Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

19579589609629631796

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,209 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    The other way of looking at that is that relying injuries as the opportunities to get guys some experience isn't enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    The panel we had failed. They weren't good enough. That's the reality! It was our best opportunity too, imo.

    There will be a phased period to additions and subtraction. In my opinion, scrum half is a key position to blood somebody. Murray should be phased out. Gibson Park didn't have a good world cup and I doubt he's around in 4 years. Hopefully a new scrum half is in the 6nations squad. Loose head I think will be Porter and Loughman with another. Pointless continuing with Kilcoyne and Healy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    There's no signs yet that he's declining, and that lower early exposure you mention could indeed stand to him.

    But a guy like him, slightly undersized for his position, and so busy at defensive breakdowns... I'd worry how many years are left. Those stamps in his "cleared out" passport will eventually fill the pages.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030



    A province badly needs to get across the line in Europe, imo. I'm no psychologist, and not to downplay the achievement of a Grand Slam, but it really does seem as though the mental pressure created by "we need to win to stay undefeated" is very different to the pressure created by "we need to win or we go home with nothing and they take it all". There's even a hint in the language you hear from players and coaches "we're treating this as a final", suggests there is just that difference between the natural context of a 6N game, to that of a knockout or final. Note I'm saying "different" here, not "more/less" etc. The caveat here is the tour win in NZ, which comes a lot closer to the context of a tournament. Could ROG have therefore derailed the momentum of the Irish setup before the RWC? Discussion for another day...

    But if one of the provinces can bring home a European title, I think the changing room of the national team can only improve. I'd rather have a chunk of the players buoyed by European success, and the rest envious of that, than the entire cohort fighting their anxieties about whether they can get the job done.

    tl:dr Munster should be allowed sign Ox Nche.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Even the IRFU spelling Baloucoune's name wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,357 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Andrew Porter talking about the World Cup and more on the 'Rugby Pod' on YouTube. A very very good interview. Worth a watch.

    Not sure how to post a link but it's worth a watch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    We won the Grand Slam, came second the year before. Not sure we need to win a European Cup

    To win it in reality we will need to change the current overseas policy which seems to be not allowing leinster to sign a top quality international player. At the moment it is clear to me, the strategy is for Leinster to sign decent pro's but not big names international. Probably because they would stop Irish players getting into the team. I don't think for one second when Leinster went to the IRFU to sign a beaffy second row to compete with La Rochelle they had Jenkins in mind.

    Will that happen? I very much doubt it. Is it better for the game in Ireland? questionable.

    DO I think Ireland should do it? At the moment no. It is milimetres between winning and losing at the moment.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    We don't need a foreign beefy second row now we have McCarthy. Which is more or less what the policy is for.

    Also one of the biggest issues in both finals was the kicking of our previously foreign signed back 3 player. The Leinster squad is and was good enough to win the last two championships.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    I'd say Leinster will win it this year with Nienaber. Lancaster's a brilliant coach for developing a squad and doing very well in the regular season, but his Leinster team weren't good at stepping up when they were taken out of their comfort zone, which is a big problem in high level knockout games.

    The Provinces needed big foreign signings to win in Europe years ago, but Ireland were, what, 5th, 6th, 7th in the world rankings back then. Now the Provinces' go-to players from the top two or three Test sides are actually Irish, or Irish-qualified at any rate. At least that's how it is at Leinster; they have 10 or more starters for a very good Ireland team. You couldn't have said the same in 2009.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    The 15 that took to the field v La Rochelle last year was all Irish qualified if I remember.

    Leinster could of gone and signed an Ezebeth or a big star like that, Im sure they have the money if they needed it but im sure someone in the IRFU would have said that would hamper big Joe. As luck would have it he got injured most of the season and wasn't in a position to be the impact off the bench

    Plus, keep Ryan on that pitch...who knows



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I'm less interested in what specific provinces need, more interested in seeing the IRFU loosening the restrictions a tiny bit, with a view to increased European success across all provinces. The latter epoch of the Nucifora era was well-intended, maybe even financially forced, but it evidently left outcomes too close to chance, and nothing but recent memories of knock-out failure in the heads of the national squad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Sorry just seen this, yes I agree. But when Leinster went to sign someone they would have asked for a Ezebeth type World star and the IRFU would have said no, Big Joe is coming. Was that better for Ireland? of course.

    The model at the moment of signing decent quality players like Ngatai etc I think is working. The IRFU can't rival the French clubs for a big star and they shouldn't, that money can be used for future Irish stars



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    McCarthy benched versus the Sharks and Munster - the two games before the Euro Final. I think they just preferred Jenkins. It remains to be seen whether that has changed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    To win it in reality we will need to change the current overseas policy which seems to be not allowing leinster to sign a top quality international player. At the moment it is clear to me, the strategy is for Leinster to sign decent pro's but not big names international. 

    I think the reason for that is because, obvisouly the Leinster players make up the bulk of the Irish set up. They need their signings to be available during / around the International window.

    Signing a top quality international, who would also be away, would leave them even further stretched during that period.

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Not to mention the Leinster playing budget is already gonna be pretty hefty.

    We have a stellar squad, I don't think not being able to sign a top tier NIQ is much of an excuse/reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    McCarthy missed a large part of last season so my assumption was Jenkins was preferred because of his experience. He only got 8 games last season and 285 mins



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    The games during the international windows are minimal these days in URC. Those games anyway in the URC and if they are bringing in a big name it would be for the big European games at the end of the season.

    As I said in my post I don't think Ireland need to do that, the model is working as is.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It may technically remain to be seen if McCarthy is ahead of Jenkins, but I would be absolutely flabberghasted if it was not the case. It was a poor selection in the final.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Poor selection now based on McCarthy's progress, at the time I didnt hear many grumbles. Especially as Jenkins was only supposed to be on to close out the game and in reality would have come on with Ryan.

    I'm sure moving forward for Ireland and Leinster McCarthy is going to get more minutes and will be interesting to see how the other young lads at Munster get on because a couple of crackers in their squad



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    It absolutely is a consideration tho; take Alaalatoa, started all 4 of the games around 6 Nations time. Fardy a perfect example of that type of player.

    Add in Podge's point about the playing budget already too and it makes sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Kitshoff, Snyman, de Allende, Vermeulen?

    They're a lot more high profile than Rhule, Leyds, Sclavi, Seuteni. I don't think I'd heard of the last two before they came to prominence with La Rochelle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,539 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I tend to agree with this. The coaches taking a hard look at the gameplan and the squad will inevitably reflect on their failure to get past the ABs when it mattered. We can beat them but on the biggest stage we failed. I don't imagine Farrell et al will console themselves with 'but for Barrett's milky white thigh or the ball bouncing over Sheehan's head'...they'll say what do we need to change to win the next time. That will start sooner rather than later. Does it mean a change in the game plan and tactics? if it does it may mean more new players involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    There was a fair bit of talk at the start of the season that McFarland has taken Ulster as far as he could - even that he'd have been replaced if they had the money to pay him off. I wonder if he did finish up with Ulster whenever his contract ends would he be brought into the Ireland set-up. Ulster's scrum and maul have consistently been excellent during his tenure. He would probably be an upgrade on John Fogarty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 440 ✭✭conquestscarer


    The Leinster need to sign Eben Etzebeth to win in europe is utter bollix. The utter arrogance of playing the exact same tactics with no changes other than "being more Physical"(Not the reason we lost in 2022). Leo and Lancaster had the deepest set of talent in europe for 2 years in a row and didn't manage to get them over the line in either of the competitions last year. I hope Nienaber comes in and brings in a different attitude, for example the arrogance of pretending the scrum doesn't matter so you can have an extra player running lines out the back. I've seen some good tactical decisions this season to counteract line speed and that could be the difference, also McCarthy is a dog at the ruck which we didn't have last year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    It's funny that we've lost to LA Rochelle on the trot. Each time different aspects to the loss. But it still remains, that Leinster fall short and usually through their own fault. For me, Jenkins was very poor last year and didn't have any impact. Lowe was poor and Molony looked wrecked at about 60 mins.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    All of the above didn’t sign for Leinster and I was specifically discussing Leinster

    Leyds was in the Bok squad in 2019 and was told he wasn’t the type of player they wanted so hardly an unknown. I don’t watch enough of French rugby to tell on the others


    Maybe read what I posted first before heading off on a rant.

    The discussion was if the provinces should spend big money on foreign players to win Europe, so maybe read back and explain what it “utter bollix”?

    Leinster clearly don’t have the deepest set of talent in Europe. it’s very arrogant to claim so when you see the recent record



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Current NIQs:

    Connacht: Shamus Hurley-Langton, Santiago Cordero

    Leinster: Michael Ala'alatoa, Jason Jenkins, Charlie Ngatai

    Munster: Jean Kleyn, R.G. Snyman, Alex Nankivell

    Ulster: Steven Kitshoff, Dave Ewers

    I believe Ewers and Hurley-Langton can qualify on residency, although the former would be 38 by then so the chances of him actually representing Ireland are virtually nil. The others appear to be tied to other countries.

    If Leinster easily make playoffs and their NIQs don't make their strongest XXIII for games at the business end of the season I think there's a strong argument that it'd be better for Irish rugby if they didn't have any of their current three NIQs.



Advertisement
Advertisement