Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

18468478498518521415

Comments

  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Lia Sweet Racist


    Because the very thing that’s driven the discussion is the central contract announcements this week, and Leinster announcing a 6 month NIQ signing.

    Apparently these items are indications of some massive inbuilt irreversible structural advantage in Leinster’s favour.

    The central contracts are purely a product of the quality of Leinster’s player production. That’s an area that wasn’t always anywhere close to as skewed as it now is.

    People claim it’s purely driven by private schools, bigger population, weather population, big stadiums to move games to etc, but all of those things have largely always been a factor, and certainly were in the 2000’s when Munster were bulk supplier to Ireland.

    There is an absolute refusal to acknowledge that Leinster prioritised and invested extensively in player development pathways well over 15 years ago and have been reaping the benefit of it ever since.

    Ulster and Munster could have invested in just the same way, because god knows they’ve invested plenty in enriching various South African rugby players over the same timeframe.

    Even this offseason - Ulster’s decision making is still utterly puzzling - we’re supposed to believe they couldn’t afford to retain Billy Burns if they wanted to, yet the best he could do was a one year deal at Munster, while somehow Ulster had the ability to go and sign another NIQ South African winger in Werner Kok.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    You've been a mod over a forum where there has been free rein to call Leinster chokers and they're regularly discussed as not being able to get over the hump, yet now they're taking steps to improve the team there is a complete freakout.

    If the actions you want aren't going to materially affect Leinster then how the hell will it resolve your claim of inequity, especially spreading it across three provinces? You're making zero sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,272 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Mate, I'm not sure anything you say there is anything I disagree with, and I'm pretty sure none of it I said.

    I'm not responsible for"apparently", nor am I in charge of "people". In your last post you said that you didn't say anything about "the cost living" - that's fair enough. So I shut up. Now you're bombarding me with every perceived slight against Leinster you've heard. No interest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'm genuinely curious if other posters are also not understanding the point I'm making?

    As simply as I can put it, I think the money could be better spent elsewhere, that could have more material impact in the long run, while simultaneously not materially impacting Leinster.

    If Leinster didn't sign Jordie Barrett, I think most people would agree they'd expect Leinster to be there at the business end of next season regardless. Right?

    Now, if the reason Leinster can afford Jordie Barrett is because they have 10 players on a central contract, but all the other provinces only have 1 each, it's entirely reasonable for fans of other provinces to question if that money could be better spent elsewhere. Indeed, it's entirely reasonable for the IRFU to ask the same question.

    Since this is the first time we've ever had such a dramatic imbalance in central contracts, it begs the question if such an imbalance was ever intended / expected in the first place. If it wasn't (and I don't think it was) then do you think a review seems pretty reasonable? I do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I was the person who raised the cost of living and responded to that post from you.

    You're ignoring evidence in every corner of the world if you believe salaries are not usually lower in lower cost of living areas. Look at multi-nationals or even private companies in Ireland who have offices in different parts of the country.

    Dublin is down as 30% more expensive than Belfast. If IRFU let provinces offer the same salary then Ulster should be significantly more attractive in monetary terms. For reference, 22% cheaper in Limerick and 18% in Galway.

    Leinster players are already turning down significant money by staying with Leinster over moving. Doesn't help the case for those who think throwing money at the other provinces will fix their issues.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I understand the point you're trying to make but you're being both hyperbolic about the current situation while offering a minor solution - which makes zero sense.

    You're saying things are incredibly inequitable right now and if that is true then the impact of the value of the six month contract of Barrett split across the other three provinces would make absolutely no material difference.

    You cant have immaterial change to one province split across the three provinces and it move the needle.

    There either isn't the gulf you claim or to resolve it there needs to be changes to Leinster that impacts them significantly. You cant have it both ways.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I've thought about this before but never asked. So this is a question to everyone but relates to your comment.

    Ulster players who are resident in Belfast (i guess all or most) are british tax residents. Therefore they aren't eligible for the athlete tax rebate that's available in the south?

    I think its a pretty substantial amount that you are eligible as long as you paid taxes in the south and finish your career there. Unless the irfu figured a workaround around that, that is actually a decent difference. I think it can be as much as one whole year in a lump sum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I can't get my head around this. I agree, that Leinster have advantages. I also agree that Leinster have provided a pathway that is unequaled probably anywhere. For the sake of "equality", what measures should be put in place to help the other provinces, while not destroying Leinster.

    There's really no fix. Leinster players want to play for Leinster. It's fairly straightforward. Some will leave and improve other provinces. The tide will turn somewhat when Munsters young backrows are flourishing. Leinster have not produced any of note recently.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I was thinking about this recently.

    I honestly would make exactly one change. Loosen up on NIQs. I don't want leinster to have to move players, i don't want to curtail their budget, none of that.

    I would make one policy change with some stipulations. The policy change is that each province is allowed 5 NIQs in ANY position with the following stipulations

    • No more than one per position
    • A limited number of regular season games played (maybe 15) and unlimited playoffs
    • You have to be able to afford it and prove that to the irfu

    This is for all provinces. I have no problem with leinster getting even better.

    My main reason for this is that i literally do not think its possible for ulster or munster to win a european cup without more NIQs. I think we need to do a better job developing our own talent (and imo that is happening but it takes time for it to come through) but i just don't think we will ever be able to produce the number of homegrown elite players 1-23 that is required for a european cup. Especially evenly over a whole team position by position.

    In fact, i honestly think that its probable that it will also be hard for leinster to do so in the future. The last 10 years for leinster have been a mix of fantastic management, a golden generation of players and honestly generally good chance (except for imo in close games). Henshaw, Lowe and JGP are all elite imports (that you developed in the latter two cases) but that's probably not happening again. There's no guarantee that the insane production of 5-10 years ago will continue. I absolutely believe leinster will always produce a great volume of players but i firmly believe that there is some element of chance to producing a ton of elite guys at the same time in any sport. Or producing them and most of them staying healthy, and so on.

    To add on to that, all but one of the european cups won by irish teams were won by teams with more than the current 3 NIQs.

    There are other benefits. Instead of waiting for an irish player to fill a glaring weakness, you can do so immediately. This will then expose your best young players to deep playoff runs and add to their development.
    You also get more freedom to really build a team to suit any style, which would be fun to me. You also get to experimemt a tad more on NIQs which i feel like only connacht really do now.

    Also, i honestly don't think it holds anyone back as long as there is a game limit. I think a really deep squad with lots of competition is actually the best environment.

    Anyway, that's what i want. I kind of doubt it would happen but i think it would solve some problems, and it wouldn't hurt leinster or ireland at all imo.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Do tickets to sporting events really not have VAT in Ireland? How come?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    To encourage people to go to sporting events probably



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Bizarre. Yet there's VAT on theatre productions and museums.

    Edit: and VAT is higher if people dance at your concert 😅. What a country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    convert to euro? 😂

    That’s a lot of money to get invested



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    that’s 20 players in Ireland NIQ

    Nobody in IRFU or who think of the good of Irish rugby will want 20 NIQ in Ireland , that’s more or less taking an entire provincial team out of selection for Ireland

    Also is throwing NIQ the answer? If you have that many the failure rate will be a lot higher so you will end up with a lot of overseas, highly paid , NIQ players who are not working out for the province



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I don't think people are calling for it to be equal (at least, I'm not). They're calling for it to be less inequitable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    It's really not hyperbolic. Leinster are favourites to win both competitions this season. The significant imbalance in CC's only begins next season.

    I go back to this question; this is the first time we've ever had such a dramatic imbalance in central contracts, it begs the question if such an imbalance was ever intended / expected?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 712 ✭✭✭jonok28


    The IRFU have the model for fixing things staring them right in the face. The IRFU have a rule in place, no Irish province can have more than 3 Non Irish Qualified players.

    Why don't they say that each province at a bare minimum has a choice to centrally contract 3 players. Leinster could still have their 10 CC players but it gives the likes of Ulster, Munster and Connacht a chance to get money off the books so they can strengthen the squad with that money.

    Ulster could CC Nick Timoney, Tom O'Toole and Stuart McCluskey. That doesn't stop the likes of Robert Baloucoune, James Hume or Nathan Doak from getting CC's, it just means that 3 contracts will be guaranteed Central contracts.

    Yes it costs the IRFU more money but if each team uses that money to improve dramatically and bring in more players who can help them win, then the IRFU benefit from that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Central contracts are in place for the best players in Ireland, you are now just rewarding players with central contracts because they are in a province and not becuase they deserve it?

    Isn't the IRFU already doing this anyway with topping up wages for some players in provinces?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 fitzgea1


    So how about abolishing central contracts altogether and the IRFU just contributes to each provinces operating costs every year. But it's on a sliding scale where the worst performing gets the most. So it would be something like (figures are just for illustration)

    C: 10m

    U:9m

    M:8m

    L:7m



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Would anyone mind sharing the presale link please? Many thanks.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,719 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Was the imbalance intended/expected? Yes and no.

    The whole set-up is geared to producing test-level player to populate the Irish team which drives the whole IRFU.

    What we've seen in the last ten years is one province do exactly what it's supposed to, so yes that bit was intended, even if we didn't expect it to be quite so successful.

    On the flip side, the other two bulk suppliers to the national team have fallen off a cliff, so no, that bit was not intended or expected.

    But the bit that is working as it should seems to be the problem?

    I know a certain poster will come along, call me disingenuous and say that Ulster/Munster can never match Leinster's output, or some other trite deflection, but next season, there will ONE centrally contracted product of the Ulster and Munster academies combined. One. And you'd struggle to point to anyone and say they're hard done by not to have one. Yeah POM could have got another year, what odds would that make in the bigger picture?

    The imbalance is not due to the favourable treatment of Leinster, which again, we've yet to hear an explanation for why the Aussie and English guy would do so, it's down to the collapse of the Ulster and Munster conveyor belts.

    But apparently Jordie Barrett going on a J1 is the issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,016 ✭✭✭Ciaran


    How long are Ulster fans going to keep this up? Will Leinster fans be allowed to talk about up coming ticket sales and league games any time soon?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,664 ✭✭✭realhorrorshow


    Because the IRFU wants to control the negotiations for the national team's most important players, rather than leaving it to the provinces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Many thanks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 fitzgea1


    Maybe we don't need to keep 'all' our best players in Ireland, maybe that's part of the problem. Look at South Africa



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,955 ✭✭✭Nermal


    Also looking for the pre-sale link if anyone could send it on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,238 ✭✭✭Deank


    The same if someone wouldn't mind sending it on, thanks a mill.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭Bogwoppit


    I’d appreciate a presale link too if there is one going.
    thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68 ✭✭Jayno66


    Would also be very grateful for a presale link, trying to sort good seats for a group! Many thanks.



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,837 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Id also appreciate the link if possible please



Advertisement
Advertisement