Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1714715717719720943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    Past performance does not guarantee future results.

    Ireland is facing numerous serious structural and demographic challenges and resting on the laurels of the past may not be sufficient to grow further. It seems you may be trying to ignore certain figures to fit a pre conceived conclusion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Absolute nonsense - population has increased by 11% (4.5m to 5m) since records on FTBers began in 2014. Number of first time buyers over the same period are up 120%. (16k to 34k)

    Population has crept up. FTBer numbers have exploded.

    I should have more accurately stated that more people are getting on with it than at any point in last 15 years/records. Of course a higher percentage were buying in Celtic tiger period and prior.

    Things are bad but they’re the best they’ve been in a long long time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    This is something we'll be seeing more of. If you do a job that requires sitting at a desk with a computer, even skilled jobs, there is a good chance that an AI can and will do the job in the near future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The increasing age of FTBers is primarily due to the fact almost nobody was able to buy a home for about a decade from 2007-2014/15. The 40 year olds now who should have been buying 10 years ago had nothing to buy because there was no credit and no building.

    The 100% mortgages from 05 to 08 had a huge part to play as executable demand of the future was brought forward

    Today, we have shared ownership where upto 40% of the price is underwritten or paid by the state. What is this doing to executable demand, land and housing values and how sustainable is it?



    Rigorous enforcement are not something I expected to see in the same sentence about the Irish Planning System



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    “ONE YEAR ON from the launch of the Government’s shared equity First Home Scheme, just 474 homes have been delivered to date.”

    In a year when 36k first time buyers will buy homes. It’s fair to say the shared equity scheme is a statistical relevance at this stage. I agree it was a terrible scheme by the way - but it’s not impacting current demand in any meaningful way.

    On Irish planning. Incompetent, slow, corrupt etc. could all be thrown at them. But as someone who tried to get planning for a large one off house - I can confidently say they are anything but easy. We are definitely not replicating past mistakes of allowing ludicrously levels of sprawl.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    I posted and cited the relevant statistic. Home ownership rates for young people have worse than halved - from 60% in 2004 to 27% in 2019. And continued falling since.

    "Things are the best they've been in a long long time" is just completely false. The rate of home ownership amongst young people is the worst its been in the history of the Irish state, and this is going to have an absolutely huge impact on the state long term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Don't forget, the would-be FTB generation (i.e., people in their 30s now) was the same generation that came into the work-force during the crash. A lot of this generation would have suffered employment scarring or depressed wages that would only have recovered in recent years.

    The old express of "pulling the ladder up" comes to mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The 18-34 home ownership rate statistic is also key because of how it becomes significantly more difficult to get a mortgage as you age past 35. A 40, or 45 year old, isn't getting a 'full' 35 year mortgage - they'll only get shorter mortgages, of lower amounts. So their options are ever more limited as they age, even if their salary is ticking up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭J_1980


    18-30yo home ownership is totally uncommon in all EU countries.

    celtic tiger home ownership ages were the exception (not the current situation ).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,712 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    This is your perspective though. You’re very angry because you feel that your cohort is uniquely disadvantaged. It’s not.

    The previous generation of FTBs (myself included) lost huge sums of money in the property crash and spent a decade climbing out of negative equity. You dodged a massive bullet and you’re still bitching.

    EVERYONE saw wage cuts and huge tax increases. Not everyone had to worry about providing for a family on a massively reduced income. You certainly didn’t.

    People approaching retirement saw huge sums wiped off their pensions and either had to keep working or take a much less comfortable retirement.

    There’s no ladder being pulled up here. Just an insatiable need to blame others and not take any responsibility yourselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    You're wrong on literally everything there.

    The statistic I quoted is 18-34 years old.

    Ireland in 2019 had the 10th lowest home ownership rate in Europe.

    Home ownership rates in 2004 were below home ownership rates in 1991, Celtic Tiger rates absolutely weren't the peak (or an "exception") in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Pointing out that one group has a problem does not in any way mitigate the problems of other groups. This is like telling someone whose house is on fire to not worry so much because yours was flooded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    I think the issue is that people are settling down and buying much later than they used to anyway. All of the parts add up to it being hard for FTBs like myself. If I could go back and reason out whether I should prioritize buying a house, or staying in uni til 25 and then going traveling and not getting into the workforce til the back half of my 20s, what would I do. Not sure. But I know that what I did in my 20s was not what the people who are buying houses younger than me were doing. Its my own fault im starting late, and i cant really blame anyone else for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    You’re confusing the short term and the long term and drawing the incorrect conclusions.

    Home ownership rates in a total population are a function of purchases over many many decades not something that is fixed or broken at a singular point in time. The period from 08-2017 was disastrous for home ownership.

    2023 was the best year for first time buyer numbers since 2007. That is a fact. 2022 was the second best year since 2007. That is a fact.

    Home ownership rates can continue to decline despite the improving trends as the long term nature of how the rate moves means current FTB rates are essentially changing the mix relative to a previous generation who had close to 100% ownership rate.

    Unfortunately understanding this dynamic requires a somewhat reasonable grasp of statistics which based on your previous posting, I suspect will be beyond you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    If you’re Going back to 1991 then you need remember that it was common to enter the workforce at 16 years or just after leaving cert. What age would those same people be entering the workforce now ? Also back then there was forced high emigration which also would impact stats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    In 1991 it was common to be buying in one salary also and you were less likely to be competing with a double income couple or charities and councils. Not the same conditions these days for sure.

    Leave school later, sow your wild oats, Get a much higher deposit together when you do get a job, couple up to have any chance at all of buying. And then compete against councils and reits.

    So we have a choice now. Knuckle down, save like mad and get it done, or spend our money on something else and complain. Only one of those options has any sort of chance of buying a house.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The number of people aged 18-34 who live in a property they own has gone from 60% in 2004 to 27% in 2019. Thats a catastrophic decline, with a verifiably greatly reduced quality of life for hundreds of thousands of people. And one with dire implications for the Irish state in 20-30 years time.

    A small increase in outright FTB purchases year to year that you're clinging to, in a country with a population increasing by 100k a year, doesn't compensate for this massive decline.

    You can try and spin that any way you want, but those are verifiable, hard, statistics. The statement that "Things are the best they've been in a long long time" as you've made is just laughable. This is verifiably, in late 2023, the worst housing crisis in the modern history of the Irish state.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,620 ✭✭✭combat14


    the problem with more and more in many case single older FTBs is that when you hit your 40s you are looking at 15 to 20 year mortgages rather than 30 year ones severely depressing what these increasing cohort of buyers can afford ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    Thats why im kicking myself for not entering the workforce until the wrong end of my 20's. I had a good time, but its going to work out expensive in the end. All my friends who got jobs and settled down in their early 20s all have somewhere to live now for their old age. I'll be in my 60s before my mortgage is paid off. No more work breaks for me :)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Same here. I could have used my 20s better, but let's not commit the avocado toast fallacy here. The primary reason for difficulties with housing for our generation is because of what the state (and a sizable proportion of the population) has done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,620 ✭✭✭combat14


    and the chickens will come home to roost when many of the 40/50s generation with no pension and no hope of buying can nolonger afford their rent



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    Additionally those with pensions and houses at that point in the previous generation will be in their 60s and 70s at that point. Their skills usefulness degraded and will be much more vulnerable to policial changes which will likely occur with such a scenario.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    True, though if I were in my 60s or early 70s now, I wouldn't be feeling too confident that the pension promised by the state will be there in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    While I agree with you, that's a very weird statistic.

    18-35 is an incredibly broad age range. Chances are that few aged 18-25 owned property in 2004. It was the case between 2011 and 2022.

    So if you said people aged 26-34 who live in a property they own has gone from 60% in 2004 to 27% in 2019, the statistic would probably hold true.

    But then it paints a less dramatic picture.

    Check out fig 3.2


    What we're seeing is the average age of homeowners getting older by maybe 5 years or so.

    Those who owned property by 25 pre-2011 are probably 30 before they're on the ladder now, and so on.

    Buut... by 40-45 it's pretty much the same. Now, maybe those who bought at 25 had paid off a mortage in 15 years (unlikely)


    I would say if your statistic was 18-40, instead of 18-35 then it would be a lot less shocking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,926 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    So its always someone elses fault. There was a substantial porportion of people who taught from 2010-2016 that renting would always be afordable and house buying would always be easy. When prices started to climb from 2014 on they expected a double dip after then we got the expectation of a crash during and post Covid.

    Its only now the penny is dropping. But the standard and specification of housing expectations are still quite substantial, a substantial number of buyers have plans to buy to the limit of what they can afford. It was always the way. Single people still want a three bed semiD. Many want a new A rated house with the Audi parked outside and probably in D4 as well

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,712 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Sold the house for 80k less than I paid for it, 13 years after buying it and having put a fair bit into renovating and extending it, so total loss probably the guts of 150k.

    That “should” have been a sizeable chunk of equity for my next house but it didn’t turn out that way, so I’ll be paying a larger mortgage for longer, retiring later and being less comfortable when I do retire. Lots of people in my age bracket will tell you a similar story. It is what it is.

    The repeated assertion that the current crop of young people are being shafted by their greedy predecessors is a load of bollocks. We have all gone through huge challenges and thinking otherwise is exactly why the word “snowflake” gets thrown around so much.

    The problems with housing are so complex and have been building for so long - and are in no way unique to Ireland - that there simply isn’t a quick fix, it will take years to resolve.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    "So its always someone elses fault."

    No, it isn't. That's not what I said, and if it was what you understood from my post, then I was unclear. Apologies. Whilst I dearly wish that I'd bought a few years earlier, I will be finished paying the mortgage that I do have in 4-5 years with no hiccups. All in all, it's not too bad.

    Let's be clear about one thing, the enormous rise in property prices and in rents was not just something that happened. It was the result of deliberate policies by the state in inflate property, and Michael Noonan himself famously (or infamously) said this. This may well have benefited a sizable number of people, but it is going have serious long-term effects on Ireland, and we don't know what that will be.

    If I were a young man faced with dismal hope of owning a home and settling down through no fault of my own, I'd be rather upset.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    ? did you read my original post on the last page? I quote from it directly:

    "Research by the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) found that the share of 25-34 year olds who own their own home more than halved between 2004 and 2019, falling from 60 per cent to just 27 per cent."

    That aside, the average age of FTBs is increasing (with lots of negative consequences) yes, but "by 40-45 it's pretty much the same" is absolutely not true.

    These are the figures for the overall home ownership rate in Ireland over the last 20 years:

    2002 = 77.4%

    2006 = 74.7%

    2011 = 69.7%

    2016 = 67.6%

    2022 = 66%

    Theres a continual drop, driven by older home owners dying off and younger people being unable to become home owners. Fewer and fewer people as a percentage of the population are able to buy their own home.

    Once that figure hits below 50% things are going to get interesting - a democratic country where the majority of people are renters will likely start to radically/heavily tax home owners.



Advertisement
Advertisement