Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1307030713073307530763690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,807 ✭✭✭threeball


    This Prizoghin think is too off the wall to not have something behind it and the Russians are nutty enough to try anything.

    I'm going to throw this out there, feel free to tear it asunder. Anyone who knows my posting history on this thread knows I'm first to shoot down anyone rattling the nuke sabre but theres a few things culiminating here that would worry me. So the story as it stands

    1. Putin knows hes losing the war
    2. Putin moves Nukes to Belarus
    3. Prigozhin goes off the rails and supposedly stages a coup. Then backs down
    4. Gets exiled to Belarus
    5. Gets a camp built not far from nuke storage

    So far that's the facts as we know them. So is Putin daft enough to think that if the war turns bad when the remaining battalions enter the fray, that he turns Prizoghin lose. Accuses him of going rogue again. Has him launch a WMD on the largest concentration of ukrainian troops, then condemn the attack. Believing it gives him plausible deniability and perhaps avoiding a retaliatory strike. What could we do, you saw him try to oust me last month? Would the west really respond with a proportional response?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,427 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Watching Lukashenko's televised remarks today, he made Putin look very weak, not a strong man. He made it sound like he was the calm and measured one on Saturday whilst Putin was in a state of panic and depression.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,303 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,890 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I heard a report earlier the AFU have re-established positions within the perimeter of the town itself. If there's another protracted battle for control of the town, not even the blackened husks of the buildings may be standing by the end of it. As long as it remains worthwhile in terms of the ratio of Ukrainian losses to Russian ones, and as long as the Russians are boneheaded enough to keep committing forces there, then crack on, I suppose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,473 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Hopefully not but this is Russia so you could be right unfortunately.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Well for the deniability stunt that Putin has used successfully up to now, I don't think that it will work when it comes to Nuclear weapons. Any kind of Nuclear attack will be blamed fairly and squarely on Putin, as he is considered to be responsible for all Nuclear events in that part of the world. And it would be the correct decision, as only Putin would have the codes needed to fire them, So no matter where they are launched from, the trail leads back to Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,011 ✭✭✭macraignil


    I can't see that type of scenario working as a free pass for putin and a bipartisan resolution in the USA has tried to clarify that any use of nuclear weapons by a proxy of russia or a nuclear accident that leads to radioactive fall out on NATO members would qualify as a trigger for Article 5 of NATO and russia would in this situation be at war with NATO and all of its military would be subject to NATO attack.

    I'm worried that the moves by Wagner forces to take control of some russian airfields before the Prigozhiin - Putin deal led to some tactical nuclear weapons falling into the hands of Wagner and they now have the nuclear card to play if putin does what he would like to do and tries to have Prigozhin killed. It is only me speculating but I can't see how Prigozhin was so comfortable moving away from the bulk of his troops unless he had some sort of reassurance that he had a way to retaliate if putin moves against him.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,890 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Has Putin successfully used deniability? Seems to me that the only people who believe Putin's attempts to deny things that were very clearly Russia's doing are Russian citizens and a gaggle of western contrarians. A low enough bar, imo. I absolutely agree that Putin would be bang to right if he ever launched nukes, not that who's to blame would any longer be a pressing concern when doomsday is in the offing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,807 ✭✭✭threeball


    There'll be no fallout on a nato country from any nuke if used. Putin may well have very loose deniability but we've seen how slow the west has been to react to all kind of atrocities.

    He denied having little green me in crimea in 2014 and lied straight to the face of western leaders. They knew it was lies and the best they could muster was some sanctions and even that wasn't even close to being unanimous.

    He denied being involved in MH17 and blocked the recovery of bodies. Nothing happened.

    He denied he was going to war with Ukraine. Within 48hrs he did and again he wasn't really squeezed.

    We have a history of not punishing him despite he continually crossing red lines.

    I just think there is a back story to this Prizoghin tale that has yet to play out. The absolutely unopposed mutiny was just too convenient and easy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,889 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    Its quite disturbing that RT are publishing more of this type of story, getting the Russian public more accepting of the idea ?

    https://www.rt.com/russia/578814-russia-has-to-consider-launching-nuclear-strike/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,746 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    Saw desperate scenes of a restaurant being hit in kramatorsk this evening . Involving an injured infant. Really shocking stuff. Unbelievable the depths that Russia has plummeted to. It’s a hell hole country with some really really **** people with nothing to offer the world only sh1t. We waste too much time and give them too much credit trying to understand them. It really is a country that is just stuck in medieval mode and it’s entirely its own fault. Guys talk on here of them leading a new world order . Jesus Christ.

    Post edited by 20silkcut on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Very graphic failed Ukrainan assault in the Zaporizhzhia region,more Bradleys lost, artillery and mines seem to be doing most of the damage ,

    *Video is graphic *





  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,653 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    They are going to be demining that country (and having civilians lose limbs) for years to come after this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,890 ✭✭✭✭briany


    @20silkcut

    It really is a country that is just stuck in medieval mode and it’s entirely its own fault. Guys talk on here of them leading a new world order . 

    I'm sure you know this already, but when it comes the people you mention, the repression and wanton brutality of the current Russian regime is not a bug, it's a feature.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭Cake Man


    Yeah saw that myself, awful stuff. As a father of a child about that age/size in the scene it would make you want to cry and fill you with rage seeing an infant with their head covered in blood and the mother shaking. Please god the little one will be ok. Absolutely shameful to see how low those dirty cowardly b@stards will stoop to. If the west/NATO don't want to supply Ukraine with their latest technology to really hurt the scum, so be it. Not ideal but it is what it is, however they really have to ensure every single Ukrainian city and town are covered with multiple AA systems that ensures anything the scum launch at innocent civilians is intercepted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,513 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Seems a few medics getting injured badly there. Last chap looks like he will loose his leg sadly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,011 ✭✭✭macraignil


    I agree that there must be more to this Prigozhin story and another possibility is that behind it all he is still working for putin and all this threat to russian security is playing up to the idea that they are still better off with putin in charge even with the mistakes he has made.

    Don't agree that putin would get away with nuclear escalation in Ukraine however as if he was to get away with this once, there would be no end to the number of times he might use the tactic again. Chernobyl caused nuclear fall out across Europe and NATO was established to stop this from happening deliberately in the countries close to russia. I'm not saying they would immediately strike russia with nuclear weapons but a conventional response against their military has been hinted at. Would not be surprised if efforts to take out all of putin's military in UKraine and sink their navy were followed up with a move to take back Kaliningrad and disable their airforce to lessen the danger from putin's tactical nuclear weapons being used again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,965 ✭✭✭rogber


    The restaurant attack is horrendous, I don't care if it's kids or adults, all victims are equally tragic and it's one more in Russia's endless list of senseless war crimes. These attacks have become so commonplace they barely even register with most people now. All for the deluded fantasies of one embittered old man. Sickening. Every time it happens I marvel at Ukraine's self restraint. The urge to strike back against Russian civilian targets must be overwhelming at times



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,713 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Jesus I'm not the better after watching that. Poor sod jumping out of the carrier onto the clay patch like everyone would., Hope he makes it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    They don't have to take the town itself, they just have to flank it? And that opens up a big area of Luhansk.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    North Korea is a medieval hell hole: Russia is, as some previously commented, is more like mafia state whose controlling interests are strip-mining the place until invariably, it all collapses. Its people are not the problem, only beholden to a criminal class running the country into the ground, latching onto that historic sense of deference embedded in the broad psyche. It has barely held itself together since the USSR fell and while Putin ran an authoritarian ship with occasional economic bumps - much to the cheer of the terminally anti-West self-loathing crowd - it was at the expense of stable growth and prosperity. And in some cases, literal growth given Russia's much documented demographic/population problem. Russia is a moribund state at this stage.

    And now, Russia military strength has been shown to be all talk, and the thinnest of paper tigers. At this stage I'd question if even their nuclear weapons work TBH. All the army can do now is stall the inevitable; lace Ukraine with mines like monstrous armies before them, continue to attack the civilian population in the style of the Nazis they claim they're fighting [*], and presumably wait 'til its "leaders" decide enough is enough. But the damage is done: Russia's industrial military complex is treading water, their army now a ghost of its previous self having lost experience and equipment - and internally, a coup is apparently as easy as driving fast up the road, interior troops ineffectual.

    [*] Not on Boards but I did see some Twitter replies where the mental gymnastics to justify the Russian attacks on civilians, is to claim Ukraine are hiding "terrorists" and soldiers in these locations, using human shields.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,052 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    More bad news for Russia. Chinese ambassador stated that China has no objection if Ukraine recoverd its territories including Crimea. Also part of the Russian front line has come under 'friendly' fire. This indicates confusion and the cracks in the defence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Still happening in Afghanistan to the present day, mines laid during the time the Russians were there are still killing and maiming people, Men Women and Children. And not only people, but animals too, and this can impose serious hardship on family's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,395 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Chinese 152mm artillery shells turned up in Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,807 ✭✭✭threeball


    You'd have to imagine the east of Bahkmut is a real weak point. They won't have been able to build defences and mine it like other areas due to their own activity in the area so potentially a real breakthrough point. Go round it rather than through it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭amacca


    A precursor to them bringing Russian or Russian adjacent "territories" on their border under their control I wonder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, I think that he has successfully used plausible deniability in the sense that he has never been seriously punished for it. Prigozhin's murderous operation's world wide are still filling Putin's ( and Prigozhin's) coffers in Russia. And this "spat" with Gerasimov and Shoigu largely stemmed from them no longer supplying weapons and ammunition for Free ( supplied by the state) and he was having to use his own money. And of course, the outside world did not believe a word of Putin's deniability claims. As you said, it was all for home consumption. But now having admitted bankrolling Prigozhin, it seem that the Russian State can be sued for all the murder's, theft and depredations carried out in its name.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,052 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    I don't think the 'Coup' was organized by Putin. Why would Prigozhin publically state that the war was bogus and that there were no Nazis and no NATO threat. Undermines Putin's reasons fo rthe war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 anonymouscactus


    Just a suspicion, but part of me thinks China will get more explicitly involved in this conflict over time and in exchange, Putin has already agreed to give some territory to China (de facto through some form of regional autonomy, or real via official transfer to Chinese control).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    I hadn't actually thought of that but it's a great point.

    If Wagner is a proscribed terrorist organization (which it absolutely should be), and Russia openly admits financing them...then Russia is a state sponsor of terrorism. Which we all know obviously, but this is another stick to beat them with.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement