Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

RTÉ admits paying Tubridy €345,000 more than declared

1616617619621622848

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 Clay Shaw


    Word in Montrose is the nothing burger can get as big as a Tardis inside.

    • RTE Source


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 Clay Shaw


    Great to see the screws being turned by the public regarding the licence fee.

    Democracy in motion - the truth matters indeed when it suits me says RT.

    Only one paper in the local shop had it as front page from what I could see regardless it keeps the ambers stoked on the scandal.

    You can call a man all the basterds under the sun and he won't care.

    But murder his wallet and you'll get his full attention.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,285 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    However broadcast TV itself is optional which, of course, is the big worry for RTE. Hence the push to make the fee mandatory regardless of the quality of RTE's output.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 Clay Shaw


    In my old manor I signed a Statutory Declaration every year from the Licence Fee website and never had a knock on the door; not that I'd open it if I saw him.

    I genuinely had no TV.

    I had 10 bit monitors and I'd acquire entertainment online and occasionally RTE player for a laugh at the shite they were broadcasting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,148 ✭✭✭Hyperbollix


    There's huge power in numbers. Withholding the licence fee is the only tool available to the public here. The politicians don't really give two fcuks, they're all on an even bigger gravy train than RTE.

    Ireland is a small place. Dublin is smaller. And the Dublin media bubble is the smallest clique of all. Bakhurst has zero intention of doing anything other than shuffling papers, moving deckchairs around and making the right noises. He certainly isnt going to make enemies or inconvenience Irish national treasures like Ryan Tubridy, who fully expects he'll be "open for business" in a matter of weeks.

    If people allow this to happen and tacitly agree to it by sending these clowns €160, it's simply going to be a case of business as usual for RTE. They need the kick in the nuts that is a mammoth loss of funding and the political pressure that that should bring.

    Post edited by Hyperbollix on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Yes and it's discussed a bit over on the Louise Duffy Show radio thread. She mentioned ATN a few times yesterday between 12-12.30, noticeably plugging the event and her participation in it.

    But it was

    a) unclear as a listener if we were being fed advertorial

    b) who is paying her for her time there and if there is a transaction between ATN for broadcast rights and RTE for advertorial.

    This is typical of the problems with public service broadcasting intersecting with a commercial event. Murky and from what we heard at the various hearings, not at all clear if there is tax avoidance. Never mind not declaring advertorial.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭inajock


    Ryan Tuberdy wont be back on the air with RTE. KB has a monumental task ahead of him with falling revenues because of RT. Why would he spend the next few years bitterly defending RT to the public when he's the catalyst . Sap doesn't even have a contract so why give him one. Hes toast



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,028 ✭✭✭✭ButtersSuki


    Well you can write to RTÉ and ask these questions. Or your TD.

    I’ve done both over the years.

    I wouldn’t expect much by way of response though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 Clay Shaw


    Its not one big club now is it?

    You're mad Ted!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,061 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    If people allow this to happen and tacitly agree to it by sending these clowns €160, it's simply going to be a case of business as usual for RTE. They need the kick in the nuts that is a mammoth loss of funding and the political pressure that that should bring.


    That won't put any real pressure on RTE. Bakhurst knows that however badly a licence fee boycott hits RTE's finances, the government will step in with a bailout to cover it in the short term. And that we will be shortly moving to a new funding model for broadcasting that will secure RTE's financial position in perpetuity.

    Untitled Image




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭hawley


    Negotiations between Ryan Tubridy and RTÉ's director general Kevin Bakhurst on his future with the broadcaster are not likely to conclude until later this month at the earliest.

    Mr Tubridy and Mr Bakhurst held a meeting in late July but have not been in direct contact since then. It is understood that both have taken some holidays since then.

    Glad that Tubs was able to take a holiday. Don't know how there's even a decision to be made here. Tubridy has cost RTE millions in the past few weeks and will cost them even more if he comes back. Even if they move to a new funding model, a huge proportion of the population would lose all faith in RTE if he returns to the airwaves. So many people are disgusted by his lies and sense of entitlement and will boycott RTE if he returns.

    Communication was the greatest fatality



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,576 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    It would be the worst commercial decision in history if they brought back Tubridy. They are on course to be down 3 million for July and 36 million for 12 months if people continue to boycott the licence fee in the same numbers largely because of this scandal.

    And yet they think bringing back Tubridy will secure a few extra quid from advertisers.

    It won't be for commercial reasons they bring him back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,281 ✭✭✭Damien360


    A new tax will be in place very soon direct from your paypacket to cover the cost along with the announcement of the end of the licence fee. At that point, RTE won't care what anyone thinks and the party can continue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,090 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    How will contractors like Joe Duffy and Claire Byrne pay this tax?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭hawley


    They also draw quite a lot of income from advertising and programme sponsorship. As Butters said, it's hard to see any that any organisation would want to be associated with Tubridy. Bringing him back would still have a hugely negative commercial impact on RTE. I don’t know anybody who wants him back. Even if he returns to his old radio show, it would be impossible to take him seriously when he reads through the day's news or comments on current affairs. He has no moral credibility anymore.

    Communication was the greatest fatality



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 Clay Shaw


    If Bob the driver of the 46a is fired; the 46a still runs the route.

    46a is what the people need.

    Nobody cares about Bob?

    What about Bob? Never happened. F**k that guy.

    Will the bus be on time though?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 Clay Shaw


    I agree.

    And thats KBs job.

    Re-install the software.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,090 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    In an ideal world the sponsor of a radio show should cover most or all of the hosts wages. As long as RT is the host of his radio show, no sponsor welcome on board.

    By having no sponsor, RTE are being told RT is tainted and damaged goods and as long as he is there no sponsor will come on board.

    However, knowing RTE they will try and brazen it out knowing the government will bail them out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 Clay Shaw


    Private sector cut and dried as quick as you like.

    Public sector wet and slippery as we like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,595 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    You should put a complaint into the CnaM, as this would come under their codes.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,595 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    Who in RTÉ advised Kevin Bakhurst to take a holiday? Did no one in his leadership team not turn around and say we have a **** load of work to do that really cannot wait.

    This would be like if his predecessor on her first day in the job re-organized her office!


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,286 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,286 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly



    But...any sponsors will have eg a year long contract so maybe no dramatic slump in ad revenue but...maybe Renault are standing on the side lines ready to jump in



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 Clay Shaw


    It was all structured and scripted from the start.

    This is all play like that little old nun character SUIN.

    Its a heist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,508 ✭✭✭Field east


    There are two issues before the paying public Re this RTE /RT debacle and they are RT returning or not and the way RTE is being/has been run / managed with its barter a/c , what money was spent on , etc.

    I wonder if RT , unilaterally ,handed in his notice to quit or if RTE paid. Him a reasonable sum to quit. Would the licence fee payers be significantly less reluctant to withold the annual fee. ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,090 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    At the moment the RT radio show has no sponsor and there is no sign of a new one coming on board anytime soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,508 ✭✭✭Field east


    I should add that RTE would also need to indicate - AND FAST - how it plans to CLEAN UP IT’S ACT before fee payers would oblige. Otherwise it is in big trouble , financially if it does not and RT stays



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,286 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly



    Oh really? Don't listen to it, listened a bit to Callan one morning and was like whats with all the crap accent impersonations



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,286 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly



    Well in any normal company thats what would normally happen but holidays come first

    The rot is well and truly infested in RTE, nothing short of a new management team is needed, root and branch clear out, unions go F... themselves, anyone not working full time gone, all contractors ended, multiple job redundancies (feck me 1800 people working there - plenty of room for ending of jobs) - the list goes on.

    Then back to making Irish programmes people want to watch, actual investigative journalism that is not living off the backs of other journalists (Prime Time Investigates my arse)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭fplfan12345


    It strongly points to what they’re going to do.

    Let’s not make any hasty decisions. The public are normally dumb and apathetic so if we don’t do anything for a couple of months then it’ll be all forgotten.

    Then the money party can resume and RT can come back and take his share.

    It’s incredible the disdain those publicly funded organisations have for the public that fund it.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement