Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Western Rail Corridor / Rail Trail Discussion

1152153155157158184

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,427 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    If going from Galway to Sligo via this route you'd go:

    Galway->Oranmore->Athenry->Ballyglunin->Tuam->Milltown->Ballindine->Claremorris->Kiltimagh->Swinford->Charlestown->Tobercurry->Collooney->Sligo.

    It might take a longer while to get there if speed is lower due to more stations and less straight track with more LCs.

    You'd also be waiting for the state to rebuild 75km of rail line which is unlikely to happen in any of our lifetimes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭mayo.mick


    The disused route north of Claremorris was called " The Burma Road". If memory serves me correctly from listening to local historians, its a light rail narrow gauge alinement, 47 miles long with 48 level crossings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,537 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    as i understand it is correct that it was built to light rail and narrow gauge rail standards but it is definitely a braud gauge line rather then narrow gauge.

    trains were able to run the whole through route from limerick to sligo until the closure of mayo to sligo from where they went to mayo only.

    i'm sure freight would have come from other destinations as well and specials from various destinations may have ran the through route as a whole in the line's time.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'd wager they were the slowest running trains on the whole network though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭Poxyshamrock


    Spotted this in last week's Clare Echo. Local Councillors still pushing for a station at Crusheen.

    'Compelling case' to reopen Crusheen railway station to be put before Iarnród Éireann - Clare Echo

    image.png




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,852 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Population: 543 (2016)

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭mayo.mick




  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    These articles always amuse me

    They're full of "if you build it they will come".

    Thing is, not one author, in the last decade, has been able to show the benefits that phase 1 has brought to the likes of Gort, Ardrahan, Craughwell etc

    Zip, zero, zilch.

    Just more of the same "trust us boss".

    To be clear, I don't object to rail investment, just WRC investment. Its a farcical waste of money which would be much better spent on the main lines



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭Poxyshamrock


    The train is slow and infrequent so until it can be improved in this regard, it's unlikely to attract people from the intermediate stops. It has attracted plenty going from Galway to Limerick and vice versa.


    Galway County Council should also seek to concentrate development in these towns and villages over the likes of Kilcolgan and Clarinbridge which are more dependent on the road network.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Nail on the head there. Why haven't the government and councils been encouraging dense development in these towns? They should have been. It's an appalling failure of policy.

    Build it and they will come come holds true as a general concept.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Thing is though, the current service is shockingly poor and won't entice many to use it

    You can concentrate development in these locations all you want, but if the service

    1. takes twice as long as the car,
    2. has a poor frequency,
    3. crap schedule

    then damn all people will use it

    Without additional capacity on the main line, there is no scope to improve #'s 2 & 3 above

    As for #1, well, I don't see how that will ever improve without close on 500 mil being spent to improve the alignment and double tracking it and the main line.

    Adding another line from Tuam (or beyond) to Athenry would just make everything worse for the existing services and any such service would also have the 3 issues that WRC phase 1 has



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,885 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Indeed, it's a bit of a chicken and egg problem, should we build a rail connection in the hope that these towns will densify, or should we encourage the towns to densify so that a rail connection is justified.

    I'd say that if you put it to the rail line campaigners that in order for the rail line to get the go ahead they'd need to support Strategic Development Zones in these towns to rapidly increase density, you'd very quickly find that many would lose their voice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,537 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    the problem is that densify first infrastructure later has always been our way and unless it's a road, it hasn't delivered.

    so maybe it is time to change tac.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,885 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Can you give an example of where they purposefully and specifically increased density in an area on the promise of a rail line, and then didn't provide that line? I don't know of any off the top of my head, although Cherrywood is probably close.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,537 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    i was beaten twice to it by yourself and ronald but i would add that i believe possibly parts of cork also could be examples.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Is Cherrywood the one where they built the platform and everything but never ran anything to it or is that somewhere else?

    Edit: Maybe I'm thinking of Kishoge Station



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux


    It is Kishoge alright.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,532 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    "Build it and they will come" holds true when what is built is fit for purpose.

    Reinstatement of a line along an old meandering alignment is setting up for failure from day 1. For the line to succeed it needs to offer an alternative that will be comparable or faster times than bus at a bare minimum, and ideally times that can complete with car commuting times.

    The original WRC alignment will never provide a service that's faster - or even equivalent time - compared to the alternatives and will struggle to get viable pax numbers because of that.

    For a WRC to actually work then a proper route assessment needs to be carried out. Use elements of the old alignment where it makes sense to do so, but also be willing to deviate from the old alignment (and deviate significantly) where needed.

    Too much of the campaign appears to be driven by spotters who are more interested in seeing trains along the old line than in actaully having a service that works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    The line from Athenry to Tuam is pretty much as straight as the crow flies. Tuam to Miltown is curvy, but Miltown to Claremorris is pretty much straight again.

    Tuam is the largest town in county Galway, so it's a pretty good justification to reopen.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Still won't mean anything near a comparable journey time though

    Plus, and here's the thing details are very light on, will phase 1 trains continue up phase 2 or will phase 2 have its own set of trains?

    If its option 1, then its a worse journey time for all users of the WRC

    If its option 2 then its worse journey times for everyone on the mainline as there is zero additional capacity until dual tracking is completed (see 2035 if you're lucky) and the passing loop at Oranmore will just mean sitting and waiting for passing trains as happens everyday at Athenry

    Galway to Dublin main line is supposed to get to hourly services. That simply won't be possible if you add WRC phase 2 without dual tracking



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭serfboard


    A "slow and infrequent" service "has attracted plenty going from Galway to Limerick". Really? How do you know that?

    I'm amazed that a service that takes two hours attracts passengers when a more frequent and faster alternative bus service takes an hour and twenty minutes. Some people must really not value their time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Dual tracking of main line definitely needed. I would be more optimistic of this happening sooner than 2036 given the changing focus from roads to public transport.

    Current time from Galway to Athenry (20km) is 18-20minutes. Athenry to Tuam is 25km, so 20 to 25minutes is definitely possible. With dual tracking, a 40 minute Tuam to Galway journey is very achievable.

    This compares to 50minute current bus time. Since people prefer trains, there would absolutely be demand for this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭Poxyshamrock


    I use the train on a daily basis and often there is standing room only from Galway and Limerick. Not many get on or off in between, save for Ennis. The tickets (especially for students) are far more reasonable than the bus and many like myself just prefer the train to the bus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭serfboard


    Ah OK, so anecdotal evidence only. Right, right.

    You spend an extra forty minutes going all the way from Galway to Limerick? Meaning you spend an extra eighty minutes per day? Fair play to you - you must love th'oul trains. Percy French would be proud.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,885 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Ah, I should have clarified that it's the one on the Luas line rather than heavy rail. The development of about 10000 homes got planning permission on the basis that the Luas would be metro standard.

    Now that that's cancelled, everyone from there to the city centre is going to be paying the price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭Poxyshamrock


    Alright, take it handy! I’d love to know where first hand information is now considered anecdotal? I’ll stick to the train and you can stick to your car and your tin foil hat.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,885 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    That's quite literally the definition of anecdotal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,532 ✭✭✭blackwhite



    The demand is for Tuam to Galway - not Tuam to Athenry.

    The diversion via Athenry (and the insistence on stopping at any and every historic stop in between) all adds time, which takes away from the benefits v bus. Especially when you factor in that how much of the Tuam to Galway commuter traffic is heading for the various business parks around Parkmore/Ballybrit

    Tuam to Athenry to Galway on the existing alignment (followed by many commuters having to then face the traffic from city centre back out to the business parks) would simply be too slow to get enough modal shift. A proper commuter line would go direct from Tuam to Galway, with a stop at Claregalway, Parkmore and then the alignment heading to meet the mainline around Roscam.

    Given how bad we are at building new lines, that's unlikely to get funding anytime in the medium term - but the fact that a viable line won't be built doesn't justify pissing away money on an unviable line that would doomed to failure due to the alignment



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭Poxyshamrock


    Fair enough point taken…but take the 17.50 from Galway to Limerick or the 18.05 from Limerick to Galway some evening and see for yourself. I’m still of the opinion that the trains are slow and infrequent but the numbers are well up on what they were after the line opened in 2010.



Advertisement