Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1318831893191319331943690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 698 ✭✭✭TedBundysDriver


    I haven't bothered following the daily in's and out's of the war but the reason i ask the question is because the analyst on sky sounded pretty much as saying the window was closing rapidly for success and i remember a few months back hearing a lot of experts saying this offensive was Ukraine's last chance to regain what's rightfully theirs.

    You are right though, there where many very naive predictions and a lot of bravado that was never realistic.

    Amnesty International’s new investigation shows that Israel imposes a system of oppression and domination against Palestinians across all areas under its control: in Israel and the OPT, and against Palestinian refugees, in order to benefit Jewish Israelis. This amounts to apartheid as prohibited in international law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,852 ✭✭✭zv2


    It is hard to determine if it is a failure or success unless you know what the Russian strength is. There is a lot of uncertainty about what they have. But they are losing battles so they can't have a huge amount left.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,887 ✭✭✭Apiarist


    Yes, the bridge can be defended from rocket attacks with a combination of air defence systems. Which needs to be taken off the front lines, so Ukraine wins in any case if it continues sending cheap drones and rockets towards the bridge. But the bridge was damaged twice already, and not by rockets -- once by a truck bomb, and another time by drone boats. Next time it could be mined by Ukrainian sappers brought by a submarine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,703 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    There was a Washington post article released either today or yesterday where US Intelligence officials are saying its unlikely that this Ukraine counter offensive will achieve the gold medal of piercing all the way to Melitopol. Just to get ahead of the misery merchants on the thread.

    And while I'd actually agree that it seems unlikely that Ukraine will reach the sea of Azov by this time 8 weeks there really isn't anything new in the article that isn't widely known for months now.

    • Ukraine not using NATO tactics but opting for small scale and attrition rather than driving all their units in a columns and taking huge losses
    • Russian minefields and defenses more formidable than originally thought
    • Ukr not having air superiority
    • Counter offensive being a tough slog

    The hope is there'll be a breakthrough somewhere by October but it's looking increasingly unlikely.

    By what metric are you basing this on? Ukraine are on the offensive and currently(going by Oryx) destroying Russian armor and equipment at a rate 3x to what they're losing. That's absolutely miraculous considering the defenders advantage. And an absolute disaster for Russia. Russian artillery and counter battery is being absolutely genocided daily.Russia even fired one of their most respected generals for saying as much. They fully lost 2 of their most effective anti armor helis yesterday alone. And continue to lose 1 a week.

    The Ukr forces that have crossed the Dnipro continue to creep forwards towards the only good main supply line in the south by Oleshky. And Russia seem unable to dislodge them. Almost certainly because they simply don't have the reserves to do it. Another potentially catastrophic sign for Russia. And now as of a couple of days ago Ukraine has put their 82nd brigade into the mix. So we'll see soon enough why they've chosen to do this.

    All that implies that a breakthrough is much MORE likely now than it was 2 months ago. Unless the mud season starts tomorrow. They may not make massive gains in this counter offensive noone here knows. But I just can't agree that the signs are terrible as of today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,703 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Depends on what analyst you're listening to. If it's Michael Clarke then he's been reasonably good so far. Although nobody has a crystal ball and its not clear but to a handful of people what's actually happening on the ground as a whole.

    If its Sean Bell then good luck. The guy is as much a military analyst as I am. A through and through idiot who has been calling for Ukraine to sue for peace since the start of the war. Even as Russia was flattening Severodonetsk. If Ukr had taken his advice they wouldn't have reclaimed Kherson nor Kharkiv.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,852 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 54,514 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    If you think lefties support a totalitarian right wing country like Russia then you've been drinking the far right coolaid my friend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,965 ✭✭✭rogber


    This is a good point. I remember hearing on an economist podcast an excellent remark that dictatorships often look very secure until about 5 minutes before they collapse. The stalemate situation could be similar. Or it might go on and on. Who knows...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,306 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Expectations by who? I don't recall anyone from Ukraine laying out their expectations. Things haven't gone gung-ho and that's a disappointment to the war fan boys out there who then throw their soothers at the laptop when there isn't carnage and Russians dying/fleeing while the Ukrainians dance at the crossroads in celebration. Who set the time limit on these expectations? Did someone say if ye lads aren't in some village with X thousand dead Russians then go home and the war is over? No they didn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,303 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    They do. For example, Clare Daly and Mick Wallace have consistently voted against Europe in favour of Putin's Russia.

    The recent term Campist encapsulates their thinking:

    "A leftist who supports any country/organization simply for being opposed to the United States or the West, including authoritarian governments who would otherwise not follow leftist beliefs."

    They are typically smart enough to make a vapid condemnation of Putin, but typically it's just window dressing before making statements that are directly in line with Putin's. The "Putin is bad but" trope.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 54,514 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    I'd put them in a wheelie bin marked 'clowns'. I wouldn't even call them leftists. Most people on the left have compassion for the common man.

    Anyway:

    This could well be Ukraine moving laterally along the Russian defensive line as consolidating this line for defense for themselves. I just hope they keep pushing. If they can do the same at the tokmak like then Russia has basically lost the entire south.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,924 ✭✭✭thomil


    I wish you were right, but looking at the local far-left crowd, or the likes of the Linkspartei back in Germany, they are fully onboard with the Kremlin line. Anything that goes against the "evil" United States and NATO must be supported.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    There's a cohort of Left Wing people who, in a ideological desperation to pin the blame on The West/NATO/The USA, will jump through hoops to at best, Both Sides the war & at worst, openly support Russia's right to invade or will argue away Ukrainian autonomy like it's nothing. From the likes of Jeremy Corbyn to Brazil's Lula to Sabine Higgins, nominally sober and left-leaning figures have simply ignored the concept of Russia as either autocratic - or Empire Building, such is the myopia for all things "west".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,303 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,139 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    You’re engaging in the “no true Scotsman” fallacy. Daly and Wallace are, by any reasonable definition, on the (far) left of Irish politics.

    I will note that “being soft” on Russia is not a prerequisite for being on the left. Brendan Ogle is a contrary example to be commended: https://www.newstalk.com/news/war-on-ukraine-the-left-is-being-too-soft-on-putin-brendan-ogle-1388301



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I would question how Noted Businessman Mick Wallace could be considered "far left" though, purely from an economic perspective, for someone to be quite ... enthusiastic in the pursuit of private capital wealth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Did you see the footage from the Bray chap called Finn last night on RTE? In one of the sectors he was in, he noted that the Ukrainians were just collecting their own casualties and filmed Russian bodies rotting away on the roadsides. I'm sure they'll be tidied up in time but not a priority when their f***er friends are still trying to wipe you out. Better things to be doing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,894 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Any Ukrainian gains will have been a success (and we're already past that criteria), russia aren't advancing, their economy is collapsed and they're now having to defend Moscow from daily attacks.

    From Ukraine's perspective, it won't be over until they have their territory back, however long that takes.

    From "the west's" perspective, now that all bridges with russia have been burned, by russia, while russians were standing on them, continued support of Ukraine is still the cheapest ever dismantling of a superpower. The weapons to Ukraine will continue to flow, once F-16 are added, then there will be clamouring for F-18 maybe F-35 (I doubt the latter, but I doubted we'd see Abrams as well).

    It also acts as a cautionary tale for others thinking to do the same (China with Taiwan), doubly so by NATO and allies all turning the weapons production back to full, so there will be far more exercises carried out and equipment available if and when needed (my own opinion is that China will just wait it out and both countries will meet in the middle at some point far in the future).

    As others have said, artillery superiority on the Ukraine side makes it a long winter for russian troops, but I do expect them to lash out at civilians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,764 ✭✭✭storker


    It's funny how a policy of "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" was criticised when the US indulged in it e.g. with the Taliban, but is now a perfectly sensible policy when the anti-America/NATO types do it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,139 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    That’s where the fallacy part of the “no true Scotsman” fallacy lives. Concentrating on one particular aspect in isolation, demanding purity, and dismissing the overwhelming evidence as a whole. There’s nothing that says the far left can’t be susceptible to hypocrisy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭ColemanY2K


    100%... taking tokmak would open up a potential dash to the coast but the town is 25km or so from the frontline with enormous russian defensive positions in-between. the russians will throw absolutely everything at the ukrainians to stop them getting to tokmak in order to prevent a potentially war ending scenario from occurring.

    map below courtesy of ISW which illustrate the dense russian defenses.

    ISW.JPG


    🌞 7.79kWp PV System. Comprised of 4.92kWp Tilting Ground Mount + 2.87kWp @ 27°, azimuth 180°, West Waterford 🌞



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,513 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Yeah and the problem is that they will be adding to these every day making them stronger or more of them. That's why it's super important that Ukraine can get as far as they can before the really bad weather happens as Russia just needs time to increase their defences. So the more pain Ukraine can dish on the Russians before the bad weather happens the better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭TheRepentent


    I think Moscow Mick only sucks at Putins teat , cos he knows if he lived in Russia his corruption would of earned him kudo's



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,530 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    So it seems, as we speculated about previously , the Cluster Munitions are having a decisive impact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,513 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    I know Russia are using them but I wonder will they increase production of them to use on Ukrainian military.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭ColemanY2K


    For ordinary Joe's like us there's no way of telling what state the russian forces are in (I'm sure the IC community know full well the current situation). They could collapse in days or hang in there right through the winter. As you said the more attrition the better before winter.

    Had the US supplied large quantities of ATACMS in 2022 this war would surely be over by now.

    🌞 7.79kWp PV System. Comprised of 4.92kWp Tilting Ground Mount + 2.87kWp @ 27°, azimuth 180°, West Waterford 🌞



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,223 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I don't think the war would be over no matter what was supplied but if everything that is going to be drip fed was just given straight away or ASAP including training on fighter jets starting immediately a huge number of Ukraine civilian and soldiers lives would be saved and Russia army casualties would be far higher.

    By now they'd have probably retaken the south and northern luhansk province up by svatove. And by now they'd probably attempting to retake Crimea, Mariupol and Donetsk. Bakhmut would never have fallen.

    But alas the West has appeased Russia too much and prolonged this war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,852 ✭✭✭zv2


    40 Cesars/Archers pounding those trenches in the south, for a month, should do a lot of good. Time for the west to shift gear.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,566 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    The most well known leftist who adopts the Kremlin line is Naom Chompsky. He was, at least until very recently, considered to be the opposite of a clown.

    I'm pretty sure that it is not the case that he was just given a big bag of money and told to go out and spread the good word of Putin.

    Instead, he is, as other posters have pointed out, ideologically opposed to the USA and to any military assistance abroad. He also needs to be seen to be outside of mainstream or conservative thinking. And he also, in a weird way, thinks that he is being compassionate for his fellow man by suggesting in a rather Utopian way, that if only there was peace there wouldn't be so many Ukrainians being killed at the moment.

    These guys were saying the same thing about the invasion of Iraq and they had a point. Lots of people, including myself, agreed wholeheartedly that the USA was wrong in that instance. We believed that they were speaking from a position of high morality.

    However, with Russia's invasion of Ukraine the tide has really gone out on these people. They are not high minded or moral. They are just contrarians who object to the established order because it appeals to a certain demographic and it gets them paid.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement