Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill 2022 - Read OP

How exactly would this legislation in particular help with lying and non-violent crimes exactly?

You’re peddling this angle as though there are no laws currently in place to deal with such instances, when there are. You even had to go back to Nazi Germany to try have a position on this, if you go back far enough I’m sure you’ll find some sort of solace. This pertains to legislation today, not the 1940’s.

You can reject all you like, but you did do it. If it's not characteristic of how you feel, then that's your fault fro not articulting yourself propoerly. You were given countless oppertunities to clarify, you declined them all.

Saying libel and slander should be legalised is kinda sbackups my point: why else would any sane person want it legalised? Unless you want anarchy, but that would suprise me.

The Nazi comparison has been presented and backed up. You disagreeing with it or baselessly attacking it changes nothing: legalised lying of minorities was one of the first steps of the rise of Hitler: you can't honestly deny that.

Not nessecarily. I'm saying that current law is NOT adequate and I've used the actions of posters like Rapidash to prove it. It's not about "feelings", it's about honesty. Never once did I write the word "feelings". Again: READ THE POST BEFORE REPLYING. It does not contain the word "feelings".

Posters attacking me personally does not challenge my point. Changing my argument to suit themselves - as you've done twice in a row now - does nothing to challenge my point.

How is the current law not adequate then? If you’re going to use one posters posts (which, by the way, I am confused as to how that justifies your switch in stance), that’s a very poor level of argument to go from. Actions of a poster on boards is hardly solid evidence for the need for national legislation.

Ive not seen any poster attack you personally either, but you may well be reading it that way, that would be on you though, not the posters.

Immoral, fine, but that’s not illegal. I don’t see how it could be seen as dangerous, if it was then it would be libel, and we have legislation for that.

You say the poster wants the right to tell lies about people, and they should be. If there are adverse reactions or outcomes from that, there is existing legislation for that. So again, I can’t see your stance on this legislation having any real legs.

Not liking what someone has to say shouldn’t warrant interference from a government. If you don’t like what they say, don’t listen.

More the consequences being dangerous. If I say knowling lie and tell someone that you're a pedophile, for example, and someone else goes and beats you up; are you going to see me as partly responsible?

Again - it's not about not liking what someone has to say, it's about using the dangers of using lies to spread false information. I've been over this and I've given examples, not doing it a third time.

And there you are again with the lies. No wonder you're against the law so much. Again, it's all you have.

I didn;t compare Ireland with Goebbels - I compared YOU to Goebbels (although on reflection, comparing you to the German public would be more accurate: Goebbles knew exactly what he was doing). I've given reasons, but you can;t debate the reasons, can you? Yo can only make false accusations.

Now, you want to debate the reasons with honesty, or are we done here?

Unwilling (or unable) to debate reasons, reasons for comparison remains unchallenged, we're done here.

I would say that "only tiny amount of prosecutions" actually indicates it's a good law - the bar to prosecute people for words should be very high indeed.

Yes, and this legislation will stop that apparently. Hitler and the boys wouldn't of had a hope if there was a German Helen around back in the 1930s.