Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Leinster V Stade Rochelais. Champions Cup Final. Sat May 20, 16:45. Aviva Stadium, Dublin.

1192022242531

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭cheese sandwich


    Gerry Thornley having another go at Leinster fans in the Irish Times today. I think he’s completely wrong, the atmosphere was great on Saturday. Yes, Leinster don’t have any decent songs but that was not something that was going to be rectified before the final



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭cheese sandwich


    Real lack of class from O’Gara after the match. Totally unwarranted but can’t say I’m wholly shocked



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    When Munster won the 2008 Heineken cup all refs were told pre season to be really strict on sealing off the next season. Cup rugby is all about winning tight matches. I have never seen a ref ping a player for lying on another after a ruck or a TJ flag it. There is no explicit law against it. But let it happen and we end up with American Football.

    It was definitely, a good one to push and see what you can get away with. Two of the LR tries came from them doing it the rucks leading up to it. LR are really good at it because some of them are so big. For me after you rick someone you should have roll off them just like you do with a tackle as you preventing that other player play.

    Now, in lower skill, lower intensity game it will make f - all difference. But, in a top level professional game it will make a huge one.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Secondly - I have huge respect for Ronan O'Gara and what he's achieved, but he has behaved like a prized prick the last couple of days.

    You won the game, why are you manufacturing this GAA-like faux outrage over invented issues?

    This absolute bullshit about James Ryan not looking Aldritt in the eye, when there is clear, undeniable images of him looking him squarely in the eyes (and, fwiw, even if he wasn't, that's entirely his prerogative).

    This stupid **** about not being given a room in the stadium or something, when (a) it's the ECPR who manage that and (b) they say LAR were offered a room in the stadium.

    He's clearly a great coach, who his players love, and his ability to develop a winning gameplan is excellent, but I'd wish he'd cut this utter prickishness out of his character for his own good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭ShatterProof


    Very tough to win finals when you finish up with 13 players on the pitch.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,201 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Paranoia. It's what drove him as a player to excellence & also crippled him at times. Same for Sexton.

    Its a trait well served in the coaching business.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,404 ✭✭✭ironingbored


    Anyone else think the IRFU will not look too kindly on this in the context of a replacement for Faz.

    Not to mention his two suspensions (16 weeks) this season.

    Do they really want an Eddie Joneseque figure at the helm?

    As well as how these comments and attitude will go down with the vast majority of the squad.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,065 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    "I don't know where the narrative exists that there was some sort of unmanageable power displayed by LAR that Leinster couldn't live with. Where are the actual examples of this from the match?

    LAR scored one try in their "dominant" second half, and didn't really create another good opportunity for one.

    The difference was solely down to Leinster, inexplicably, not being able to manage their exits properly (which, tbf, was illustrative of LAR's pressure game), and, very much connected, Peyper's refereeing decisions."

    I think you answer your own question here. LAR annihilated Leinster in the scrum, lineout, maul. They had possession for the entire second half and forced Leinster to make 2-3 times as many tackles as they did themselves. They were guilty of fluffing numerous chances just as Leinster were heroic in defence. It's not that suprising when, completely dominated as they were, Leinster repeatedly snatched at, and screwed up, the few chances they had with ball in hand.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Would you stop with this nonsense - it's fair enough to suggest they are lacking some leadership, but there is utterly no point in suggesting guys who were never, ever remotely at the level required like John Muldoon.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's not the case though - they didn't really cause the Leinster line out too many issues. Leinster (once Ryan was lost) inexplicably opted to not to compete on any of their lineouts.

    Scrum wasn't really that significant a factor - yeah they definitely had the edge but there wasn't that many of them, and Leinster managed to claw a few free kicks and penalties out of it too.

    The maul without a doubt was dominant, but my point is they consistently got the opportunity for it because Peyper wasn't giving penalties for those jackal turnovers in the second half, and because of bad execution on Leinster's part with the exit kicks.

    Outside of Seuteni's line break in midfield (which led to 3 LAR points), what other clear try scoring chances did they create in the second half?

    They huffed and puffed a lot and went through phases (which I get are energy sapping for Leinster's defenders), but still ultimately just got territory through Leinster errors.

    Essentially, what I'm trying to say was that the Leinster half backs lost the game, not the Leinster pack.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,861 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers



    With all due respect your looking at this through blue glasses.

    Aalatola should not have gotten a red card, because he should have been in the bin from the scrum previous to when Kelleher got carded.

    Ringrose was blatantly in at the side of a ruck that wasnt penalised.

    GJP dived on a player on the ground, no penalty either

    There is the penalty from the scrum that gave leinster 3 points, and everyone bar the ref agrees it should have been a LAR penalty as porter was sideways into the scrum.

    Argue about jimmy o briens penalty if you want, but the breakdown previous was a clear as day penalty not given to LAR for poaching.

    If you want to slate peyper (which ive no problem with cause i actually think he has issues with his sight) the slate him fairly because he missed a LOT by both teams, and left a lot go by both teams.

    Leinsters problems were poor kicking, not taking a DG opportunity, and some poor calls on the sideline like taking off Conan instead of molony.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,065 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Leinster were terrified of the LAR maul and never contested so as to try and counter the inevitable attack with a full complement of defenders. They still gave up 10-15 metres or a penalty each time. Similarly at the scrum Leinster had big problems getting their own ball out and JGP was repeatedly scragged by his opposite number creating big pressure and forcing errors.

    I'm not mentally ready to go back through the match and pick out all the missed chances in the second half but watching it live we were all amazed at how they had not managed to take the lead before 70 minutes and there was a crushing inevitability about the way they eventually did score.

    The ref was grand, he let a lot of stuff go on both sides and I daresay if he'd pinged everything Leinster would have come off worse. The resultant high-speed game with the ball in play for long periods didn't help Leinster and hopefully this notion that La Rochelle are slow lumps who tire quickly is now definitively put to bed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,861 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    LAR are producing their own players, they just are not doing it currently from a young age.

    They are taking discarded internationals and good players from all over and making them world beaters.

    An outhalf from PAU. A prop from breziers.

    These arguments about money and budget's are almost as bad as complaining about the ref.

    Leinster started with 13 or so players who are first choice on the best international rugby team going and they lost to a side that havent even a handfull of current starting internationals

    Leinster had better players and home advantage and still lost.

    The question you should be asking is this:

    Why is it that one coach can take the group of players and win a grand slam and another coach cant win a league or cup with them???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    You lacked leaders, and clearly there is a lack of self-awareness as well as a touch of arrogance not to recognise short-comings while clearly dismissing the strengths of other players and teams.

    La Rochelle are not a team full of current internationals (some were rejects from international teams), they were not a team with a massive chequebook, they played you at your home and won. What they are is a team which is well coached, well led, plays to their strengths and are now back to back champions.

    Leinster had 11/12 of the starters of the number 1 rugby team in the world, were playing at home, had blown away Toulouse a few weeks previously, ran away with the normal phase of the league, had the world player of the year and a host of players on the six nations team of the year. What was missing was leadership, composure and common sense to go for a drop goal.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The incident you're accusing Porter of in the penalty Leinster got at the scrum was the exact same thing Joel Scalvi did in the scrum where you're claiming Ala'alatoa should have got a yellow - he clearly just goes directly sideways into the scrum. Did the exact same thing in the scrum earlier in the second half where Kerr-Barlow steals the ball on the deck.

    When were the incidents with Ringrose and JGP?

    It's an absolute fact that he should have rewarded Sheehan, Henshaw and Ngatai with penalties for their successful jackals, rather than just the scrappy possession Leinster got. In none of those cases was it a quick and easy turnover, it was scrappy, slow ball. Obvious penalty, and easy opportunity to clear the lines and retain possession.

    The decision against Doris was an absolute disgrace - he's on the ball clearly for a solid 2 seconds before any LAR players get there. If that penalty is given, Leinster win the game.

    You also cannot look at the refereeing of the final 5 mins on the LAR line and tell me that there wasn't a multitude of penalty offences committed by LAR down there where Peyper just looked the other way.

    These are the moments where finals are won.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, all of which might be true, but there is no point in suggesting they just need "leaders" - they need players who are leaders but are also of sufficient quality to warrant a place in the squad. There's a 39-year old second row playing on my J1 team who is a good leader, doesn't mean he's any **** use to Leinster in a European Cup final.

    None of the Irish teams are awash with leaders either. Leinster didn't have Sexton on Saturday, and lost James Ryan then. There's no endless pool of top tier leaders though, any team would struggle to weather that sort of loss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,028 ✭✭✭✭ButtersSuki


    This thread has been a very tough read.

    From a club rugby perspective, I’m a Connacht support first, and a Leinster supporter second. The reasons for this is I spent my childhood between Galway and Dublin and have ties to both. Without over-romanticizing the past too much I’m old enough to have watched Jim Staples and Simon Geogheghan play for Connacht (not even in the sportsground, but in Corinthians Ground) as a teenager in front of less than 20 people, and Leinster lose to Cardiff in the inaugural Heineken Cup semi final in the old Lansdowne Road in front (from memory) of approx 5,000 (it might have been more but it was noticeably empty). First and foremost however I’m a rugby fan, and an Ireland supporter.

    Reading this thread is embarrassing and it’s why I’ve stayed off the rugby thread for years. The bickering, the pettiness, the nastiness - from mostly you’d have to assume grown men, is actually disgraceful. I’m all for a bit of slagging but how any Irish person rugby fan could actively want another province to lose a major final (when the opposition isn’t their own team of course) is beyond me. I was in Twickenham when Munster lost to Northampton and in Cardiff when they lost to Leicester. I was cheering for Munster both days, not sitting there sneering and cheering for the opposition. Both times I was with friends from Munster who were obviously devasted, I wasn’t going to rub it in.

    At the game on Saturday I saw grown men - and I’ll allow some leeway for alcohol - become triumphalist, expletive- laden, foul-mouthed ar$eholes basically growling at women and teenagers and children about how pathetic their team was and that they were “f-ing” losers, chokers, bottlers etc. - way beyond what you’d normally think is acceptable. The blue-red rivalry thing has become (in some quarters), poisonous. There isn’t a team on earth that could be coached by any former player or indeed be stacked with Irish players playing an Irish team that I’d root for in a game let alone a final. And then these same “supporters” will be cheering for Ireland shortly?

    I’ve lots of thoughts on the game itself. In summation I’ll say Leinster weren’t mentally tough enough. To lose like that at home after last year’s late collapse is simply not acceptable. And I’d be very worried about the World Cup after that performance.

    But what saddens me most about the whole weekend is the provincial bull💩 again raising its ugly head.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,721 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    The difference in power was obvious. The Leinster forwards were going backwards for the whole second half and that made mistakes more likely from the backs too. After Ryan went off that was it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,114 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    Doris was unlucky to be penalised but it should have been a La Rochelle penalty regardless as Van der Flier was lying on the wrong side and interfered with the clearout, allowing Doris to get his hands on it in the first place.

    Leinster got away with murder at the breakdown in the first half. They were coming in from the side repeatedly and supporting their weight with their hands. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if the trouble at half time resulted from the La Rochelle coaching staff trying to bring Leinster's action's at the breakdown to Peyper's attention because he rode Leinster in the second half.

    Peyper is a poor enough ref and he missed a lot on Saturday. Furthermore, I'd argue that his cavalier attitude towards the ruck encouraged nonsense from both sides. However, he was in no way responsible for Leinster's loss. That comes down to the failure of the players to properly exit their half when under pressure (this was a constant issue in the second half) and the reluctance to go for a drop goal when they were sitting bang in the centre of the 22 with 2 or 3 minutes to go. Management also have to be held to account due to their use of the bench (McGrath and Frawley left twiddling their thumbs when the starting halfbacks were playing poorly) .

    Finally, I don't know why people keep banging on about homegrown players. It's a club competition, teams are entitled to recruit. Leinster are fortunate to have probably the best foundations for player production in the world. That is as a result of excellent work being done behind the scenes and no small amount of luck due to the population base they have to draw from, as well as the numerous mini academies which feed into the province, i.e., the schools. This does not confer any kind of moral superiority on Leinster. It's impressive and a great model but it doesn't make them any more pure than their opponents. There were players playing for La Rochelle on Saturday who were playing for the club when it was knocking about the Pro D2 and that's equally worthy of recognition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    No AR at this level would flag that. Leinster are excellent at doing similar around ruck time. you dont become one of the most successful sides in pro rugby over the course of a decade and a half without that side to your game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    It can be a little cringe inducing. But it would be better if him and his newspaper looked for solutions. They could easily cover the Leinster youths and Towns cup more instead of their fascination with upper middle class southside Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    I think you're doing some of those signings a disservice. Hastoy was very highly regarded in France before signing for La Rochelle. He was in the French squad that went to Australia the previous year and was capped in Japan then. He was the T14 top scorer with Pau, I believe and is seen by many as the best goal kicker in France.

    Don't get me wrong, they're incredibly shrewd in their signings and see the abilities of players and identify specific traits/abilities to suit their game plan. They signed Dillane to play flanker when he had played nearly every minute of his career at lock. They signed two established sub props of over 130kg, one a current Argentine international. When Saracens collapsed, they were on the phone to Skelton immediately to draft him in when people said he wouldn't be as good outside of Saracens. They're very canny with their signings.

    But La Rochelle do sign players and big names too. They're not afraid to open the cheque book. Teddy Thomas has been a bench warmer for them this season. Jack Nowell is signed up for next season. They've signed Iribaren to be their back up scrum half. They have Ihaia West coming back in to now be their back up outhalf after he was their first choice guy for a few years.

    Leinster blew it, undoubtedly. La Rochelle's greatest strength is their clarity of plan and coolness but a lot of the guys they have brought in are seasoned lads who have been there and done it.

    I've seen a lot of people make the point about these players winning in green but not being able to win in blue. I'd suggest that this La Rochelle team is as good and better than anything Ireland faced in the 6N. And the England game showed to me that these same players are just as susceptible to pressure when playing in green.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    It isnt cringe inducing and Thornley has a point but its nothing to do with him or the IT to come up with solutions

    Its off topic but the Times doesnt need to cover leinster youths competitions more now. Leinster rugby itself could and should be doing more coverage of them through their own distribution channels via website, social media first before any national papers cover them



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Doris was unlucky to be penalised but it should have been a La Rochelle penalty regardless as Van der Flier was lying on the wrong side and interfered with the clearout, allowing Doris to get his hands on it in the first place.

    No, that's not the case. Murray Kinsella has the gif of the incident in his article on it today - Doris is on the ball before any LAR player gets there. JVDF rolls out to the side of the ruck, not back into the scrum half or anything like that, and an arriving LAR player (their sub hooker) stumbles over him, but he wasn't in a position where he was going to hit Doris anyway, and the line he was on he would have been joining from the side.

    By the time he stumbles over VDF, Doris had already been on the ball for a solid 2 seconds and should have had the penalty.

    Leinster got away with murder at the breakdown in the first half. They were coming in from the side repeatedly and supporting their weight with their hands.

    If you're going to make statements like this, then why not actually suggest a few examples of it, because it's not the case IMO, and wasn't a factor in any of Leinster's three tries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    Hmm.... Leinster do cover youths and towns cup more and have done a lot for youths the last 20 years. But, the Irish times doesn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    you are talking about media coverage. Leinster dont cover youths rugby etc on their website enough as they dont have the staff to do so. Get regional/local papers to cover youths rugby more. Get finals covered in national papers but Leinster need to work with clubs more to help them showcase the youths rugby more. same with other provinces. if clubs themselves arent covering their youths games. how can the provinces be expected to?

    Its the same with all the national papers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    They do. They gave some coverage to all the finals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    Interesting. Could have been a red card against LAR. Not sure if they would have stood.




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Virtually identical incident to the one he did himself down the field about 7 minutes later.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,861 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    You have details and clarity coming out your ears about penalties leinster should have gotten but cant remember the obvious stuff that leinster got away with.



Advertisement