Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish rail fleet and infrastructure plans

Options
12526283031

Comments

  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,834 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Airport - Irish Rails hopes and dreams. It is not a DoT project, it is not funded.

    Ryder Cup - the line will be back in place for freight by then, the ability to do something temporary will be down to funding and also CRR approval. It might happen, more chance than the airport spur.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,571 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    "A lot of people" are going to be very disappointed when that line opens and it's only for freight. I know people from West Limerick who only follow the story from a vague "line being built" point of view and don't understand that it doesn't automatically mean passengers.

    It will be interesting to see what kind of political drive both real and bonkers gets behind passenger services.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,990 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    "Envisage freight only north of Claremorris"

    what does this mean given "No funding for WRC rehabilitation"

    ballina branch seems to have healthy numbers so is hardly going to go freight only.

    as for the hourly enterprise, i am still not seeing how this is going to happen given the issues with the DD stock, and the fact that it will mean capacity losses elsewhere on the IE network, which, even with the 41 cars, still has capacity issues due to the suburban network being backfilled due to it's own capacity issues.

    NIR might be able to spare a couple of units but can they do that on a daily basis long term?

    they should really wait for the new trains and then launch the whole lot, new stock, new service frequency, big bang.

    but no there will be capacity cuts again and it will be launched this year of course.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Wait, are you saying the Dart+ fleet allow for retrofit of toilets? I can't feasible see that happening.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,558 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    No I imagine that they’re saying that later orders could be with toilets for use on longer services - remember this is a multiple order programme of fleet replacement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,558 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    An airport spur would only become an option if the ongoing EU funded four tracking feasibility assessment study reports in favour of implementing four track expansion along the Northern Line.

    That would change the landscape.

    But again we shall have to wait and see what the study reports in due course.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    I've said it before, you won't get four tracks in without insane expense. Stick three tracks in and it'll be a lot easier, and cheaper.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,558 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well let us wait and see what the engineering feasibility study says.

    I'd rather wait for a full professional assessment of this before making any pronouncement.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 4,967 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Good to hear the DartSW RO is imminent. It was submitted last March.

    The report says DART+West RO is also imminent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,431 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    When they say re-,connecting cork port - do they mean reconnecting to the north docks - which is scheduled to close and re-,developed or re-connecting to marino point - which is planned to be a bulk terminal ,

    Theres no way of connecting the new container port at monkstown

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,142 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Marino Point



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,431 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    So fertilizer and feed only then , is there much demand for bulk to be moved by rail ?

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,312 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    I have to agree with CitizenSix - it will take a mint of money to get the fourth track, plus the construction disruption. A third is doable without too much land take , but for four through each station you need a second overbridge minimum (track either side of existing platforms), or you move a platform to create an express track or tracks in which case you’re reconstructing the overbridge that’s there. But if there is a big shove on to get the airport train maybe there is a mint to be had, we’ll see

    interesting that he thinks Adare worth discussing when some thought it was impossible - still leaves himself an out for CRR to say no but it feels like he’s sticking his neck out.

    presumably the mid west container customer is in Raheen - who are the big players there these days? I thought Dell’s production was gone to Poland? and send it where - Dublin Port or Belview?

    As for freight north of Claremorris, I read that they are not seeking out freight business elsewhere in the country at present - that’s where it’s all coming from now anyway. There may be a distinction where the “mid west” customer came to them, and if it’s someone in Raheen then there is some synergy in that Limerick is where wagon repair happens at the moment anyway, so wagon swaps could be done at the other end to get wagons due for service over to Limerick.

    I do wonder who’s going to be sending what from Mayo through Foynes, and how well it’s going to work with running around freights in (presumably) both Athlone West and Limerick Yard if an increase in Dublin-Galway service is also anticipated.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,672 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Wouldn't suprise me if the hourly Galway comes at the expense of Westport. Keep a direct daily return like the Tralee branch. Probably adding 3-4 extra services rather than 6-7. Hard to see them keeping both and filling such capacity. It didn't work on Cork so why would Galway be different.

    Look how well received the extra connecting evening service was received by political reps recently. Question is will they be as happy if this change happened.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,312 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    @Jamie2k9 given the capacity constraints Athlone-Portarlington and Athlone-Mullingar handed over to the bike crowd, where do you see the Mayo shuttle terminating? Seems hard to believe the Shannon bridge and Athlone Station as currently configured isn’t a serious pinch point - more constrained than Mallow, but reinstating Athlone West may not be welcomed even if it is rebuilt as a substantial facility with a decent waiting area.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,497 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    But if there is a big shove on to get the airport train maybe there is a mint to be had, we’ll see

    If quad tracking justifies itself on its own then fair enough, but I don’t think getting to the airport should be the driving justification for quad tracking.

    I don’t see where the demand will come from once Metrolink is built. It would be much faster getting to the airport from the city than DART would be.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,312 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    Metrolink might be faster but from the same catchment? Assuming it’s operated as a DART branch and not some notions branded link, then you’re coming from Howth or down from Malahide/Balbriggan you could just transfer at Howth Junction. It would also provide some relief to Metrolink in the event of maintenance or incident.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,497 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Well you could extend Metrolink north of Swords to Rush and Lusk, to allow integration with the Northern line there. Passengers could change from intercity and DART for the airport there.

    Much cheaper to just reuse the Metrolink station at the airport like this, then needing to build a second underground station at the airport for DART.

    Also has the benefit of opening up a massive amount of land north of Swords for development. Something that isn’t possible via a Clongriffin connection due to that route being under the airport flight path.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,672 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Athlone which has 3 platforms. I don't think they will go back to splitting trains like they did before when they axed 08:05 Heuston/Westport. Never an issue goning west but could cause problemes going east when joining them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,774 ✭✭✭SeanW


    I don't know if Mayo shuttles from Athlone would work, because of the further split between Westport and Ballina services at Manulla Junction. While a one-change for Westport is something one might get away with, having a situation where someone travelling between Dublin and Ballina has to change twice (once at Athlone and again at Manulla) would put that branch into "F it, I'll just take the bus" territory. And considering that the Heuston area likely isn't people's final destination anyway in a lot of cases, realistically it would be at least 3 changes.

    Realistically I think they'd have to start running trains directly from both Ballina and Westport to Athlone.

    I also agree with the plan to build a spur from the DART line to Dublin airport. Even with just the coastal DART, it makes a one-seat ride from much of Dublin to the airport and if Dart Underground were ever built, it would make the airport accessible by one seat ride by train from points as far away as Heuston and the Hazelhatch line.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,497 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I also agree with the plan to build a spur from the DART line to Dublin airport. Even with just the coastal DART, it makes a one-seat ride from much of Dublin to the airport and if Dart Underground were ever built, it would make the airport accessible by one seat ride by train from points as far away as Heuston and the Hazelhatch line.

    But that doesn’t seem to be what Irish Rail are suggesting. The “cheap” and “easy” connection that IR are suggesting would be a shuttle from Howth to the Airport, which would thus necessitate a transfer at Clongriffin.

    You would be faster getting to the airport by transferring to Metrolink at Tara, then staying on to Clongriffin and then transferring to the Airport DART shuttle.

    Or again coming from the West, transferring to Metrolink at Glasnevin. Even once DU built, you’d still probably be faster to transfer to Metrolink then going all the way over to the Docklands area and then up to Clongriffin to transfer to the Airport shuttle.

    The only way to do what you suggest is to quad track the Northern line, which obviously would be a major project and very expensive. Fair enough if they decide to do quad tracking anyway, but with Metrolink in place, there isn’t much advantage to going to the airport.

    Now that I think of it, how would you even route the services? How would you split trains coming from the south going to the airport versus Howth versus north of Clongriffin? Every third train goes to the airport? Would you wait thirty minutes for a train going to the airport, versus just getting the next DART to Tara St and then transferring on a Metrolink that comes every 90 seconds!



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,672 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Perhaps not however this part of the line is a small % of passenger’s. I don’t think the bus would win out over 2 changes unless there was a private express service.

    Many Ennis services require 2 changes and its likely more people travel to Heuston from there compared to Foxford/Ballina on an average day.

    The 2 changes is also in place for some services to Ballina.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    My thought on how you get the airport spur into the two tracks.

    You will have Dart North which will be combining both the current Malahide DART service plus the Northern Commuter services. These run every 15 minutes out to Drogheda all stations.

    Then a DART out to the Airport every 15 minutes. At Howth Junction connection into and out of the Airport DART.

    This gives a 7.5 minute headway to Clongriffin, 15 minutes to Howth, Malahide and Drogheda.

    Belfast services hourly, following out the Airport DART, stop at Clongriffin, which then overtake at Skerries / or Donabate, new long loops as required where land allows for overtaking to take place both ways.

    Peak extensions to Dundalk.

    Ideally, 3 or 4 tracks to Clongriffin would be ideal but a huge cost if even possible.

    Having both a DART to the airport would allow for the whole southside of Dublin along the DART through to the North East of the city to be directly connected with the airport, with parts of the city (especially Clontarf to Donaghmede) that don’t have an airport connection.

    Then Irish Rail can have a win for city centre journeys to the airport, connecting also with Belfast and Sligo directly.

    The loop line is the constraint as always but something will have to be worked out there.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,497 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I don’t believe what you are suggesting here is possible with just the current two tracks, it would require quad tracking.

    The service pattern you are suggesting is a DART every 5 minutes, they currently struggle with one every ten minutes! It would be 12 darts PHPD.

    The DART+ North projects goal is for just a maximum of 9 DARTs PHPD on the Connolly to Clongriffin section (plus 2 Commuter and 1 Enterprise). So your service pattern I don’t think is possible with two tracks.

    Also I’d suggest that a DART to Drogheda every 15 minutes would be too little, DART+ North is aiming for a 12 minute frequency and frankly in the long term I’d suggest we will probably end up needing 10 minute frequency given how popular this is likely to be.

    That is kind of the problem with this whole idea, you are taking service away from the greater need, just to save people from needing to change (but likely an overall longer journey time) to get to the airport!

    And even then, are people really going to wait for up to 15 minutes for a direct to airport DART, instead of just jumping on the next dart and transferring to a 90 second Metrolink at Tara for a likely overall faster journey time!

    Honestly I just don’t see it, it is marginal improvement if that. I certainly wouldn’t say never, perhaps Metrolink is such a success, that it is overcapacity and this might help take some pressure off, but it would certainly require quad tracking.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,018 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    I feel very much like "I'll believe it when I see it" about Metrolink.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,497 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    well you could say that about any of these infrastructure projects, including DART+

    At least Metrolink is a funded project, with a project team, has been designed and its railway order is currently making its way through ABP. BTW ABP oral hearings begin next week, which is another big step.

    Of course no guarantee, but then this idea of a Clongriffin to Airport link is much less likely. The idea isn’t supported by government, a report was done into it and it was rejected, it isn’t part of the NDP up to 2042.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,558 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Expanding the tracks along the Northern Line is currently the subject of an EU funded feasibility study.

    I think you can be pretty sure that EU funds would be a major part of any resulting capital investment project and that it would be pushed as part of the peace dividend on the island of Ireland as the Enterprise would be the main beneficiary along with outer suburban trains.

    But we will have to wait and see what results from the feasibility study.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,497 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Yes, I’m really looking forward to see the results of this report. Hopefully it will give us a better view of what is possible, different options, costs, etc.

    Im not sure it would mean that the EU would fund it though, actual construction I mean, what with Brexit, etc. but perhaps they would make an exception in this case as you say, peace dividends and all that. Certainly if the EU were funding it, then I’d most likely drop any concerns I have about it, quad or triple tracking that is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,558 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I suspect that would be the card that the NI Executive and Irish government would be playing but we shall see.

    I wouldn’t be concerned too much about Brexit - given the special circumstances that NI finds itself in, I’m sure that arms could be twisted!



Advertisement