Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Tesla Model 3 - V3.0

1420421423425426497

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    They won’t give you “something” back. You’ll have to go through with the return and get your full money back (minus any charges) and then proceed to a new order.

    Hopefully they haven’t messed up the new price and you can actually order and wait and then hole you have your refund in time to pay for the new car.

    I would say it’s also worth the hassle for €3k. What will you actually gain after the charges though?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    The fact that the buyer even has the option to do this is ludicrous. Any other brand would laugh at you!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,436 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    No it's not, it's part of the directive they sign up to when they do remote selling. Any other brand that removes costs like this and goes to remote selling will have the same experience and results.

    Entirely fair when you don't know what you're getting into. It gives the customer respite where large companies cut out their own operational costs.

    Let's not give companies more power whilst getting more profits aye.. they've enough of that from the amazon's to the teslas



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Part and parcel for the simple buying process.

    They could remove a whole world of heart ache by making people come into the show room to place the deposit, or following a test drive (which both are not covered under the distance selling rules).

    But we’re going back to the legacy dealership model then. Good, bad or indifferent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,267 ✭✭✭User1998


    On the plus side your car is worth just shy of 50% of that after 5 years of ownership. Thats very low depreciation for a brand new car.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,394 ✭✭✭Royale with Cheese


    Got rid of it in January for €26k. Just under 50% depreciation in four years is probably more or less what I was expecting when I bought it, was a very different world in November 2019 though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,729 ✭✭✭PGE1970


    That will be the deciding factor.

    I'm in a lucky position that I'm covered by the distance selling regulations and have 11 days to deal with this. The only deduction mentioned in the order agreement is the return fee. I'm happy to drive to Sandyford so no fee arises.

    The car has only done about 200kms and whatever else in the forthcoming days.

    I've emailed Tesla and asked for any proposal that they might have given my rights and, respectfully, suggested that we can deal with this in a way other than me returning a car that I don't want to and that they don't want back.

    It's not obvious what other fees that they might like to levy and I can't find anything that says that I can't buy another EV (Tesla or otherwise) and not qualify for a SEAI grant again.

    But Elon Musk has deeper pockets than I and may wish to play financial chicken with me. We'll see how it goes.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    A poster handed back their car on here only a few months back. I can’t think of their username unfortunately but they will be able to tell you the exact figure you loose. Hopefully it’s worth while.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 640 ✭✭✭antfin


    They may decide that anything over 100km is more than needed to assess the car and then seek to apply charges beyond that under the provision to recover up to €900 for the "diminished value of the goods resulting from the handling other than what is necessary to establish the nature, characteristics and functioning of the goods."

    Based on how bad the customer service is in general, I wouldn't expect the process to be easy!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,532 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    The referral credits stop at end of the month. Make your move fast. We all have referral links 😂

    Stay Free



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,729 ✭✭✭PGE1970


    They have no such restriction in the order confirmation.

    I have contacted them on the next working day after collecting the car so it's not like I've used the car as a free hire to discover Ireland!

    I absolutely agree that it won't be easy but nothing ventured, nothing gained!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 640 ✭✭✭antfin


    The extract that you posted above specifies "You are only liable for any diminished value of the goods resulting from the handling other than what is necessary to establish the nature, characteristics and functioning of the goods."

    This would generally be taken to imply a limitation on the driving distance beyond a distance needed to assess the car and that contributes to the reduction in value when they want to resell the car. Whether they would use the previously expressed measure of 100km is not clear but I would imagine it's still indicative as to what they will take into account.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,632 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    Why are you handing it back?



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭Luna84
    Mentally Insane User


    Tesla lowered the price of the M3 by 3 grand a day after he collected it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,185 ✭✭✭sk8board


    with the RWD and LR now €38k v €50k (correct me if I’m mistaken), and the range of the new RWD looking far closer to the older battery LR than the official numbers suggest; am I right to say the LR now looks like poor value compared to the efficiency of the RWD plus a few public charges if needed?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Not if you're into the Performance of the LR and the Acceleration boost options and handling characteristics.

    All a personal choice over the RWD.

    Some people will pay more for it, others who treat cars as A-B boxes wont, same way people will pay more for a 335i over a 320i, an M3 over a 335i etc etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,729 ✭✭✭PGE1970


    Even if they did apply a per km charge of 50c per km ( as an example) and I lose €250 over 500kms, it's still a no-brainer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 822 ✭✭✭CivilEx


    If I was the next person receiving a car that had (let's say) 750km on the clock, would I pay full retail for it or consider it to be new?

    Perhaps I would as long as the €3k discount applied and the full warranty was in place. No issues with handing back so close to the sale, but just trying to "game out" in my head what the next purchaser of the car might be willing to pay....



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    no, it will go into inventory as CPO and discounted accordingly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 822 ✭✭✭CivilEx


    What sort of discount would CPO typically have on the comparable retail price?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    No idea to be honest. It could be €3k cheaper or it could be €5k or indeed €1k!

    It would have to be significant enough to make it worthwhile.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,185 ✭✭✭sk8board


    yeh, I’ve zero interest in the performance improvements - it’s already a 6sec family saloon car.

    €12k buys a lot of supercharging if you needed it, and still get probably 85% of the real world range



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,920 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Once Tesla brought the SR/SR+/RWD battery from 50kWh to 60kWh and especially when they used LRP batteries you can charge to 100% the difference between the two does not justify the price difference WHEN IT COMES TO RANGE.

    The LR still wins on AWD, acceleration, acceleration boost, charging speed and audio

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Model 3 Performance available now for €61,091 in white. New wheels, new seats and adaptive suspension is nice.

    Not sure it’s worth that now that the RWD is €39k. Seal AWD is €51k.

    Tough competition this time around.

    Nice upgrade from my Fremont M3P but I don’t think it’s worth the financial outlay to upgrade personally……

    IMG_0945.jpeg IMG_0946.jpeg IMG_0947.jpeg


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭Luna84
    Mentally Insane User


    Just went on the website and was wondering how it was listed cheaper before going up in price. Does not qualify for the grant.

    edit: Just on the Tesla website I actually think the new price drop is a mistake as the VRT is wrong on the RWD model.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,207 ✭✭✭innrain


    It is the second time I read the VRT mistake so I looked a bit deeper into the issue.

    Based on some combinations on both Model Y and 3 I deduced the VRT reduction to follow the equation

    VRT rebate =3100 - 0.31* (OMSP -40k), 40k<OMSP,50k 
    

    why this particular slope I don't know but based on this and the OMSP for the cheaper Model 3 is 41,113.22 VRT rebate is 2,754.90 VRT@7% from OMSP = 2,877.93 Subtract the rebate ⇒ VRT payable = 123.03

    Unless there is a mistake on the whole website for all combinations I think the 123 amount for the VRT is correct.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭jiminho


    Yeah I think Tesla are in some ways shooting themselves in the foot with their pricing and how the features in each model are differentiated. You get a lot of car for the RWD version. Dont get me wrong, I really like the look of the Performance. The subtle external mods plus the frankly insane acceleration for that price range but does it warrant the 23k price difference (~60%), hell no. It’ll be interesting to see if many over here go for it because I think once you get past that 60k mark, they might be looking for a different type of motor



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 592 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    I'm very disappointed they didn't increase the horsepower output of the performance M3. The battery must be at its limit. Performance figures haven't changed.

    I'm seeing conflicting horsepower figures on the tesla site. Tesla US says the car has more than 500hp (Marques brownlee quotes 510hp). Tesla Ireland says the car has 460hp… maybe they made a mistake quoting the LR horsepower instead of performance?

    IMG_3963.png IMG_3964.png
    Post edited by DrPsychia on


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    yes I seen the differing BHP figures. That should be static across the geographical location I would imagine.

    The 3.1 to 100 hasn’t changed from the older model so somethings at the limit alright. Unless they are holding back an acceleration boost or something 🤷

    Edit. 0-60mph of 2.9 is deffo quicker. It was 3.1 so must have been 3.3 to 100kmh for the older model.

    Post edited by Gumbo on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 592 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    Will the Seal AWD be your next car given the performance figures hasn't changed? I wonder if BYD will release a performance Seal🤔



Advertisement