Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1284528462848285028513690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,334 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    It didn't work on the British in ww2, the Japanese or Germany with bombing from the air and they were bombing in the thousands on some air raids. The Russians should be trying to hit ammo dumps or troop build ups. They should be disrupting the Ukrainian military but they are wasting their resources on civilian targets which they should never be going after. But if tonight is a massive air stikes etc. this is done even semi correctly against the Ukrainian counter offensive will be a major headache for the Ukrainians. This is what possibly might stop the counter offensive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,249 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Looks like it worked wonders in Kiev overnight




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭dePeatrick


    The Russians only do semi correctly at best and it won’t slow the counteroffensive at all. I reckon that Ukraine are taking their time and it has the Russians rattled.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Seanmadradubh


    What?

    No it dosen't, if anything it increases peoples hatred towards the perpetrators, hardens resistance, and can even get people to rally around a previously disliked or unpopular government.

    There often seems to be a racist/xenaphobic attitude towards mass civilian attacks ie: If it happens to us "we will never surrender" (Blitz Sprit), but they are weak and can't take it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Seanmadradubh




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,015 [Deleted User]


    About time,and hopefully be there soon,they should have had those 8 months ago




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,108 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,249 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Try to disappoint me all you like. I deal in reality, not make believe. Doesn't matter how I or anyone else feels about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,589 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    What's the point of a referendum when Russia has displaced the indigenous population with planters?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 939 ✭✭✭wildefalcon


    Screenshot_2023-05-01-08-04-22-939_com.brave.browser-edit.jpg


    Are you the same Kermit that posts mainly in the fantasy Island section on the weather board?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,479 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Was expecting terrible news this morning. Pleasantly surprised.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,385 ✭✭✭Field east


    A referendum???????? . Are you out of your mind ? OK then .I will go along with your idea re the referendum on the condition that Putin repatriates all the UKr he forcefully removed , directly or indirectly from UKr occupied territory, that the Tarters are allowed to return from past ‘genocides’ of them and that some ‘ discount is calculated for the UKr killed since 1991.

    what do you think Putin is at in ‘shifting/rearranging’ the population around the place , in his scorched earth policy where villages, towns, cities are raised to the ground, etc, etc and repopulating same with people from Moscovy and especially those from the East - being promised a BETTER life!!!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,249 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    It seems Russia got exactly what they wanted - a massive arms depot which judging by the footage - possibly ends notions of a counter offensive. The Ukranians will dress it up as something else but the video and pictures speak for themselves. It was a massive arms dump. A very serious development. What could be even more serious for the Ukranians is how much US gear we're talking?

    Ukraine has to prove it can do what it takes to hold US support- if they've lost a massive payload that won't go down well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,142 ✭✭✭prunudo


    The longer they drag their heals with this offensive the more exposed their stockpiles becomes to attack. I hope they've not missed their chance pandering to outside political pressure.

    I appreciate its a fine line though, keeping your friends supplying you happy while also doing what you feel is right for your country.



  • Posts: 2,015 [Deleted User]


    Why would they put ammo in a chemical plant that produce explosives?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,249 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Come off it, have you seen the footage of that explosion? That was an arms dump - not a "chemical plant that produces explosives". The weapons were lighting the sky for 3 hours.

    Do you believe a "chemical plant that produces explosives" would not have been levelled literally at the start of the war??

    There is a serious point to be made about corruption in Ukraine. A non-condusive environment to keeping secrets to say the least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭macraignil


    Can you post a link to the footage you mention as I'm only seeing reports of Ukraine air defenses taking down the majority of the missiles launched by the moskovytes and a picture of another civilian apartment block after being largely demolished?

    Why would Ukraine store a large portion of their counteroffensive weapons in one place?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    I find it hard to believe that the Ukrainian military would be inclined to replicate the Russian's habit of stockpiling ammo and equipment in large concentrations. That led to several of their dumps being blown up last autumn. Something blew and there was a big fire, but what?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,141 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Seemingly it was a train carrying ammo etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,023 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Reportedly it was a chemical plant where old ICBM rockets were to be decommissioned and hundreds of tons of rocket fuel were stored. Possibly ammunition was stored there also, at this stage I've seen countless strikes on ammo dumps.

    Ukraine likely has hundreds of ammo dumps, if not thousands, why would you assume a strike on one ends a counter offensive?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,744 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think some people are underestimating the sheer quantity of ammunition that would be used in a counter-offensive and overestimating the importance of losing one ammo dump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    No .

    If Russia bombs and missles keep coming it's the people who will start asking questions, comparison to the blitz doesn't come close ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,108 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui



    Still not good if true, but storing unstable munitions at a military explosives and propelants plant doesn't seem like the best of ideas, other than isolation and security would already pertain to the site.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It's not losing losing one ammunition dump Being significant,but losing a single large ammunition dump before a big counter offensive is to start and a publicised ammunition Shortage, but if Russia has the co-ordinace of other dumps this could cause panic, Which the Ukrainans would need to start moving ammunition to prevent this happening again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,141 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Also stories of 500 soldiers, 10 armoured vehicles, howitzers etc where on the train.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,356 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I have to disagree. Its exactly the same as the blitz. It reinforces the general population against the aggressor. It reminds them of the he cost of losing.

    It also shows the poor quality of the Russian military. It's highlights there inability to strike at small targets. Generally it shows that there targeting is a blunt instrument and has not pinpoint accuracy.

    Russia has shown an inability to hit with pinpoint accuracy military targets. A chemical plant producing explosives will have these stored in various stores in the plant. It will also have different chemicals in different stores that are required to to make different explosive types.

    There is nothing we have yet seen that indicates that Russia has the ability to accurately pinpoint targets. They would know the exact location and positioning of an explosive plant compared to ammunition dumps. It highly unlikely that the UA is using old arms dumps that Russia know the location of. An explosive production facility is not easily moved

    What is amazing is it took them so long to take it out. You would have imagined that a facility like that would have been hit early in the conflict. There is no record that such plants have been consistently hit over the last 12 months.

    It much easier to take out electrical infrastructure they structurally larger and hitting the infrastructure anywhere will reduce it ability to produce or distribute power.

    This war is only going one way and the offensivie will show that when it happens.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,744 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Sure, its not ideal and could be a portend of more problems. It is most certainly not going to end notions of a counter offensive though, that's just silly.

    Though equally I wouldn't rule out sheer dumb luck on the Russian's part as they don't have much of a track record of accurate targeting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,108 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @Bass Reeves I have to disagree. Its exactly the same as the blitz. It reinforces the general population against the aggressor. It reminds them of the he cost of losing..


    The difference between the blitzkrieg of London was the British had the spirit of knowing that if Hitler bombs us our boys will be hitting him where it hurts ,they were already were fighting over the skies an they also had daily reports of British victories, something we're not seeing in Ukraine,

    This thing about an old chemical plant has come from a single tweet that's been parroted by other accounts we still don't know what was hit , but whatever they hit it was significant



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,108 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Along with Zelensky and the Ukraine cabinet...



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement