Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sinn Fein and how do they form a government dilemma

17273757778391

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Maybe, no idea what they are waffling about inferiority complex. Rep of Ireland is a hugely successful country, we are standing on the shoulders of giant who worked to get the people of today into the position we are in. Maybe that is me been inferior, not sure to what. Certainly not the UK or England



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,976 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    No, you are not inferior or displaying any inferiority complex. We all should be proud of our country, of what we have achieved since independence.

    Those that wallow in the dreams of the 19th century, who labour under a misapprehension of 800 years of oppression, who salivate over census returns that show Catholics growing in numbers, they are the ones with the inferiority complex.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Those of us who have overcome our inferiority complex are happy with our Ireland, 

    'Our' Ireland?

    That sounds very like the bombast Irish people have to listen to up north.

    It's 'Our' wee country.


    If you are silencing people who wish to speak your own native language in their own country or supporting those who would silence, because others might be offended, then you have a problem with your own self worth.

    Colonisnised peoples the world over would be familiar with this self censorship and involuntary kow towing. It takes confident movements, like Conradh na Gaeilge, to rebuild pride in who we are.

    The majority of the Irish people are done apologising.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,976 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The more I read about this case, the more I think it could have an effect on Sinn Fein's ability to form a government.

    I haven't seen a judge come down as hard on a litigant, except maybe someone who was caught out in an insurance fraud.

    "The judge then went further, saying that Mr Kelly’s decision to sue Mr O’Doherty was “without doubt an abuse of process”.

    "The judge agreed with that, saying: “The field of political speech — and I use this term in the widest possible sense so as to include not only what politicians say, but also what others say about politicians, their policies and their actions — is a field which must be carefully handled lest the fabric of democracy be damaged. Defamation actions in this field need to be carefully considered in case they are being used to attack legitimate free speech… Of course every individual has the right to defend their good name but, as elected representatives, politicians have a duty to display a greater degree of restraint when it comes to taking to legal action against journalists.”

    The judge went on to say that the facts suggest that “rather than being a genuine attempt to defend a reputation which has been damaged by an untruth, the proceedings are what has been referred to as a SLAPP, namely an attempt to silence two bothersome journalists with the threat of legal costs. The proceedings appear to be a strategic effort to intimidate them, to deprive them of time and resources, and ultimately to silence them… The abuse of process in this case is so blatant that it would be utterly unjust if the court were to allow the proceedings to continue."

    This is a hammering for Sinn Fein, Gerry Kelly and their SLAPPs cases in the courts. Other parties are going to want clarity on these kind of issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 997 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    We really need to take a step back and think how it would look to the rest of the world if SF were elected into power, they have so many skeletons in their closet that international media will love when they come out and will damage Ireland's reputation long term, especially with the UK.

    So many of SF's younger supporters really don't know what they have supported and been tied to in the past.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Does a young FF or FG voter 'support' what happened in the past here?

    Should a young Tory voter in the UK be held responsible for what Thatcher did?

    The party will soon be totally run by people who were children or not even born during the conflict/war unless these white bearded men in the hills of Antrim have discovered the secrets of eternal youth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Especially when you consider that SF wanted to roll out Gerry Adams to be part of the negotiations with other parties if they decided they wanted to talk post the 2020 election

    You can imagine the UK licking the lips and sharing this saying a person with his history is not front and centre of the government formation in Rep of Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The same Gerry Adams the UK negotiated with while pretending they never would up on the higher moral ground they were allowed to inhabit?

    Why would anyone in this country be embarrassed by the attitude/opinion of the UK?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,976 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The issue here is that people like Gerry Kelly still hold very prominent positions within the party. Why Sinn Fein haven't asked him to resign from the policing board following the court's depiction of him is illustrative of the power that he holds.

    There is a big question over Sinn Fein's suitability for government, this will be the problem that FF will have after the general election. The constant SLAPPs litigation is only one facet of their subversion of democracy. The governance of the party by the Army Council cabal in Belfast is another.

    There will be idiots who dismiss the significance of the effect on the UK (and we can ignore them), but it isn't so much what the UK public think, but what the UK government can and will do with the information. Attracting FDI will become much more difficult under a SF government that has a bad profile internationally. Look at Greece and Syriza and the way that the economy collapsed under them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,341 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Disaster for SF given the verdict from the judge and right before election season.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,976 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I missed the reporting of the Lappin case when it happened.

    "Six weeks ago, the High Court in Dublin dismissed a defamation action against the Sunday Life which had been taken by schoolteacher and Sinn Féin constituency organiser Liam Lappin.

    Mr Lappin claimed that a photograph of him and 13 others at a Sinn Féin Christmas party — which the newspaper highlighted contained Frank McCabe, an IRA commander whose gang was implicated in the notorious murder of Paul Quinn — had defamed him, even though McCabe was circled in the photo to identify him.

    The judge said the claim “stretches credulity”.

    There is now a significant pattern of courts summarily dismissing SLAPPs cases taken by Sinn Fein and their members.

    However, what is most worrying for the formation of government is the presence of one of the alleged killers of Paul Quinn at a Sinn Fein Christmas party. This is not something from the distant past, this is not something from the pre-ceasefire days, this is a horrific crime of which senior members of Sinn Fein have claimed a lack of knowledge.

    Also, like Dowdall, the infamous SF criminal, Lappin appears to live in MLMD's constituency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


     Look at Greece and Syriza and the way that the economy collapsed under them.

    What an ill-informed ridiculous comment.

    The Greek economy had already collapsed and had been covered up with the help of American corporations like Goldman Sachs long before Syriza came on the scene.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,486 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Well, that worked out well, given that Syriza is now run by a Goldman Sachs trader.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You disputing that the Greek economy was already wrecked long before Syriza?

    Plenty of money to be made wrecking economies as we know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,486 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    No (more pointing out the irony), but good to see the excuses are coming in early for if and when SF get into power and fluff it.

    Your American corporation theories on Greece are probably best for another thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Not a theory, a fact.

    Nor is it an excuse.

    Political parties can wreck economies we know this to our cost. FG rehabilitated the last party that wrecked ours.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,976 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Unfortunately, can't read it as it's behind a paywall.

    I did see that Michelle O'Neill was asked about their 3-0 defeats on libel cases and she said that it was a matter for individuals to take libel cases not Sinn Fein as a party. Four things struck me after the interview - party meetings must be awful polite as people must be in real fear of being sued for anything they say, who was the man on her shoulder making sure she said everything correctly, she didn't answer the question directly about paying for Gerry Kelly's legal bills, and finally, nobody asked her about the rumour that Gerry Kelly got a 150k bonus this year for services to the party (the last one is satire and tongue in cheek before I am sued).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    I don't think they care if they win or lose, they are just trying to shut down the media. So if you are a journalist and writing a story which SF might deem negative they will sue, so editors etc will shut it down because they don't want to spend thousands fighting the case in court and potentially losing because a judge has a bad day

    Clear attempt for years now by SF to shut down the media, starting with Gerry trying to shut down the story of him protecting a paedophile. I'm sure other cases happened before that but thats when it brought it to most people attention



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    That doesn't tally with the inordinate and noticeable amount of stories attacking SF. Often stories that go nowhere. Remember Regina Doherty trumpeting the 40 or more abuse cases before the last GE?

    Story never went anywhere. Was Regina pursued by the media about it as she should have been? Nope.

    How did Gerry get on 'trying to shut down the media'? Miserably it would seem.

    Still waiting for someone to layout what they wish to do about this.

    Remove everybody's right to defend themselves or just some?

    Personally I will defend everyone's right to re-dress, unambiguously.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,410 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    We need reform of the libel laws. I think there are few who would gainsay that.

    Libel should not be a cash cow for those that win, but should be a severe punishment to those found to have libelled. Also, the libel must be publicly rebuked by the perpetrator to at least the extent of the original publication of it, and to a degree acceptable to the court.

    The solution might be the financial penalty be divided into two parts - the first as compensation of actual provable loses to the person libelled, and a second amount deemed a suitable punishment to the party that committed the libel. The second amount should be paid into a fund of some sort to be distributed as a victim support charity perhaps defined by the court.

    The court should be at liberty to punish frivolous cases.

    The bigger the second sum is, the greater the vindication to the victim's good name that was defended and that it suitably is restored.

    The real problem is the delay that court cases take for resolution.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,341 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Since MoN has stated that the Gerry Kelly ruling is a personal one, I wonder how will he pay the legal costs?

    No doubt some money will be 'donated' to him by someone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    in these situation I would expect the SF TD walked away with costs for their own case but not the cost of taking the case, or the paper to defend itself


    they should have to pay costs for both sides. Might stop them been so quick to take these cases out on such a regular basis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,976 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Yes, SF have been at it for years now. Brave women like Mairia Cahill and Aoife Moore who speak out against Sinn Fein are subject to hate speech online, incredible misogynistic stuff, even some of it on here from the usual suspects.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,410 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    If costs are awarded against a litigant, it is for costs of both sides and not just their own costs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    quite ironic how people used to say that if, for example, gerry adams didnt want people saying he was in the ira then he could always take them to court. now when SF do take people to court, the whingefest begins



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Not to mention a certain amount of sour grapes. Far as I know SF reps have won more of these cases than they have lost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,976 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    And isn't it even more enlightening that when Sinn Fein take people to court, they lose, 3-0 in recent months.

    It means that if someone says that Gerry Kelly is a murdering terrorist, it isn't defamation anymore. Now if only those other cases would hurry up so we could be clear on some other things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,060 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Set arbitrary points to claim victory. Great win there.

    Fact is, SF have won more of these than they have lost. Which leaves self proclaimed democrats in a bit of a quandary, But I guess they will just ignore the facts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Not 100% sure what that is supposed to mean.

    Unless you think Gerry should be taking former members of the PIRA to court?




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Given you are a member of the party, are the old guard happy with SF labelling the IRA as a criminal and terrorist organization in their legal submissions?



Advertisement