Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1306630673069307130723690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Girkin with his usual blast of candour





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,740 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Could be the generals got together and decided to hang together instead of hanging one by one?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    This has now been deleted. The tweet was an announcement (edit: see below screenshot) that he had Scott Ritter on his podcast to discuss what happened over the weekend in Russia. The fact that he deleted this tweet means that the first he must have heard of Scott Ritter's "history" were the hundreds of replies telling him about it(many showing Ritter's charge sheet and mugshot). I know his campaign is a massive joke but bloody hell!


    image.png


    Edit Edit: Looks like the podcast is still up:


    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭combat14


    the generals might decide they are safer without prigozhin or putin if uncertainty continues much longer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,617 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre



    The more I think about this I am of the view someone saved Putin at the weekend and now has him in his pocket. This person or perhaps there is more than one person probably switched sides and betrayed Prigozhin. Or perhaps what is more likely is that they never switched sides but convinced Prigozhin that they had. I just don't think Prigozhin would have revolted otherwise. It would also help explain why he called it off despite it making him look weak in the eyes of his fighters, but self preservation is a good motivating factor.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,785 ✭✭✭✭josip


    @jmreire what are you doing hanging out over there with the right wing nationalists and the fascists? I didn't think you were that way aligned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,084 ✭✭✭kevthegaff


    Maybe prig and luka have taken charge with putin as a basic spokesperson. Putin is one of the wealthiest people in the world and was worried he would be murdered, maybe he handed over control to keep his life and wealth. Prig looked very happy in that jeep leaving



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Just being in Belgrade doesn't make you a fascist fellow traveller! It's actually a pretty interesting place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 472 ✭✭Mullinabreena


    Russia is such an enigma, I can't make any sense of what's going on there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 695 ✭✭✭lostcat


    As a matter of interest which station was this on? I've had opportunity to watch a reasonable amount of Serbian TV (PCT, not the commercial channels) i've never seen a snigger on the equivalent of the ' o clock news').



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,396 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It must be the most dysfunctional country and society in Europe by some considerable distance. Even Belarus is relatively normal in comparison.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,702 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    In the alternate universe that wingnut lives in sure thats what happened.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    You wonder?

    Or you’re trying to take us for eejits and think we might fall for your “questions” whether Putin was acting in good faith.


    Spare us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,605 ✭✭✭silliussoddius




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,120 ✭✭✭Lirange




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭Apiarist


    I see two ways this can go

    1. Putin fires Shoygu and Gerasimov. It means that the faction behind Prigozhin has won and they will force Putin out, probably through a successor that Putin will transfer the power to.

    2. Putin tries to disarm the Wagner group. They will resist and this time they will not stop until they reach Moscow. Regardless of whether Prigozhin is alive/free or not. The military head of the group is a nutcase called Dmitry Utkin, aka Wagner. He can lead the rebellion with or without Prigo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,016 ✭✭✭jmreire


    No, far from it. But Vucic controls the media, so he gets to control what goes out in the news, and he's pro Putin, big time. But recently there has been massive anti-Vucic protests in Belgrade calling for his resignation, and new elections because Serbian's can see the way things are going with Vucic, corruption and mafia rule ( they've seen them before!!!) and now they are calling for Rule of law, not rule of one man. In recent anti Vucic protests, Vucic had to bring bus loads of his supporters from the provinces to counter the opposition protest, even so, the opposition showed in far greater Nrs. No, just because they are definitely not fans of NATO ( they have their own reasons for that) does not automatically mean that they're the big fans of Putin that we are led to believe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,006 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Think if the mafia ran a country. 7 or 8 "bosses" are part of the inner circle, Putin is their decision-maker.

    They run everything and take a cut of everything, from business to oil to the media. On the plus side for them, everything is corrupt, on the negative side, everything is corrupt. Step out of line? Get thrown out of a window.

    They pissed off one of the bosses, the one with a private army of 25,000. He decided to shake them up. The snakes ran and had to cut a deal with him. They'll probably "take care" of him later, but for now they need to shore up and make sure something like that never happens again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,785 ✭✭✭✭josip


    "...led to believe".

    Do you mean we're being misinformed? By who and for what purpose?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,016 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Josip, I've spent many years working in war torn country's, more than I care to remember, all over the world. And what I think about them is they have all without exception two things in common. One, corruption has been the root cause of each and everyone of them. Two, don't make the mistake of tarnishing each and ever one of the people who live in these Country's as being the same as the monsters who commit atrocities. Because they're not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,455 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    This is just a pause or eye of the storm so to speak isn't it?

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,016 ✭✭✭jmreire


    After the news, there was a program discussing the days events. And plenty of laughing and sniggering on that. No, their news readers are professional, but were definitely smiling, whether that was normal or due to the content, I don't know. Have to watch it again tomorrow night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,834 ✭✭✭Caquas


    I don’t think the Americans had great detail about the Russian invasion. The Spetnaz got to the Presidential Palace in Kyiv and almost got to Zelensky The Russians took Hostomel Airport and the Battle of Kyiv would have been very different if the Ukrainians hadn’t managed to retake it in a fierce gun fight.

    I see media reports just now that John Kirby of the White House said the US had advance knowledge of Prigozhin’s mutiny. That’s the opposite of what he actually said I.e. the West were not involved and will stay out of it (contrary to Biden’s call last year to “depose Putin”)

    Putin’s statement tonight confirms my original take: there is no deal. Putin thanked the Russian people for their support but we all saw the opposite. At best, the people were indifferent. Putin’s cronies stayed loyal - not surprising because Prigozhin was gunning for them. But Putin has to punish the mutineers or his speech this evening will be like Louis XVI condemning the storming of the Bastille.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,702 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The West may not have to have been involved to have picked up advance notice of it though.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Best and simplest explanation of Russia I’ve heard to this day.

    Thank you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 720 ✭✭✭farmerval


    Whatever happened on Saturday; whatever deal was struck, Putin is in a weakened state at best. For the first time in this conflict the failed reasons for the invasion and so the cause of the war was laid squarely with Putin.

    A genuine rival for control of Russia appeared, someone who was cheered by Russian people, his army happily accepted to replace the Russians in Rostov, nothing like this has happened on Putin's watch before. Putin was made to look weak and ineffective inside Russia, roadblocks in Moscow?? This is completely new territory.

    The only person that has a positive tale to tell in the Ukraine conflict, one that has laid the trail for withdrawal from Ukraine by his statements that the reasons for the conflict were wrong, were lies, and is sitting waiting in the wings, smiling.

    Apparently when the uprising was ongoing, there was very few denouncing Prig's actions, that really says people in power didn't know how this was going to shake out, they were waiting to see before committing.

    Putin has always stayed above squabbles between his underlings, leaves them fight among themselves all the while stabbing each other to get the big bosses attention, now he has been directly challenged. Things are definitely changing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    But they didn’t take the presidential palace or the airport or Kyiv.

    Why is that?


    America said days before the war Russia would invade. Without that intelligence Kyiv would have fallen.


    It wasn’t a firefight that stopped Russia taking Kyiv, it was precision artillery fire on a dumb idea of having a 40km army on one road.


    A handful of Ukrainian soldiers stopped Kyiv from being taken.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,834 ✭✭✭Caquas


    Read the thread. I said the Americans knew before any other Western power that the Russians would invade,

    I was answering Nacho Libra’s suggestion the Americans have a source close to the top of the Russian MoD. If they did, they would have tipped off the Ukrainians and the Russians would never have got to the Presidential Palace or taken Hostomel Airport. (The lines of tanks on the road to Kyiv happened because the Russians lost the airport.)



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement