Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The new recycling system

16162646667137

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,429 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    This includes the requirement for accessibility of RVMs. RVM Suppliers and RPOs must ensure the machines are accessible. Compliance by 9 other stakeholders will be outlined in other relevant documents, such as the material specification. While every effort has been made to provide comprehensive and accurate information on the requirements and specifications, RVM Suppliers must form their own conclusions about the solution needed to meet the specifications.

    Well that is comprehensive and reassuring.

    Either way not much good to you if can't actually get to them though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭BoardsBottler


    5 days after when feb 1st comes, in honor of certain members of the thread and due to the inspiration they gave, i'm tempted to get lend of a yellow van (can't find any 3 wheelers unfortunately) and dress up as del boy, load the back of the van up with cans and bottles to recycle in the RVM. And do collections like every couple of days. that can be my gimmick. i don't yet have a rodney but i do have someone who can be albert.

    if anything ever comes of this, i'll be sure to have someone record it and upload it to youtube. And post the link to it here.

    it will just be me and 2 others if possible (only 1 atm) coming out of a yellow van and unloading alot of recyclebles from out of the back of it to put into various RVMs. If all goes well, or people are into it. i'll then upload a second video talking about the RVM scheme, encourging others to recycle, and have a few funny random jokes inserted here and there.

    They just want the quick easy money cash grab recyclables and to up their recycling stats at your expense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,502 ✭✭✭bren2001


    I doubt many supermarkets will be selling bottles and cans eligible for the scheme at that stage. More likely to be selling off non-ReTurn logo containers before the deadline.

    I look forward to your update never the less!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,931 ✭✭✭JVince


    I said the cohort will use (abuse) "disabled and elderly" argument.

    People tend to do that when they know they don't have a valid argument and then hope that by using "disabled, elderly or children" in their argument, without anything to back it up, will get some gullible people to side with them.

    The refugee issue is a classic - "unvetted men" (they are vetted, DNA taken, photographed and fingerprinted) and then suggest they will all be child molesters. Funny thing is that the majority of child molesters are relatives of the child.


    But don't worry, there will be something else for this cohort to get into next year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,208 ✭✭✭Genghis


    You may be happy to hear that re-turn is not completely bad news for the consumers of Ireland. One good thing is the reduced price on old barcodes stock you may pick up between now and 1 June.

    Lidl are aiming to wash through all their old stock by 10 Feb, and are already discounting anything in a plastic bottle or can. Reductions of 25% to 40% on soft drinks and beer.

    I couldn't see anything yet in Dunnes, no doubt all retailers will have stock to sell. Shame we can't suspend MUP, it's killing the joy as intended.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭BoardsBottler


    True, the 5 days in between the 1st and the 6th is so that i can get a little few cans only but more primarily making use of non-logo cans i already have and experimenting with the RVM's to see what works and what does'nt. Not just that but i'll also be annoying a few people in cafe's too lol.

    Lets just say i plan to get more deposits than i've paid for XD.

    They just want the quick easy money cash grab recyclables and to up their recycling stats at your expense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,429 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Can beer be discounted?

    I though MUP did away with that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,429 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Huh? Strawmen tangents aside.

    We have people with disabilities comment on here that they will struggle with the scheme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,933 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Yes it can.

    MUP is based on the alcoholic content of the beer IE. 4.3, 5.0 etc that you see on the can.

    There is a minimum price set accordingly.

    However there is no maximum price so retailers will sell for as much as they can.

    In the case of craft breweries which don't have the same economies of scale as larger breweries their beers cost more to produce anyway.

    As Genghis says Lidl are currently discounting craft beers and there is value to be had.

    Only a shadow of pre MUP discounts but worth checking out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,769 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    It can be discounted down to MUP; and must be the same price per unit in and out of multipacks; if the same size product is available.

    Guinness have had different sizes in multipacks than out (520ml vs 500ml) to avoid the latter regulation but its sort of irrelevant with MUP.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,429 ✭✭✭✭Boggles




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,933 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Yes.

    Crafty Pale Ale in Lidl at MUP.

    Bottoms up 🙂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,208 ✭✭✭Genghis


    As far as I could see it was basically anything in a can, both craft beer and standard beers like Guinness and Smithwicks. There was one exception to that but it was a high ABV beer called lazy something, maybe it retailed at MUP and couldn't be discounted.

    Some items had sold out, so if you have something in mind maybe head down sooner.

    Decent shelf life too, May to September I found.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,933 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Yes basically that's it.

    You pay the deposit and then get it back when you put the bottle in the RVM machine.

    The big difference with your youth is you don't get a few coppers back but you get a voucher which you can change for cash or goods in the shop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,933 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Not really a win but you do get your money back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,933 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Oh right.

    I was in the UK before Christmas and milk bottles are making a small comeback.

    You leave out your empties, order online and it's on your doorstep in the morning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,208 ✭✭✭Genghis


    Would love to see bottled milk return. There has been some recent re-investment in milk deliveries (mymilkman.ie being developed and advertised, etc), albeit not so far as bringing back bottles, it is a delivery only model. It's also not nationwide but certainly covers the majority of homes.

    If there are an 1.8bn containers in scope for re-turn, I wonder how many tetrapak and plastic containers are sold here for milk and other dairy products p.a.?

    Re-use is many times better on all fronts than recycling, this also deals with dairy waste, something re-turn have opted themselves out of.

    It will be interesting to see how we tackle dairy packaging waste in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,933 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I have few of these bags.

    You just select your unwrapped veg and fruit from the shelf and you don't need plastic or paper.

    Never had a problem at checkouts either.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,933 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    It was stated earlier in the thread that dairy companies lobbied against the inclusion of their plastic containers.

    I also heard an interview on radio where odour was given as a reason for excluding them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,792 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    As opposed to the zero odour from Guinness cans? I'm not buying that argument. Farmers lobbying to not have to pay for the scheme, however, I think is believable



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    That's how the proponents style it. Do you have a bin collection that you pay for? Whatever colour your bins: rubbish, recycling and composting perhaps?

    This is the system we brought in to replace the old 'pop man'. You/ we/ the consumer pays for it and it works for responsible citizens.

    What we are now being ordered to do from on high, is create a new waste stream of these drinks cans & bottles, then drive somewhere where we can get a few cent back.

    Meanwhile you/ we'll still have to pay for our bins and it's likely costs of this will rise as the bin companies lose the more valuable recyclables.

    In other words there has been no attempt to integrate the old 'pop man' scheme and the current recycling system.

    Extra work and cost is being pushed onto you, so that 1) the state can count these cans/ bottles and prove numbers to EU bureaucrats and 2) others will be enriched at your expense - the quango Return and the manufacturers/ suppliers of RVM machines at €15K a pop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,502 ✭✭✭bren2001


    You omit the fact that we would likely be fined if we do not count the containers. That fine will effectively be passed on to consumers.

    I’m yet to see a coherent argument as to what benefit there is to ReTurn. There’s no shareholders. A CEO will be paid and employees will be paid. The better a job they do (and the public), the less money they bring in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,933 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Yes, and as anyone who ever had a barbecue knows wasps love drowning themselves in beer.

    Your explanation makes some sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,393 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    This is a sledgehammer to crack a nut. It would have been sufficient to have deposits on smaller bottles that people use when out and about. The bigger 2L bottles of water go into households and then to the recycling bin, as milk bottles typically do, and neither needs to be in this scheme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,502 ✭✭✭bren2001


    ctrl+f dairy - these are the reasons Scotland omitted dairy and I assume our rationale was a similar.

    Cant say I agree with any of them personally.

    https://www.gov.scot/publications/deposit-return-scheme-scotland-analysis-responses/pages/7/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,792 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I suspect that's why they put the upper limit at 3L. Also they're easier to recycle when separated from the general recycling bin



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,933 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Thanks, that's interesting.

    Given the legendary power of the farming lobby in Ireland I'd say they went in feet first against inclusion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,393 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    It doesn't take a sophisticated process to select out 1L and 2L plastic bottles at the recycling centre. One of these easiest things in the recycling stream to select, I would have thought.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Doesn't that tell you everything you need to know though. We could be fined if we don't count our bottles and cans going to recycling?

    Just who makes decisions in this state, that affect the citizens??



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,502 ✭✭✭bren2001


    I think forcing countries to have reliable stats in relation to single use containers is reasonable. I personally agree with it but understand how you and other might consider it overreach.

    I was just trying to add some further context to what you wrote. The government is effectively being forced to introduce this scheme. That’s all I was trying to say really.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement