Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Marvel Cinematic Universe general stuff

1117118120122123157

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I'm not usually one to ascribe meaning to film ratings, but that's something at least; don't think there'd be much leeway given to a new Blade film that couldn't or wouldn't at least indulge in what I presume will be hardcore violence and/or language.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,722 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Yeah. One of the good things about the first Ant-Man (Apart from Michael Pena) was the fact that it was pretty much its own thing: A comedy heist movie. Minimal interaction with the overarching MCU. Yes, Howard Stark was at the start and Falcon was there but in general, it was its own thing. And it meant you could just WATCH it!

    I mean, really, WHY was that girl with her Iron-man suit in Black Panther 2 apart from introducing her for her own series/movie/whatever? WHY didn't they leave Not-John Snow as just Not-John Snow instead of that post credit sequence.... You know the one that WASN'T yer man from One Direction (Jesus). Now we have to watch Captain Marvel, Wandavision and Miss Marvel before watching Marvels? That's 20 hours of programming.

    Do we REALLY want Blade to fight Jared Leto or to trade quips with Star Lord? Or have some Family Guy-esque tangential reference like "Wow, I haven't seen THIS many dead bodies since Iron-Man 5: The Quest for Peace"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,353 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    The Marvels actually has positive reviews by sounds of it. So I'll be going I guess.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I don't wish the MCU ill but I have been wondering how they'll react to their first, bonafide bomb; I suppose Eternals was a disappointment but it was also a bit of a wild swing of sorts. This is a sequel to one of their main Big Hitters and a character who seems relatively central to the whole universe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,784 ✭✭✭EoinMcLovin




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 31,241 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    'Atrocious' and 'worst MCU film yet' from Donald Clarke. Oof. Will see where the other reviews land, but as ever a reminder to ignore the inevitably gushing 'social media reactions' from the premiere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Worst MCU film yet is itself kind of unhelpful given we've had some pretty good contenders for that label, I'm finding it immediately hard to imagine it's somehow even worse than Love & Thunder or Ant-Man 3?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,782 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    the original release date for this movie was a year (ish) before secret invasion... not a big mystery.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Jeremy had a bit of the what was he watching about him. Not a movie that will have "legs" i reckon ,



    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,543 ✭✭✭✭Varik


    The after credit scene was up on Youtube so I'm good until this shows up on Disney+ an maybe not even then depending on the general response.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,993 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    I'm hoping it's just a load of neck beards being nasty. Iman Vellani doesn't deserve a shrug and a "That's showbiz" as she gets kicked out.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,696 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    I liked Captain Marvel. The Skrulls were handled surprisingly well, and I enjoyed for once the subversive nature of the final fight....but they haven't compelled me to watch the sequel in the cinema.

    They've just lost all control of a tight narrative and that's the biggest issue for me. As others have said, Multiverse was awesome on paper, but it's been done so half heartedly. You have to make these things mean something beyond fan service.

    They've had multiple ideas that you could say that about in Phase 4/5. The Skrulls in Secret Invasion is another example, a good idea that could of been fascinating but ended up being a story they couldn't effectively develop.

    I'd like to think Deadpool 3 will be the start of the course correction but I have no confidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,277 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I think it'd be hard to fcuk up Deadpool given Ryan Reynolds is untouchable and likely wont let an Origins level butchering of the character happen again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,670 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    For Deadpool, depending on how much Wolverine is in it, I can see it just being them enjoying themselves with the plot a secondary thing. So could be a fun watch or could be all over the place. But I think they're both professional enough to want to make it as good as they can.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Deadpool will be the only MCU film in 2024.

    Captian America, Thunderbolts and Blade are now pushed to 2025.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,014 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Not surprised by what I've seen review wise. Looks like a pretty bad movie by all accounts. I'm going to not go and see it.

    If I'm depressed and hating myself enough I might give it a watch on Disney +.

    P.S I see they were giving out free alcoholic beverages at the press screenings...


    Edit: meant to put in The Marvels thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Marvels Spoiler:

    If you'd just waited 3 more days they would have answered your issue regarding Bishop, Young Avengers etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    If you read the thread, very few people want standalone movies.

    There are endless posters frustrated that the bigger plot isn't moving on or loose ends arent tied up. People always complain when there isn't a tie in.

    What makes the MCU different and what studio after studio has fell on its face trying to build is the interconnectedness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    The COVID element and now the writers strike are absolutely huge issues, that are generally downplayed. Add the unfortunate death of one of the actors who was going to lead the MCU and you can see the mess they're in compared to the relatively smooth early phases.

    Due to COVID everything has been pushed back so many times (e.g., the Marvels was supposed to originally come out the summer of 2022) and it even changed order of the movies causing huge rewrites and reshoots. I agree with many on Wanda wasn't smoothly transitioning to MoM, but that is understandable when you look at the context that MoM was originally supposed to come out before No Way Home and Loki, so a load of stuff that had to be changed when the order was flipped.

    MCU was a well oiled machine from Phase 1 to 3 which was ran smoothly and was turned up to go faster and faster, with more movies coming out. When it got to Phase 4, and you add in Disney+, it was starting to go a bit too fast and then the wrench of COVID was thrown into it which blew the whole thing up. Rather than stopping the machine completely and fixing everything before slowly getting going again, they just tried to put some tape on it each time it broke and fight fires while maintaining the same fast pace.

    It does look like they've listened and the most recent pushback of movies from 2024 into 2025, leaving just Wolverine between now and 2025, and pausing others. It seem like they're trying to finally reset everything and get that path to move forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    2025 is going to be busy with Fantastic 4 also.

    Would have guessed we'd have another Spider-Man in 2025 but guess that might be one too many and probably too tight to get that into the end of 2024 unless they've something far along behind the scenes.

    Wonder how much they're going to change of CA and Thunderbolts. I doubt they were going to be impacted directly by Kang, but if they were to pull Majors then they'd probably need to set up something within these to drive Secret Invasion and whatever would happen to Kang Dynasty.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭McFly85


    The great thing about the infinity saga was that the films were for the most part their own films, with hints at interconnecting - GotG, for example, had the power stone which would be important in later films but you didn’t need to know that to watch the film, it was really just a maguffin.

    The post infinity saga has sort of been all over the place because a lot of the films have either spent a lot of time explaining things that you’ll need to know for later, like the multiverse, or introducing characters that will be in their own thing at some point. Theres too much emphasis on other people existing rather than a core plot that will need to bring these people together at some point. It’s almost too focused on the fact that it’s a shared universe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,867 ✭✭✭speedboatchase


    https://deadline.com/2023/11/box-office-the-marvels-1235599363/

    The Marvels is shaping up to be the lowest domestic opening ever for a Disney Marvel Cinematic Universe title, with a 3-day swing of $47M-$55M. That’s lower than Marvel/Universal’s The Incredible Hulk ($55.4M in 2008) and lower than Ant-Man ($57.2M, 2015).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Certain YouTube feeds will be beyond obnoxious to hear the crowing.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,074 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    I think everyone is happy with an interconnecting universe, but when it's hard to keep up, especially with the TV series it's when you lose people, they tried a lot of this with Agents of SHIELD and it failed. It's a very difficult thing to keep the whole thing going but when you have to do homework to watch a movie, no thank you. I was thinking of going to see Marvels and even searched for "what to know before watching the Marvels" and then I thought, I can't be arsed doing that. No problem doing it for a sequel or maybe an s sequential story like Harry Potter, but for a castaway movie, nope, I might catch it when it comes to Disney+



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    I think you overstate the energy , its been so well flagged for years now that it will be more ho hum, Its not like any youtubers cause a film to do better or worse in cinemas as most movie goes wont even know they exist. Maybe just maybe their analysis is more accurate and more predictive, its very unlikely they are correct for totally the wrong reasons

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The people I speak of don't do "analysis" and we both know of whom I speak so let's leave it at that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,696 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    I don't think streaming can be underestimated either in the hit cinemas have taken. A lot of people seem to be extremely comfortable now waiting for something to arrive on Disney+ or on Video on Demand

    The "Event" nature of the genre seems to have simply passed. No Way Home was the last one to capture something of the essence of it for me.

    I also feel that Millennials are still the key audience for these films and are the most likely to go to repeat viewings, but as they get older and priorities shift, the need to rush out and see these films is gone to a degree.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,074 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    I don't know, I'm a middle aged man who LOVES the cinema, I much prefer watching a movie in the cinema than at home, everything about the cinema is great, BUT, I'm not going to watch any auld shite. I've no connection to this movie outside of the fact that it's a Marvel movie so I'll give it a miss, same as I don't goto every Warner, or MGM, or Disney movie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    I dont know Youtubers I dont watch but as of now, the most common youtuber I watch is Mr H Reviews for general Hollywood takes cos he puts out nice and short 10 min videos which is about my level of interest, the question is if you see all criticism of hollywoood as "not analysis" then you may miss out on why general audiences dont like particular content or why a particular project is likely to fail before the trailers are even out.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Wtf you talking about "all criticism of Hollywood" I never said that either. Do I need to spell out that I'm talking about the very loud very obnoxious "go woke go broke" crowd who'll be lining up to declare woke Hollywood dead, spend videos sledging Larsen etc. off the back of this films box office. They have no value but man you can't avoid the man babies and negativity.



Advertisement
Advertisement