Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

1498499501503504644

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 463 ✭✭Dont Be at It


    Of course not - he was a seasoned pro in his prime. But if the structures are put in place so that it's youth players moving, that dynamic changes completely.



  • Registered Users Posts: 463 ✭✭Dont Be at It


    Disagree with premise of your first two points. On your third point... Why sign them them, if they're not going to win you a European cup?



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,963 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    i think Murray Kinsella had a very good idea on the latest 42 podcast in regard to NIQ signings. His point was basically that teams should be allowed sign a second NIQ as a replacement for an outgoing NIQ in the same position. The point being that its a disincentive for that province to produce a player in that position over the period of the first NIQ.

    So for example Leinster shouldnt be allowed sign an NIQ to replace Ala'alatoa. Munster shouldnt be allowed sign Nankiville after Fekitoa, Ulster shouldnt be allowed to sign Vermeulen after Coetzee etc.

    Its an interesting point which i agree with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,674 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Hang on, I never said forced.

    He took a gamble leaving out a few front-line players that didn't pay off. And lets not forget, we were one knock-on from winning that game.

    Let's revisit that team:

    LEINSTER: Jimmy O’Brien, Tommy O’Brien, Robbie Henshaw, Charlie Ngatai, Dave Kearney, Harry Byrne, Luke McGrath (capt), Michael Milne, Rónan Kelleher, Michael Ala’alatoa, Ryan Baird, Jason Jenkins, Max Deegan, Will Connors, Jack Conan. Replacements: John McKee, Cian Healy, Thomas Clarkson, Joe McCarthy, Josh van der Flier, Nick McCarthy, Ciarán Frawley, Liam Turner.

    Is that a bad team that's not taking the tournament seriously?



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,576 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    If players have no incentive to move elsewhere (and all these examples support that) then why do they need central contracts? A normal Leinster contract should suffice.

    The whole CC thing is a bit nebulous. I'm not sure anyone fully understands how the IRFU budget works and a lot of discussion goes on under false assumptions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,674 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    I agree. I've never argued one way or the other on central contracts and I agree entirely that they're nebulous.

    There's a good chance that if central contracts didn't exist, the players would still be exactly where they are now - so using central contracts to beat Leinster or the IRFU with with is utterly futile.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,571 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Is that a bad team?

    I think it is a team that wasn't taking the gravity of the competition seriously yes.

    I think, obviously, part of this stems from having won it in close to a procession 4 times in a row and being maniacally focused on the Champions Cup. I wouldn't expect them to do it again this year in the same situation tbh.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    I must admire your commitment to winding people up Burkie that you included Te Aihe Toma, an NPC (at best) level scrumhalf who played a grand total of about ten minutes in a RaboDirect game against some cannon fodder team.

    Including the likes of Blyendaal, Stander, Gallagher and Haley who all are (or became) IQ is ludicrous. Imagine if we tried to claim Lowe and JGB were a big name signings!

    Omitting Synman and De Allende, who were the works of JPs 1014 Consortium and not subject to any IRFU money, who was the last signing to be off the standard of Barrett and Synman? Probably Howlett/Botha/JDV/Cullen - all from "back in the day"

    (Fekitoa was perceived as well last his prime after Toulon and Wasps, even if he did play quite well for us for a finish. He'd be the most likely rebuttal to that argument about the standard of NIQs we've signed with IRFU money. Du Tout I don't believe was anywhere near the Springboks at the time.)

    You mentioned Nankivell earlier as an excuse for "Munster can't complain" as if Nankivell wasn't a bit part Super Rugby player before he arrived.

    Ye also both forgot Jean Deysel, for what it's worth. (EDIT: And Kiran McDonnell, but I also think that injury cover signings are also not really the same thing - unless they signed on again for a longer period a la Taute)

    Regardless, @awec basically hit the nail on the head with his post last night so I don't know what further I can add. The system is designed to keep the top team at the top, simple as. Refusing to acknowledge it is just serious mental gymnastics.

    That's without going into international selection policy, but that's for the Irish thread I think :).

    Side note: I think it's clear by now that this is far from a Munster fan issue, which I think most posters bar a couple seem to acknowledge. Ulster fans aren't pleased at all, while Connacht fans are just used to being the runt of the litter and are too caught up in their ongoing depression to care.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,571 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The system is designed to keep the top team at the top, simple as

    The system doesn't actively punish the team at the top, that's essentially it.

    You can argue that it should be more distributive but that is not the same argument as claiming the system is designed to suit or boost one team.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    On an additional note (and likely my last), the allocation of NIQs by position is also a weird one.

    Leinster had three international seconds rows and three international centres (excluding Frawley and JOB, which would be a stretch tbf), and they have been given NIQs in those positions. I think a THP I could get over, given there isn't much going on behind Furlong.

    It just seems a bit backwards.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 54,256 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Well, it does. By fluke or by accident, the system DOES boost one team.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    The begs the fundamental question of "What are the provinces for?"

    If they are exclusively to develop and produce players for the National team then yes the above makes sense , however if the goal is for the Provinces to be successful and win things then it becomes a more complex decision process.

    In reality , the goal is to try to do both things - Develop players for the National team AND be successful at URC/CC level.

    That will sometimes mean having so called "luxury" players in the squad or not forcing the distribution of players between provinces and so on.

    For example , if Leinster were required to offload a bunch of players like Penny, Deegan, Frawley, Milne etc. - All names frequently bandied about as players who "should move" or "be moved" , would that make Leinster more likely to win things?

    Would it make the recipient Provinces more likely to win things?

    Or would it just make all of them more likely to be "Almost but not quite" teams?

    The system isn't perfect and is never going to make everyone happy , but it's what we've got and in terms of a Country with less than 200 Professional players it's working overall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,674 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Well I think we can reasonably agree to disagree on that one. That team was good enough to beat Munster and likely would have on another day but fell agonisingly short. It's a squad game and they didn't throw out 23 Academy players.

    On the second point, they were unceremoniously dumped out in the semi-final the year before so I don't buy that there wasn't a hunger to reclaim the title.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,963 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    clearly the deal is "when we have our international lads away with ireland, and have their minutes managed during the season, we want to have decent level replacements in their to aid our young lads."

    Leinster could have up to have 20 players away in ireland camps, that leaves 24 players for leinster to work with on match days. Leinster ROUTINELY bring academy players into URC match days when test players are away. Its actually a big success of the system Leinster employ. These lads need to have guidance and leadership on the field, be it a Jason jenkins, Hayden Triggs, Kirchner, Nacewa etc



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,963 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    ??

    none of that has anything to do with Kinsellas NIQ point



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    This was part of the NIQ rules brought in back in 2011, that you could not renew an NIQ nor could you sign another in the same position. It was quietly done away with a few years later.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    I’d be pretty sure they’re the reward. We haven’t made big name signing much over the last decade or so. Like, when Munster were bringing in Snyman and DDA, Leinster were bringing in Jenkins and Ngatai. We’ve been bringing in big numbers into the Aviva a couple of dozen times over the last 10 years or so. That’s a huge amount of revenue, little of which has gone on foreign signings. Even guys like JGP and Lowe wouldn’t have been recognised names when they were signed.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I disagree - If we say "You can't sign two consecutive players in the same position" then we are saying the primary purpose of the Province is to develop players for the national team but if you allow that multiple signing then perhaps you are helping that team "win things" so I think the point is definitely connected.

    It's a balance between both so hard rules around who you can sign and when maybe don't work..



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭theVersatile




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    I have already acknowledged that some of those signings were project players etc but the bottom line is players have been signed by Munster from the southern hemisphere in vast quantities. Munster have had plenty of latitude from IRFU with signings.

    Just because De Allende and RGS were paid by a benefactor doesnt take away from the reality of signing RWC winners while now complaining about another province signing RWC winners. Mental gymnastics at its finest. If Fekitoa was well past his prime, why not give that game time to some one else? Scannell maybe? I have no issue with provinces signing players but when one province justify it with "they buy into the province" and "he will help develop players" and then the next centre after Taute and Saili are Fekitoa, De Allende, Nankivell, Frisch then you really cannot complain. All of them are centres and cannot play anywhere else. Jordie Barrett can play 10-15 basically.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,571 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The system doesn't degrade one team that has a lot of natural advantages. Maybe it should, but the ultimate outcome of all this is that people want the talent at Leinster distributed more broadly which is a tale as old as time. Otherwise what do you think a different funding model would achieve or look like?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Just because De Allende and RGS were paid by a benefactor doesnt take away from the reality of signing RWC winners while now complaining about another province signing RWC winners. Mental gymnastics at its finest [sic]

    It kind of does when the whole premise of the argument (or atleast my argument) was about the financial inequality between the provinces caused specifically by the IRFU.

    As I said above, I wouldn't have been too pushed if Leinster signed an NIQ THP. It's not like I'm saying "Leinster should be barred from ever signing NIQs". Synman and Barrett are a bit ridiculous though.

    If these were positions where Leinster were deficient, then I wouldn't have a foot to stand on (as you have well pointed out re: Munster's centres)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,674 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    He's been a really great servant to Leinster. 177 appearances and still only 29.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,576 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    In fairness, it's a bit facile to essentially say "we've been filling this huge stadium in our back yard with wealthy local punters for big European knockout games for years, why can't you guys just do the same?". That would rub me the wrong way as a fan of a less wealthy, less successful province without easy access to a big arena.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,674 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Di Allende joined Munster for two years and RG Snyman joined for four years. Six years of salaries.

    Leinster are getting RG Snyman for one-year and Barrett for six months. 18 months of salaries.

    Which do you think cost more? There's a financial inequality in those two examples but not in the way you think.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,576 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Do people think Jordie Barrett won a world cup or am I misreading some comments?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    I'd imagine the one which the IRFU actually paid for is the one which cost the IRFU more. I don't know why this is such a difficult concept to grasp.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Former Former Former




  • Administrators Posts: 54,256 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    But what would this data prove?

    1. Leinster have the best, and most expensive squad in Irish rugby, which allows them to go further in competitions, and therefore bring in more money.
    2. Due to benefits of geography, Leinster have the national stadium at their disposal, literally on the doorstep of their home ground. They can easily shift games there for big incomes on big ticket games.

    So of course Leinster's income is going to trump everyone else's .Again, money brings in more money. All these stats would prove is that the system is self perpetuating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    wealthy local punters 

    ?? Pricing the tickets at an extremely affordable level is one of the main reasons the Aviva gets good crowds.

    less wealthy, less successful province without easy access to a big arena.

    Munster have sold out Pairc Ui Chaoimh twice in the last 18 months for random games that no other province* is allowed to run, and another one is lined up for Thomond in the autumn.

    *source; Gerry Thornley



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,674 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    But we're talking about financial inequality more broadly here so surely we're not picking and choosing which revenue streams we're talking about.

    Because I remember people up in arms when external funding was needed to keep Johnny Sexton (Denis O'Brien) and Jamie Heaslip (Bank of Ireland) at Leinster.

    But its not relevant when Munster do it, got it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Leinster played against an international team less than twelve months ago :P



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,576 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney




  • Administrators Posts: 54,256 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    The system isn't perfect and is never going to make everyone happy , but it's what we've got and in terms of a Country with less than 200 Professional players it's working overall

    It's working well overall for Leinster and Ireland, let's be clear on that. But this is enough to make those KPIs on David Nucifora's spreadsheet in D4 go green, so I imagine he's patting himself on the back for it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Out of interest, and in good faith, can you point me to that Gerry Thornley quote?

    Ulster used to have the likes of Australia playing touring matches, and watching Munster get these money spinners in, I've been wondering why there haven't been any up here. If money really Ulster's current key issue (caused by poor management), I'd have thought that a couple of games like that would have been scheduled.

    (I also understand that that plastic pitch is able to accommodate concerts.)



  • Registered Users Posts: 289 ✭✭redmca2


    What's the squad going to South Africa, have I missed it?



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,576 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Ignore, wrong thread

    Post edited by pickarooney on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    My bad, it was in fact Tony Leen in d'Examiner;

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/sport/rugby/arid-40946060.html

    Munster – the only Irish province with a licence to host international touring sides - are holding off announcing the fixture until the GAA’s Ard Comhairle approves use of the Cork stadium for November 10.

    This always lodged in my head because "licence" is such an odd word to use there, like it's not a legal licence, it can only mean permission from IRFU.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    That's a certain viewpoint for sure.

    I'd submit an alternative question - Do you think we have the overall resources to have 3 or 4 very strong squads, each capable of competing at the business end of both URC and CC every year (or even most years) ?

    And if we don't (and I think we don't) then which is better in terms of the financial and rugby health of the game in Ireland - 1 strong team that can compete consistently at the very highest level and 3 others that can continue to develop players and compete at URC level and sometimes CC level OR 4 middling squads each with 4/5 Top end players that aren't quite good enough to get to the Semi-final/Final stages on a regular basis?

    Not saying that this is the conscious planning of the IRFU but there are finite resources available and you can choose to spread them evenly across the 4 teams for the sake of "equality" or you can allow them to coalesce in 1 team giving you strength in the knock-out stages of all competitions.

    National demographics mean that the majority of players and money is in Leinster so do you leave them there or have some kind of Rugby "decentralisation" program that ultimately benefits no one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    FFS

    (Responding to FFF's post)



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The practical differences with how it impacts Ireland are essentially zero. The practical differences with how it impacts the Provinces are not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 380 ✭✭moonshy2022


    wrong forum.

    I know this seems to be the home for a lot of Munster supporters at the moment judging by their incessant posting over the last 24hrs.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,576 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    D'oh! Had the wrong thread open.



  • Registered Users Posts: 380 ✭✭moonshy2022


    I find it quite funny and a little sad that so many people are pointing and crying at how unfair life is while simultaneously clutching on to their 2 World Cup winning NIQs, a New Zealander and a Frenchman.

    In fairness in a little over a years time Leinster will have neither of those players. Which is ironic considering Munster had one of them for 4 years. I guess it’s only unfair when someone else is doing it. Also which team has been more successful in the last few years……that again would be Munster, or has that trophy already been forgotten as well. Remember success is measured in trophies not in “most amount of semi final appearances”.




  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,576 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Munster don't have two Irish international centres in their side, Leinster do (three, with Frawley, and Osbourne will probably make it four at some point). If there's a question of fairness, it's about adding a luxury, world-class player on top of that pile when it's absolutely not needed whereas there is a desperate need for players like a LH prop or hooker in Munster, a FH in Ulster or gestures vaguely in Connacht.

    It's a **** and giggles contract that wasn't apparently an option for anyone else.

    That's ignoring teams spunking their NIQ-wads on crocks, homebodies and the most unusually-shaped wide-man in world rugby.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,571 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Leinster have the best, and most expensive squad in Irish rugby, which allows them to go further in competitions, and therefore bring in more money.

    Which, again, basically just boils down to shifting Leinster players around the other provinces. Because they didn't assemble the most expensive squad out of nowhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,903 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    That's ignoring teams spunking their NIQ-wads on crocks, homebodies and the most unusually-shaped wide-man in world rugby.

    Thats a cracking line! Love it!

    What is (and Who) is the homebodie? And the most unusually shaped wide-man is Kok I presume?

    edit: I think he'll be primarily playing fullback



  • Registered Users Posts: 589 ✭✭✭baas baa


    So one of the best players in the world wants to spend a 6 month sabbatical at Leinster for personal and professional reasons and Leinster or the IRFU are supposed to say no, is that what people are arguing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,674 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    You forgot to add that assumedly Leinster will be freeing up some or all of the cash for said 6 month sabbatical from Charlie Ngatai and Michael Ala'alatoa moving on (absent of anyone else coming in).



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,576 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Leinster didn't even want him, he just kind of said he was coming, couldn't find an AirBnB and Cullen was just brought up to be a gracious host.



Advertisement