Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Immigration to Ireland - policies, challenges, and solutions *Read OP before posting*

1202203205207208557

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    How long do you think it will take to build all these houses for all those 130k in state accommodation now not to mention in case you’ve forgotten all those Irish born on housing waiting lists as well as those looking for a house to buy with their own money?

    Its a ridiculous answer to say just build more houses when O’Gorman says we have to expect 15k a year and Martin predicts a big shift northwards due to climate change



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,719 ✭✭✭DebDynamite


    Not true. I posted two examples of people who were given a deportation order and continued to stay in direct provision until they were eventually given leave to remain. Also:

    IMG_1986.jpeg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35 sive60


    Why is it great.

    There are forty million Ukranians living in an enormous country.

    we are a tiny Island and we simply dont have the capacity to cope with the numbers arriving in such a short space of time.

    So the issue is what should we do now.

    O Gorman is talking about building tents to hold up to five thousand people, has anyone any workable solutions as to a suitable location for this.

    If the Government dont listen to the concerns of the electorate then people will take the law into their own hands.

    Thats the reality



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,262 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The 'Ireland is full' thing only comes into play if we are discussing available accommodation in 2024. But there are many other metrics that decide whether a country is 'full' or not : we have enough food, medicines, energy, natural resources, transport, finance, school places, job vacancies, hospital beds etc for our current population. If the country was literally full or even overpopulated, we would be on the verge of famine and disease, with all services at breaking point, like some disaster zone in the Third World.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 239 ✭✭tikka16751


    Why is this attitude by others that we need to house the world also.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭dmakc


    You're just skimming over the accommodation metric then? By far and away the biggest factor in whether a country is full or not?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,400 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    They all appeal, and appeal again, and again and when all of that fails, they seek a ministerial review for permission to remain.

    The system is being gamed, supported and encouraged by NGOs, they all use the same playbook and at a time when the system is clearly overloaded, this gaming of the system, is causing massive frustration amongst the public, particularly when deportation orders are being issued but ignored.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    It’s bizarre to skim over by far the most important factor I.e accommodation or the lack thereof.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    But this is your same old, same old answer. And it's simply not going to happen. You know it, we know it.

    The state is not going to massively ramp up housing, schools, hospitals and all the other services that are under increasing strain.

    You know that - so face the facts. What other solution do you have? That doesn't wash.

    Take some responsibility for your rhetoric.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭StudentDad


    I do wonder what would happen to the general price of property if the govt. went ahead and built 100,000 homes - 3 and 4 bed semis maybe. Too a good standard and not in Dublin. How about 100,000 spread equally between Sligo, Tralee, Waterford, Cork and Letterkenny. All council houses, all for rent to people on the housing lists and none of them for sale to tenants down the line? All within 5 years? Snowballs chance in hell of it happening! I picked those spots at random. The govt. has had decades to build actual properties. Is it access to land banks? Cash for building? Resistance from land owners? That field has been in our family since god was a boy! We ain't sellin! Great, have you done anything useful with it in the past 5 years? No? Well in that case that field is going to be used for social housing, here's a tenner good luck. Will that happen? No. Why? Coz the shriek from the country will be, It's my field! I ain't sellin!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭dmakc


    It's not the landowner's responsibility to oblige the government on the back of failed policies. The state already has scope to build upwards of 60,000 homes on state lands across the country if they wanted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭StudentDad


    Great, we'll add the 60,000 to the 100,000. Given that ultimately all the land in the country belongs to the State and the State belongs to society. The good of society has to trump the individual landowner. Gee, we are in the 19th century again. Who's up for reforming the Land League?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,262 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    You can't just decide a country is "full" because of a housing / accommodation crisis - it simply means you have a successful, thriving country with an excellent standard of living, but which is also accompanied by a housing crisis. I've seen people in these threads even argue that Ireland has too many people and needs to depopulate - something that no economist or demographer would agree with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35 sive60


    You clearly have no experience of working in the health service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,343 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    It will take a long long time unless they actually start doing it 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,343 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Ah, ok yes, I stand corrected. They can obviously stay while awaiting deportation.

    Thanks 👍



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,343 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Ah, ok yes, I stand corrected. They can obviously stay while awaiting deportation.

    Thanks 👍



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,262 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I doubt any problems in the health service are caused by the country being "overpopulated". That wouldn't even make any sense - a government can increase hospital capacity at any point it chooses (providing it has the funding, and our one does).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭ShamNNspace


    This is what's happening out there nowadays, guy approaches owners of disused property buys it up flips it and doubles the price selling on to one of the housing associations/charities loads of 💶💶 to be made

    IMG_20240103_143201.jpg

    Another one ready to go in Tuam👇

    IMG_20240103_143546.jpg

    Same director in all those companies, another one here in Dublin, it's the new klondike, stashes of 💶💶💶💶 to be made

    Screenshot_20240103_143514.jpg

    The whole charity/ngo sector needs a good shaking up, far too many of em intersecting all over the place guarding their patches, follow the money.. There's a club there and we (the regular 9 to 5 taxpayer) aren't in it, and I can't see it changing anytime soon

    Post edited by ShamNNspace on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭dmakc


    Or let's leave the virtuous nonsense to the side, see if the government has the "good of society" in mind and start with the 60,000 that's literally available to them 👌



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35 sive60


    How can the govt increase hospital capacity when it doesnt have the staff, they are all in Australia and many wont be back, my own child among them.

    Oh yes, issue more visas, where will these people live.

    Rotunda master at the weekend said some staff are commuting from spain as they cant find anywhere to live.

    The young teachers are gone too, why should they break their backs in overcrowded classrooms and then have to hand over a third of their after tax to tent a boxroom.

    But yes, we have plenty of capacity.!!!!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭dmakc


    You can absolutely decide based on a housing / accommodation crisis.

    We have hundreds of men landing here on a monthly basis for tented living, but we're not full as we're a "successful, thriving country with an excellent standard of living"?

    Got you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,343 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Already agreed, system needs to be overhauled, streamlined and quickened, significantly.

    Not much point in complaining about current system, and not look for change



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭StudentDad


    It's not virtuous nonsense and yes my post is a bit tongue in cheek. However, the point I'm making is that there is plenty of land and plenty of people needing houses. It isn't their fault that the price of property has been jacked up etc etc., In real terms we are back in the 19th century. If we keep going down the road of Dickens the populace will vote in a crew who will change things. That'll be fun, won't it? An extra few quid on social welfare and helping people to pay esb bills, whilst welcome, doesn't solve the problem long term. I hate to say this but I know people who'd vote for Dustin the Turkey quicker than the current lot in govt. and frankly that's depressing. The thing is, more and more people, will vote. Who for though?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    This is just fanciful delusional stuff. How can you & others seriously support expanding the population with migrants at the growing rates we see?

    It's all very well to be altruistic but one of the principal objections local communities and society in general has, is that of housing and a whole range of public services coming under pressure. In other words, this is increasingly affecting the average Irish citizen.

    There is nothing in the history of the state over the past five decades that would suggest it will or can rapidly expand these needs and services and deliver what people reasonably expect. It'd delusional to think so and misleading to argue on the basis that these will follow.

    One of the first principles of being Green is Reduce. Reduce consumption, reduce needs. Reduce population. And we're all supposed to be Greener nowadays, aren't we?? We don't need 15,000+ asylum seekers rocking up each year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,719 ✭✭✭DebDynamite




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,343 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    And why do you think the state will ignore it's international obligations and it's own laws and stop taking in refugees and asylum seekers?

    It's the same old same old answer from others, at least I come up with solutions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,343 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Yep. Answered plenty straight questions.

    You should read posts



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭dmakc


    What international obligations to take in asylum seekers?



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement