Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

30k speed limits for all urban areas on the way

1394042444557

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,485 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    but yes, further road design would not be unwelcome in reducing speeds on a road originally laid out for higher speeds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,443 ✭✭✭VonLuck


    I am regularly in the Phoenix Park and I can tell you that the majority of cars (motorists) are not doing the posted 30km/h speed limit!

    You can't solely rely on people's behaviours to change just because you've told them that they have to reduce their speed.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,485 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    well, the new speed limiters built into cars may have an effect on that hopefully - and it might only take a few new cars to create the 'context' for other road users to stick to the same speed.


    not that i've heard a lot about those speed limiters having any effect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61 ✭✭Disco24


    Wonder could insurance companies offer a substantial discount for motorists that agree to have speed recorded against limits. Technology mustn't be that far to allow this. Drivers who break speed limits regularly I'd imagine are more likely to attract claims.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,928 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    BoxyMo (and possibly others) have been doing that for quite some time now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,374 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Old review here

    Can't see it working myself. Road limits are so random even a saint will get caught out from time to time.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,485 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Technology mustn't be that far to allow this

    again, apparently it's already in cars which were new to the market since the middle of last year; and all cars sold from July next year must also have it too.



  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Next up, Limerick City Council will vote on Monday to apply a 30k limit in the city center

    I'm guessing this will pass without issue given the national speed limit review that came out recently, as in its better for them to do it now, get some publicity out of it rather than wait for it to be imposed

    But hey, this is local councilors so anything is possible



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 698 ✭✭✭TedBundysDriver



    30 is ridiculously low for that park. I regularly do 60 or more safely when i have to dash through there.

    Amnesty International’s new investigation shows that Israel imposes a system of oppression and domination against Palestinians across all areas under its control: in Israel and the OPT, and against Palestinian refugees, in order to benefit Jewish Israelis. This amounts to apartheid as prohibited in international law.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,928 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,374 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    For those on the Pedestrian/ Zebra Crossings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,403 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    Ever been hit by a car doing 60kph? Trust me…it hurts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,374 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,403 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    im sure it does, it not as much…car that hit me was doing 60+.. (in a 30 zone) thankfully it was just the door mirror that glanced off my arm. It was enough to take the bike from under me and I landed on the road. I was even more grateful that when I fell to the ground, the car coming towards me was able to stop before running over me.

    BTW…I agree that 30kph is too slow in the Phoenix park with its current road design. They need to modify the roads (add chicanes, speed ramps etc.) to slow cars down. Expecting cars to stick to 30kph along Cheaterfield Ave. is unrealistic at the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,374 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    That it hurts when it by a car seems quite an arbitrary metric.

    If they have a issue with pedestrians crossing on Chesterfield Ave perhaps a pedestrian crossing might work better than playing chicken through traffic at ANY speed.

    Besides AFAIK the park isn't a public road in the normal sense. They can just put in a by law and change whatever rule they want. I'm open to correction on that.

    I'm a bit baffled why if pedestrian safety is an issue for the OPW. Why they have not put any pedestrian crossings on the Ave. If the OPW don't want cars going up the middle, why they don't route them around the perimeter. Theres himalayan speed ramps on the north road. No one's doing high speed over those.



  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Personally I find a through road in the middle of the park more baffling but that's just me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,374 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Not entirely sure why they OPW (and others) are more interested in cars than actual safety.


    The Park is man made. Its artificial. Its AFAIK always had a through roads (plural) even pre-car. They rebuilt the Ave about a decade ago. Because it didn't have a proper foundation. They closed it for best part of a year. That was the time to close it.

    Back in the day they ran a Grand Prix in the Park. Ironically they ran a pedestrian subway crossing for the race, under the Ave and OPW haven't even a zebra crossing.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,510 ✭✭✭jlang


    Independent of car speed it has already got so much safer to cross the road since the parking along the Avenue stopped because driver and pedestrian sightlines are so much better. I wouldn't be in favour of installing dedicated crossing points. I prefer being able to cross the road wherever using normal safe cross code procedure. Drivers should be considerate and careful everywhere in the park, not just if the road has stripes painted. It's not like the deer will ever restrict their crossings to designated points.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,374 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Certainly adds a bit of excitement when a pedestrian or jogger just randomly runs out across in front of a cyclist.

    Can't blame the deer for being skittish when we shoot a load of them on a regular basis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,403 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    The park’s primary role should be for people to relax/recreation etc. Any road restrictions should be for motor vehicles. People should be free to cross wherever/whenever they wish. If designed appropriately it’s possible to cater for this. In short the OPW need to prioritise people over vehicles. If they did that then the changes needed are quite obvious. BUT, we all know that the changes needed will never be approved by our current politicians. The fact that they managed to remove the car paring along chesterfield ave is a miracle!



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,485 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    the time difference between doing 60 on the main avenue and doing 30 is a maximum of 4 minutes.

    you'd lose that on a busy day waiting just to get past the top of auburn avenue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,831 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    The majority of motorists are doing lower speeds than they were doing before the 30 kmph limit came into play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,374 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    The removal of that car parking was primarily due to pedestrians walking anywhere they wanted to and causing issues on the cycle lane. So they moved the cycle lane to the road.

    People have been asking OPW for segregated cycle lanes in the park for a decade or more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,374 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Hope we'll see you all at the bike disco...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,374 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    You'd have to be mad to go through Castleknock unless you absolutely had to. Always a queue there these days.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,394 ✭✭✭SeanW


    A good piece of propaganda maybe, but not much else. A genuinely "good piece" would explore a concept from a neutral lens, provide background, context etc. Good propaganda on the other hand, starts with the conclusion and works backwards, misleading or deceiving the reader as necessary to support the pre-ordained narrative.

    At no point in your "good piece" did it point out that Ireland has among the world's best road safety records or that fatalities are so rare that they can be measured in the low single-digits per billion vehicle kilometres, both of which they could have determined by spending 5 minutes on wikipedia. Nor did it point out that cruising at low speeds like 30kph uses significantly more fuel than at more normal speeds like 50 or 60.

    At no point did it try to estimate how much of people's time and fuel would be wasted by wallpapering main roads with absurdly low limits. And the author straight up lied by claiming that "default" would not be the same a "blanket" as we saw what 30kph as default would look like with Dublin City Councils "Love 30" campaign.

    So your "good piece" is really just a collection of carefully chosen arguments, lies of omission and just straight up lies.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭kennethsmyth


    Why was 40kph not considered ????



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,374 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    So much stop start driving in urban areas that fuel economy is irrelevant. An EV is going to be far more efficient.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,203 ✭✭✭Rubberchikken


    Instead of focusing on 30 kmh limits which won't be enforced or obeyed they should really crack down on phone use while driving.

    I had a dopey one come around the corner weaving over the centre line while talking into her phone which she was waving around in front of her gob because seemingly the utter plank's ears weren't working.

    Not much going on in that thick head of hers either.

    If I go out in a firey crash I don't want it to be caused by some dim half witted phone user😄



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Phone use is absolutely a problem, no denying that.

    Ok, let's do that, crack down on phone use. Assume we eliminate it as an issue, 100% eliminate it.

    Now, for the collisions that will still happen between motor vehicles and pedestrians/cyclists at 50k,how will the severity of those impacts be reduced?

    Answer, the severity will not be reduced as this comes down to physics. Getting hit at 30k is way more survivable than getting hit at 50k.

    Don't get me wrong, I agree phone use while driving is a problem ghat needs to be tackled and addressing it will reduce the amount of collisions.

    However, that does not mean we shouldn't go for the day 30k limit. Simple physics shows the benefits.



Advertisement