Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1352635273529353135323690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,724 ✭✭✭flutered




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,123 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Never, the West has shown its colours.


    Putin is right.


    The west has gone soft and weak…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    Above I asked:

    When is the west going to wake up? When is the current President and party in power in the USA going to so something about this also? At the moment, even though they are not in power .. from the sidelines Trump and GOP are running the show effectively.

    Where are things like executive orders? Was the house of reps / congress bypassed in recent times to get weapons etc to Israel? When is Biden going to take back control?

    In bold above .. the answer is below. So why different where Ukraine is concerned vs Israel?? From Dec 2023




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,724 ✭✭✭flutered


    canada has offered $25 million to the chezes in their effort to buy all the munitions they say is rolling about



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    The difference is for Israel they are purchasing the weapons from the US. For Ukraine they are getting them free.

    If Ukraine was buying weapons from the US, Biden could do the same for them (bypass Congress approval)

    I could be mistaken but I believe any fiscal decisions Biden makes needs congressional approval for the funds. Hense the drama with aid to Ukraine, he can't just bypass Congress.

    Someone posted an article earlier today about Biden having within his power to dispose of excess arms or obsolete weapons to countries for free. Like the US giving Blackhawks to another country and that country giving Ukraine their old Soviet era ones. Stands to reason the same can be done directly to Ukraine for the obselete cluster shells etc... just doesn't seem to be any urgency about it. Easier to point the finger at the GOP for political points scoring.

    Same for the EU funding for Ukraine, specifically wrt artillery shells. Here's billions to buy/manufacture them but then France vetos the option of buying outside the EU.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Locked out in a cold yard without proper clothing would be as effective as a high window.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Makes sense that, getting them that way. I just wasn't sure they have a few left and were waiting on more to be supplied. But if there constantly getting them that's a good thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,750 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Especially considering how thin he looked in recent photos.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Definitely. These would of slowed the Russians down considerably and I think adviika would not of fallen if they used the Cluster Munitions around there to stop the Russians.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Not sure on this person if it's pro Russian or not, I presume it is as more showing Russian side but did mention some Ukraine success with HIMRAS strike on Russian soldiers. Definitely talking crap about patriot systems being destroyed but the rest of the video I did find interesting. It's more interesting as it shows where the extreme points of contacts are happening at moment and geo locates them so gives a good eye on where the heavy fighting is happening and shows where it looks like Russia are trying to capture.

    Screenshot_20240223_021231_com.google.android.youtube.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭pcardin


    Ah common! I think 15 rubles is the minimum going rate these clowns get per each sh1tpost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,950 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    A ring purchasing programme with the US's might behind it would be very effective. Would also help lock in countries to various Western systems. Something similar was used in Greece. Also an attempt was made in Ecuador, from what I understand the Russians threatened to reduce their fruit purchases which unraveled the thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,123 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Still can’t believe Trump is acting as a Russian puppet and holding back vital military aid while Putin carries out his Hitler fantasies on the people of Ukraine.

    What a horrible prick he is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    Because @Jinglejangle69 .. Trump wants to join the "strong man leader" club in 2025 alongside Putin and Xi and Kim. I think thats what Trump wants as a legacy. Other than that he doesnt give a fck about the US, its people or for that matter the christian nationalists or the MAGA crowd. They are just his ticket to that club.

    The only person Trump cares about is himself, thats it. Its all about me ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    You can always tell the slant of these types of accounts by simply looking at the comments under any of their videos. i just picked one of his at random and these are the top comments:


    image.png


    Many people seek out news filtered through the prism of their preferred political outlook. In the case of these kinds of accounts it's often Westerners with a horn for Putin's Russia for reason's similar to Tucker Carlson



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 840 ✭✭✭I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct


    YouTube needs to get their arse in gear and deal with this plague of coordinated bots. I don't expect anything from twitter or tiktok though.



  • This content has been removed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    @linkoping That is the prime reason I am hearing from all the media and journo's I listen to on this matter. I would say Putin and Co would just love to do a Bin Laden on the body way up in the arctic sea

    They dont want any opportunity for a public display of outcry as this could spark a 1917 type revolt against Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Definitely agree when I checked at the comments. More just he goes in depth where the heavy points of contacts are and where Russia are trying to attack and does a birds eye view on map where it is and what the terrain etc is like so I do find it interesting to see that as just gives a bit clearer picture then just YouTube videos of body cam fighting footage. Does mention Ukrainian success tho but definitely leaning more towards other side for sure and yeah the comments are definitely more pro Russian.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,123 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Lot of bleak reporting from the frontline.

    Russia has the wind in their sails and are pushing, Ukrainian soldiers saying they can see the Russians approaching but have no shells to fire and hold them back so they are in retreat mode.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,065 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Biden hasn't done it the last 2 years when their use would have been multiples more effective. Why would he change now?


    I hope they will but know that they won't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,722 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Sounds like the Finns on the Mannerheim line. Plenty of targets but lack of shells.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,065 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Pity Biden didn't win last time and he was the President instead.


    Pity that European States can't be bothered to pay to defend themselves or be in a position to provide Ukraine what it needs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,750 ✭✭✭✭josip




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,327 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    They were already sending the US cluster shells (so Biden did decide to 'do it', and I assume they were effective at blowing up Russians in Ukraine and their equipment).

    Issue is they can't authorise more (without some kind of creative use of loopholes by Biden, as per article) because the US political system is broken.

    One of their 2 parties has rotted (maybe beyond saving) + now has too many autocratic (and vaguely pro Putin/pro Russia) elected politicians in it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,065 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Russian forces are poorly led but learning and copping on, often poorly resourced.


    Ukraine are starved for support it needs by Western allies who talk a great game but do not want the reality of the situation, to affect them.


    Europe should have acted as if it is in a war time period, cause it is.


    There is a ring of lunatics and instability around Europe, not just Russia,Hamas. Iran, Turkey? Yemen and on and on.


    The response from Europe to kyiv is we'll give you a months worth of shells in 2 years time.


    Prediction or stating the obvious.

    Russia will likely hold what it has indefinitely, maybe even take more and the world will be a much more unstable and violent place in the next 20 years than in decades and that is down to miscalculation by the West.


    Europe currently doesn't have the will to defend itself or its interests and the US is now more focused on Asia and will be for the rest of this century.



  • This content has been removed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,982 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Interesting

    "In an ironic twist, Russia’s wartime box office is being dominated by a blockbuster adaptation of Mikhail Bulgakov’s Master and Margarita, a film that denounces censorship and was filmed by an American director who is “vocally anti-war”.

    One leading film critic, Anton Dolin, told the Guardian it was the “best commercial film ever shot in [Vladimir] Putin’s Russia”. A movie’s runaway success can work against it in Russia now: the film has had to run the gauntlet of pro-Kremlin propagandists and censors, and in true Hollywood fashion it has triumphed against the odds.


    Michael Lockshin, the director, said it was “a miracle” the film came out, on a call from Los Angeles where he lives. “It was a very hard journey getting there since the war started,” he said."

    "For weeks after its release, Lockshin had mostly avoided the press. The reason was simple: an army of online trolls and pro-Kremlin pundits wanted him arrested and did not like his anti-war views, or the film’s excoriation of totalitarianism, or that some of its estimated $17m (£13m) budget – one of Russia’s largest film budgets ever – came from the state-backed Russian Cinema Fund.

    “We know that when someone makes a film now, he is writing or making a film about now,” said Dolin. “And here it’s quite obvious. Because this is a moment in Russia where censorship is rife, and the film is dedicated against censorship and doesn’t obey that censorship is inspiring to audiences.”

    Pro-Kremlin Telegram channels have demanded Lockshin be investigated for discrediting the Russian army and called him a terrorist. He has been attacked by Margarita Simonyan, the head of the state-controlled broadcaster RT, and Vladimir Solovyov, one of the most popular pro-Kremlin talkshow hosts. Russian tabloids have published details of where he lives (luckily often wrong) and he has received death threats."





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,065 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The President can send them if he wants. Congress can object or complain about other domestic issues but the President has the executive power to override that in situations like this.


    At anytime in the last 2 years he could have sent so much that Ukraine would have years In reserves.

    Excess Defense act is already in place allowing the President to sell cheaply or give for free excess arms or arms about to be past date. He can't give new or near new but what he can give with just a signature is so large.


    Congress legally can't say a thing, if the White House and Joe wanted to. Even if Congress was completely opposed to it. On this, he just has to sign the order, this has been the way it has been done for countless years.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement