Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ulster Bank/First Active Offset mortgages, here's the answer to previous thread!

Options
1679111214

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Renbrandt


    Let us know the answer to this- it seems preferable to paying off the mortgage.

    It would be worth it to have the flexibility of future removal of the lump sum.

    I drew down some relatively small amount of additional borrowing under the 'Facility' back in about 2008.

    The process took a couple of months and we had to have the property re-valued for the bank.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Renbrandt


    I have a Booklet dated January 2010, "A guide to Ulster Bank Accounts and Services for First Active customers'

    Page 11 'Mortgages'

    Important Information

    New Sort code and account number

    Terms and Conditions

    Your terms and conditions remain the same



  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Renbrandt


    Yes my offer looks like it's similar to yours. It's at around 2.25% interest on the borrowed sum for the remainder of the term, doubled.

    The calculations are far from clear.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5 Renbrandt


    No interest paid on the excess amount in the Facility ( need to move it elsewhere) and no I wasn't expecting additional compensation for the excess



  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭Seurat


    I have drawn down from the facility a few times with Ulster Bank, never with FA. All it needed was a letter written to Leopardstown stating the amount wanted and why (eg home imporvements). The money was always in my account within a working week. I find it hard to believe that will be the same with AIB/PTSB/Fund when they get sold on, you may need home valuations again etc. Also I imagine the amount available in the new "facility" will reduce more regularly and rapidly than with UB



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13 IC2023


    Same here. In fact I took it any time they offered it as I needed it for an extension which i am only now building. Delaying the extension was the best decision I ever made. UB will pay for the extension now



  • Registered Users Posts: 13 IC2023


    I tried to draw down again in Sept and I wasn’t allowed for some reason I didn’t understand then but makes sense now



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,310 ✭✭✭phormium


    The procedure for drawing down some of the facility was easy with FA too, it only required a written request and proof of life cover in place for the new higher o/s balance. I drew down a couple of times myself. You'd only need a valuation if you were actually increasing the overall loan or if maybe the value of property had seriously dropped, possibly happened some people back around last prices crash!



  • Registered Users Posts: 129 ✭✭Abel Magwitch


    True the LA was also needed with Ulster for me anyway



  • Registered Users Posts: 126 ✭✭aoraki


    I was considering using this Pay and Redraw feature going forward. But with the existing Offset arrangement I was able to offset the full amount of the mortgage, and I was fastidious about just having enough in the Offset balance to cover the mortgage, with a standing order reducing the balance of the offsetting savings account in line with the balance of the mortgage account. To do something similar does not look possible with Pay and Redraw, it's just too messy and inconvenient for me and I'd say trying to fully offset the mortgage using this mechanism would trigger a redemption. Considering that 68% of people currently are hardly using the offset capability, I'd say very few people will use this Pay and Redraw feature going forward.

    Thankfully my decision was made for me when I got the offer letter, I was surprised at the sum I got (in a very good way), and will most likely just put that towards the mortgage and pay off the rest with savings and be done with it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,310 ✭✭✭phormium


    Yes you are right, the pay and redraw would need a lot more managing for full offsetting as such whereas having extra in an offset account didn't matter at all, actually the original CAM mtg from FA did have a limit on the offset linked account and you had to keep it below the mtg balance or it would also trigger a redemption but that was subsequently fixed when it was revamped to Offset mtg.

    Again I'd imagine not too many have the full thing offset but if you wanted to then definitely the pay and redraw would not be nearly as good, should be fine though for someone who just happens to have an extra lump sum less than mortgage temporarily.



  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭kenif


    I'd say Ulster Bank had your scenario factored in when coming up with this formula.... Again I wonder how much of this loan book will remain when it comes time to sell.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭kerryjack


    I wonder what happened to the lad or woman or team of people that came up with this product, I got this by pure accident was supposed to have a meeting with someone from EBS I think and I walked in to first active by mistake and met someone in there that said sure we are open for your business and got mortgage off of them instead. 2005 and 6 was mad years for banks trying to give away money to who ever would take it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9 virgo65


    Hi all, are there any people here with an offset flexible mortgage in arrears? I received my letter today but will definitely be challenging it.

    Also, somebody made the point that we have been hanging around for over a year wondering what's going to be done about these mortgages and now all of a sudden, at the busiest time of the year we are being asked to make up our minds by Jan 10th 2024. A little suspicious I think and typical of UB and their cunning antics.

    Has anybody set up a group to challenge them as I for one would like to be involved. I know of a few others also challenging this....

    TIA



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,065 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    The young guns in any bank comes up with 10 dumb ideas every week, it is up to the rest of us to but a stop to them. Most of the gate keepers from then are retired by now. And of the one ones I know a fair few are not doing so well.



  • Registered Users Posts: 126 ✭✭aoraki


    I got advice myself at the time regarding these mortgages, I had never banked with First Active before that. But I was always fairly disciplined when it came to saving, so the concept appealed to me. Offset mortgages were not something that First Active invented, I think they were and might still be popular in Australia and the UK. But yeah, packaged up the way FA did was a costly mistake. But as the saying goes, the past is a very different country and back in 2005/2006 everybody had their heads up their arses thinking that the boom would go on for ever. Hindsight is 20/20 and all that.

    I was trying to work out how much Ulster Bank have lost in relation to my own mortgage. It's a lot. Between the financial crash resulting in interest rates going to practically zero plus the offsetting feature, there were probably only 2 years in the entire term where they got the expected amount of interest from my mortgage. It's very rare that you beat the house, but it's nice when it does happen. Anyway, we all got shafted back in 2006/2007 when it came to house prices so at the end of the day it's swings and roundabouts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13 IC2023


    Absolutely. I’m almost embarrassed for Ulster bank to talk about this publicly. Haven’t told anyone else about the windfall- at least not until it’s in the account. Anyone else feel like this?



  • Registered Users Posts: 126 ✭✭aoraki


    That encapsulates exactly the situation I'm in myself. Apart from discussing this anonymously on this forum, we haven't mentioned it to anybody in the "real world". And probably won't even after we get the payment. I feel I can't mention it to friends or family because most of them still have big mortgages that they'll be paying off for years and years - I'd feel bad about telling them about this huge stroke of fortune we got. As of the end of January we'll be mortgage free with a very small impact to our savings (that we'll make up in a couple of years now that we won't be repaying a mortgage). My friends and family would be delighted for us but I still feel bad about it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,310 ✭✭✭phormium


    Weren't you lucky! 😁

    As a mortgage type it wasn't really a FA invention, very common in Australia at the time especially, it was a hard sell as very few could understand the benefits bar the occasional person who had lived in Aus and already had one! Either way all those staff long gone in all the clear outs over the years and finally the merger with UB.


    Aoraki- just saw your comment after I posted, yes it already existed prior to FA and FA actually bought an Aus financial system yeares back when computerising stuff, can't remember details but people had to go out there for discussions/training etc, probably came across it at that stage. Even though some used it very well I would say they were in the minority, no matter how much it was explained a lot of people didn't get it. I know someone who still gets car finance from garage despite having one of these mortgages and I explaining umpteen times how it would be far cheaper to draw down some of the facility!



  • Registered Users Posts: 716 ✭✭✭soap1978


    Is there any chance of Ulster taking back the offer or is it definitely going ahead with the payment in your account in January?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3 Mmar1234


    First time posting. I have been following the thread.

    Overall I am very happy with the offer I have received.

    Does anyone know if revenue are going to tax the payment. Has anyone been in contact with them?



  • Registered Users Posts: 35 shanoh


    I asked revenue and the CAT unit said they have been told internally it isn't liable for CAT but may be liable for income tax... so i've put in an enquiry there too and yet to hear back



  • Registered Users Posts: 3 Mmar1234


    Great. Thank you



  • Registered Users Posts: 4 whoareya1


    I find that insane that if there is any liability that it would be income Tax... CAT would be bad enough but income tax would be over 50% for some.

    That is putting all beneficiaries in a worse position and totally cancels out the "doubling " up assumption that UB applied.

    Therfore,their doubling up assumption to cover future losses because we are losing the product that could have saved us thousands is defunct!!

    I cannot understand how there is even an argument to Tax recipients , it is a payment to cover the loss of future gains therefore no gain.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,065 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    As you say: "it is a payment to cover the loss of future gains" so of course it is a gain otherwise there would be no need to compensate you in the first place and furthermore it is a realised gain that is a fact. Whether it is taxable or not remains to be seen. First we'll hear from the Revenue on how they propose to deal with it and then we'll see if someone appeals it and so on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4 whoareya1


    They also tell you to get Tax advice and no tax specialist has a clue. I couldn't get an actual answer from Tax specialist.

    Anyone else had any joy with getting a clear answer,?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4 whoareya1


    The offset product is a legitimised gain though. It's never been a case that whilst using this product to reduce interest (gain) that that was ever questioned for Tax.

    So what sense does it make that if we can no longer do that on a product that didn't originally have a liability that the compensation gets taxed and we make a loss on what we would have had we kept it.

    Post edited by Jim2007 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,445 ✭✭✭fliball123


    The offset product is a legitimised gain though. It's never been a case that whilst using this product to reduce interest (gain) that that was ever questioned for Tax.

    So what sense does it make that if we can no longer do that on a product that didn't originally have a liability that the compensation gets taxed and we make a loss on what we would have had we kept it.

    Sorry it was never a gain as long as you were paying the loan back how can it be a gain? Interest is the banks gain and they were losing out on a proportion or all if the full amount was offset at no stage during the mortgage was the customer getting a gain. If your definition was to be applied with all mortgages anyone paying off a mortgage early would be subject to tax and that is not the case



  • Registered Users Posts: 13 DB2023


    My tax consultant said its not taxable as it would be deemed as compensation by revenue despite the wording on the UB letter. If it was taxable virtually everyone would be at a loss.

    Anybody have any feedback from UB about the loss of the ability to remortgage on the same terms as your current mortgage. This is potentially a massive loss if you were going to avail of it. I'm waiting on UB reply ....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 411 ✭✭obriendj


    Hi There

    Has anyone been in contact with a financial advisor on this matter?

    Not sure who would be best to contact.

    thanks



Advertisement