Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

American roads

  • 14-04-2024 08:01AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,325 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Are we seriously suggesting we can not discuss USA roads on this forum? Tell me why we can not discuss roads in America on Boards?

    Really? A roads forum.

    Really?

    I'll try again

    This is magnificent.



«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,590 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    I don’t understand why this thread is being closed constantly. There is no issue in discussing American roads in my mind.

    The issue is some posters coming in this thread just arguing they are not needed when the thread was clearly labelled as an appreciation thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,590 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Sea to Sky Highway in British Columbia. Absolutely stunning drive.

    (Liberal with my definition of “American”)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,325 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Thank you 🤗



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,590 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,964 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    The scenery is incredible and allways has been but the roads are very expensive monotonous concrete death trap eye sores, which are gradually destroying the scenery. But if concrete is your thing I guess they are fascinating. 😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,068 ✭✭✭Dr Turk Turkelton




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,068 ✭✭✭Dr Turk Turkelton


    You'd have a long tough walk over mountains, through canyons, deserts, rivers and swamps to get a look at the scenic sights without those roads though.

    And that's without taking the weather into account.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,068 ✭✭✭Dr Turk Turkelton


    ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    This "death trap eyesore" provides a safe crossing of the Rockies that's open all year round and can accommodate large vehicles. It is a necessity, and has most likely repaid its CO2 build emissions by now simply by providing a more direct link between places that people already needed to go. If it wasn't there, people would fly and freight would take a longer more demanding route.

    And this isn't some bloated mega-highway: Like most of the Interstate network, the road in this video is 2 lanes each way for most of its length, with a cross section that is no wider than our own inter-urban motorways.

    US transport planning has failed in some areas, especially in relying on private car transport around cities, but the Interstate Highway system itself is a major success story.

    I had a disagreement with @Kermit.de.frog on the old thread about whether the massive freeways surrounding Dallas were a triumph or a sign of failed transport planning, but when it comes to builds like this, we're entirely in agreement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,325 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    One thing about crossing the Rockies on I70 is how you go from flat green plains to mountains to desert so quickly.

    This is another one from Flagstaff to Pheonix which shows what the gradual loss of elevation does. I think it's fantastic. You don't see such contrast anywhere else. The elevation drops by over a mile here and you're in to desert.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7 KylaDecker


    We can easily discuss roads in the USA on this forum. I see no reason why we can't discuss road systems and infrastructure in America here. This is a completely natural and interesting topic for discussion on a forum dedicated to roads.



  • Posts: 344 ✭✭ Sky Short Servitude


    that’s fair enough, hopefully this time the op can stick to your reasonable expectations and not start posting lies again in a troll fashion. Thats what happened the last time and it was the constant corrections of the OPs lies that caused it to be locked (eg dumb things like posting pictures of roads and claiming it to be in Europe when it was an Asian road or posting empty us roads at night claiming zero congestion because in reality during the day it’s a car park).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,325 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Could be Cork, Limerick or Waterford if we get our act together



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,966 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Stop talking through your rear end. It could not be anywhere in Ireland

    San Antonio has a metro population of 2.6m people.

    Cork City's population is 224k.

    Limerick City's (metro) population 102k

    Waterford City's (metro) population 83k.

    The total population of Munster is 1.37m.

    We don't need to get any act together as we have zero need for any roads like this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,023 ✭✭✭cantalach


    Even ignoring the population discrepancy to which the previous commenter has referred, why on Earth would we want our Munster cities to look like that? It’s soulless dystopian sprawl. The closest we have to that in Ireland is the Blanchardstown, Lucan, Clondakin, Tallaght continuum. That’s not a development pattern why should be proud of, and definitely one we need to recreate elsewhere in the country.



  • Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What a dump.

    Are you saying our road deaths are not high enough and we should build an environment that encourages 10 times more road deaths/100,000 inhabitants?

    It's a bold move. Have you ran your proposal by someone who has lost loved ones on our roads for their thoughts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,590 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    What on earth are you on about? Who mentioned anything about road deaths?


    I suggest to those who have issue with Kermit’s posts to simply avoid this thread. It’s not that difficult to do.



  • Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Road deaths happens on roads.

    There are more road deaths in American roads than on Irish roads.

    Kermit seems to want American style roads introduced to Ireland.

    This is not complex logic, I don't know why it needs to be explained in simple terms to you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Also, the design standards for highways in Texas are very high in terms of safety.

    The appalling road deaths figures in the state are down to driver behaviour, particularly a high tolerance of drinking and driving added to the reluctance of a significant minority of drivers to wear safety belts... there's no road-engineering that can make those problems go away.

    I was making a point on another thread about how bad design can increase the chance of accidents, but there's no amount of good design that can compensate for dangerous driving habits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,590 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Why are you automatically blaming the roads and not the drivers.

    What features of American roads make them more dangerous. I doubt it’s the consistently better road surface or much better and consistent sight lines.

    Anyways, you are the one bringing roads deaths into the conversation where it has nothing at all to do with this thread. This is an American road appreciation thread yet you are trying to derail and hijack it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,590 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus




  • Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You seem confused on how forums work. People are allowed to give opinions for and against. It is an echo chamber you are looking for it seems, not a forum.

    I don't care what makes American roads more dangerous, but it is not insignificant when their rate is 10 times ours. Anyone with the slightest bit of interest and knowledge in road systems should know the horrific carnage on their roads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,068 ✭✭✭Dr Turk Turkelton


    Seems like you are confused about how forums work.

    This thread is for the appreciation of road in the USA.

    Use the magic of how the forum works to start your own thread and see if anyone wants to get into the crap your peddling and leave this thread for what it's intended for



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,590 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Well, you are talking rubbish so. If you claim that the design of American roads is the reason for American’s higher road death rate per capita compared to Ireland, you’ve got to support it. That’s how discourse works.

    I see no evidence on how American road design is fundamentally more dangerous than Irish designs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The US road fatality rate is not "ten times higher". US deaths in road traffic accidents were 43000 in 2022. Ireland's in 2023 were 184. Ireland's per capita rate applied to the current US population of 330 million would work out at 12,000 per year, so the US rate is 3.5 times the Irish, not ten. I found those numbers with just two Internet searches... I'd hope that anyone who was serious about discussing the issue would do the same basic factchecking before making sensational claims..

    But: that figure is a basic per capita count, and it makes Ireland look good for two reasons. First, we have fewer private vehicle users per capita than the US, and second, Irish drivers travel far fewer kilometres per year than their counterparts in the States. Basically, your chances of dying in a car accident dramatically improve if you spend less time in a car, but Americans are the highest users of private cars in the world. (Taking that logical error to its extreme, I could say that not only are amazingly safer drivers, we also kick their ass on bear safety...)

    Account for those factors, and the US is still higher, but nothing like "multiples". To account for that there's the social aspects I mentioned before, but road design is not a factor in their higher fatality rate, except to reduce it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,325 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    ...

    Post edited by Kermit.de.frog on


  • Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That's precisely my point, thanks for backing up my argument! The ridiculous nature of American roads causes induced demand. More capacity, therefore more cars and trips are made to fill that capacity. Their road design leads to more sprawl which leads to more trips and for greater distances and make having a car a necessity for living.

    This really is simple, simple stuff and generally accepted as a massive failure in planning in US where they are now trying (half-assed) to build train routes and cycleways. There are multiple YouTube channels dedicated to the subject. I can't believe I have to spell this out in a Roads forum.

    From Wikipedia the rate there is 6 times greater. From memory, I thought it was around 10x times higher.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    No, you're still wrong.

    "Induced demand" isn't the reason why Americans drive further. Look at a map. Preferably one with a scale.



  • Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well done you, you can read map. I can also see the massive sprawl in America on a map, as a result building roads everywhere.

    Just because a country is large doesn’t mean you have to pave so much of it.

    Anyone encouraging such road building ought to be ashamed of themselves given the damage to society it has caused in the US.

    I like the way you totally ignore the impact of induced demand in commuting patterns despite it's affect being universally known by any civil or transport engineer.

    The ignorance is breathtaking. At least the Americans had the excuse in the 50s the impact of OTT road development was unknown.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Your original claim was that American road designs are dangerous, and now you're aiming your ire at car dependency, so I will assume that you've conceded the design safety point, and are now moving onto fresh ground in your apparent grievance against the United States.

    As it happens, there is only a weak link between car commuting and traffic fatalities. Commuter corridors at peak periods have the lowest fatality rates; most road deaths occur at night on local routes. That's true of both the USA and Ireland.

    On car dependency being a terrible thing, I agree with you. But it's also something that is extraordinarily hard to reverse once it has shaped your built environment. The "Western" USA developed most of its transport infrastructure in the second half of the 20th century, and that made it especially vulnerable to car-centric planning.

    But even in Texas, where the state DoT is legally forced to prioritise roads by the (almost permanently Republican) state government, the trend is away from more roads. Urban densification, trip avoidance programmes, increased occupancy rate promotion and even passenger rail expansion are all being pursued in the large cities.

    None of that's on topic here, though. This thread was killed before by people using it as a soapbox (and I hold my hands up to that too... Sorry, Kermit). Let's not repeat that. I'm happy to discuss with you or anyone else how a car-dependent society can try to wean itself off cars, but on a new thread, and in good faith please. But if you just want to gripe about "America is bad", take it elsewhere.

    (For the record, I "love" the US so much that on two separate occasions I have turned down very lucrative opportunities to live and work there…)



Advertisement