Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Leinster V Stade Rochelais. Champions Cup Final. Sat May 20, 16:45. Aviva Stadium, Dublin.

1181921232431

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,991 ✭✭✭TRC10


    A 5 game tournament with 2 rest weeks. Hardly comparable to a world cup schedule.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭lbj666


    Said fans are never gonna win ultimately a bragging match if we've consistently been 2nd fiddle for 13 years , so why bother.. it's pathetic...we ve to sort our own house out..schadenfreude will get us nowhere.

    And ya inappropriate choice of word on my part sorry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,991 ✭✭✭TRC10


    There was 3 weeks between those games, in which all the first 23 were rested. Can't do that at a world cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,557 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    well the tough games of the world cup are a 5 game tournament with 1 rest week with the changes now. we play south africa on 23rd sept and then scotland on 7th oct before knock outs the 3 weekends after that.

    the changes made make it far more comparable as between the warm up games and the 2 opening pool games we ideally will be more than ready for the important games



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭lbj666


    It's a weird one, the ruck was such a mess that tidy ball for a drop goal wasn't a given, on the flip side the same sort of mess was the reason for the red card that ended the game. Also a drop goal would have left time on the clock and any return back to the Leinster half probably meant la Rochelle getting some sort of chance to win it..they were that dominant at that point.

    I am sure it was on their mind how could it not be.. but they found themselves in the position where they were close to the line and too wide for a drop goal. I dunno did la Rochelle give up the wide channels purposely..don't think so. That whole passage was so frantic it's hard to imagine settling the situation down for a drop at goal, players were out of position everywhere simply cause the ball was never secure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,015 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    About a minute before they got close to the line, there was an opportunity for a drop goal, they were in centre of pitch around the 22, so there was definitely a chance had they been brave enough to take it on. There would have been a minute or two left to hold on, but better to be defending a lead with time almost up than chasing it, was always going to be extremely difficult to score a try at that stage, maybe they were hoping to get a penalty in a kick able position, but, again the referee is less likely to give it at that stage of the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭trevezel


    nothing better than statistics to analyse the game :

    Leinster were destroyed by La Rochelle, when you spend your time tackling and tackling, you spoil your energy...and you lose

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,217 ✭✭✭✭Sangre


    Only watched the game now. Last year all over. Terrible game management and non forced errors constantly letting la rochelle into leinster half. From the moment Ryan went off Leinster just lost their composure. .

    all the talk of lessons learnt and made the exact same errors all over again.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They had the chance way before that. Off the lineout, got to dead centre on the 22. Pick and go and then set up the kick. A 30m drop goal is very makeable and if you miss you get it back.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yes, that was the moment right there. JGP or Byrne didn’t even seem to consider it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    And they watched it seven days earlier from the stands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭trevezel


    i think the guys were exhausted and lost their lucidity... only 3 points in the second half, i can't believe that but credit to La Rochelle, they deserve the win



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 346 ✭✭normanbond


    A lot of Leinster fans should just suck it up and stop trying to divert the narrative away from the fact that they were justifiably beaten by Rochelle and Munster when the stakes were high.

    You need to have bottle when the going gets tough, Leinster didn’t have it in both big games.

    With the narrative diverted to criticism of both referees, throwing patronising comments etc.,

    it’s easy to see why supporters of other Irish teams aren’t putting their arms around the shoulders of Leinster supporters atm following these defeats.

    I feel for the Leinster players but some of their supporters just need to stop whining on this discussion page, maybe start an alternative discussion page for whining Leinster supporters?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 529 ✭✭✭Dont Be at It


    It summed Byrne up to a tee. Not up to it. Surely that's the kind of moment a young out half dreams about getting. 2 minutes left... A point down... Deep in the 22....

    Yeah,its huge pressure but you have to step up. Not as if if it was 40m out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    The game is far far far far more physical now. A high intensity match between 1 - 4 people go for HIA's and there's nearly at one concussions. That's insane. Munster had four players missing for the semi, some because of consussion.

    We need to be careful in our cozy ivory towers. I think the tournament organisers need to consider the fixture congestion at the end of season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,998 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Which clearly shows Doris should've won a penalty. A **** carbon copy from last year when Al'alatoa was denied one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,991 ✭✭✭TRC10




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    Doris was unlucky there but equally VdF could have been penalised for interfering with the clearout. Peyper was very poor yesterday but I don't think he favoured one team in particular. He rode La Rochelle in the first forty and Leinster in the second forty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,241 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    All the 4 munster players missing for the Leinster game were because of Concussion.

    All of those were due to dangerous tackles

    Leinster and Glasgow are the 2 dirtiest teams in the URC in the way they hit high, come in from the side, and fly off their feet

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,486 ✭✭✭rodge123


    You’ll find the stats don’t back that opinion up, both teams yellow and red cards are not in the top 2 for the league. Dangerous hits generally get dealt with / caught by TMO these days.

    Take a look at the stats for yourself before making ill informed unsubstantiated claims.

    https://www.unitedrugby.com/statistics/2022-23



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,241 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    10 HIAs by players playing Glasgow in their last 3 knockout games.....

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,486 ✭✭✭rodge123


    Doesn’t prove anything, plenty of HIAs are a consequence of accidental collisions like the James Ryan one for example.

    If they were 10 dangerous tackles that caused them then there would be lot more than 1 red card against them in the stats.

    Or are you inferring the officials don’t bring their red cards to Glasgow games?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    Some interesting tidbits in this article and in the comments from overseas...

    Interesting quote about the La Rochelle setup:

    "There's also been a lot of fake news and sneering about La Rochelle's 'model'. In fact, their owner is a local entrepreneur who played for their juniors and has steered them back after they've been relegated a couple of times to the 2nd division - they were languishing there as recently as 10 years ago. Their region is not a rugby stronghold like the deeper southwest, but they now sell out almost all of their home matches."

    Insight into the La Rochelle dressing-room:

    "O’Gara knew Leinster badly wanted a record-equalling fifth title but, regardless of their home-field advantage, he had other ideas. In the buildup he told his players to imagine they were setting out to climb Everest. Who, he asked them, would they most want to conquer it for? A parent, a loved one? In the team room a mat was laid out on the floor where people could place photos of their personal inspiration. The result? A team that never flinched, even when the blue whirlwind was at full intensity in the opening 40 minutes"

    "While Leo Cullen is waving goodbye to the estimable Stuart Lancaster and welcoming the current Springbok coach, Jacques Nienaber, to his coaching staff, there have been too many narrow losses in big games, particularly with O’Gara in the other coaching box, for anybody’s comfort. “You can have data for everything but you don’t have data for character,” O’Gara said afterwards."

    I find that last quote interesting given the sometimes sneering comments about 'pashun' on here by a few people. Leinster will have their day again no doubt, they're too well setup now to not be at or near the top table with great regularity... but I'd say they would have killed for a Muldoon or POM (or a Sexton!) out there at times, Ryan was a huge loss of leadership (and grunt) and the implosion on the pitch was worrying with such a lead at home on such a stage. I still can't fathom how Ross Byrne doesn't even try and take a drop, especially given how they lost the previous week.

    A horrible way to lose, commiserations to the decent Leinster posters on here - ye'll be back no doubt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭leakyboots




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    Yes a leader - someone who inspires the team on the pitch and makes the right decisions. How many matches did Connacht win with Muldoon that they had no right to win?

    Once Ryan went off you were lacking leadership. Worth their weight in gold even if technically not the best player in a position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    Those comments about character can really get people's backs up and will make him very unpopular in Leinster.

    Looking back at the match, a massive difference was La Rochelle when they clear out rucks they can lie on players. That means, the defender is a fraction slower to form their D line. Meaning you have less defenders and your line speed is off. Yeah, it's rugby, it's dark arts - but those things have a much bigger impact than his chimera's.

    Similarly, a few 50 - 50 calls went their way. Jimmy O'Brien competed for the ball got pinged. Dorris was deemed off his feet when for others it was legal turnover. A few LR mauls had truck and trailers. It's unusual to YC someone when the other team score. He pinged someone for professionally fouling VDF, other days they are yellows.

    So, in all probability two match teams are going to have a close game. You could win twice or loose twice. That's sport.

    O'Gara was terrible tackler in his day. He obviously knows the impact size can have. But he should have some respect for a club that produce 90% of their players before shouting on about character.

    No French team other than Toulouse has maintain a long level of consistency. They come and go as the money does because they don't produce their own players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    Leinster should bottle that for the next meeting. Maybe time that the bitterness is targeted at teams beyond Munster.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Incredibly frustrating loss, and no surprises at all to see this place literally full of seagulls and the usual spoofers in talking nonsense.

    I don't know where the narrative exists that there was some sort of unmanageable power displayed by LAR that Leinster couldn't live with. Where are the actual examples of this from the match?

    LAR scored one try in their "dominant" second half, and didn't really create another good opportunity for one.

    The difference was solely down to Leinster, inexplicably, not being able to manage their exits properly (which, tbf, was illustrative of LAR's pressure game), and, very much connected, Peyper's refereeing decisions.

    Why, in the second half, did Peyper decide he was no longer going to award jackalling players the penalty when they're on the ball?

    Three clear examples in the second half - Dan Sheehan, Robbie Henshaw and Charlie Ngatai where they get on the ball, have to survive getting pummeled for it, and he just gives "turnover good", even though it's incredibly slow and scrappy ball. As a result - Leinster are usually out of position and scragging a kick into touch. If these three were rightly blown as the penalties they very obviously were, then Leinster kick to touch down in the LAR half and have the put in to the lineout.

    That's a f*****ing enormous distinction. Leinster's defence actually dealt brilliantly in the second half with LAR's power, but the referee never gave them the penalties they were entitled to.

    The decision not to give Caelan Doris the penalty on 67 mins and to actually give the penalty to LAR was the decision that swung the whole game. It's a **** disgraceful decision - he's on the ball for an eternity and more than long enough that the penalty should have been blown. From that penalty, they kick to the corner, score the try, and Kelleher gets the yellow.

    The penalty against JOB in the LAR 22 when he simply contests for the high ball and Leinster win the ball was a terrible decision. That was a huge moment of territory and possession and was a bad decision.

    The difference between how he refereed the sequence from 68-72 mins when LAR were on Leinster's try line to how he refereed the sequence from 73-78 mins when Leinster were on LARs was night and day. LAR got advantage constantly, every minor infringement blown immediately.

    By contrast - you have Seuteni lying on the wrong side for an age and blocking JGP getting to the ball, you have Bourgarit clearly diving off his feet onto the ball at the ruck, you have the tackler holding onto Ngatai for an age after his long break preventing quick ball, after the Ringrose check back inside the sub-LAR hooker clearly swipes the ball back on the deck with his hand, and you have Skelton attempting to play the ball with his hands in the ruck on 78 mins. Multiple phases during this sequence you have the LAR outside backs very visibly offside which forces Leinster back in narrow.

    Any one of these is an obvious and easy penalty.

    This game wasn't about LAR's power, it was about Jaco Peyper deciding he wasn't going to referee the breakdown in the second half. That cost Leinster this game.



Advertisement