Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1278127822784278627873690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,728 ✭✭✭storker


    Which part of "that's up to the Ukrainians" are you having trouble understanding?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,079 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Did you miss all the ceasefire violations and shelling of civilian corridors by Russia?

    You dont see much do you.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 7,946 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm a bit behind... catching up.

    So, when Hitler turned on his Russian mates and invaded Russia, at what stage do you think Stalin should have looked for peace to save Russian lives?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 313 ✭✭rubbledoubledo


    Just wondering what will become of Russia, if Ukraine win the war , I presume sanctions will not be lifted, who would replace Putin, will it become a massive killing field , probably no one will trade with them either, probably a few more nut cases trying to get their hands on the bombs. We on very shaky ground now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,047 ✭✭✭jmreire




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 7,946 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Why would the West want to deplete Russia... Are you somewhere where you cannot get Russian propaganda? The official mouthpieces for Putin and senior Muscovy politicians have openly called for the destruction of the west. These langers need to be defanged, and if that means sanctions for a hundred years and continued support for Ukraine against the war criminal, rapist, child abductor rapists then that's a great thing for the world, is it not? That's not a rhetorical question by the way... don't you think war criminals, rapists and child abductor/rapists should be stopped?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 313 ✭✭rubbledoubledo


    The scary thing in all of this , is Putin has no reverse gear



  • Posts: 7,946 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Can you show a time Russia hasn't broken a ceasefire in Ukraine... you cannot, because they kept killing fleeing civilians. You see Bev, you don't mind if I call you Bev do you? You see, Bev - in the west, with access to free media, we can see that your comrades, marauding soldiers are mostly scum, and their leaders not to be trusted. So, go ahead Bev, try and convince us that Russia can be trusted (despite all the evidence to the contrary) - but, you might want to start with something easy first and work your way up. How about convincing us the world is flat... that's going to be a lot easier, Bev.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,398 ✭✭✭SortingYouOut


    I don't agree with the poster you're arguing with when I ask this - do you read the words of a sane person when you read this post from yourself? Your point that was there in earlier posts has been lost now among this nonsense. Do yourself a favour and refrain from the over emotional shite, it reads like someone is under your skin.

    Beverly Hills, California



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,047 ✭✭✭jmreire


    I doubt very much that Putin ever dirtied his hands, never mind working in any kind of hazardous environments. But he does have one unbeatable and implacable foe : Father Time. Average life span for males in Russia is 71.34 years, and for women its 76.5 years. and this is best case scenario. Many Russians do not even reach the late 60's. I do not know what or even if he has any serious illnesses, but I doubt very much despite the best health care his stolen wealth can provide, his card is marked, and he 's not in perfect health.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,166 ✭✭✭✭briany


    If Russia had reasonable terms to proffer, then by all means sit down and talk, but when the leader of Russia does not even believe that Ukraine is a real country, it's not hard to see how Ukraine would regard any possible negotiations as being on shaky ground to begin with. Putin's own words are telling - he wrote himself that he believed that Ukraine could only be sovereign in partnership with Russia. Reading between the lines on that, he means that if Ukraine wishes to break with Russia, it cannot be allowed to exist as an independent state. He also wrote that modern Ukraine's borders are a result of Bolshevik idealism and that Russia was 'robbed indeed' by how lands were allocated.

    So any negotiation with Russia at this point hinges on the idea that Ukraine should be prepared to cede significant amounts of land to Russia, and this isn't even talking about Crimea, but at least any bit of land laying east of the Dnieper. There is a huge chunk of Ukraine that Russia could regard as their historical land - a portion larger than Ukraine wants to give and, frankly, larger than they have to give, given how they are holding Russian forces from even taking the Donbas, never mind marching to Kyiv. If Putin wants a proper negotiation, he will have to recognise that he cannot have things his own way and drastically downscale his ambitions upon Ukraine.

    I would say the idea, for one, of barring Ukraine from NATO membership would be off the table now (this is something Zelensky was willing to offer at the outset, and still talks broke down). It would be the only thing preventing Russia from rebuilding its forces and attempting a fresh attack upon Ukraine in years to come. But, as a compromise, an agreement could be signed not to place any long range missiles on Ukrainian soil (in peacetime, at least).

    Russia could have an internationally-recognised referendum on Crimea, as opposed to the rushed kangaroo one they held in 2014. In return, Russia withdraws forces from the rest of Ukraine.

    Russia would have to pay reparations. This could take the form, at least partly, of not protesting the funds which have already been seized.

    Putin would agree to step down as Russian leader within 5 years.

    Azov battalion to be disbanded.

    UN peacekeepers dispatched to Donbas.

    Return of all Ukrainians forcefully deported.

    In my opinion, this would be a fitting compromise as things stand. Russia would do well to take this if offered. These terms are as good as it will get.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭pcardin


    pfft, hes working off his script. Let him. A different clown every day but they all use the same script.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,071 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The longer it goes on the greater the chance of the Ukrainian backers in the West stopping. Germany's Socialist party has said the supply of weapons is ending from them .


    Say Labour get in in Britain. Starmer wouldn't be suspect but still lots of old style reds in Labour that will step up for Russia.


    America is again flirting with withdrawing from the world.


    A global financial crisis might change perspectives.


    China is delighted to see a longer war tying up its enemies in the West.


    There are many reasons why Putin would want a more drawn out affair.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,071 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    He also tried to force European NATO countries to arm up and invest in their armies because of belligerent Russia.


    That went down like a lead balloon. Lucky for Russia that Merkel was on the job.


    If they had listened we would see a much greater supply of weapons to Ukraine now.


    Merkel may or may not have been a Russian asset but either way she was the greatest aid to Putin internationally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,047 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Ang getting plenty of help from international brigades as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,047 ✭✭✭jmreire


    You have been in close proximity to the fighting yourself?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,785 ✭✭✭macraignil


    I've already mentioned about the conditions for negotiations that Ukraine made public and again I repeat what I have seen is that putin has given no indication he would agree to any of them so as I have already said there currently seems to be nothing for them to talk about. Looks to me like there is going to be a lot more moskovytes liquidated in Ukraine when if they had any sense they would simply march back home. Ukraine has made it quite clear they have no intention of invading russia so the moskovytes have nothing to fear if they just stop killing Ukrainians in their homeland and leave.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Sending UN peacekeepers and taking all troops out of disputed territory is about the only ceasefire possible.

    russia won't accept any ceasefire where Ukraine doesn't give up a lot of their land and leaves russia ready to strike again when it wants as well as denies Ukraine access to arms.

    Thus russia will continue to decimate both it's own economy and army while the world watches and NATO becomes more and more powerful.

    If putin was reasonable, he'd have withdrawn after the 3 day plan spectacularly failed, he'd still have his oil money, but I suspect that he needs a foreign war to have an excuse to keep the russian people afraid to speak out against him.

    Would the posters who want a ceasefire or peace accept the UN moving in and russia moving out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    If you want to keep your posts, there is no point quoting them, they're here to wind up others and send them off to get "answers". Your posts will be deleted in the cleanup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has been ongoing since 2014. The conflict began when Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine and supported separatists in eastern Ukraine. The conflict has been fueled by a number of factors including historical tensions between Russia and Ukraine, ethnic divisions within Ukraine, and geopolitical interests.

    While it is true that many Ukrainians are native Russian speakers, this does not mean that they support Russian aggression against Ukraine. In fact, many Ukrainians have been fighting against Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine for years. It is important to remember that the conflict in Ukraine is not simply a matter of language or ethnicity, but rather a complex geopolitical issue that requires a nuanced understanding of history, politics, and culture.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,521 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    One could hardly read too much into the language issue. Michael Collins couldn't speak a word of Irish, despite being regarded as on of Ireland's great patriots and revolutionaries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,047 ✭✭✭jmreire


    When the Ukraine Government is good and ready to talk, then they will talk, and not before. It will be their decision and theirs's alone to make. And rightly so!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,166 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Putin does want to own Ukraine, yes. This may not be the aim of another hypothetical Russian leader and Russia is a nation of individuals who will all have their own opinions on the matter which may or may not align with that of Putin, but Putin is leader of Russia, is in charge of its political direction and does want to own Ukraine, at least in the case where Ukraine wants to diverge from Russia.

    Your reasoning on language could be used to say that Irish people are really English. You would find widespread disagreement on that assertion, if made. Look at behaviour rather than words: the Ukrainian people have fiercely resisted Russkiy mir. Ask yourself why that's happening. Clue: it's not because they're just confused Russians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,790 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    Pity. You're giving away your age with this post. You had a good point, but then your post became teenagey, Genx nonsense. Have a coffee, eat some fruit, walk up and down the road outside for 10 minutes and try it again. You're letting us down here.


    Lol.



  • Posts: 7,946 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,418 ✭✭✭Field east


    Has ‘the West’ not presented him with a number of options as to how to get his gearbox fixed and he has refused them all to date?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,418 ✭✭✭Field east


    the only problem with all of this is that Moscovy do not honour any agreements they are part of. There are numerous PRECIDENT eg Moscovy agreeing to never attack Ukr if Ukr Give up their nuclear weapons



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,720 ✭✭✭Rawr


    So there was another forum troll screaming for talks.

    It will be interesting to see if this will be the continuing trend in their scripts going forward.

    “Let’s get them to talk!” “No more killing!” “Putin and Zelensky can be reasonable” “Common Since!!l”

    I can of course be wrong about this, but my takeaway is that the Russians now know they’re peaked in this fight and will be lucky to hold their current creeping advance across Donbass. They are devouring their own army by fighting a professional AFU defence, and they must be concerned what a professional AFU offensive might do to them. If the Russians are very unlucky, a breakthrough anywhere on the lines might result in their Bakmut forces getting encircled and taken out.

    The Kremlin now wants to appeal to the West’s hippy peacenik ways and inject the idea that talks are needed. Talks…so they can hold onto what they have, and buy time. Never mind them starting this conflict needlessly. Never mind the innocent lives destroyed in its execution. Never mind Putin’s leaked plans to systematically exterminate undesirable elements in Ukraine, which I fear Bucha etc.. was just a preview of. Never mind any of elements that put Putin’s Russia into the same category as Hitler’s Germany or Pol Pot’s Cambodia. We should talk “peace” with him, as if that word had any value to him what so ever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,418 ✭✭✭Field east


    One major key ,IMO, is that if Putin was disposed, - totally and PERMANENTLY removed from the scene - and his replacement showed some signs of wanting to bring an end to this madness then things might open up



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,418 ✭✭✭Field east


    We are being taken down another rabbit hole here by La-bev - a classical case of deflection, etc, etc, etc, etc. This Russian speaking thing has been flogged a few times in this thread and yet it is being brought up again. What has language FUNDAMENTALLY got to do with the present conflict.

    some points on the above

    (1) Donbas , Luhansk and Chrimea - the pro Ukr population —has been targeted and either killed , forced to leave the areas for their own safety or told to f—k off and then planted with people from Moscovy. We then hold a referendum and lo and behold it is passed by a large majority - most want to be part of Moscovy. Simple . ARE WE BEING TAKEN AS FOOLS?

    (2) the English language is 100% associated with the UK so the UK have every right to attack any English speaking country- , The USA , NZ and Australia immediately comes to mind as do a lot of its ex colonies. Cricket, court structures/proceedings, etc, etc - which are very British- as practiced by a lot of the ex colonies further strengthens the ‘RIGHT’ for the UK to attack and take control of these ‘SO CALLED’ countries

    La BEV - will you get up-the-yard and stay there with your tripe. By the way is the main gate at your Orwell Road pad swinging ok again?



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement