Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

15758606263410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,413 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Can you show me the letter of the law where it states it's a red?

    I posted earlier where VAR issued a statement last season and confirmed that those types of tackles were not a red card offense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,247 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    Hold on a second here bud, I’m just quoting what Townsend said in response to someone saying he said it wasn’t a red.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,672 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    My issue with the red was the VAR just showed a slow motion of the contact Jones made, which doesn't show the full picture. Jones wasn't reckless or endangering his opponent. What else is Jones supposed to do?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,639 ✭✭✭Iago


    casemiro got a red for an almost identical 'roll over the top of the ball' challenge earlier this season. FWIW I don't think either should have been red but if there was consistency you could just about accept it. There were a few challenges yesterday that seemed to be ignored in various games, a particularly high one on Rashfords knee comes to mind but there was another in a different game that I was convinced would be red and wasn't even given a yellow. Both, for my money, were worse than the Jones tackles yesterday or the Casemiro one earlier in the season.

    The offside is probably the most disgraceful decision I can remember. Not because they gave offside, but because VAR clearly saw it wasn't, muddled up communication and didn't fix the error. Like some 4 year old child who broke a vase and runs off before anyone sees who was at fault. I don't remember anything like that happening before and I'm not sure it ever will again and for that reason Liverpool were absolutely screwed and not by something that 'evens out' in a season.

    In relation to the VAR still, they pretty much do that on every tackle. The still is always on the point of contact on the opposition player. In the recent piece Howard Webb did on SKY you can hear one of the refs going to the monitor and saying 'Give me a still on the point of contact and then run through the clip' so it is clearly something they have decided on as a group, possibly believing that the default of them being called over is that they have missed something..so there's definitely an inherent bias in there but it's against everyone that is subjected to a VAR check rather than an individual player or team.

    LLYod is right though, the reason it's so bad in England is that they are the only association (that I know of) who have tried to implement a system where the on field ref is almost infallible and so there's a reluctance to intervene or overturn their decisions. Everywhere else the VAR is considered an aid, only in England do officials think it is a slur on their ability.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 34,981 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    And it started with the still that added to the case of it being a red. The reverse angle at normal speed would indicate a yellow could well have been the right decision - not shown at all.

    Add to that, the Joke of an offside decision. Coupled with Jota's firts yellow for a player simply tripping over. Add to that a Spurs player on a yellow, asking for a yellow - but not getting one himself. A still of the tackle on Gakpo looked like a Red also etc etc

    It's just strange that All of this happened in one single game.

    A real pity, as it was gearing up to be a cracker of a game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,413 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Casermio wasn't sent off this year? Think he was sent off around the time the Spurs fella didn't get sent off and that's why VAR made the statement wasn't it?

    That Rashford one was a really bad challenge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,352 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    The point is that the contact Jones ultimately made with Bissouma's leg was dangerous and deemed to be worthy of a red. What preceded that - the sole of his boot making contact with and then slipping over the top of the ball - is rendered irrelevant as is whether there was no intent to commit a foul. Neville, commentating on Sky, was seeking to absolve Jones on the basis of the challenge being accidental and not malicious which is just nonsensical .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,639 ✭✭✭Iago


    Absolutely correct, honestly it’s been so bad at United that all the games and seasons are blending into one.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 23,414 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kiith


    Why is there such an issue that the first thing the ref was shown was the still image of where Jones caught Bissouma? The height of the contact, along with the force (intentional or not) was specifically what cause it to be a red card.

    They also showed it slow mo, and at full speed. Didn't change the refs mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,247 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    IMG_0270.jpeg

    Decisions yesterday have not even made up for a fraction of this mistake.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,965 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    Ya, but he also said Jones won the ball and that for him and a lot of other players that's all that matters, and so the rest is academic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,247 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    He said it was excessive force and deserved a red. He was the only one of ex players to say it though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,965 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    I'm not saying what happens after winning the ball is academic, Townsend said it. This is his quote:

    Former Tottenham star Andros Townsend concluded: ”Letter of the law, the force it has to be a red card.

    “But he does get enough of the ball and for me, and for a lot of players – football is a contact game, as soon as you get the ball, the rest is history.”

    So he's saying the law is wrong and it shouldn't have been a red card.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,247 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    Yes that’s it exactly. He’s saying the law is wrong but it is a red card

    honestly think Andros was going out of his way to be controversial yesterday to get a permanent job.

    Post edited by joeguevara on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,321 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Eventually there will be no tackling. Man City don’t tackle, they foul. Takes the risk out of it.



  • Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭ Van Tall Cemetery


    It's the most obvious red card you'll ever see. It's one of the only correct decisions from yesterday. Any other league and there isn't a debate. You don't have this nonsense in rugby over decisions. World cup is a breath of fresh air over watching over paid football players whinging and their idiotic fans



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭Lauras Law


    You think the red card needs to be looked into. And in another post you said it was "mired in controversy". So I think it safe to assume you don't think it was a red card offence? Or at the very least you're on the fence about it. So could you please enlighten us as to how this incident is so different to a red card that Casemiro received last season for a very similar incident which you said at the time "He can have no complaints, it was a red"?

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/120349092/#Comment_120349092



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    80% of his posts are little digs at Utd. We all know the game.

    To be fair it is funny watching them trying to twist things into an anti Utd post.

    At least they aren't hiding their bias I suppose 😂😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,939 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    Why was there no 4pm "super sunday" game today?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,872 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Sky control that and wanted all eyes on the Ryder Cup it is the same every time the Ryder Cup is in Europe

    ******



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,872 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    It was the Ryder Cup Sky have only had one PL game on the final day of the Ryder Cup when in Europe and its usually none of the big teams

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,965 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    For starters Casemiro was out of control, thought he was Liu Kang. Jones was on his feet, won the ball and had nowhere near the force of Casemiro's aerial lunge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,413 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    50K + at the Liverpool Arsenal game today. Great turnout.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,413 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Ok I understand that point of view as well.

    Would you say the Spurs player could see red for this tackle as it's from behind and could lead to a serious injury?

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,965 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    I'd say the ticket prices between the men's game and the women's game is like comparing apples and oranges, but that's not even remotely close.

    A 5 game home package, lower tier for the women's game costs £50. One equivalent home men's game ticket, well you can check it out yourself as there's various options, but it could cost a little over 50% more for 1 men's home game as opposed to 5 matches for women. There's a gulf in ticket prices though between men and women.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    This tackle led to an ACTUAL injury, not a theoretical :he could have been badly hurt there if there was more force ', force which there wasn't there in Jones tackle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,850 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    are Liverpool looking for a replay on Spurs game ?

    cant see it happening , similar to the Glen/Crokes football final saga.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,872 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    The game will never be replayed just a strong worded statement to show they are not happy how yesterday went is what I say

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,413 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Spurs won the game, it's not their fault the VAR fecked up. It'd be very unfair to Spurs for a replay to happen and I doubt any sane Liverpool fan would call for one.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 34,981 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    I don't think they are. It would never happen and rightly so.

    I think their statement is an effort to push the issue as far as possible, we won't be passive about accepting the mistake kinda thing.

    It might grow legs in as far as Audio might have to be releaased or look at the whole Audio issue going forward - which would be a good thing overall.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement