Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1591592594596597943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 414 ✭✭ingo1984


    I wonder what scheme the government will conjure up next to maintain demand and current price levels. Increase lending limit to ×5 times?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    An intresting interview with a former adviser to the Government on housing policy. Gives us clues as to why we are where we are.

    Apparently property price drops are a disaster for the economy.

    If we weren't pumping prices by double digit percentage increases each year might be better strategy to avoiding disaster seems to be a point that is completely lost with Conor

    Seperatley on the same show, the minister seems to have given up on claiming that incentives given to developers will be passed on to the consumer. Noticeable change in his tone

    Reaction to Conor Skehan interview




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Yep - fortunately we won’t see a return to 100% mortgages but loosening the LTIs to allow people to borrow more just as rates started to rise at a pace never seen in history and inflation erodes people’s disposable income.

    I really can’t understand the thinking. I know it was under pressure of people in the ‘rent trap’ and to keep building viable. But the timing could not have been worse. Discussed at length on here I guess.

    We have to trust the banks themselves impose reasonable restraint as individuals won’t. They’ll borrow what they’re given.

    4x is probably still serviceable at current levels but if mortgage rates do tick up above 5/6% (I don’t think they will at the minute, but who knows) then we could be in for some real pain.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If you want to give your property away free, good for you.

    I didn’t say I trust all EAs, but I’m calling BS on your statement that what they did with the OP is “100%” EA little bag of tricks. How could you possibly know?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Of course the saving were never going to be passed. I think we all knew that. The state is using tax-payer funds to subsidise developers, who will presumably rent or sell many of said properties back to the state for premium rates.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    When you sell your home, you will pay an EA to get the highest price possible for the most valuable asset you will own, so of course you want interested buyers to view, and bid on your property. The fact that you would suspect that this is what the EA wants, seems an odd thing to suspect. Paying over the odds when bidding on a property is hard to quantify, the value of that property at that time is the highest price someone is willing to pay. If you look at the PPR in a few months time and see that someone pays, say €320k, then I’m not sure how you can say now that they tried to fool you by trying to entice you to bid more than €302k.

    Just remember, the EA works for the seller, not you, their job is to get people to view/bid/buy the property, and bid what you are comfortable with, it may not match the market value of the property, but at least you won’t stretch yourself. The fact that the PPR may show that the property sells for more than you think it was worth doesn’t mean you are a fool, but don’t think that just because another bidder thinks it is worth more than you do, that the EA is trying to fool you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It often hard to know. I have stopped bidding at different times on things and they always end up sold. Back I in the 2009-12 period was the only time I ever say deals not happening on bids in large amount.

    ''You pays your money and takes your chances as the sayings goes''.

    The reason the auctioneer may want bids fairly fast is the property is near enough where the vendor wants in price and the vendor may be willing to close the sale so the auctioneer will not want to hang around.

    Did he originally give you the wrong info, maybe, however you may have two bidders that just got stuck in( unlikely but it can happen)

    Limerick has the second highest income level after Dublin. However it trails Cork and Galway on house prices.

    Is it under or over valued??

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭mayo londoner


    I think it's pretty obvious the estate agent wants to get the highest price, no disputing that.

    My issue is not the end sale price, if people want to pay over the odds for the house then fair play to them. My issue it's that the bid miraciously went up over 30k in the space of 20hrs after everyone attending the viewing had been told current bid was 272,500, is that not in the slightest bit shady to you? Didn't particularly like the optics of the laptop being in the kitchen either so someone could log in and place a bid on the spot.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What’s over the odds? Surely that is the value of the property as set by the market.

    You could be right, the PPR will confirm one way of the other in the future, but unsurprisingly, people often find that properties sell for more than they were sure it was worth to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Ah now, price fixing and manipulation has been seen to occur in many markets including property.

    Sure wasnt there a big antitrust suit filed in the US over some landlord software that basically advised all landlords to up rents using the other people they advise to increase as justification.

    Similar things happen in property - I know of a few towns where that has happened in the past due to much constrained supply and 3 men buying up most development land and houses between them



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Trouble is the only way of avoiding the game is to emigrate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭mayo londoner


    Over the odds is most certainly what is being paid now for it considering highest selling price in the housing estate previously is 290K and that house was detached, more modern and not subject to probate as this one is. The fact that it was 30k over the previous bid within 20hrs on a house valued at 285k is nuts, if it was a house selling for say 800k in Dublin I'd find it a bit more believable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,737 ✭✭✭pinksoir


    Absolute insanity out there at the moment. Outbid on 2 properties in last couple of weeks. First was a tiny gaff in an alright area and would need about 80k put into it. Nice enough size garden but house itself is depressing beyond belief. 2 people still bidding away on it now way beyond after I pulled out.

    The other was a wreck, needs minimum 120k put into it. All sorts of issues to be uncovered but would qualify for gov vacant property grant. Mid terrace at edge of fairly rough area of Dublin. Grotty end of the street and similar house in far better condition and much nicer garden on street sold for 470k in march. Bid up to 450 and had to drop out as anything beyond would eat into renovation budget or would have to borrow more.

    It's desperate times out there right now. Far far worse than last year and seems higher interest rates are having absolutely no effect on folks. Genuinely finding it difficult to imagine how much worse it could get.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    But it wasn’t valued at €285k, it was advertised at €285k and “previously” is the important part of your post, that doesn’t mean someone isn’t willing to pay more today. Best way of a buyer who wants the property getting rid of a few interested other buyers? Bump the bid up quite a bit, there are buyers out there who are desperate to buy what stock there is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Exactly, think of how much longer it will go on like this? Madness will eventually die down. The money tree may loose it's leaves.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,737 ✭✭✭pinksoir


    Honestly, that's hard to see at this point. It's like people have collectively lost their minds due to the desperation. Every property becomes the site of a bidding war where people are taking on incredible levels of debt for miserable houses. And the only way to actually get a place is to throw away any sense of reason or future accountability to yourself, and dive into the pool of insanity. You have to be the craziest person bidding, the one who blinks last.

    Interest rates will be 5.5-6% most likely when drawing down if you buy now. I'm lucky to have a large lump sum, but many folk out there are taking on massive massive debt. And the only thing that will seemingly stop them is when they're told no by the bank.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    In 2006/7 everybody was saying it was hard to see a scenario in which the madness would die down, demand outstripped supply, fundamentals solid etc etc.

    And then in 2011/12 everybody was saying it was it was hard to see a scenario in which prices would ever return to 07 levels, zero demand, it would take 30 years to fill the over supply etc etc.

    And now prices are largely back at 07 levels, and everybody is saying it is hard to see a scenario in which the madness will die down, demand outstrips supply, fundamentals solid etc.

    Sure it might be different this time. But as Villa05 pointed out earlier - history doesn't always repeat itself, but it usually rhymes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭Beigepaint


    The only thing we know for sure is that people experiencing an economic cycle are poor are predicting whether the bubble will inflate or pop.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Finally starting to see green shoots


    13,782 properties on Myhome up from 13,452 on 5th April.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    In what world could we be close to oversupply of property in this country?

    Oversupply of large offices maybe, houses not a chance



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I think there is a lot in what he says, some data does indicate we are nowhere near as crisis levels of supply as the headlines would have you believe.

    It's important to distinguish between whether somebody means supply as in houses actually on the market versus supply as in volume of existing housing stock.

    Sure the data shows that supply of houses on the market is at record lows.

    But the data of supply of housing stock suggests the picture is nowhere as bleak as most claim.

    And I think Skehan's point if we ramp up a housing program that builds 60/70/80k houses a year for next decade, we are likely to have turn quickly into a position of oversupply.

    And that then causes the same problems of 07/08 all over again.

    Skehan is not a particularly likeable fellow, but he's no idiot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    What data shows us having enough stock to meet our housing needs?

    And where is all this presumably empty stock that isnt making it to market?

    Genuinely this is the first im hearing about risks of oversupply, perplexed as to how this can be the case.

    In 06/07 people were not struggling to find any place, there was a clear bubble but there was supply and lots more coming on stream



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    2022 census for one.

    According to the CSO the total housing stock is 2,124,590 and the average household size is 2.75 in Ireland.

    Total housing stock of 2,124,590 x Average household size 2.75 = 5,842,622 total housing person capacity

    And the population is 5,123,536.

    So on the face of it based on average household size we have "spare" capacity for 719,086 people. Or to put it another way - 719,086 / avg household size 2.75 = 261,485 spare housing units.

    Obviously it is not that simple because in order to facilitate a healthy turnover of stock in a functioning market you need some spare capacity at all times - this is in the region of 6% of housing stock equating to 127,475 units.

    261,485 spare housing stock - 127,475 turnover stock = 134,010 oversupply

    That potential oversupply we have will have dropped a bit because of significant net immigration since April 2022, but the raw numbers are still nowhere near as alarming as the headlines.

    Or to put it another way, if you had never read a newspaper article on Irish property, or tried to rent/buy a house recently, and were coming to the situation with no preconceived idea of the situation and you looked at the number of houses in Ireland compared to the number of people you would conclude there is no shortage of houses.

    If you have a few years of building 60/70/80k into to those housing stock numbers you will run into oversupply sooner or later. The longer it takes, the bigger the impact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    I think Rory ahern made a good point in response to Skehan. In 2007, people were buying second properties as an investment.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Just listened to both interviews, and feel a bit bad about my comment on Skehan not being likeable. I thought he came across well, nervous as he knew he'd get it in the neck.

    Re Ahernes point about people buying investment properties, we didn't really have a investment landlord class back then.

    I daresay if we still didn't have the institutional landlords, and all the units that have been delivered in last 7 or so years that have not made it to market because of build to rent, REITs bulk buying, PArt V delivery etc, had been on the open market it would feel like every Tom, Dick and Harry had been buying second properties as an investment.

    I agree with Aherne's thinking re the government should putting all the public money eggs in one basket to supplying the social housing demand and leave the private market to look after itself by and large.

    I just did same housing stock / average household size / population calculations using the numbers from the 2006 census.

    And the result was an oversupply of 159,187, only 25,000 units more than 134,010 figure from the 2022 census.

    And in the year or so following the 2006 census another 100k new units were built, which led to a huge crash due to oversupply. Skehan is just warning to be careful we don't repeat the same mistake again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭mayo londoner


    And it's not worth 285k, personally I'd have gone 275k max, alas irrelevant point to my main crux of the house suspiciously going up by 30k in 20hrs after everyone had arrived to view. As I said earlier, if people want to pay way over the odds let them at it, fools and their money are easily parted.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Interesting. I wonder what would happen if th Ukraine war ended and Google pulled out of Dublin with the new 15%.

    As far as I can tell, Skehan doing his best to be calm in the storm. It's interesting what he says and if you're saying REIT's are the new investment home bodies akin to people investing in a second home...

    Who knows, there seems to be a fair few very large apartment developments coming on stream this year. Will be interesting to see how things pan out.

    In the meantime feel sorry for the many people in accommodation distress.



Advertisement
Advertisement