Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

16162646667410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    That’s a perfectly sensible request and fully agree with you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    They could. I see these sorts of mistakes every day of the week in my work. It can happen anywhere because where you have humans, you have mistakes. The trick is to strengthen the process to eliminate the possibility of errors - not hang individuals.


    Vincent Kompany spoke very well on this today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 763 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    I am not employing my children so in the future:)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 763 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    Maybe they are looking for a transfer to another department & are smarter than suggests at first sight:)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,667 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    What's ironic is some of people outraged by Spurs call were delighted to see same result in Liverpool v Newcastle last season game in which Isak had perfect goal ruled offside. But apparently then Newcastle "deserved" it.

    If my mother tongue is shaking the foundations of your state, it probably means you built your state on my land.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I think that sort of misses the point and comes back to a sort of tribal whataboutery.

    The Isak call marginal, the sort that has depended on the VAR lines drawn that I’ve seen go against many teams. But procedure was followed as expected. The one on Saturday was a complete failure of procedure.

    Also, 100% I was delighted with the result, as Spurs fans should be with Saturday. But honestly, I don’t think anyone really thought it was correct for the referee to get a decision wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,580 ✭✭✭jacool


    People talking about "in my work" can you please jog on!

    Even with ludicrous injury time slots here, we are looking at a two hour window!!

    My wife does 12 hour shifts in hospital, no f**k ups allowed there, I can tell you.

    If you cannot commit for just two hours, with a 15 minute break in the middle, you might be in the wrong job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,874 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    That is human error if the ref drew the lines on the wrong player. I was at an MLS in March. there were 2 checks on the same goal the 1st check ruled the goal out but they missed a defender out wide, so once they seen the full picture they were able to award the goal.


    So because it is Liverpool you are not taking failures okay nice to know 19 other clubs are fine if VAR fails them but Liverpool ahh you don't care, says all we need to know on your stance.

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,874 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    What football team does John Henry own in America ?

    ******



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,069 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Lol. Where in the fùck did I hint at that?

    I was actually complaining about it this weekend after the Zaniolo offside interference goal was let stand.

    But because my complaints dont center entirely around the Liverpool error that automatically means I'm happy with it? Interesting interpretation, VAR-esque in fact.

    Sorry but the league doesn't resolve around Liverpool. All teams get fúcked and have been fùcked by the incompetence, its not just a Liverpool-only thing cloaked in conspiracy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,673 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Its all on Darren England, were they not watching the game at all? When he saw the free kick awarded to Spurs for offside, why didn't he get in the ear of Hooper and tell him stop the game, that's a goal you misunderstood.

    They to at the very least release the audio of the incident.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    I already admitted that I may have been wrong in that above. The guy on Sky Sports seemed to have suggested it but I should have verified before I said it. Apologies.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    What about, what about? What about the climate crisis.

    Btw, is that actually irony? Alanis Morissette playing in my head right now 😅



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,673 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Why are people comparing close offside calls to what happened Saturday. Do you have any idea how stupid you sound?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,080 ✭✭✭✭OmegaGene


    Maybe because it’s a discussion forum where people come to have a chat or a rant, much like you just did 🤣

    The internet isn’t for everyone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,614 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Well all you're talking about now is Liverpool going OTT and now trying to make up a conspiracy, in order to drive the Liverpool against everyone agenda. All the talk of the league revolving around Liverpool. You're trying to create a battle that isn't there.

    Too many people can't say the words 'VAR fecked up big time, in a new way, and something needs to be done about it'. Instead this thread is full of comments of decisions from 5 years ago, whatbaoutery and tribalism because of which team was on the receiving end.

    There are a number of wrong calls and inconsistencies that happened in Saturdays game. And they happen in every game and some are debatable and that's part and parcel of sport. There has never been an example where the VAR and referee were telling each other different things while assuming they were the same like on Saturday. That has to change. Whether people like yourself admit it or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Augme



    I have.


    2019/2020 - 6th

    20202/2021 - 7th

    2021/2022 - 4th

    2022/2023 - 8th


    Suggesting Spurs will finish top 4 is being generous given their recent history. A suggestion they'll finish around 6th is absolutely fair.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,069 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    No you were the one who decided that the battle

    You said that because I think Liverpool are acting like they are the only team in history to be wronged was OTT that I was automatically happy with VAR.

    This happiness with VAR being in spite of my criticisms of it from this weekend just happening to predate the Liverpool one.

    Even in this post you ramble on about tribalism with a bonus weird dig about "people like myself". So by that do you mean people like myself that think VAR is useless? Or are you still insisting I'm happy with VAR?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Augme



    Apart from the Arsenal offside the other decisions people have issue with are all subjective. When you are dealing with decisions that are subjective you should accept that mistaken interpretations of the laws will happen, especially when they have limited time to make a decision.


    What happened with Liverpool and arsenal had nothing to do with a subjective decision. For Liverpool it came down to two people responsible for VAR not ha inf a clue what actually happened on the pitch during the match. It's bizarre. The reality is if this happened in Russia, Africa or south America people would be putting it down to corruption because it is that bad.


    Also, I don't think its about the whole league standing against VAR. But if clubs that had been wronged had made stronger demands the situation might have already been fixed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    The corruption word has been thrown out a few times today by Liverpool fans. Why on earth would any official deliberately make that call? What's the motivation for the corruption?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    Well firstly why did you pick those years and not go back to 15/16 for example. Secondly we have a complete new style of play, better players, better manager. History doesn’t define current season and you’re comparing apples with oranges. I understand Liverpool fans need a scapegoat. But spurs isn’t it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,816 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Middle Eastern involvement don't ya know. Match fixing. A team effort from the Saudis trying to unsettle salah before the transfer window shut and now the Qataris bribing VAR officials to take points off Liverpool. Diabolical plan with I believe the Illuminati AND the Rothschild family involved. All to take down Liverpool.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Has there never been such an example? Have you listened to the audio from every single controversial VAR decision to conclude that Saturday was unique?

    I can tell you what makes me annoyed. I have pointed out systematic problems with VAR, including the lack of professionalism, the matey comments from Dean, the lack of diversity in recruitment of referees, the absence of a performance culture etc., and it was ignored, but, suddenly, because Liverpool were on the wrong end of a decision, VAR is bad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Augme



    I never said they would. But as I said, if this happened in other jurisdictions people would assume corruption because they wouldn't think someone could be that incompetent. But when it comes to PL referee's they absolutely can be that incompetent.



    In 2015/2016 Lecister won the league title. Not sure what that has to do with current form though. It's not about a scapegoat, it's si ply about discussing the merits of Spurs as a too three team. As for Spurs' current form, they needed the opposition to score a 95th minute winner to beat 9 men. 😂 I'm struggling to see how impressive that is, but we can agree to disagree on that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭McFly85


    It bothers me that getting rid of VAR is being considered a solution.

    VAR as a concept is a good one - having access to more data shouldn’t be seen as a bad thing.

    But having one organisation implement and execute it doesn’t work, and has led to the referees being a law unto themselves.

    Would separate organisations work? PGMOL manage matchday refereeing, training etc, with a separate organisation that manages the VAR procedures and post match reviews - a sort of refereeing regulator.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    well I am the tantamount optimist and believe we will win every game. But can understand why you aren’t of the same opinion and can respect that. One thing though, the reason why Liverpool were down to 9 men was from constant and wreck less fouling because being overrun by spurs. And the constant pressure inevitably caused your defence to flail at a cross causing a goal. Spurs were the better team. Salah was anonymous. There was a reason Allison got a good rating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    There’s a very sinister undercurrent to the outrage from Liverpool fans though. You’re not the first to use the corruption word and, whether deliberately or not, you’re creating an impression there was something underhand going on. Of course, you can say that you, and others, are just random people on the internet so what does it matter. Well, all that noise gathers pace and Liverpool themselves released an official statement saying that sporting integrity had been undermined. Again, a not so subtle inference that this was deliberate.


    Liverpool suffered a very bad call at the weekend. But it was a mistake. Human error. It’s **** but it happens in every walk of life and has happened for as long as sports have been played.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 789 ✭✭✭finno


    or could we say it's the glaziers fault, seems to work for you guys.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,614 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Here's a list of all of the PGMOL statements where they have admitted they fecked up. None have the example on Saturday where the VAR was telling the ref to give a goal as his lineman was wrong. But he assume they were saying not to give it.

    This has to change the wording for future cases or else the same thing will keep happening over and over again and we will have wrong decisions again and again again.


    Leave the clubs out of it, and it's easier to talk about VAR.




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement