Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Room to Improve (v2)

194959799100127

Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,578 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    Also on the costs.. I was stunned.. but from the plans it looks like a demolition of 46 sq metres, complete retrofit of 76 sq metres (including a new roof), plus 114 sq metres of new build for a combined total 190 sq metres..

    So 600k is explainable.. everyone can have their own opinion on whether you'd invest that in that project in that location.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,719 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    If you're talking about medical judgements, that's an entirely different story. She didn't get where she is today in a male dominated sector by faffing around with red herrings when she needs someone to do something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 338 ✭✭GolfPar


    Final granting of planning was only at the start of August last year. Tight schedule to get it all turned around so quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,669 ✭✭✭touts


    Not very. We had a scene where the house was gutted, lots of decisions were not being made and the builder was complaining that he had an impossible amount of work to do in 7 weeks. A minute later Dermot was walking up the street to the finished house. Something happened that meant they decided to cut possibly the most interesting part of the build.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Thanks for that, but I would lve to know how come he got away with building something different to what is on that Bannon drawing above in your post?

    For example, The window of the extension in the drawing above - the only perforation in that wall, which is the front wall of the house and facing the road / closest to the road - is square and the exact same size and proportions as the other three upstairs windows.

    Was was built is a tall narrow window, at least 3 times tall as it is wide, totally out of keeping with the rest of the streetscape.

    Also, from the drawing, you would think there is a pitched roof on the front extension, to match all the other houses in the area. Instead all that is visible from the road is a box, like two shipping containers, one on top of the other, painted up. From the photos and from the tv programme, no pitched roof is visible on that front extension, it just looks like a flat roofed box joined on to the house like a carbuncle. Even from the most sympathetic angle the tv company could photo it from ( sideways on, and from behind a few branches ), it still looks pathetic and hideous. No wonder everyone hates it. Let us hope it does not set a precedent for other FRONT extensions in housing estates.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,595 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Actually, I didn't see this view on the programme.

    I quite like that and can see the planners argument now.

    hous.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭gipi


    That's the kind of view I remember - no sloping roof visible there, it just looks like a large box tacked onto the side of the house.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,595 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Do you have a link /photo ? Because all anyone else can see is a box.

    From the front elevation it looks worse than in the photo above, because you do not see the brick on the side of the extension then, or even the front door.

    And should not the window have matched the planning drawings, instead of being completely different shape?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,595 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It's not a court of law Francis. 😁


    The porch comes out from the main wall at 90 degrees,(blue line) but the roofline doesn't seem to, (red line) indicating a slope.

    Secondly, if you drop a line from the front point of the wall (green) and the back(yellow)

    they are different lengths, indicating a slope.

    As I say, there may be distortion but that is how it looks to me. If the line was straight it would be parallel to the porch line.

    hous.png

    Re: Window, as stated by industry pro's here, changes like that can be made and retentions sought. Works much better for me as a rectangle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The relationship was broken, apparently...

    ...

    Then we see how pleased the couple are with Dermot and their new house.

    Not everything is a Soap Opera



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    That in fairness, is ugly.

    If they got planning for that, I would be amazed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,595 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    They did.

    Planning comments are posted above and from that angle I agree with them.

    I think when planting and newness wears off that is not as bad as it first looked and I have to say the laths are growing on me bigtime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I would bet the green and the yellow are equal distance, because that is how perspective works.

    https://www.johnlovett.com/perspective-drawing


    In any case, it is different to the drawing submitted for planning permission, which someone else posted yesterday evening.

    So Dermot Bannon did not comply with planning permission for the front extension? I suppose he can apply for retention planning permission, says you.


    The TV company was quite clever to wait until frost /snow to photo it, so it blends in to the ground and wall in the foreground more. And do not forget, from the front, you do not see the red-brick on the side of the extension, or the front door. See the initial bit of video on Room to Improve showing the outside. Vile as other poster on this thread called it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 305 ✭✭hole in my lovelywall



    I loved the idea of the bike shed/storage at the front with the hidden door.

    Very impressed with the builder.

    Post edited by hole in my lovelywall on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,595 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The TV company was quite clever to wait until snow to photo it, so it blends in to the ground and wall in the foreground more.

    Jaysus Francis, that is just bizarre.

    What a fabulous conspiracy theorist you are, 😁😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,318 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    Almost as bizarre as thinking the front wall of the extension is sloping.

    The pitched roof of the extension is stepped back and a parapet gutter hides the roof from the ground.

    Here you are;



    Edit;

    Just looked again, it seems you think it's the roof that's sloping, still bizarre!

    Post edited by chooseusername on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Not a conspiracy theorist. Just noting that you are looking at a photo taken by the TV company in the best possible conditions (snow/frost) from the best possible angle. So you think the front extension is OK.

    About a dozen other posters on this thread before you, who saw the footage on the TV on Sunday night, took time out to saty that front extension is "Vile", that if they were a neighbour they would be "bulling" at how it turned out etc.

    The photo shows the roof and window are a lot different to what Bannon submitted planning permission for, so do you think Bannon will have to apply for retention planning permission yet again? What if he is refused, like some people are?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Click on that link above, this is what the front extension should have looked like. Note the very different window shape and roof shape?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Brannon has a direct line to 'de powers that be', so it will not be an issue.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,578 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    20240130_131401.jpg


    There's a shot that hints at the roof detail. Not flat, but not identical to the original plans.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The plans show the 'Box' going up the gutter, not 5 rows of tiles higher. I'll say nothing about the window difference.

    Screenshot_2024-01-30-13-17-51-511_com.brave.browser-edit.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,595 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    And you implied they took it to fool people. Bizarre.

    I couldn't care less what 'other posters say' I make my own mind up and am not led by others.


    We have been told by industry professional that 'retention' is commonly used when changes are needed in an ongoing build. If Bannon did this then he did nothing wrong.

    What the hell does it matter to me or even you if he applies for retention or not? If somebody objects, let them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,318 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    I would say that's a bigger issue than the window, it makes the front of the house look completely different.

    It looks like the plan had a gutter in line with, and matching the original house, and it would have looked worse if the parapet was built on the side only to avoid the overhang at the boundary. I don't understand why that parapet has to be so high.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Agree. If you compare the photo / drawing in post number 2929 and 2930 above, you will see that what was built is considerably uglier and different to what planning permission was granted for. The white rectangle (above the wood) is much much larger / higher.

    The window is also considerably different. Why did he change that compared to what planning was granted for?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,228 ✭✭✭✭event


    Why do you care that what was built isnt the same as the planning permission? Will you go on this crusade on every single house in the country thats in the same boat?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,669 ✭✭✭touts


    They didn't show the last 7 weeks of the build. The body language initially as they toured the house seemed very bad. That's when I first posted. When they appeared more friendly I put an update on my post.

    A day later you come in and make a snarky comment as usual about the first half of my post completely ignoring my addition where I admitted it was better.

    I'm not engaging with you any more. Go look for your argument fix somewhere else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 315 ✭✭Feets


    Totally disagree to the comment on spending too much money, if you have the money and the house is in a perfect location then why not. You get the house u want. Everyone has different budgets and value systems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,051 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Two possible spinoff shows for the producers to consider:

    1. RTI - the detail

    2. RTI - Francie and Francis go at it



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,199 ✭✭✭micks_address


    Curious why they only ended up with a b3 ber rating.



Advertisement