Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

16263656768410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,975 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    Sheff United had a goal not given when the ball crossed the line. Pretty much confirmed their relegation.

    The arsenal one is worse for me. That was a var blatantly not following the rules. This is a miscommunication if what they have said so far is true.

    The ref thought the goal was given so did a quick check and confirmed it was onside so check over. That's a human error and whole bad is understandable.

    They need to review the process because they fecked up the process here. The assistant var does essentially nothing, and when they realised their mistake they couldn't intervene.

    It just seems a completely over the top reaction from Liverpool. Talking about the integrity of the sport when they've not care before. Obviously that type of over the top response will bring out rival fans.

    And it's a shame they issued that statement as Klop was brilliant in his interview, raised his point well, made it clear it wasn't acceptable but stayed calm while doing so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I agree, leave the clubs out of it.

    Take from cricket and rugby which have had video refereeing for much longer and have standard protocols in place. Everyone knows what everything means, no mates chatting, no confusion.

    How many times have you heard the rugby VAR say "You may award the try"? Simple, straightforward, concise and absolutely clear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,818 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Definitely need different people in the VAR room as it's a different skillset. The assumption that the best on-field referees would also be the VAR referees was always flawed thinking. Akin to Argentina sending Messi to be their player in an e-sports soccer contest.

    Someone who can instinctively work out the best of 20 available angles to spot a potential handball, or notice an incident in the build-up to a goal may be a terrible on-field referee (fitness, lack of control over players maybe) but a brilliant VAR.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,666 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    If my mother tongue is shaking the foundations of your state, it probably means you built your state on my land.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,666 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    Well said.

    And I didnt realise you have be certain amount away before could discuss decision.

    Offside is offside surely be it a metre or a centimetre.

    Both were wrong calls.

    If my mother tongue is shaking the foundations of your state, it probably means you built your state on my land.

    EVENFLOW



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Augme



    You keep believing. Don't celebrate that league title just yet though!



    Of course sporting integrity had been undermined. A clear and obvious goal was ignored ignores by the people responsible for implementing the rules. I don't think that means it will delibrate though. Sporting integrity can be undefined through incompetence. I watch watc lots of sports, and I honestly can't remember the last time I've seen a video assistant genuinely have no idea what just happened during a match. Like, where they even awake when the goal was scored? Where they even in the room? None of that has been explained.


    Liverpool are perfectly entitled to ask those questions and expect answers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    Fair play. I do hope the rest of the season isn’t marred by stupid VAR decisions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Augme



    Do you not realise that they won't bother reviewing the process unless they are forced into it by external pressure? PMGOL operate like this because they can and no one has really made any demands that they change. Arsenal should have done it last year.


    But for some reason, Liverpool are being told they should just stfu and accept what's in place now. I think that's crazy personally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Augme




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,943 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I think we have went from refs and linesmen getting 98% of decisions correct with some controversial ones wrong, to VAR getting 99% of decisions right with some controversial ones wrong.

    And to get that minimal increase we added layers of complexity and completely neutered any sense of celebration after a goal is scored. Well done everybody.

    The sad fact is that they all are asking the wrong questions. Who said the point of VAR was to get more correct decisions? To get from 98% correct to 99% correct? The point of VAR was to reduce controversy, and it hasn't done that because it can never do it, subjective will remain subjective no matter how many levels of officials they have watching the game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Arsenal did do it last year, and their fans made a song and dance about it online, but were shouted down by other fans.

    Liverpool are very late coming to the VAR isn't working table.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,613 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    People giving out about Liverpool because they were on the receiving end of a wrong call and VAR inconsistencies.

    If those lads' clubs had complained when they were on the receiving end of decisions, then maybe the wrong decisions wouldn't happen so much.

    It's up to the clubs to force change. Change doesn't happen without some sort of catalyst.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,577 ✭✭✭jacool


    People here are being deliberately obtuse in pretending not to recognise the difference between

    "Offside" not matter how tight the decision is and the lines being drawn correctly e.g. Garnacho (Man Utd. vs Arsenal) and

    "Blatantly onside" where no matter what lines you draw, no offence has been committed. and the VAR decision must reflect this.

    The reason people are mentioning the term "conspiracy" is that there doesn't seem to be any logical reason as to why this goal was not allowed.

    Gary Neville said that he heard the comment "check over" but no one knows what was being checked because the VAR decision didn't go up on screen.

    At half time, Liverpool has been made aware that there had been a f**k up.

    I'm surprised that Spurs fans are weighing in so defensively, as Tottenham didn't actually do anything wrong. It would have been a very different game had the goal stood, but I think after how Spurs twice came from behind against Arsenal, they can feel that they would have done the same here. I don't think its a fight they need to get involved in. They, along with everyone, should be more interested in having VAR fixed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,665 ✭✭✭Xander10


    Did Liverpool ever speak up when they benefitted from wrong VAR calls?

    Just trying to get my head around it being for the greater good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,313 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    What club does?

    Are people seriously suggesting their club should come out and say sorry about that lads, if they the benefit from a VAR error? Should Spurs have given us the goal at half time, when everybody copped something went badly wrong?

    Why would they? The error has got nothing to do with them.

    I might have a little smile to myself the next time Spurs are on the wrong side of a VAR decision, but that's just tribalism and being a fan. It's still stupid, irrelevant and illogical. The offside call has nothing to do with Spurs.

    Next we'll be expecting Klopp to apologise and award the goal himself to Brighton, if the same thing happens in the next game against them.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,665 ✭✭✭Xander10




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,313 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    The other thing is; when the ref is asked to come over and look at the screen, start the footage at the beginning, without slow motion Then do the slow mos if needs be.

    Showing a still like they did yesterday is leading the referee to change the decision. By starting with that still, they are basically saying, look at how that tackle ended up. You better change your decision.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,067 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Going by the intense reaction I think this is the first time VAR has been used in a Liverpool game. Hence them only realising what 85% of people already have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,815 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    They did in their holes and you can be absolutely sure that if it was United or City on the receiving end of that decision at the weekend the majority of the lads crowing in here about the injustice would be laughing their arses off over it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 763 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    The look on Simon Hooper's face when the VAR spoke to him 30 seconds after the ball went out following the check complete is priceless, thank god it is black shorts that wear😀

    The poor fella as he did nothing wrong; I hope the fella doing VAR bought the first round after the game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,873 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Like the majority of non Liverpool fans now laughing at the Liverpool damn strange that i just can't put my finger on any reason why they would 🤔

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,156 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    All club's should get together and demand a complete review of how VAR is used in England. There have been too many mistakes this year already.

    Liverpool weren't even the latest example from this weekend. Brentford had a Stonewall peno not given against Forest yesterday when Turner just straight up booted Wissa up the hole after he nicked the ball off him. It wasn't even a subjective call, just 100% a penalty.

    Yet you have Dean and Co afraid to make the calls they are paid to make because their mate on the pitch might be having a tough day.

    Those comments alone should have triggered a root and branch reform. But no, we are stuck with nonsense ever week and we are all the stage were we are not even sure what the rules are anymore.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,613 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    The Premier League rejected the automated offside decisions that the World Cup etc had, for this season iirc. They don't help themselves when it comes to VAR.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,648 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Liverpool fans have been complaining about VAR for years, same as all fans - I've no idea why people see it as such a mystery that fans would be particularly aggrieved when an entirely new way to fck up occurs. This is the first time match officials actually knew there was a huge game defining mistake immediately, but didn't have the basic common sense to rectify it on the spot. Of course people will have a renewed sense of "wtf?!"

    The fact this has become fans of clubs bickering at each other, when no club is in any way at fault for anything here, is beyond me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    I don’t think one spurs has said it wasn’t a goal. We all know it was but liverpools reaction and their statement and subsequent large portions of fans (a few here but not many) demanding a replay is what’s getting everyone annoyed. The game is over Spurs won, end of.

    now if Liverpool want to go on a crusade of transparency and reform we are all supportive. But if they are trying to change the result of the match, it’s pretty embarrassing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,648 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    There is literally zero indication whatsoever that the club are looking for the result to be changed.

    Getting annoyed about what random other fans elsewhere on the internet are posting about is beyond pointless. There will always be an endless stream of nonsense from fans of all clubs, all the time. It's a fools errand.

    Nothing about the clubs official reaction or statement is in any way surprising.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    Well what escalation and resolution are they looking for?

    Leave the match and result out of it and go on the crusade. Can’t do both.

    Did I read Liverpool already voted not to have artificial intelligence VAR?

    But I wholeheartedly agree with any club that’s looking for actual reform. We have had our ups and downs with VAR but it evens out. But that’s not right either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,873 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Again with this replay nonsense where has the club asked for this or the result to be changed?

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,648 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    The entire Premier League voted to stick with the current lines-drawing var system for this year. IMO a mistake (but also something which was not enacted on Saturday - on-screen lines were especially conspicuous by their absense).

    As for escalation and resolution, that is what the requested investigation is for. If you have a problem with a procedure/process, you escalate it and look for a way to resolve future problems. Nothing about that indicates any desire for a change of result. It's basic problem/solution language.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement