt your style your on a hiding to nothing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,699 ✭✭✭doc_17


    There’s no doubt in my mind that Everton are the present day Stoke. Absolutely attritions brand of “football”. Long balls, play for set pieces. It’s prehistoric stuff. But effective given how bad their players are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,000 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I see loads of ball on the ground with Everton. They often play it out from the back through Mykolenko. Doucoure is a fine midfielder and McNeill is another. Calvert-Lewin often drops deep and he runs with the ball a lot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,557 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Could be something to do with him being bald. I'm after developing a baldyish spot at the back myself and my GP said to me wear a hat when you're out in the sun for hours. UV exposure. It's a possible explanation anyway.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,871 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    I've heard it's to hide a rat called Remy who is actually making all the decisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,244 ✭✭✭golfball37




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Augme


    While every promoted club objective is to stay in the Premier league, they possibly took a more long term approach to achieving that last summer. They invested in a long of young players. I think they have the strongest chance of bouncing back to the PL next season than Luton and Sheffield. I can't see a huge amount of their players being in demand in the summer either so they might have a good chance of keeping most of their players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,199 ✭✭✭ronjo


    Paqueta charged by the FA for intentionally trying to be booked to affect the betting markets.

    Could be in massive trouble for that.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,871 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    He was linked with a big move as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    West Ham the biggest losers as they were likely planning their business around that big sum coming in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,915 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Stupid that it's taken the entire season for the charge tubbe brought.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement