Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

18378388408428431415

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,223 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Maybe use the money to help the provinces to catch up to where Leinster are with the Schools program churning out players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭FrannoFan


    I think because the spending power in England has been reduced the importance of central contracts in keeping the best talent in Ireland has been somewhat forgotten. It wasn't long ago Furlong was strongly considering offers from abroad.

    Perhaps a top up style system (like what Murray and POM are apparently on going forward) might feel more equitable but at the end of the day pretty much all the money comes from the IRFU anyway.

    And while announcing Barrett the same day Sheehan moves on to a central deal might look like "thats where the money went" in reality those Marquee signings come from private money, same way Snyman and DDA came from the 10-14 club or whatever they were called



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    I'd agree with that. Far too many of our promising young players waste away years of important development after the u20s, either not playing or playing in amateur games. The pro D2 is proper, tough, professional rugby and a great way to bring through young players. It's obviously impractical to send Irish players there (and the clubs wouldn't really want them) but players like Prendergast and so many more could really do with exposure to real rugby. He might even learn to tackle.

    It's a terrible idea for any young Irish player to go there. It's a hyper physical league where you'll be dropped immediately if you start to struggle

    This isn't an accurate portrayal of the ProD2. There are 30 regular games a season and away games are pretty much a write-off for most teams. There's plenty of game time to go around and talented players can make an impression even when making mistakes.

    Again, it's impractical and incompatible with the lifestyle of a young Irish player who's almost certainly in tertiary education.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,272 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    All the money does come from the IRFU but we don't have one big IRFU balance sheet. We have a central balance sheet and four provincial ones. Billy Burns is hardly a world beater but he's going from one branch of the IRFU (who just simply said, we need to make savings and can't afford you) to another, because of internal budgets.

    "Pretty much all the money comes from the IRFU anyway" is true, but it's how that money is then allocated, distributed and spent.

    Every province makes a loss. Every province, including Leinster.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    The simple solution is for the other Provinces to just go and develop better players to push the Leinster lads off their central contracts. That’s what Leinster decided to do 20 years ago when Munster had the majority of the best players and the CC’s and it’s paying off now. But the fans of the other Provinces don’t want to hear this and don’t want to put the time and effort in, instead looking for a quick fix.

    This kind of thing is hand-wavy, bootstrap, nonsense. "Just be better" like "Just don't be poor" or "Just don't be depressed" and patronising shouldawouldacoulda is not only utterly useless to the people it's addressed to, it's smug and unhelpful. If you can't empathise or offer any kind of constructive advice, why not just not say anything?

    If Leinster are the 'bad guys' it's not because they win games and produce players, it's because of the self-satisfied attitude of a lot of their fans and their refusal to at least acknowledge the privileged situation of being a Leinster fan in 2024.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 56,215 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    In case people think I'm just whinging, here are some things I think are worth looking at. I am looking at this in the perspective of the IRFU are responsible for 4 clubs, and they are responsible for ensuring that all 4 of their clubs have the maximum resources available to them to try and increase the chances of success across all 4 clubs.

    Leinster have been in 2 Champions Cup finals in a row, and look odds on for a 3rd. Since the time that another Irish team won the European Cup, Leinster have won 4 (possibly a 5th this year). It should be recognised that investment in the Leinster squad needs to be the absolute bare minimum, they are already head and shoulders ahead of the other 3 clubs. Money will be more impactful to Irish rugby as a whole if it is spent elsewhere.

    I think the gap between Leinster and the other 3 is so enormous that there is plenty of scope for changes in how things are done without impacting Leinster's ability to dine at the top table. This isn't about dragging Leinster back, but rather making targeted changes at some of the more luxurious elements of the Leinster setup.

    With that in mind

    1. Leinster are about to have 10 free elite-level players from the IRFU from next season onwards. These are players paid from the central budget, i.e. they are paid for by all of us. Leinster obviously keep these.
    2. In exchange for the above, other funding to Leinster has to be curtailed. In terms of NIQs the Jordie Barrett signing should have been laughed out of the room. Leinster's depth at prop is vastly superior to any other club, so there is no pressing need why they need to replace MA, again that money would be more impactful elsewhere. Snyman, with both Jenkins and Moloney off, is ok so long as he's cheap.
    3. In terms of Irish players, the likes of Deegan, Penny etc, the players who don't get near a Leinster first choice 23 but are still good players (i.e. the members of Leinster's 2nd 23), are told they can stay at Leinster if they want but they have to take salary cuts if they do so. If they move, salaries stay as they are. Any savings are diverted elsewhere.

    I don't agree with a draft model, I don't think it's necessary.

    Unless the funding model switches to looking at Irish Rugby as a whole and investing where it's really needed, and away from the "Leinster win a lot so Leinster keep getting more" model, the circle will never be broken and we'll still be in the same spot 10 years from now.

    The dangers for this are huge. There is a real risk that the current system becomes entrenched, we become cemented in this super province + everyone else model we have now. This is going to make it really difficult for U / M / C to attract new supporters. Though I totally understand that this is not something Leinster fans need to care about at all.

    People who weren't old enough to support Munster in the 00s or Ulster in 99 have only ever known their team as being also-rans. There's only so long that this is sustainable for. The IRFU need to be really careful here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭FrannoFan


    Exactly, Clubs who do well financially are rewarded with a greater chunk of what they bring in. It wouldn't be right to give connacht and leinster the same money when leinster are getting 92k through the turnstiles over two weekends and the other has an average 5,500 showing up to watch them each week.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,832 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    AGAIN….

    Leinster add about 7-8 players per season to their academy. where do all the other "churned out schools players" go? why arent they going to other provinces? Leinster already provide approx. 20 senior players to the other 3 provinces as it is.

    how do you suggest that "money" fixes the production problems in other provinces? what will that money be spent on that isnt being done already? or are you simply talking about buying in players?



  • Administrators Posts: 56,215 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I agree, our academy needs a massive boot up the hole. But this is far from the only change that needs to happen. The "invest in academy, produce more players" is just way too simplistic.

    If Ulster want to invest more in their academy they need money to do so. Where is this money going to come from? Our squad is already threadbare. We're already firmly a mid table team, and at risk of not even getting into the CC next year. There is no fat to trim.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,755 ✭✭✭BoardsMember


    What happens to Leinster when they lose ~20 players to Ireland camps?

    The next best players have left because they've had pay cuts enforced.

    A weakened Leinster team end up without home advantage in knock out matches. Or Leinster have to play the internationals more often than currently, shorter rest periods. Either way, Leinster make less money, Ireland are weakened, so less money comes in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,272 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Why wouldn't it be right? It's, as you say "all IRFU money". It needs to maximise its potential.

    I guarantee you, if giving Connacht the same money as Leinster produced better international players and results, it would happen. There's no "it wouldn't be right" about it. Ulster function under a number of problems that the other provinces don't face, and the IRFU don't worry about "what's right"; they leave us to get on with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭gneel


    Could put money directly into the schools in other provinces. It's very telling in the Leinster SCT when the coaches have Kiwi accents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,272 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    I've said. Make the provinces contribute to "central" contracts. The central money saved is given to the smaller three academies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    You make a reasoned argument there but another view around development etc would be Munster at Centre in that time you reference

    Halstead, Mafi, Tipoki, Farrell, Frisch, Nankivell, DDA, Fekitoa, Taute, Andrew Smith, Pat Howard, Laulala, Downey, Chambers, Warwick*, Tuitupou, Sam Arnold

    • Utility back but did play centre

    Sean OBrien is a centre being played on the wing currently, Tom Farrell is on his way.

    18 (20 realistically) players brought in, the only players I can recall them developing in that time are Scannell and Goggin.

    Its a snapshot of the issues at the centre of the discussion here. Now obviously you need the players to come through at underage level into academy etc but has there been a level of neglect here too? Money is part of the problem but how that's spent is vital. If money is to be thrown at the problem, then it needs to be thrown at a longer term development. Not on short term fixes with no time invested in 10 years down the line.

    Jordie Barrett is a luxury, but he is one that's been earned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    @awec

    In terms of Irish players, the likes of Deegan, Penny etc, the players who don't get near a Leinster first choice 23 but are still good players (i.e. the members of Leinster's 2nd 23), are told they can stay at Leinster if they want but they have to take salary cuts if they do so. If they move, salaries stay as they are. Any savings are diverted elsewhere.

    With regards to this point, do you think people, and they are people like you and me, would be happy to continue playing under the IRFU banner if you tell them they’re getting a salary cut unless they move away from their friends, family and home? I would resent my employer if they did that to me.

    Sounds like a great incentive to pack up the bags and retire or travel abroad and work for an employer who isn’t going to coerce you into moving somewhere you don’t particularly want to be. Or maybe you would accept the proposal, rock up, coast and take the money for a few years in response.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,832 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Bandon Grammer DOR has a french accent (ex spain national team coach 😜 )

    but the exception above aside, thats an idea. Have you any idea how much funding Munster put into schools rugby as it is?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,712 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I'm not missing the point, at all.

    No, Ulster won't be able to match the output of the Leinster academy any time soon - but no one said it should or could. Constantly saying "we can't match Leinster" sort of overlooks the fact that you're struggling to match Connacht. For a man who was so fixated on red herrings, you're throwing them around at a fair old pelt yourself. You have to, because your underlying position is so weak and flawed.

    It's not about matching Leinster, it's about contributing something. When we're sending out a 23 in the Six Nations that features not a single Ulster player, something is deeply, deeply wrong. The only players who featured at all in this 6N were McCloskey (age 31) and Henderson (32) so I'm struggling to see things being much brighter this time next year. Munster at least have Crowley, Casey and Nash as young-ish guys who got a run out.

    If you want to sit there and believe that this would all be OK if only Leinster don't sign Barrett, fair enough, you're probably on the same wavelength as the guys running Ulster for the last decade.

    I'll repeat it - the contracts system has been in place for 20 years, it has not changed. What has changed is the relative abilities of different provinces to work under that system, and Ulster in particular have viciously resisted the efforts of IRFU to help/force them to do so. The party line seems to be that the Australian bloke is conspiring with the guy from Wigan to favour Leinster for reasons as yet unexplained. Fair enough.

    So the question remains - if we give more money to Ulster, what will they do with it?



  • This content has been removed.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I'm partly on awec's side in this. Deegan is a grown up - if he doesn't understand leinster saying "you're third choice at best on our depth chart we think you are only worth this much to us but someone else in ireland will value you more" than that's on him. I don't think ireland suffer from him leaving as things stand anyway. I think leinster do have a few luxury players like this.

    Where I differ is that I don't think this is going to change much or placate many people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭FrannoFan


    Ok there Karl Marx "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,785 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    How much of Leinster schools money comes from Leinster Vs just from the fact they are extremely wealthy schools plus outside investors?

    I wouldn't think Leinster Rugby are the ones funding warm weather training camps abroad in Leinster schools, or building massive indoor AstroTurf pitches - but I'm open to being proven very wrong (as I often am).

    Admittedly, your point re: coaches is an area Munster could improve on. The standard of coaching in all of the Limerick schools are absolute dirt. Only the Cork schools seem to have their shtick together in that regard. However Munster are already operating at a loss this year so it's hard to see where that money could come from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,117 ✭✭✭StormForce13


    Munster also have Tom Ahern who I reckon will be included in Irish squads very soon, possibly as POM's replacement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,016 ✭✭✭Ciaran


    if we give more money to Ulster, what will they do with it?

    Spend it on Aaron Cruden apparently. I don't see much outrage about this rumour for some reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    I do get the idea to a point. If you’re not starting why should you get the same pay as a player at another province who is starting all the time.

    But it doesn’t sit with the IRFU’s policy of not being able to outbid other provinces if they start cutting salaries for particular players who don’t move. Feels like it’s punishing players rather than rewarding them. So maybe they need to go the other way and allow provinces to offer players more money if the move. But then that creates another big problem if Leinster then decide they like the look of Gleeson or Hugh Gavin for example..



  • Administrators Posts: 56,215 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I'll repeat it - the contracts system has been in place for 20 years, it has not changed.

    I mean, this is demonstrably false. The central contract system is significantly different than it was 20 years ago.

    There are significantly less of them given out these days, presumably because elite player salaries have grown to a level where the IRFU do not want to pay 25+ players 100% of their salary any more. But this cut back has a knock on effect that we are seeing today.

    If the CCs are only given to the cream of the crop, then it's unsurprising that they almost exclusively go to the one province that has the resources to continually churn out elite level players. And so this province frees up more money to invest in more development, which churns out more players, and so the loop is self-perpetuating.

    You are being disingenuous also.

    1. I never said things would be good if you didn't sign Barrett. I used Barrett as an example of how skewed the system is.
    2. I didn't say Ulster wouldn't improve if we sorted out our academy, in fact the opposite.

    Look at David McCann. Ulster have finally produced a forward who looks to have a bright future ahead of him. Let's imagine McCann kicks on in a massive way next year. He has no chance of a central contract, the back row contracts are all tied up in Leinster. Ulster have no chance of getting his salary off their books so that they can divert that money back into the academy. In all likelihood, Ulster will be paying McCann's salary for the entirety of his career. This is yet another symptom of a broken system.

    If you imagine Leinster are a 10, and Ulster are currently a 4, even if we absolutely perfected our academy that might bring us from a 4 to an 8. But that final 2, we can never, ever bridge that gap under the current model. Nor can Munster. So long as Leinster perform to their potential then nobody can ever take their place at the top, an intended or unintended consequence of the IRFU funding model.

    What we are hearing in this thread is that Ulster and Munster need to develop more players. And they need to improve. Maybe the IRFU need to make some changes. But these changes cannot involve:

    1. Taking any central contracts from Leinster
    2. Forcing any players to leave Leinster
    3. Negatively impacting Leinster's funding in any way

    I totally understand why Leinster supporters are so vociferous that nothing can change, I honestly would be too if I were one, but something has to give.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,272 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    "What has changed is the relative abilities of different provinces to work under that system, and Ulster in particular have viciously resisted the efforts of IRFU to help/force them to do so."

    What is that in reference to? What does that actually mean?

    And we spend the money on improving our academy and underage systems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,712 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The problem here is that, by definition, moving Leinster's third choice players to become first choice elsewhere cannot close the gap between the provinces.

    All it will do is alienate the fan bases in those provinces because they won't see the provincial team as being representative of the province, just a franchise based in that province.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,272 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    I'll be outraged if we bring Aaron Cruden in. Is he even playing professionally any more?



  • Administrators Posts: 56,215 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Because it will never happen.

    Ulster are shopping for a 10 with 150k to spend according to the article that published that rumour. That is pennies.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    You are also acting as if the central contracts have been given to Leinster to do with as they will. McCann will get one if he breaks into the Irish team.

    You can't take central contracts away from Leinster, you're taking them away from the irish international player. This is not just semantics. The argument is that they should get less commensurate general funding.



Advertisement
Advertisement