Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

16364666869410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    Ok that clears that up. Happy to support that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    The ‘Liverpool should have been down to 8 men’ line is funny all the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,313 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Loved that one myself.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,325 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Just reading the last few pages and one or twonthings struck me, People are assuming Liverpool want the match replayed? That’s dumb. They don’t and there’s no hope it would ever be.

    Spurs fans talking about the CL penalty? At that time, under the rules the refs were operating under, it was a penalty.

    Releasing the audio sets a dangerous precedent, will it make VAR better? I don’t think so. Refs have to be protected.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,648 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Even if they don't release it to the public, they really have to release it to the involved parties - otherwise the lack of transparency removes any credibility. The precedent should always be transparency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Releasing the audio immediately protects refs because it removes any notion of conspiracy or corruption if you at least hear they tried to get to the correct decision in good faith(even if you disagree with the decision).

    The only reason to not release it is to hide incompetence or lack of process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,111 ✭✭✭Unearthly


    I thought Webb was going to appear on Monday Night Football. Probably need to wait for his monthly show with Michael Owen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    I don't think Spurs fans are defensive. I've not heard one say that it it was anything more than a 100% incorrect call. Liverpool got screwed by a mistake. I'd be sick if I was them but it's happened to all clubs at some point and this kind of specific decision happened regularly before VAR. If you think we haven't been screwed by VAR, go take a look at the Harry Kane goal that was disallowed v Sheffield United a few years ago. The most farcical decision I've ever seen on a football pitch. It happens albeit I have sympathy for Liverpool and I wholeheartedly agree that this should result in a review of VAR to ensure it can't happen again. If that comes out of this, it'd be great.


    Here's where people have a problem with Liverpool. There has been constant whinging since Saturday about it. The sort of whinging I didn't hear from Wolves against United and don't hear from Brentford about yesterday. You can say it's a different "wrong decision" but all 3 have potentially had a material impact on the result and are all clearly wrong. You'd swear Liverpool were the first club ever to suffer a bad decision. And if you look around this message board and social media, you'll see several explicit and inferred references to corruption by Liverpool fans. Like the VAR official would really make a call that obviously and demonstrably wrong on purpose. Poor fella is being vilified in front of the world for crying out loud. It was a mistake, a really bad one that shouldn't have happened. But corruption? Some people need to give their head a wobble.


    I will add that I thought Klopp conducted himself brilliantly on Saturday. Made his point reasonably and very well. I also thought Liverpool were absolutely brilliant on Saturday when they went to 9. People saying "ah Spurs couldn't beat 9 men" do not understand how good Liverpool were with 9 in terms of how they defended their box, the effort they put in and their game management.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,648 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    The obvious difference between this and all those other errors that everyone - including liverpool - have suffered in the past, is that in this case the officials knew it was wrong immediately, and didn't rectify it. That's new. It wasn't someone making a subjectively bad call, it was a mess up in communication that they could have immediately fixed, but chose not to. I don't think there's corruption, but it is a pretty unprecedented level of incompetence and bad judgement.

    I don't see the point in getting so upset that fans are still talking/complaining about it 48 hours later, especially when it's an ongoing story with updates coming out every few hours (the most recent being that the PGMOL are split on whether or not they should release the audio).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    That's a difference but, at the end of the day, it results in the same thing. A wrong call that potentially materially impacts the game. If I was a Brentford fan yesterday, I'd be as enraged as I would be if I was a Liverpool fan on Saturday. That non-award of a penalty beggared belief.


    The difference you've highlighted doesn't justify the reaction and it doesn't justify the paranoia about corruption.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,648 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    IMO the difference is more than that. Subjective errors will always happen. There will always be awful calls we don't agree with. But systems and process failures on this level should not be able to occur at this stage. It wasn't a bad decision on the football, it wasn't a mistake in subjective reasoning - the officials looked at it, saw that the goal was indeed perfectly fine, and then knowingly allowed the game to continue with the wrong scoreline. it was a fundamental failure of the system to do its most basic function.

    I don't personally agree with the corruption allegations either - but ultimately that will always happen in some quarters when an information vacuum is left. The way the PGMOL have slowly meted out information piece by piece over the course of 2 days has invited criticism and allegations. That's on them. There's been no chance for this to blow over as there's a new piece of information every couple of hours.

    And so what if fans are still annoyed after being screwed over in an entirely new and unfathomable way. What skin off your nose is that? Who cares? I'd have no problem with Brentford fans being pissed off for a few days either, that was also an atrocious call.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 487 ✭✭bdmc16


    Where is the large proportion of fans looking for a replay? I'm reading most Liverpool forums and overwhelmingly most reasonable fans are not remotely looking for a replay but you've seen afew on here so it's represents a large portion ?. Liverpool are doing exactly what they should be doing and yet there's still fans like yourself trying to twist it in a having a pop as "embarrassing".

    Post edited by bdmc16 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 487 ✭✭bdmc16


    This is where I wonder if some people watched the game at all. The red cards and offside goal were only afew examples . Every single vital 50/50 decision was in spurs favour over the game. As a liverpool supporter for a long time, it was literally like watching months of unlucky calls cramped into one insane game .

    Your take on why people have a problem with Liverpool is no different to the typical response from a rival fan who if the shoe was on the foot would be saying the same as what Liverpool are now . Almost all reasonable fans here are looking for accountability and transparency.

    When you lose a league by a point to a city team after an "apology" to Everton for missing a handball that could decided a league then the consequences of these errors are huge .

    Serious questions need to asked why these officials were in the UAE 48 prior to this Liverpool (surely a conflict of interest) and then put a performance like that where they knowingly allow a wrong scoreline to stand



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭joeguevara




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 487 ✭✭bdmc16


    Not your bud and and even when your team you support won, you still on here crying about Liverpools reaction on here :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    I was at the game so I saw it. The red cards are not terrible decisions. Really they're not. I can understand the debate on the Jones one but there is a case for him going. Jota's second yellow was an absolutely brainless challenge. You should complain about him, not the ref. On the first one, he is unlucky but there is contact with Udogie. Probably unintentional, maybe not. But Jota should have been booked for a very cynical foul on Bissouma just after he came on. He deserved to be sent off.


    There you go, like many Liverpool fans today, inferring some kind or corruption. There was a massive failure of the system and a mistake made by humans. It's infuriating but, sadly, it happens. It's nothing more than that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    But the end result is the same. A club potentially loses points because of a bad decision or poor officiating. Why should what Liverpool suffered elicit any more of an extreme reaction than what Brentford or Wolves suffered?


    The point on the reaction is that most clubs are on the wrong end of poor officiating at some point. They have their little moan, are a bit sore about it and move on. The Liverpool reaction is far more extreme than I've seen from any other club over the last few years (including Arsenal who suffered a similar failure in the system last season). And the extreme nature of it has been driven by the bizarre statement the club themselves put out about it last night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,648 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    That bit has lost me a wee bit... you reckon as long as the end result (that the literal result of the match is affected) is the same, there's no difference in events? That's obviously silly... the type of failing is obviously pretty crucial to how people will feel about it.

    You're talking about emotion as if it's some weird exact robotic output... emotion will be dictated by circumstances, and these circumstances were particularly weird. I would also say that the level of emotion in all these different mess ups are all different to each other, depending on context. There's no lab-tested exact level of emotion fans should feel that will umbrella all ref errors. To think there is is a bit mad.

    I don't think a justification of emotion is required tbh (especially when a fan learns match officials immediately knew it should be 1-0, but chose to continue with the match at 0-0 anyway without interceding), but another factor - that i touched upon earlier - is the timing of the information. Normally a bad call happens, and we immediately know the full context, as much as we disagree with it. The ref's decided not to call whatever thing, and that's that. And so you have some bit of annoyed closure on it once the match is over. This one ended with a massive mystery hanging over it of exactly what happened in the VAR office. Even as late as the airing of Monday Night Football, there were still new pieces of information being added to that. And there's been more info since about the will-they/won't-they on the release of the audio. A continued story will always have a continued reaction. That's just how humans work.

    Anyway, as I said before, who cares if a set of fans of another club feel aggrieved 48 hours later? What skin off anyone's nose is it? Like, you seem as invested in the liverpool reaction, as liverpool fans are invested in the actual event itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 487 ✭✭bdmc16


    You being at the game only shows you are spurs fan and doesn't give anymore credibility to your comment .

    I don't think there is corruption and Jones Red was a red but this isn't a mistake . This is something new where refs knew they was a mistake at the time and choose not to fix it. The fact you think fobbing it off as nothing more that another bad call I totally disagree with and what is driving such outrage for transparency . How can refs for hire fly across the globe 48 hours before a game and perform to the level needed . I'm glad the club is looking for answers and rightly too .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    I only mentioned I was at the game as you seemed to wonder if I’d seen it.


    No one is trying to fob it off. I think everyone, me included, would say that there needs to be an investigation into how it happened, which PGMOL immediately said there would be, and the protocol needs to change to ensure this kind of mistake can’t happen again.


    I don’t know what else Liverpool or their fans want.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,648 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Just to chat about what happened and discuss the new bits of information continuously coming out (it was a pretty noteworthy event, with a lot more nooks and crannies to discuss than you get with your regular bad call, after all). Pretty obvious.

    Also, discourse (and particularly conflicting discourse) is what drives a subject to continue - if you're so eager for it to end and so upset by how much people have talked about it, then being so actively involved in it is probably not the best way to go about that...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    I’m not upset about it at all. Honestly, Im finding the whole thing absolutely hilarious from the club statement to some of the tinfoil hat conspiracy theories being put out there. It’s pure entertainment.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    This is the wierdest thing for me and probably shows as someone else pointed out earlier the complete lack of a decent procedure between VAR and the ref, like GNev and sky said they didnt get line images so there were most likely not drawn.

    That to me means they werent bothered to draw them and while the eyeball test was right and a miscommunication led to the wrong decision, it wasnt so obvious they werent needed i mean they should be drawn every time.

    Maybe the VAR officials are under pressure from the top to get decisions made quicker but the amateurism is baffling, Although i do quite often find myself baffled by it in football especially as a united fan

    The whole system does seem fucked and a bit like The FAI, Fifa, and any politics really those in the system just want to keep the gravy train rolling in case they get to the top, I think Lyod already mentioned it and i wouldnt go as far to call it a conspiracy but when people are well paid to do jobs that are beyond there capabilities and seemingly just promoted within that system, you will never get much improvement

    As the saying goes who watches the watchmen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,648 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    The sheer volume of your posting on the subject across multiple threads, and the emotive sentiments involved, would appear to suggest the opposite.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,613 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    And Liverpool fans asking for a change to that communication is seemingly wrong going by the constant comments and sniping in this thread, when it only helps every other team to never have the situation that happened on Saturday. Just move on they say.

    The VAR told the referee to award the goal but the referee never did and the scoreline never changed. That has never happened before and should never happen again.

    All the posters taking about other incidents that are subjective calls is a lot of crap IMO. Subjective calls happen. Such miscommunication cannot. There have been other incidents down the years where incidents have happened and they should not have. They resulted in changes to the system. The Paul Pogba goal against West Ham for example where the cameras were not set up on the sideline. The cameras are now. Only one team ever got on the right side/wrong side of that sort of freak occurence and now every team has the correct set up. It result in an instant change, and for the better. This isn't giving out about a red card etc. It's a system and process change that needs to be made.

    A major feck up has to result in a change. This wasn't subjective, it was matter of fact. Subjective happens, matter of fact cannot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    Who has said that a change to the process is wrong? I've seen quite the opposite from opposition fans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,156 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    It's not new though. Mike Dean admitted to not making calls he knew were correct because his mate was already having a tough day. In fact, I think Dean's examples were far worse because unlike in the Liverpool game, which seemed to be a genuine breakdown in communication, he basically said he would not make the correct call because it was a mate referring a game. That wasn't a communication issue, just outright cheating.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭joeguevara




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,050 ✭✭✭✭L'prof


    They really need to do away with all this drawing of lines tbh. There’s already a better system out there, just bloody use it! The automated offsides worked well in the World Cup and would have made the right call for Diaz’s goal at the weekend



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement