Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

Options
1359360362364365601

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Would've thought the S8 would break in DL like the 75 even with DB the 75 drivers took their break in DL surely it's a bit of a waste running staff cars back and forth to Ballymount on a route which could break in DL and adding in more live handovers. Is the canteen in Dundrum gone now?

    114 moving to the DL rota probably makes sense but handing over in Ticknock seems daft. Surely it would make most sense for drivers on the 114 to just get the dart to and from DL for breaks. The 161 on DL rota seems odd too would've expected them to just interwork it with the S6. Wonder will the 161 go double deck now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    What an ignorant comment. Of course it matters, that's why I ask. Drivers shouldn't allow anyone with dirty clothes, the one who doesn't pay or is dirturbingly intoxicated on a bus in the first place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,657 ✭✭✭Qrt


    Ignorant? I’d reread what you’ve written.

    you can’t refuse essential public services to those with dirty clothes

    i don’t think we should begrudge those living on the streets a bus trip



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,855 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Getting the 18 to work for the final time today, before it switches to the S2 on Sunday.

    Stop 849 on Appian Way now has the new timetable, and while the 11 still uses the DB style timetable, it is showing its route diagram! Since Go-Ahead initially started operating and the new style timetables were introduced, DB haven't really gotten route diagrams - the only routes to do so were mainly the bus connects routes operated by DB.

    PXL_20231122_092357661.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,851 ✭✭✭Midnight_EG


    Ignorant comment? You realise that I am in fact in a driver. Who am I to refuse someone clearly down, who is most usually looking to get somewhere safe? I take plenty of people who are 'dirty' and not all of them are homeless or scumbags like you may suggest.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    I see John Lahart is after posting a petition to save the 75 and 175. I mean it wasn't like there was public consultation that went on for over 3 years no doubt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    Yes, there are apparently around 20 staff car diagrams planned during the week. Certainly a far safer solution than the old dragging of the bus in (I still have the last Harristown version of the 17A in my mind's eye: it only ever had 12 buses in revenue service at a time but needed 15 altogether because of the breaks in the garage).

    It appears that for any breaks taking place in the garage, GAI are choosing the closest location to it. Keep in mind that the S8 is at best f-30, so to produce an efficient enough duty cut it would have had to pair up with something more frequent anyway—might as well boost the S6 bill.

    Dundrum canteen does seem to have no more use from next week though, you're right.

    I'd also wager that there have been enough complaints about the 75 mixing with the DL locals and the resultant knock-on delays, be it the bus or drivers coming back from breaks, that they just took the opportunity to get rid of the problem altogether.

    As for the 114 and the DART, I don't think GAI want to rely on anything external for scheduling. It appears they want everything to be dealt with in-house.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Hence one of my questions if they pay. Apparently, that was ignored (supposedly, supporting those who don't pay their fare), and was focused to rather turn a blind eye attitude. Smelly, badly intoxicated and misbehaved shouldn't be allowed on a bus for other passengers safety to prevent incidents. Government should provide proper shelters to the unfortunate people, and we shouldn't pay tax and fares and still be ok with sitting beside some smelly associal people who may or may not urinate on seats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    That's sad that our society is ok with this. We should provide from a budget to accommodate rather than try to be too good to one taking away a comfort from the others. I personally don't want to be on a bus with a smelly dirty intoxicated person. By accommodating them we hide an actual problem.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    They usually have free travel. Take your issue up with the dept. of social welfare for giving them free travel not bus drivers. Drivers aren't bouncers they can't refuse anyone who they think might be trouble they have to take all passengers at face value.

    If someone is urinating on the seats then you should definitely notify the driver so the bus can be taken out of service to be cleaned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 764 ✭✭✭Tarabuses


    Same here where both the 75 and 175 pass close by. No leaflet with 4 days to go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,600 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Presumably F spine is next in line for implementation? The O bus might come first though as the charging facility in phibsboro finished recently but I suppose that also depends on when the single decker fleet arrives which we've no sight of yet.

    F will be an interesting launch as it's the first truely cross city spine. One could argue that C is cross City but I would still regard Ringsend as an inner city district.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,938 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Is there a realistic date for completion?

    I know it'll probably always be tweaked and adjusted particularly with College Green Plaza and shortage of drivers and Dart+ and Metro etc.

    But what's a realistic date for all spines and orbitals being in place?

    2 years time maybe. I assume they'll want it done before election but might not be possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,938 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    I remember years ago in London each stop has a route map and a timetable of when the bus will arrive at this stop (as opposed to when it starts its route and you've to guess the arrival time), also lots of stops had real time digital info boards

    Loads of stops in Dublin still don't have any of this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,668 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The single decks are all built and ready to go.

    Drivers will be the issue.

    Sandymount where the C1/C2 terminate is hardly inner city to be fair!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,600 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    It's impossible to say. All we can say is that by the time its complete it will be inadequate in terms of capacity and reliability, at which point the tri axel buses will be wheeled out. The frequencies proposed are unachievable and the only real solution is rail for most of the spines, but we knew that already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,938 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    I think the general philosophy is solid.

    It was way overdue for an overhaul.

    As long as it's an improvement I'm happy and keeps moving in the right direction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,600 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    By the time it's rolled out im not sure it will be considered a success, it may be an improvement but growing demand will have eaten all of that improvemt by then



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,402 ✭✭✭Daith


    I think it will really need bus corridors to be a real success.

    I mean I can't wait for the F Spine but it's not like it's much of an improved route for me cos it's still going to be slow at Harts Corner and crawl down the Whitworth road. For other routes it will help though.

    Oddly, the change I'm waiting for is an improvement to the 40e route (or whatever the new route is), because it's a proper BusConnects "switch to another mode of transport to improve your journey times", which it absolutely can be.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭Citrus_8




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,742 ✭✭✭Consonata


    Fairly grim way to view homeless folk. Most folk just want somewhere warm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,600 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    The planned bus corridors won't change much on the the Swords, Clongriffen, Lucan or Bray corridors where there is already near continuous bus lane. These routes are planned to have a 3 to 5 minute bus frequency on roads that wont be very different and currently have gaps of 15 mins or more right now. 3 min frequency buses on regular roads is fantasy, the world's most frequent bus services on dedicated roads with absolute priority can just about reach that frequency.

    The Blanch QBC will be a big improvement, the south side corridors seem to have been deliberately botched, most wouldn't stand up to any design scrutiny. Why that was done is anyones guess. But I don't see how board planala can approve some of the trash that the NTA submitted.

    If we introduced enforcement we could have a significant improvement but government doesn't wanna touch that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,855 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Seems like they're finally using the one standard with this phase (whether it's a new route or not), this is my local stop now - 8 different diagrams including the peak only routes!

    PXL_20231122_184632916.MP.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,938 ✭✭✭orangerhyme




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,668 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The Rathmines and Kimmage corridors both have the potential to finally deliver meaningful journey time improvements for buses through the use of multiple bus gates, forcing private cars to take alternative routes, and on the Rathmines corridor, more bus lanes, one way bus only traffic on Rathgar Road and bus only streets such as South Richmond Street and Camden Street.

    To suggest otherwise is just being unduly negative.

    The traffic queue relocator lights on Rathgar Road already do a great job in giving buses priority and these plans have the potential to deliver far more on the Rathmines route.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,600 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Yes the rathgar route is good, forgot about it because its been eons since it went to planning. Kimmage is a disaster as is some of the city centre junctions on all the south sode corridors



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,668 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The Kimmage corridor at peak hour will have three bus gates - one near KCR, one just before Harold’s Cross Green and one at the northern end of Harold’s Cross Green - that will mean far less cars using it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭Citrus_8




Advertisement
Advertisement