Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings - updated 11/5/24*

16786796816836841031

Comments

  • Posts: 295 [Deleted User]


    A bit like when masks shouldn't be worn, then a week later they were mandatory...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    You're right, let them sleep on the streets and in the ditches during the summer. In winter we can provide tents. That way, the message might get through via their excellent networking systems.

    And it's utterly laughable about the green leafy banks of the Grand Canal being emptied at the behest of local well monied residents associations whilst they are then dumped with no warning on various other communities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Aubrey of Tiglin was interviewed there this afternoon by Cormac O'H. Seemed to be finally getting the message that handing out tents and sleeping bags only to see them seized and dumped the next day or so, wasn't the best idea. Draining on the finances too I guess. Aubrey is seeking clarification if they should keep supplying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,246 ✭✭✭dmakc


    Are these next wave of accommodations Roderic is promising tented fields or hotels?

    The man can't complete a sentence he's so afraid of himself



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,142 ✭✭✭prunudo


    tents and pods in fields as far as i understand. Think the one in Newhall is to become operational soon. And believe one near Clomel being looked at currently too.

    Not sure what the situation is with Ballina though, it seems to have gone quiet in the news.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,668 ✭✭✭nachouser


    Ah sure, I'll pop down to the green leafy canal tomorrow and take a few pics. It's not the idyll you all seem to think it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,272 ✭✭✭CollyFlower


    With the way the government are bankruptcy the country it won't be long before we're all living in tents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 917 ✭✭✭Joe 90


    Taking money off the taxpayers to outbid the taxpayers is the sort of thing that would be called fraud or maybe some sort of protection racket if anyone other than public bodies were doing it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,141 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69



    That’s being happening for years for our own Irish chancers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,118 ✭✭✭Gen.Zhukov


    He was given a super soft interview yesterday on the 1 o'clock news -

    It was pre-recorded and this horrible image came into my head of Gavin Jennings standing behind Roderic giving him a shoulder massage saying 'you're doing great Rod' as Rodders waffles and stutters his way through it - Starts at 09:00 mins

    Then Gavin starts playing hard ball with the shinner, getting thick and putting the boot in at 20:00 mins

    Guess who's in Government Gavin? It's not SF! - RTE are not even trying to be subtle any more



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,825 Brixton Sticky Owl


    I think if they start taking up private rental accomodation at the rates being mooted within established communities to turf loads of AS in there and private renters start to be kicked out that will be a tipping point to anarchy.

    I honestly think it's long time the people most affected by all this - tax paying citizens that would not normally protest take to the streets collectively.

    This is not OK. None of it. It's weird how accepting of it we are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 67 ✭✭Ionraice


    Irrespective of whether Ireland receives any Dublin regulation requests, we do adhere to the regulations.
    Therefore, if other European Countries are refusing our return requests, then they are not adhering to the Dublin regulation.
    Their reasons, or lack of sympathy don't matter. Ireland cannot be left paying the bill when other countries fail to control their borders.
    Even the Irish Government are beginning to realise the vast majority of the electorate quite simply will not tolerate it.
    For that matter, those who came here to work, and who applied for visas, work permits, etc. hardly appreciate their taxes being spent subsidising those who feel they have a right to all expenses paid Irish hospitality, irrespective of whether they have a valid claim, or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭whatever.


    You have been given three different examples at three different stages from initial (UK) to decade long and operational between Greece and Turkey

    None of it is aspirational and the measures are all within our power as demonstrated by the Greek-Turkey deal and the previously included citation. There is nearly 4 million refugees in Turkey, the process is quite clearly working and it's telling it's the one you have glossed over.

    Inferring that we should capitulat just becauae the problem is not going away and there will be surges is and I apologise in advance and this as respectfully as I can; but that's deluded rationale

    It is important that we stand up to the chain that murders people through human trafficing aka modern slavery all done for greed

    You stand and fight



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭whatever.


    Only illegally claiming bogus asylum seekers were deported

    The father should have never have been out working as he was proven to be an illegally claiming bogus asylum seeker

    They would have had significant legal aid, appeals and protections, all again illegally obtained

    They would have knowingly used or been advised their children could be used as anchor baby pawns against the state, a form of human trafficking for gain in itself

    In your book - You are now disregarding the rule of law, advocating this position means we can disregard all the conventions, protocols and statues and just herd whoever we like onto a plane and dump them in Eritrea, problem solved

    If you are not disregarding the rule of law than you are repeatedly lying over and over again

    So you will either have to tell us you are a liar or the coventions don't matter and we are free to detain, deport or deprive as we see fit



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭whatever.


    For reference in case people are interested

    "The High Court unanimously ruled today that the Australian government can keep asylum seekers in immigration detention indefinitely in cases where they do not “voluntarily” cooperate with their own deportation.

    This includes, for example, when a person refuses to apply for travel documents due to a longstanding fear for their life if returned to their home country."

    https://theconversation.com/high-court-dismisses-key-challenge-to-indefinite-immigration-detention-what-does-it-mean-229628?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=bylinelinkedinbutton

    Australia are signatories to the same conventions we are



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 883 ✭✭✭creeper1


    Paying one group of people to give out tents and another group of people to take down said tents

    Hey it's an increase in GDP.

    Makes about as much sense as paying one group of people to dig holes and another group fill them in



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭tom23


    It’s job creation! In fairness we are very clever people.

    New headline in FT next week

    Irelands economy to grow by 2.7% due to the growth of buying and destroying tents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,902 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    the housing figures will be up too… 80 new homes delivered (in Crooksling for illegal economic migrants and the odd successful asylum applicant. )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭whatever.


    Yes it's you

    Liberal Arts and Liberal Opinion are two entirely different things

    Logic is separate to both of these as is emotion too

    I expect the supposition was to allay that a higher education devoid of logic, reasoning and science would leave that person relying only on the logic they last learnt as a 15 year old mixed with a far greater amount of emotion that would otherwise be balanced by knowledge and reason



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,168 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    I expect the supposition was to demean both women and people whom the poster considers liberal thinking.

    As for the waffle in your post.

    Are you suggesting that people who do liberal arts stop developing mentally at 15?

    Both your post and the other post are classic examples of othering.

    You both seem to be trying weaken the other side in your own opinion by assigning negative traits that are based on nothing more than fantasy thought on your part.

    All liberal people do this ..

    All liberal people think this...

    Which easily then leads to you thinking

    All the faults I see are caused by them.

    Even when it was the Nazis I always knew it was the liberals.

    Most self proclaimed free speech absolutists are giant big whiny snowflakes!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    "Are you suggesting that people who do liberal arts stop developing mentally at 15?"

    Maybe they just never really grow up or take a long time. If you wanna go to college and don't know wtf to do, then an arts degree was the trad standard option.

    Maybe they never have to figure out much how to earn a living. The need to pay taxes and support others and how that money is spent. Maybe never at the sharp end and detached?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,168 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Ah stop. The hole is nearly all the way to China already.

    So children from all over the country who complete their leaving cert to a sufficient level to attain acceptance to third level education are not all the same.

    Because if they choose what you consider arts degree at 18 that means they stopped developing at the same rate as their peers at 15 who completed their leaving cert but didn't choose the same pathway?

    👆🏿🤣🤣🤣🤣🫵🏿

    In my opinion anyone who truly held such a belief would have to be an absolute idiot!

    Most self proclaimed free speech absolutists are giant big whiny snowflakes!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    Given people are complaining about the cost to the taxpayer of a €90 tent, I'm not sure spending €400,000+ per aslyum seeker to detain them is going to be very popular.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,063 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    The one in clonmel is beside a halting site where the residents warned not to place asylum seekers as there would be trouble so that may not be a good idea.



  • Posts: 121 [Deleted User]


    If that is true, how do you explain the curious case of Mohamed Mohamud Mohamed, who was refused asylum in Germany, Italy and France and who was waiting for a decision for ovee two years in Ireland when he sexually assaulted a woman in a pub toilet?

    Why was he not refused immediately if having an application in a different country is a quick way to get rejected?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,409 ✭✭✭emo72


    I thought travellers were all for inclusivity and equality? I thought that would be an ideal location?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    There’s no point in complaining, we’ll have to find accommodation for those who travelled thousands of miles to get to a remote island on the west of Europe . Let’s start building all those houses for them. If we try and stop them coming the EU will move all the MNCS according to one poster.

    Funny thing is if the EU do decide to change our tax laws so all our MNCs move to a more favourable tax country then we won’t have to income to support all those immigrants, how does that make sense?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 612 ✭✭✭DaithiMa


    I'd say you might be surprised. In the long term such a policy would almost certainly discourage bogus asylum seekers from coming here and it would be preferable to paying 627 million a year to hotel owners to house them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭Geert von Instetten


    The idea that the EU would prevent the State from implementing immigration policy compliant with EU law and consistent with the direction of EU policy on the issue by leveraging bloc-wide tax reform measures unpopular with multiple EU Member States is certainly an interesting one…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,941 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    I'm sorry but they are aspirational and they are not within our own power — this does not make them impossible, nor does the acknowldgement of the difficulty of achieving them equate to "capitulation". You talk as if I don't advocate international migration agreements, when you need only go back through my posts to see that I do. But they require things that we cannot fully control — the lasting co-operation and conformity by the counterparty country. Deals won't always work out as things change — wars and disasters occur, economies crumble, the other country reneges on its bargains, our neighbouring countries don't co-operate with us — and all manner of other things.

    This is part of the reason there will never be a definitive solution. There will only ever be measures of varying effectiveness — and there is going to be lots of failure. That doesn't mean we capitulate — it means we stay realistic in order to refine and reform approaches when we can, in ways that can be done. Call it deluded rationale if you want. If you wish to convince yourself that there is a realistic future that doesn't involve some degree of acceptance that there will be surges in illegal migration and refugee numbers from time to time — then I can assure you that you will spend the rest of your life waiting for it.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement