Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1308430853087308930903690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    The long game. Just needs steady support both at civilian level and militarily.

    No sign of the 'west' backing away on either for the foreseeable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    The one that was recorded by a drone was an abject failure so they probably didn't bother wasting any more tanks and explosives in creating any more. Even for a T-55 it seemed like a colossal waste.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,331 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    I don't really believe this argument (1st line of post). A leader like Putin and a regime like current one in Russia will do what they think they can get away with and what their relative strength allows for. They are completely amoral, think it has been shown clearly by invasion of Ukraine that [for them] ends justify almost all means.

    It is vital that a democratic country like the US lives up to and by its claimed standards (it didn't as regards deciding to invade Iraq) but I suppose I am cynical and believe effect of powerful countries (US) providing a good example just won't work to influence some bad actors (Putin's Russia being on of those).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,616 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Yes, Zelensky said as much. He said they won't risk more Ukranian lives being lost just to satisfy demands for speedier progress in some western capitals. He said unlike Russia we have regard for our soldiers lives, we care about every solider we lose. The brigades they have held back are for when they do breach Russian defensive lines. I think with the rate Russia are losing their attack helicopters that is going to come soon enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,664 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,142 ✭✭✭wassie


    They are probably being stored in the same place where the T-14 Armata tanks are being kept.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,733 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    As the Ukrainian pressure is ratcheted up will we see mass surrenders soon?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,330 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Would have to be soon. Or the other brigades been held back will have to be rotated to take over for the brigades fighting on the front line. I'm sure they have suffered a lot of dead and injured so I cannot see them staying on the front lines attacking for another month before the brigades taking all these casualties are rotated for the fresh brigades. The issue I would see then is there is not the full fresh brigades then. So when is the right time? I know when people say when the Ukrainians breech the Russian lines and they will launch all these brigades towards the breech. Only thing is how long would it take these brigades to get to this breech? Could take days for the Ukrainians to get all their forces to that point to concentrate them all. That's why I would of thought a concentrated punch from the Ukrainians to attack 1 point with all their forces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,348 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    "Look see. I killed your brothers. Ha. Ha. Ha."

    Hotel security seemingly threw out the Russian after this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,348 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Ukrainians seemingly in around Bahkmut and close enough to Donetsk city.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,111 ✭✭✭prunudo


    He was lucky he only got kicked out of the hotel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,816 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    Russia has a brutal history and culture… it’s not surprising that a lot of them are like this….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,450 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,618 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,079 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    But a 34-year-old battalion commander within the 37th Marine Brigade, who uses the call sign Spartanets, said the tanks' "thin armour" means they can be used as fire support, but not in front-line assaults.

    "Unfortunately, there was one case when the crew died in the vehicle," the major told AFP on Friday.

    "There was artillery shelling and a shell exploded near the vehicle, the fragments pierced the armour and the ammunition set detonated."

    The crew of four inside were all killed, he said.

    😐️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,079 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    This is awful, no way Saakashvili deserves this.

    If anyone cares, you can register your protest to the Georgian ambassador in Ireland.

    https://ireland.mfa.gov.ge/en/contact

    https://www.linkedin.com/in/george-zurabashvili-586b2251/?originalSubdomain=ge



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,899 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    That's a fake ending to a video originally going around a year ago. That said, they genuinely were using artillery shells as pin drivers.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,899 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    And today in 'news of the obvious', it is discovered that armored cars designed for cavalry operations cannot be used in place of main battle tanks.

    There was some false expectation in the lay world going around when the AMX-10RCs were originally announced in the media as "French tanks", but even the Ukrainians figured out they have their limitations: Note how they were given to a Marine unit, where the lightness has some merit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 209 ✭✭jimmyging



    interesting opposing view .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,015 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yagan, if you mean me when you say that the people of Afghanistan want another invasion? Because its not what I think or say, its what my Afghan friends are telling me. And as for your conviction that the Taliban are the same as Afghans, no they're not. Ordinary Afghans hate the Taliban, in the same way that Ukrainians hate Russians, because of their murderous and brutal behavior. When the US kicked the Taliban out, the Taliban left behind them a trail of burnt out 4 x 4s that has been attacked not by the US, but by Afghans seeking revenge for the suffering that the Taliban had inflicted on them during their reign of terror. How about the Toyota 4x4 pick ups, with a machine gun mounted on it, and the bolt cutters for any on the spot amputations during their routine patrols? The Sports fields converted into Sharia punishment sites? Flogging, stoning, amputations etc? If the US had never invaded, I'd say that by now, Afghans would have revolted against them, and kicked them out. No yagan, they are not all the same Afghans.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭dePeatrick


    An uninteresting opposing view, he has been wrong about everything to do with this war, bet he misses Tucker Carlson and Trump 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,734 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    Basically saying Russia are holding back in Ukraine. That they have an army of 750,000 waiting to take on the poles and Lithuanians. This is the whole goodwill gesture hypothesis. I don’t believe a word of that utter horse manure. No army could be stupid enough to hold back and drag out a war this long as a good will gesture. Risking unrest among the army ( already happened) and unrest at home. Army’s are built on stoking fear in the enemy and projecting to the enemy that surrender is the better option. Russia are not projecting that. Not since about 2 weeks into this invasion. The only card they have is bollixing around with the nuclear plant. That is the only genuine fear the Russian army are manifesting among its enemies. And once they blow that they are finished.

    He also leans heavily on the Cuba/Ukraine analogy a completely defunct desperation tankie position. What parts of Cuba did the US level to the ground. How many nuclear weapons did the US try to station in Ukraine? How many Cuban children did the US steal from Cuba? How many countries in Eastern Europe were forced to join NATO? How were they forced? Why do Russia and their western tankies outright lie about this issue ???Should sovereign countries be allowed to join whatever military alliances they choose. Why aren’t these countries choosing to join the CTSO??

    Post edited by 20silkcut on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,667 ✭✭✭Rawr


    They've been close to Donetsk since 2014, where the frontline ran through the airport just north west of the city center. However, you'd wonder how the DPR forces are holding up lately? They've been used as cannon fodder for ages, and spread out across the frontline. If the AFU managed a breakthrough into or around the city, would there be much resistance left? Also, would the people of Donesk be glad to see the AFU, or would they see them (ironically) as an occupier?

    I'm kind of hoping that a decade of Russian "DPR" rule will have motivated the people there to get away from that nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Seanmadradubh


    Opposing reality is not "interesting", it's just boring.

    Putin himself has stated the reasons for his invsaion, there is war because Ukrainians don't agree with him, nor want to be part of Russia, this fella gives Ukrainians no agency in the running of their own country.


    War is politics by other means, if Putins political aim was to keep NATO away from his borders, he has already lost. The NATO-Russia border has doubled since Feb 2022.

    This fella is talking through his imperialist arsehole.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,321 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    He's been wrong every step of the way in this conflict. Just like other useful idiots of the Kremlin, Ritter et al. Even if you built a GPT bot to fire out random nonsense about the progression of the war, the law of averages would suggest it would get something right in over a year, but not him. And like the others he speaks from the exact same script. The "West" and Ukrainian script changes and is not nearly so consistent, as one would expect from people with different opinions in the mix. The Kremlin one doesn't. You only have to read or hear one of their players to know the script. It actually makes it easier to find out what the Kremlin wants to put out there in the information war.

    As for this "going easy, Russia has massive reserves" stuff. I've heard this from around the time they got pushed out of Kiev. From actual Russians too(with the interesting addition of "secret bases and cities" filled with woo armies and tech. Something even the Kremlin's useful idiots steer clear of). It's a coping mechanism writ large in the face of an obvious lack of power and progress in this war and falls at the first hurdle by making no sense at all. It might have made sense in the first days and weeks when they were convinced it was going to be a cakewalk, but that ship sailed and sank with the Moskva. It's buried even deeper under the rubble of roads hastily dug up to stop a band of their own mercenaries driving towards Moscow. I didn't expect mass armour or troops on the roads to Moscow. Even if they had those reserves that would have been foolish. Better to let them come to you and hammer them at your leisure. But around Moscow itself we saw nada. Police units digging trenches and a small bunch of Chechens and that was it. Even their air power seemed to only consist of a couple of helicopters.

    So after over a year of various setbacks and loss of face, an armed mutiny heading for your capital and a war that's dragging your economy into the gutter, you still don't bring out your reserves? The only options left are those running the country are insane, or they don't have the reserves. They're not insane, ergo...

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,443 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    I'd actually wonder if there is much or any DPR forces left

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,330 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Will be interesting how Ukraine and the Ukrainian military will respond if people don't want them there. Even tho it's 100% Ukraine just wonder what way they will go if population don't respond well to them there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,667 ✭✭✭Rawr


    The Deep State map still has a couple of units with names that have "DPR" in them....however, there's no way of knowing if they are made up of Donesk locals or just mobniks that got thrown into "local" units.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,667 ✭✭✭Rawr


    You and I get this logic, and understand that Kyiv rule would be massive upgrade for the people in Donetsk. But after so many years of being force-fed a nonsense pro-Kremlin narritive, you might still get some resistence to being taken over by a force they may regard as a hated enemy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,810 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    I lasted about a minute listening to McGregor until he said "In 2014 we installed a puppet regime and poured billions of dollars building up the Ukranian army for the sole purpose of attacking Russia" This guy and Tucker have been banging the Russian drum since the invasion, are they on the payroll or whats their motivation?



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement