Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

19549559579599601851

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,324 ✭✭✭TRC10


    It would probably suit him better. He could focus more on the breakdown where he is reasonably good, and less on handling and carrying, neither of which areas he's strong in.

    But I think Quinn will have the 7 shirt soon enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,324 ✭✭✭TRC10


    He lived up to the hype, it just probably took a bit longer to do it. He debuted at 25 and didn't break into the starting XV until the 2020 6N when he was 28 (although he should have been starting at the 2019 RWC). But 15 tries in 30 caps is a very respectable strike rate and better than most Irish wingers.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 455 ✭✭conquestscarer


    If you watched back the 2022 European cup final, Doris was our best player, he consistently made tackles on La Rochelles big carriers behind the gainline. Him and James Ryan are probably Leinster's best two players at clearing the ruck and he is a very good playmaker from 8. Was also probably Ireland's best player in the 6 nations. Also think Doris had the most turnovers for us in the New Zealand game IIRC. The "Borrowed time" Isn't true considering hes the most versatile backrow we have. Farrell absolutely flogged him playing him in meaningless games before the tournament and our entire backrow looked absolutely exhausted in the New Zealand game.

    If any of Leinsters and Irelands Backrow need slagging off for not turning up it's Van Der Flier. He hasn't turned up for a big game in a long time. I'll always be critical of players that are "workhorses" who make 25 tackles in a game, from my experience those players almost always win tackles through disregarding the defensive system and simplifying the game. It doesn't work as well at higher level's IMO.

    That said Long term I think one of him or Culhane will move to 7, I think the 7 position is changing to accommodate larger players playing there and 6 has really moved on to needing the body of a second row to play the positon I.E Lawes, Frizell, PSDT. The 7 should probably evolve into a 6.5 where you've got almost a combo of a traditional flanker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,854 ✭✭✭theVersatile




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,372 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    TRC has a pathological hatred of Caelan Doris.

    He'll never consider him as one of the best in the world despite all the evidence available.

    Don't worry about it.

    Post edited by Clegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,017 ✭✭✭✭aloooof




  • Administrators Posts: 56,559 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Doris is a phenomenal player. One of our best forwards. He's our best 8 by an absolute mile.

    Which is exactly why Ireland playing him anywhere other than 8 to accommodate lesser players, which we've done on a number of occasions, is stupid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,017 ✭✭✭✭aloooof




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    It's catching the ball that seems to be his problem. It's weird, he just seems to have spells where he drops too many.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,755 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Something is going wrong when he drops a simple ball in the most important game of his career.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think Doris is a victim of the idea of best 8 means best 8 in every situatuon.

    Ireland got dragged into going phase after phase over longer periods of possession than is typical. Doris isn’t made for that game as an 8. Being really good at rugby does not mean that every game plan will suit your game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,063 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I really like Ruadhan Quinn but he's still only a development player. John Hodnett was superb in the closing stages of last season and injury permitting, hell play all of the important games at 7 for Munster this season and he definitely deserves a look in the Irish set up

    Nobody's mentioned Antoine Frisch at centre. We'll see great things from him this season he should be brought into the Setup and given a shot for Ireland.

    He's not a 'young' player but he is new to the Irish scene in the same way Hansen was a few years ago

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,063 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I think Murray at Connacht really deserves a chance too. Hendersn's done, Beirne is getting older, the Irish team need a panel of at least 6 locks in 'the system' to cover injuries, tours and the RWC in 4 years

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,063 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    For Ireland at 2nd Row, I'd like to see a rotation of

    Ryan, Ahern, McCarthy, Edogbo, Murray, Treadwell starting to emerge in the next year or two with Beirne and Henderson stepping into supporting roles

    Ban billionaires



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,495 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    I don't think Treadwell is going to be a long-term prospect at this stage and I'm not sure which is Baird's best position yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 455 ✭✭conquestscarer


    You're forgetting the new toy factor of Quinn with a statement like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,477 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    "Hendersn's done"

    Why do you think this? He's the grand old age of 31



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Beirne is 31 and Henderson is 31....both will be circa 35 next WC if they are fit

    The speed at which people want players dropped is incredibe.

    If the players you mention deserve to start games then I am sure they will start games, putting players into the team just because they are younger is a recipe for disaster.

    The players "given a shot" is nonsense to be honest, they should be able to perform to a level for their province and then perform in the national setup. Farrell hs shown that he has no issue with putting players into the team when they meet those targets. Most of these threads are full of people posting their current favorite players and wondering why they are not in the team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,017 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    they should be able to perform to a level for their province and then perform in the national setup. Farrell hs shown that he has no issue with putting players into the team when they meet those targets.

    Disagree, tbh. To a certain extent, Farrell, more than any previous Ireland coach, has shown that Provincial form or exposure doesn't particularly matter to your inclusion in the Ireland squad.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Probably easier to name the players you think didn't get included?

    Also who should they have replaced in the squad in your opinion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,017 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Off the top of my head, Doris, Keenan, Sheehan, JGP, Crowley, Kelleher, Connors, McCarthy; all guys who had fairly limited Provincial exposure - or in JGP's case, was 2nd choice provincially - when selected.

    Even in broader squads, guys like Penny were selected ahead of, say, Hodnett, who had been performing really well against higher calibre opposition.

    To be clear, I'm not saying they shoudn't have been in (tho in some cases I'd have disagreed with the selection). But the point that they performed provincially first doesn't quite stack up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,324 ✭✭✭TRC10


    The players "given a shot" is nonsense to be honest, they should be able to perform to a level for their province and then perform in the national setup. 

    Many players have been performing to a level for their province, only to not be included in favour of players not playing to that level for another province



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I’d say there is less connection between provincial performance (especially in big games/europe) and ireland call ups than ever before.

    Not saying it is good or bad but its true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,673 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Farrell is going to pick players who can do the things he wants them to do, simple as. Performance for the provinces is probably secondary to that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    What do you mean by call ups?

    Getting in extended squad or getting game time?



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Extended squad I can maybe see it - again it depends how you're describing 'performance'. In the past you'd get into extended squads purely for existing in the 23 of certain provinces - I'd argue the fact of simply playing in games doesn't equate to 'performance'.

    I dont think there is any case to claim that there is a bigger break 'than ever before' when it comes to provincial performance and getting into the ireland 23. There were years in the past where players were playing outstanding for their provinces in huge European games and couldnt get an opportunity ahead of the guy who had the jersey. I can't think of any cases where there are such big gaps in the last year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    Hansen is 25 now, made his Ireland debut at 23. Frisch is 27. There are a lot of younger centres at a similar level who I’d say are more likely to be involved than Frisch.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    Murray is arguably the best line out operator in the world atm, particularly defensively and hes fairly rapid for a lock but he isn’t ready for test level.

    He either needs to add 5/10kg to be an effective carrier and to be able to impact the breakdown or become similes level jackal threat as Beirne.



Advertisement
Advertisement