Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Transport Aircraft

1232426282956

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,233 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    I saw this beauty in Palanga, Lithuania a few weeks ago…

    1 on the tarmac as we landed, and then I drove past the airport about an hour later and a 2nd was on the ground unloading a massive amphibious type of craft….. then down at the shops I saw it depart….

    drove back past the airport and the original one was still on the deck, so grabbed a few more pics….

    it eventually departed the following morning…..

    IMG_0495.jpeg IMG_0497.jpeg IMG_0498.jpeg

    Every now and again I see (hear) a few Eurofighter Typhoons departing Palanga also, and the noise off them is fcuking incredible…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,997 ✭✭✭CrowdedHouse


    Just train a group of pilots on 737's and 'Requisition' i.e.seize one from Ryanair when required for an emergency 😊

    Seven Worlds will Collide



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,523 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    No need. The Brits lease this Aircraft, among others, from Titan Air Leasing. Such Aircraft are available, in fairly short order, on a wet lease or dry lease basis, all painted up in national colours, if desired.

    Titan-A321N-G-XATW-first-official-sortie-departs-Teesside-1st-April-2021-Photo-David-FRASER.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,293 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    I suspect we'd need some new statutory powers for that - and think of the compensation that the aircraft's owners would seek, even if there was a legal basis for grabbing their assets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭sparky42


    As evidenced by the large amount of money the leasing companies are trying to get from their insurance firms after Russia stole their aircraft. Not too mention the idea of flying civilian planes into combat zones as evidenced by the reports a Turkish C130 took fire in the last 24 hours.

    We can easily afford a military transport capability if we want it, no need for “taking up from trade” issues, just buy a C130 or two and use them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,523 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I mean more as a multi-purpose State aircraft, including moving troops into theatre for UN missions, but not for active hot zones.

    I think if we had a light business jet, an A321LR, the C295W and a share in a strategic airlift partnership operating A400M, it would cover really every eventuality required by the Irish Defence Forces and Government for all civil and military airlift/VIP/medevac needs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Wouldn’t disagree much with that, other than perhaps a need for a bit of redundancy and maybe at least a second 295, would help reliability issues and training capacity along with actually missions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I see the UK are getting ready to park up there hercs shortly and no cobfirmed deals yet to buy them. 1 transport casa and 3 hercs would go a long way to improving our military transport options



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,523 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    We've nailed our colours to the mast with the C295s and talk of a shared strategic lift partnership, which would most likely be A400M or joining the existing SAC which operates C-17 GMIII. There is now a zero chance of acquiring C-130s from the UK or anyone else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭sparky42


    If we had gone to with picking up a herc back in 2000ish when the AC floated it then moving on to surplus Hercs now would make sense, but at this stage, short of getting the RAF to lend us an entire support staff and everything those Hercs would be sitting on the tarmac for years as we tried building up the manpower. If we actually sign on to a partnership and use the 295s well then it might be the best option for where we are and a realistic growth path.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭mupper2




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭sparky42


    That as well, aren’t they due for some costly work if they are to remain in service? Realistically how much extra manpower would we need to sustain 3 Hercs anyway?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    We could do with an extra 2/3 295s. Look at how hard the pc12s are worked



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Perhaps, but the point is still surely valid that we could do with more 295's, imo at least 2(4) more MPAs and a Transport version.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,523 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Flight crew, loadmasters, mechs and techs, squadron leaders and staff officers to keep 2 of 3 flying and on-call?

    Probably 50 additional bodies above establishment, not to mind current shortages.

    Pro rata for any additional C295s.

    Believe me lads, aircraft are not the problem here. Its entirely an equation of bodies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,209 ✭✭✭Psychlops




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Martin has said repeatedly this week since Sudan blew up that he had ordered officials to look at the European Programs that Ireland might consider joining. Whether or not anything comes from that is a whole other question.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭tippilot


    Give Marshalls of Cambridge free reign on those Hercs and you are getting a "new" aircraft.

    2 X Pilots plus a load master. 3 crews per aircraft as a rule of thumb. 9 aircrew plus techs per airframe.

    50 is wildly inflated. It's not the 1940's. 20 - 25 skilled crew per machine is relaistic and doable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Id presume maybe wrongly but the defence forces and martin already know what grouping they want to join. The air corps made there case for joining the EATC if they had got the two WFP casas. So how long will it take for us to join one of the airlift groups?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    If they had bought the 5th pc12 maybe they 3 spectare NG models could be doing there jobs maybe even heading to the med with the navy



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    Whatever aircraft the Aer Corp had in the past have given amazing service and value for money … additional C295 are in that bracket. What is ordered is only bare bones territory. The defence spokespeople are also being disingenuous this week when pointing to the new MPA - these are being equipped for a particular technical role, hawking about cargo or landing in dusty airstrips is not one of them.

    However , as we know they are a limited enough aircraft in terms of tactical transport. Clearly for access to large scale aircraft the pooled EU option is the way to go, however as a sovereign state there may be occasions where mission’s could fall out side scope and we have no ability to transport certain equipment or vehicles …

    certainly 1 transporter is better than none, but the c295:it is on occasion the equivalent of using a hatchback vehicle where a small van is the better option ….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,523 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Yeah but sure the only way to transport heavy equipment or armoured vehicles by air is the A400M / C-17 bracket and the airlift partnership, or the aircraft of the 2024/25 EU Battlegroup nations, are the only ways that's going to happen.

    In no universe are we buying a €180 million strategic airlifter, on our own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,523 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,219 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Fair comment grassy. This attachment gives an interesting comparison. The more capable of the two cam transport two IFV' s and a helicopter

    https://jetlinemarvel.net/aircraft-comparisons-between-the-brazilian-built-embraer-kc-390-and-the-european-airbus-c-295/?utm_content=cmp-true



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The main role of the PC12 is suppouse to be ISTAR not an air taxi for covid tests and officals. It could work in the med the same as the beckett will . If we have the extra pc 12 it could do the donkeywork same as the 4th an not be wasting hours on aircraft that where fitted out for ISTAR



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,523 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    It wouldn't, in that the Pilatus is a single-engined aircraft and the others are both twin.

    The risk of se-ops over 200,000+ sq.km of open sea, the southern coast of which is hostile with some of the very people your mission is to prevent from getting arms, is not a great idea.

    I couldn't see the DF or the Government going for it, even if we had the other resources to do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭mupper2


    Speaking of the PC-12's 2 of them returning home today after supporting the operation in Sudan




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,523 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    He did, but Lindbergh wasn't orbiting near the Libyan coast above a scattering of dodgy sub-Saharan trawlers and freighters trying to get small arms and RPGs into Benghazi.

    Of course operating single-engine anywhere has its risks, but no redundancy on an operation like this would be simply reckless and so won't happen.

    Who knows, maybe when the 295W arrives, we may be able to spare a 295 MPA for Irini or other international embargo or anti-piracy ops. The right aircraft for the job and a great opportunity to get some overseas operational experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Why would the transport arriving allow us to free up an MPA for such a tasking? It can't replace it here and the two aren't enough as is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,523 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Because the previous 235s and, for the moment, the 295MPAs when they arrive, will be used as transport planes also, due to the historical lack of any such dedicated plane.

    If we have one 295W and one 295MPA operational in Ireland and one 295MPA deployed abroad, we're still better off that we are right now.

    We all know the PC-12s aren't suitable for Irini and we should stop pretending that they may be.



Advertisement