Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1276527662768277027713690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭maebee




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Looks like a Ukrainan mig 29 was lost along with it's pilot yesterday




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    I think we all are tempted to give credence to the theory that, having been thwarted militarily in Ukraine, that there will be some kind of (usually vague and unspecified) political regime change in Russia that will lead to a more amenable Russian government i.e. one that is willing to compromise on Ukraine and indeed with the West generally.

    I think that is beyond optimistic. Putin is at the apex of a carefully constructed power vertical - even if he dies or is somehow deposed (and the scenarios proposed here are usually of the Hollywood variety), then his replacement will also come from within that power vertical. There won't suddenly be a flowering of democracy in Russia. If you want another real world example, look to another aggressive rogue nation; North Korea. We've been waiting many decades for the regime there to collapse under the weight of its own contradictions and it has never happened.


    This isn't a Japan or Germany 1945 scenario. Russia will not be occupied and totally defeated in the form of unconditional surrender. It has lost and probably will lose even more in its war of imperial conquest (lets call it what it is) in Ukraine but, unfortunately, that does not axiomatically lead to political change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Returning to the frozen conflict theme, we need to remember that is exactly the situation that Ukraine was in from 2014-2022. Any return to this would just represent the status quo.

    The more I think about this, the more likely that outcome seems. The open question being what lines on the map would demarcate the boundaries between sovereign Ukrainian territory and illegally occupied fake Russian 'republics'.

    (note that this is clearly not the outcome any of us want, but it seems to be the most realistic)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It's not going to happen, ukraine will retake all of their sovereign territories back including Crimea, this won't be a frozen conflict, Putin went with a frozen conflict to deny Ukraine a chance to join either the eu or nato eventually, now's he went with full invasion all bets are off there will be no negotiated settlement,they won't be giving away any of their sovereign territory to Russia because in a year or 5 years time they will come back for more,

    Russia will be pushed out of Ukraine,it's the only way this gets settled



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 775 ✭✭✭Heraclius


    That's what I worry will be the outcome too. I especially worry that the US will lose interest in supporting Ukraine once Biden is gone and Russia will be able to push the frontline deeper into Ukraine. I feel the Ukrainians really need to retake territory this spring/summer because it may be their last chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    I'm not picking anything... it's a simple fact, if Russia are so concerned about their POW's, how about:

    1) Leave the country

    or

    2) Treat Ukrainian POW's better



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    in 1917, there was a clear groundswell against the Tsar, who had clearly lost his grip on power, and a host of alternatives.

    Can we say the same in 2022?

    1. Is there a clear opposition to Putin? Is the population generally opposed to him?
    2. Where are the modern-day Social Revolutionaries, the Mensheviks, the Bolsheviks?
    3. Could we even identify a modern-day Kerensky?




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    Nobody is saying they can or should... however over a year in of Ukrainian's treating Russian POW's in over 99% of cases with a lot more dignity and respect when it wasn't ever returned, you can expect patience to be wearing thin on a lot of battle hardened Ukrainian's..

    Your armchair expertise is really showing when you're blatantly overlooking any sort of psychological aspect as to why there is an increase of Russian POW mistreatment.

    Unfortunately, this plays right into the Russian propaganda.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 775 ✭✭✭Heraclius


    Also Tsar Nicholas was more direct about being in day to day command of the army which made the poor performance on the battlefield and poor conditions of the soldiers more directly his fault in the eyes of the population. Putin still has plenty of generals and a defence minister to blame for his own decisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭Rawr


    This is my concern too. It might actually be Russian strategy to hold the line as long as possible in hope that Putin’s puppet Trump gets back into the White House or another similar MAGA-aligned cretin who has no real love for democracy.

    I too also feel it important for them to successfully drive the lines forward this year. A successful Ukraine in battle makes it easier to sell the idea of arming them and providing military aid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Even if your highly optimistic scenario occurs, you could still have a frozen conflict. It would just be based along the 2014 borders.

    I also think it's very optimistic to think that Ukraine could conquer back Donetsk city. Look how hard it is for Russia to take a much, much smaller city in Bakhmut for example. Defence is easier than attack, and Russia still, in spite of their awful tactics and leadership, has a lot of men and weaponry to throw into the conflict.

    Don't get me wrong, I'd be very happy if Ukraine could push Russia back into its own territory for good. I just don't share the same probabilistic assessment as you. Time will prove us right or wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭Rawr


    If Ukraine mean to retake all of Donbass, Donetsk City is going to be the messiest fight of all, probably worse than Crimea in my opinion.

    It’s not impossible though. If the Russians can be successful routed on the field they might be running back to the international border to protect themselves. I get the impression that there’s no real love between the DPR and RU forces with some mention of them using people from their opposite number as cannon fodder. The DPR forces themselves might not be in a good enough state to resist a full AFU assault on the city without RU support.

    Even then, it would be an ugly fight and best case would be encirclement and a DPR surrender.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,162 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Pretty sure that IS the strategy at this juncture. Putin likely fancies his chances of remaining in Ukraine until November 2024.

    Of the two Republicans most likely to run/win, both fall squarely into the 'Russian asset' category.

    What's probably more concerning than who is POTUS is what their Congress looks like. They're the one who actually pass these bills to give Ukraine another X billion in military aid.

    If the worst happens there, then Europe must severely up its game. There is a massive worry here, though. The extent to which a deep red USA washes its hands of the conflict would be directly proportional to the credibility of Russian nuclear threats against European countries, like Poland, who decided to get directly (and unilaterally) involved in the conflict. And Russia might even be free to use tactical nukes and chemical weapons in the battlefield with no comeback apart from "widespread international condemnation". About as much use as "thoughts and prayers".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 167 ✭✭Fastpud


    There are a couple of things to be taken from the current situation

    1. It’s clear that Russia can only do slow grinding advances at massive losses -but unfortunately they seem willing to keep doing this.
    2. A Ukrainian blitzkrieg attack in the spring / summer smashing to the coast with a subsequent over all Russian army collapse seems like wishful thinking.
    3. The coming Ukrainian attack will more than likely be successful at a tactical level rather than strategic making gains but not ending the war
    4. It’s going to take a few more years until Russia completely runs out of men and material so the west need to keep supplying ukraine in great quantities.
    5. Given the ongoing destruction of Ukraine with no corresponding destruction of Russia’s infrastructure means the cost is so unbalanced there no incentive for Russia to look for peace
    6. The big risk is the US election in 2024. The US is really the main nation with the deep pockets and large qty of kit who can sustain Ukraine. If that pipeline is reduced can any other nation(s) pick up the slack?

    I hope the upcoming Ukrainian offensive is wildly successfully but I fear this is going to go on for years with neither side able to deliver a knockout punch



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,785 ✭✭✭macraignil


    Sorry not to be clear but when I said that when Ukraine's looming counteroffensive has had a major impact on the moskovyte army in Ukraine that putin would fall out a window I should have simply said that a group in the Kremlin will have him elliminated. I did not intend to suggest there would be some peace loving government formed in a political regime change but meant to say that some one from the Kremlin would come forward to be the face of the existing moskovyte leadership grouping that will have lost patience with putin's delusions of muskovyte military superiority which has clearly been shown to be false by their failures in Ukraine.

    It's just an opinion but I think even non peace loving Kremlin staff will realise that if they continue to destroy their military in Ukraine the russian federation will no longer exist and a lot of the republics more distant from moskow will align themselves with China rather than continue to send their young people to be fodder for putin's dreams of a revitalised soviet style empire. Survival is a great motivator and when it filters through to the people behind putin that he is no longer doing the right things to keep them safe his time will be up and maybe one of his alleged illnesses will suddenly prove terminal and allow the regime change direction without admitting to responsibility for putin's mistakes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    I agree with most of this except why differentiate?

    The formula is simple: DPR = RU. They are two sides of the same coin. Not even the Russians pretend any different now!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    'A group in the Kremlin will have him eliminated'.

    This just strikes me as wishful thinking. All 'Kremlin groups' are part of Putin's power vertical. Their interests are totally aligned with that of Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    I think that's a good analysis and, unfortunately, it's the external risk factors you note in points 4 and 6 that are the key ones.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 167 ✭✭Fastpud


    To end this quickly there would need to be a massive increase of high end hardware given to Ukraine, including vast quantities of tanks, AFV, artillery and drones along with all the ammunition the need. Ukraine has proven its-self well able to use any kit given to them but most of all they are willing to fight and do the hard yards.

    Most of all required are long range weapons and no restriction on where they can be used. All military bases with in Russia are legitimate targets, as are rail networks, communication hubs, bridges etc. Ukraine are fighting with one hand behind their back. Let Russia feel the same pain.

    These could to slow or stop resupply into Ukraine making the situation untenable for Russian troops. Additionally it would bring it home to the Russian population that the war has consequences and increase the over all cost to Russia

    The west should not fear escalation Russia knows it is totally out matched so won’t escalate. They will huff and puff but will ‘do nuttin’



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,489 ✭✭✭zv2


    @johnnyskeleton You're not seriously suggesting that they execute POWs are you?

    No. And I am against mistreatment and cruelty which leads to no good anyhow. I am not saying POWs should be killed. I am saying it is ok to kill them if, in the heat of battle, it is too costly to keep them and risk Ukrainian lives in doing so. The expression I used was 'it's ok' - with caveats of course.

    This is not just a war, it is terrorism on an industrial scale. A horde of criminals led by a cabal of bat-sh1t crazy warlocks in the Kremlin. I don't blame the Ukrainians for getting angry.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭Rawr


    True, DPR and RU are essentially the same, and early on in all of this DPR forces were clearly a sly way for Russia to wage war on Ukraine without flying their flag.

    However operationally I suspect they are a separate force that has been supplemented with pro-RU / drafted locals. Mostly useful as a rear-guard, they have also been used as cannon fodder to spare them using official Russian troops, and possibly to frame their fights as “liberations” of DPR turf.

    If the main official RU force is pulled out of the area, I fully expect them to leave DPR troops behind to serve the image of Ukraine trying to occupy people against their will, and possibly as a local partisan force.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,045 ✭✭✭jmreire


    The way things are looking now, seems that the major Russian players know that the war is lost, and even if it drags on, its only delaying the inevitable, so the jockeying for lead position has already started, primarily amongst the military. Prigozhin has announced that he's pulling out, and moving to Africa, (he's thinking ahead, and wants to conserve his army for the coming internal war of succession) ditto. Kadyrov. He is also not doing anymore fighting for Putin. Again, he's conserving his military. And the same goes for Shoigu, and Gerasimov. Plus there are a few billionaire Silovicki with their own private military forces. They are not going to lose Russia's wealth without a fight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    One trick that the Russian MoD has been doing is transferring groups of mobiks to the DPR and reclassifying them as "volunteers". If they subsequently die or are injured they/their relatives aren't entitled to the same benefits that someone officially fighting for the Russian are. It also often means that they get screwed on salaries. There has been widespread stories of DPR and LNR troops suffering abuse at the hands of Chechen troops (including rapes)

    DPR losses aren't counted toward official Russian losses either but those are fictional anyway so that's not a huge deal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    It's almost impossible to predict but if I were to choose I would go for a combination of scenarios #2 and #4. There will be a de-facto split (I don't know where exactly - that'll depend on how successful the upcoming Ukrainian offensive is. Perhaps back to Jan 2022 fronts). It won't end the conflict though.

    While Putin is in power Russia will continue to try and undermine Kyiv in any way, shape or form. So that'll be everything from spies, disinformation campaigns and bullying of other countries as well as constant smaller attacks. They will very likely try and rebuild their armed forces for another serious assault as soon as they can.

    Putin is obsessed with not looking weak so he will want to come back with an iron fist as quickly as possible. The key then for Ukraine will be to get some kind of security guarantees from third party countries or even organisations. That may not be possible but it is their best hope of long term stability. If they cannot achieve that then the next best thing will be to get as much military materiel and as many trained troops as they possibly can.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,964 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    The rule is that surrenders must be accepted if it is feasible (as opposed to pragmatic) to do so. The usual response is that once the intent to surrender has been identified to the other force, the surrender isn't necessarily accepted, but they are left alone until it can be. To be fair, however, there is an element of reasonableness to it. If two of a group of three people are trying to surrender, and the third is only pretending, then the deaths of all three is not likely to be considered criminal.

    Things get a lot more difficult in the case of troops who are attempting to surrender to drones. It was already a bit of a tricky issue with armed/manned aircraft, but it is obvious that a drone has problematic factors in accepting surrenders. They can't take custody and secure prisoners, for starters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,230 ✭✭✭Addmagnet


    I think if there's time to ask the question "do we kill these POWs?" then, you don't kill them.

    Accidents will happen, actions or words will get misinterpreted, people under extreme stress will react unhelpfully, and all these kinds of situations should be investigated thoroughly as soon as is practicable.

    But you always start from the premise that it is never 'ok' to kill POWs.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,818 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I mean, several people are saying they can or should. I'm not "overlooking" anything - I'm not remotely surprised that such cases are appearing. It is inevitable. The correct response, and the one Ukrainian leadership has generally always taken, is that these incidents should be investigated and the perpetrators held accountable.

    The wrong response is "they had it coming, and we should execute more Russian captives".



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement