Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

18418428448468471415

Comments

  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,833 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Have to really laugh at the "luxurious NIQ signings" claim.

    Since Isa Nacewa joined in 2008 (more than 15 years ago) leinsters 'luxurious' NIQ signings have amounted to, at best, Scott fardy, Nathan hines, rocky elsom (for half a season) and brad thorn (for 3 months).

    below that, the world beaters of Zane Kirchner, kane Douglas, hayden triggs, Ben teo, Sean beirne, Matt berquist, Jimmy gopperth, Joe tomane, croked lote tuquiri, Charlie ngatai, Jason Jenkins, Heinke van Der merwe, mike ala'alatoa, Mariano galarza, David Holwell.

    Not exactly names that slip from the tongue when making the world's best.

    Now, when were in a position to actually sign a high level name (one being in a six month contract, and the other already having been here for four years with another team) there's certs to the heavens of "unfair".

    Well personally I say stuff that, at this stage we deserve some luxury given our way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,715 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    there’s no point making rational arguments with you because you reduce everything to a completely mental conspiracy theory that everything IRFU do is driven by pro Leinster bias. You’re completely gone past the point of rational debate.


    So what’s the point?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    As I see it this "problem" is in large part down to what Lancaster did with Leinster. During Smith's tenure the percentage of homegrown players in the Leinster squad was in the 60s, and I saw one analysis a few years ago that had that percentage trending down year on year over his three seasons. Kiwis like Aaron Dundon and Leo Auva'a could have skewed things a bit. They weren't imports, but were rather called up from the AIL. But even so the 'production line' wasn't anything like it was under Lancaster.

    Then there was the MOC era. No-one was saying Leinster were this unbeatable super club then. But you still had all Leinster's 'natural advantages' like feeder schools and so on.

    In Cullen's first season, they finished bottom of their Euro pool. No home knockout gates going into the coffers that year. And of course they got outclassed by Connacht in the League Final.

    Then Lancaster came in, and while he's not a winner at the very highest level, what he can do in terms of building a squad is remarkable. He had the academy train with the senior players so their development would be accelerated. And his training methods ensured everyone in the squad was prepared to a very high level and able to slot in seamlessly. The number of homegrown players rose to the high 80s. You didn't see signings like Mat Berquist and Clint Newland anymore because the training sessions made sure the next cab off the rank was at a high enough level. And that's it pretty much. The intensity of the training conditioned and upskilled the squad to the extent that a large proportion could hit the ground running at international level even if they were new on the scene.

    If Ulster or Munster or Connacht want to do well enough in the Euro pools to get home knockouts and go deep in the competition they should really see if they can get Lancaster in next time they're in the market for a coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭FrannoFan


    I get that it creates a financial imbalance when a team get someone off the books and at the moment it is weighted heavily to Leinster.

    But when a player moves onto an Irish contract they generally have their club appearances seriously limited. James Ryan has nearly the same Irish caps as Leinster appearances. Dorris broke through around the same time as deegan and has played around half the number of games.

    You don't want a club punished by producing a star that you want to manage so taking them off the books let's Leinster afford a quality replacement.

    Also a bit like league of Ireland clubs getting a % of transfer fees when a player moves from club to club in the premier League it could be viewed as a reward to the system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 366 ✭✭antietam1


    Holwell was great, flipped houses when he went back to NZ.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    But is that not the issue now for Munster. Since the HC winning era they have signed TWENTY players (including just signed OBrien and rumoured to be signing Farrell) who have (or can) play at centre. 16-18 years is a long time to not produce anyone remotely capable of any sort of impact at national level in the 12 or 13 shirt.

    From outside looking in, they sat on their hands and maybe complacency about it carrying on set in and it wasnt capitalised on?



  • Administrators Posts: 56,221 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Again you're being disingenuous and reductive.

    Nobody has said this is some IRFU Leinster bias conspiracy. Nobody.

    They have said with the system we have in place today Leinster are the only club who are equipped to take advantage of it, and that the system by design will benefit the wealthiest team in a self perpetuating way. That team is Leinster.

    And so long as team Ireland and Leinster are doing well the IRFU have little motivation to fix it, because they can point to the fact that Ireland are winning and there's an Irish club competing in elite rugby.

    There is a world of difference between this and "the IRFU are driven by a pro Leinster bias."



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The problems with all these arguments is that fans wil naturally take offense it it is even implied their team has an unfair advantage. Let's remove that entirely.

    Let's say irish rugby is an ecosystem and a natural cycle of that system is that leinster produce a surplus of players and they move elsewhere. That is what is expected to happen.

    Let's rank players in buckets. The first bucket is elite players. Provinces basically never lose elite players against their will. This is rare and will always be rare. Let's call that A.

    The next bucket (B) is the level below. Some guys here will have potential to be elite. Some will just be really good.

    In the NORMAL ecosystem, leinster would not be able to keep as many as they are now in bucket B. That's not their fault or even an unfair advantage.

    However, while it is true that Ulster and Munster have to do a better job of producing bucket A players and they HAVE to produce them themselves, they will always need to import bucket B players. It is not realistic that either province produces enough of them.

    That's the current problem. The push pull factors are currently so weak that almost no one really is leaving to other provinces unless they are below even bucket B.

    You could solve this in a few ways but its tricky. You can't and shouldn't force people to move however.

    One possible solution is to increase NIQs allowed to maybe 4/5 and be less strict positionally on where they are allowed.

    An illustation of the problem is loosehead at munster. Obviously a massive problem. They would imo have one bucket B player and that's basically it. Leinster have 1 bucket A, and maybe 4/5 bucket B looseheads. Again, they shouldn't be forced to leave but also munster can't magically make that weakness a strength in one season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    You also have to ask the question why Milne is now ahead of Wycherley in the Ireland conversation when the latter was decisively ahead when they both played for Ireland U20s. Is it purely that Wycherley is smallish for pro rugby? Or have Munster not done as good a job developing him as they could have? Put another way, would he be a better player now if he'd spent the past 5 years or whatever it is in the Leinster set up?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,228 ✭✭✭✭phog


    So, other than a headline item, you have no understanding of it, yet you think, it's worthy of a mention.

    To me, it sounds more like point scoring.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The Leinster player squad bill is the highest in ireland (and likely one of the highest in europe) and they would not be able to afford it without IRFU support seem reasonably uncontroversial statements to me. Where the water is obviously muddied is central contracts cover international fees but I suspect both are still fundamentally true.

    I think it's fair to ask if in another setup leinster would be able to afford to keep all the players they have admittedly developed. It is pretty unique we keep them all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I used your own words that you chose to explain how Leinster are currently successful and they fit nearly 100% with the scenario Munster had in '00s.

    You've refused to engage and explain how your own words aren't applicable to Munster of the '00s.

    Come on, there is a night and day difference in the level of details we know about the IRFU finances and the provincial mismanagement - it is utterly bizarre to claim different. For example, we all know Munster kept two training basis for years, while you cannot tell me how much the IRFU gives each province.

    Some facts you jumped over, presumably because they don't fit your bitter narrative:

    • Leinster have had many multiples the number of home knockout games as the other provinces recently – each one a huge payday
    • Leinster have by a decent amount the highest average attendance numbers of all provinces
    • Leinster have consistently made knockout stages so bring in far more prize money than the other provinces
    • Leinster have the biggest population and highest attendance so presumably make the most from merchandise and sponsorship
    • Leinster have brought in the fewest big name, expensive outside NIQs (Connacht have probably spent less on NIQs, though they signed a big name last summer when Leinster hadn’t for several years)
    • Leinster have been dealing with little to no debt on their grounds

    You're more upset by the guesses you're making about the IRFU finances than actual clear and obvious mismanagement, that destroyed the huge lead Munster should still have to this day and has hindered Ulster and Connacht.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,228 ✭✭✭✭phog


    If you were running a company with 4 distinct Business Units, each competing with each other as well as other independent businesses and one of yours was performing much better than the rest.

    Would you try to improve the other three by mirroring best practice or just continue as is with one great Business Unit and three struggling Business Units.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    That's complete BS, you keep refusing to engage in points that are being put to you - including your own words.

    You keep saying you dont want Leinster dragged back while every single suggestion you've made to change things 'impacts ability to compete at the levels they are competing at today'. You've either completely lost it or are looking for a rise out of people.

    If you weren't an admin you wouldnt get away with that level of posting in the thread of another province like you are.

    Mod: Attack the post not the poster.

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,715 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    ”IRFU won’t do anything to threaten Leinster dominance” is the most reductive argument there is so I guess there’s a pair of us in it.

    i find it utterly bizarre that the well run parts of the organisation are somehow the problem here and the toxic omnishambles are the victim. Yet here we are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Who's fault is this? Are you complaining about unfairness?



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm not sure. Loughman has got a good bit better since rowntree became the coach and you'd think he would be a good prop coach?

    I sometimes think wycherly is a bit like clarkson where the progress is very uneven and sometimes doesn't seem to be happening but wycherly has expectations beyond his ability. He needs to be firmly third choice and playing low leverage minutes and hopefully he pops in his late mid to late twenties. In that sense, yea leinster is a way better environment at least.

    edit: also the problem of long lulls in devlopment in certain positions at ulster and munster are just norms of their dev environments imo. That will happen just by chance. We need to produce elite players but we won't uniformly do so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Why don't we? Stockdale was on a CC and look what happened? Seriously, up the wages at the other provinces by 15%. As for lost revenue for Ulster, the union should have reimbursed some or most of the loss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa




  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 56,221 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Almost every single one of these points you claim have been glossed over have been discussed and mentioned time and time and time again on the thread. I am not sure if you've just missed it or are ignoring it.

    Take the first one. Leinster have way more home knockouts. Yes, because they have the best team. They have the best team because they have the most expensive team. They have the most expensive team because they get the most from the IRFU.

    Again, this is an example of how the system is self perpetuating. Leinster make the most money cause they get the most money which helps them make more money which helps them get more money and so on and so on and so on and so on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,272 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    "Toxic"?

    I don't agree with Awec, but at this stage your posts are just coming across as hysterical and objectionable, FFF. I asked you earlier to clarify some of the language you were throwing around about other provinces, you didn't respond.

    Mate, just chill. Go and rewatch the weekend's game of your rugby team utterly taking apart a lauded bogey team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    The issue has always been there.

    Players dont want to leave their home province, especially when the province is successful.

    Look at Donnacha Ryan's career and how long he sat in 'Bucket B' before getting his chance - what sort of career he could have had if he'd moved earlier.

    The problem hasn't changed, those who were perfectly fine with the status quo back then have unsurprisingly found their voice now.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,221 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    ”IRFU won’t do anything to threaten Leinster dominance” is the most reductive argument there is so I guess there’s a pair of us in it.

    Again, nobody has said this. I said the IRFU have no real motivation to change anything since they can point to the fact that Ireland are doing well and one of their clubs is dining at the top table. Again, this is totally different to what you insinuate.

    It is probably worth considering why you are having to be so disingenuous when making your points.

    Look at what the IRFU KPIs were for provincial teams:

    1. 2 or more URC titles
    2. 2 or more Euro Cups
    3. Consistently reaching the knockouts

    Ignoring the fact they failed to meet the 2nd point, these KPIs do nothing to push the IRFU to improve their other clubs. Reaching the euro knockouts is a particularly low bar these days. Ulster, Munster and Connacht could literally finish 14, 15 and 16th in the league and Nucifora could still mark these KPIs as green.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 327 ✭✭Number 137


    While Leinster will soon have 10/13 central contracts, that was not always the case. Yes, that benefits them financially today. But there was a time when the distribution was far more even and therefore they had to spend more money on their squad. The extra money that they now have to spend is being given as a reason that they have been able to spend more on their academy, pathway structures, etc. But I think that happened first. They invested in the pathways and academy and produced more high quality players leading to more central contracts.

    So they have more Central Contracts now because of the investment in that. Not the other way around. 18/23 of Leinster's squad that beat La Rochelle were academy products.

    The argument also exists that if Leinster were based in the Premiership for example, that they'd be screwed by the salary cap and unable to maintain their squad as it is. Yet, is there not a system in place that allows you to increase your salary cap if you produce more England international players? If that was the case in Ireland, Leinster would still have an advantage.

    Perhaps I am mistaken on the last point, but it's worth pointing out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    So basically, screw Leinster and get all 4 provinces into the investec qf's, just to lose.

    I understand your frustration. But laying it all on the IRFU and Leinster is really dumb. Imo. Ulster have had more coaching changes than Leinster over the years! Who can forget the Kiss/Gibbs shambles. Ulster go out and sign a marquee player, Piatau, who's not needed. They also signed Vermuellen, who to me, was a disappointment. Ulster have a history of fcuk ups. One after the other, compounding the culture.

    It's not like Ulster didn't beat Leinster this year already. We're talking the same Ulster that we're nilled by Sale! The Ulster house is not in order. The academy is finally producing good forwards. Finally! The last good forward to come through Ulster's academy is Timoney! It appears that some talented lads have been poached from Leinster this year. Good. Hopefully the days of Lorcan Dow, Dunleavy, Allison etc are over.

    Rant complete! I think



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    They have been discussed but you chose to exclude them in your 'facts' regarding Leinster finances - you have a narrative that you want to push and are refusing to accept the wider context.

    The system is only self perpetuation currently because Leinster are very well managed - a few things go wrong and that won't be the case.

    I've already shown you that your exact words in that example were the case with Munster in 00's and it didnt self perpetuate because they squandered it with poor decisions.

    You keep running to money being a quick fix, the same mistake the other provinces have made - trying to throw money at the problem rather than the management.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Oh god, sorry if you are looking at munster back then and saying leinster are just as deep as they were, i'm sorry its delusion.

    Yes, guys have always been reluctant to move. But now they are reluctant to move WAY down depth charts. I'm not interested in having a bad faith conversation about this.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I agree with this honestly. The tweaks to 'fix' this are tiny and would produce results pretty quickly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    That would make perfect sense but isnt what is being suggested.

    What the bitters are calling for is to pull back funding from the performing business unit, hurting its success and potentially the viability of the whole company, so they can divert resources to the underperforming business units, ignoring all the clear evidence of the incompetence of their leadership teams and believing simply more money will fix things.

    An utterly idiotic business decision.



Advertisement
Advertisement