Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Cold Case Review of Sophie Tuscan du Plantier murder to proceed

17475777980404

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    Ok, so the Gardaí on their way to the scene had to call Alfie back for more directions when they failed to find the house.

    The forensics team from Dublin failed to find the house and had to use a public phone to get directions.

    Dr Harbison said afterwards the house had been difficult to find.

    There's one thing having a map with the house marked on it, it's another thing getting verbal instructions. Which were you using?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,012 ✭✭✭Deeec


    This just proves the level of intelligence of the local gardai if they had to call Alfie for directions!

    Prior to sat navs and google maps people did manage to find their way around rural Ireland relatively easy using maps and landmarks to guide them. To say the rural location rules out anyone outside of the locality as the murderer is absolutely ridiculous.

    The location was easy to find for anyone that wanted and needed to find it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,383 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I just used a map, nothing more than an oldfashioned map. I didn't ask anybody for any sort of instructions.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,806 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    What on the map specifically identified Sophie's house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,383 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    What do you want with your questions? State the contrary?

    I bevlieve I've written it many times before.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    It's quite simple really, did you have Sophie's house marked on your map, if so where did you get that information from?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    It's very simple to find the house for someone who has been told. If you're heading from Schull to Goleen you only need to take two turns.

    I can only conclude that any of the investigating team who had any difficulty locating the house after the first Garda arrived on site were either not given instructions, were instructed by an idiot, were an idiot or some combination of all three.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,806 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I earlier described how a friend was crap at driving getting lost on the M50. I also know other people who, havng clear directions, would still manage to turn down towards Glan and manage to do the loop of Mt Gabriel. Lots of people are just crap at navigating!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    To say the rural location rules out anyone outside of the locality as the murderer is absolutely ridiculous."

    No, the remoteness of the location would suggest it was someone either familiar with the area or someone given directions to the house, they could be from anywhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 199 ✭✭Ms Robini


    One definition of theory in this context is that it is a formal set of ideas intended to explain why something happened. Like the theories in this case, there’s more than one definition!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,383 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I think the answer has been given below:

    Only, I didn't ask anybody, used a bit of common sense, assumed a bit, added one and one together, and got lucky the first time trying. If not, I would have gotten lucky the 2nd time.

    I specifically didn't want to ask anybody local, as I didn't want to cause negative feelings, like another outsider - blow in, whatever sniffing around just for curiosity reasons.

    It's really not too difficult for somebody with a bit of common sense and pratical thinking and a sense of orientation. The latter is probably hard to understand for some people with no sense of orientatin as they feel lost anywhere, no matter if it's during daylight or at night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    That presumed it was targeted in some way (either the house or Sophie herself) it may have been unplanned or completely random. Nothing should be ruled in or out without evidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,012 ✭✭✭Deeec


    I don't agree with this at all. Anyone who needed (for whatever purpose) to find Sophie's house would have absolutely found it by whatever means.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,383 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I see this the same way. Anyone who needed to go there could do that, even without asking any locals, not drawing any suspicions.

    On top of that, none of that talk would move this case forward anyway. It doesn't prove anything.

    The killer got to Sophie's house, that's certain, how he found it, how he got there, even the motive for murder is unclear, same if it was planned or unplanned. Certain is also that the killer knew Sophie was staying at her cottage.

    The rest is just a number of possible theories and personal views.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    "Certain is also that the killer knew Sophie was staying at her cottage."

    If you mean they knew she was there and set out to engage with her for whatever reason, that's not certain at all. It's possible they didn't know she was there until they turned up expecting the house to be empty and only realised she was home when they saw her car there and the lights on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,383 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Strictly theoretically yes it would have been possible.

    However I doubt that.

    The killing was about Sophie, to stop her from doing something and if she wasn't to be "reasoned with" to stop her forever and that with certainty. Also the house isn't visible from the main road, only if you drive or walk the road in, you'll see Sophie's house at some distance, - and certainly also lights on and a car parked in the darkness. But agreed, that's an opinion and a theory, not a proven fact.

    There were also no random killings in the area.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 Dogspaw


    Been following this and regd to say Bailey in hospital after heart attack. Says no deathbed confession. He says if he dies he is innocent



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,817 ✭✭✭Xander10


    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41223016.html

    The headline is possibly overstated. But with his lifestyle it's not surprising he has health issues



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,421 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    Bailey was friendly with Alfie and Shirley. They may have informed him that Sophie visited the cottage alone - more often than not. Whoever killed her knew she would be alone that evening and also that the neighbours would not notice his arrival and departure and were unlikely to hear any loud activity or commotion. The killer had probably scoped the area late at night beforehand and would have been familiar with Sophie's nocturnal habits and that she still would have been awake and up at that particular time of day. He arrived and departed on foot. I don't think there's any doubt about that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,421 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    No. It never was easy to find for complete outsiders visiting the area for the first time circa 1996 and that remains the case today. Google Maps/Streetview or whatever are of no use because no images or directions exist to this day of the (very minor) road leading to the house.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    Google StreetView takes you to within 200 mtrs of Sophie's house and the house is clearly visible.

    In fact the house was clearly labelled on Google maps as "Sophie's House" and Bailey's house was labelled as the "Prairie Cottage" up to a few of years ago, these were removed to stop the weirdos and ghouls visiting the sites. But that's immaterial as that kind of information was not available 26 years ago. The boreen up to the 3 houses is a dead end and has no road number, in fact the road it's off, the L8413, (Kealfada road) has no L road number signposted at it's Dunmanus end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,012 ✭✭✭Deeec


    Your missing the point though - anyone that NEEDED to find that house would have found it. Are you telling me a hitman, a member of the Gardai or another randomer couldn't have possibly found that house - of course they could have using directions and maps.

    A person on a mission to meet with Sophie that night /morning ( for whatever purpose) would have found her house.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,383 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Some people simply want to cement the idea that just because the house is remote it could only have been a local who killed her.

    As you said correctly, anybody who needed to find the house would have found it. No need to ask anybody. I did with ease and luck, others would have as well. And those who were "unlucky" means they had just taken one exit too soon, but would have been lucky 2nd time trying......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,064 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    How do you for sure know it was a single 'he' responsible?

    How do you know for sure they arrived on foot?

    Or went there with murder in mind?

    You simply don't.

    This is just claims and opinions misrepresented as facts. Backwards logic.

    Post edited by odyssey06 on

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭Andrea B.


    I said it before, and now again.

    A male, wishing to minimise blood evidence and maintain silence may have well veered towards strangulation.

    The frenzied animosity of what that lady suffered, should never rule out another female, who may have considered her a "threat".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Gussie Scrotch


    No, it certainly cannot be ruled out.

    But, statistically, its more likley to have been a man.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭Andrea B.


    That does not say it was a man. There are no other indicators (force, sexual, bite, punch..) to say it was a man.

    Further, female suspects become more relevant in murder investigations where a frenzied attack has taken place. Think 76 stab wounds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    Or 2 perhaps, one of each?

    A fight with a woman, and her male partner came back to finish the job with the concrete block. Remember both the first Guards on the scene and the doctor claimed there was 2 different ages of blood.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,347 ✭✭✭FrankN1


    Very strange case overall. But most likely that the main suspect went to see her from the bar and then got frustrated after his advances.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭Andrea B.


    By the main suspect, you mean IB?

    Only proven guilty of being a twit and having physically assaulted his partner.



Advertisement