Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1267626772679268126823690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,023 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Looks like a rough outline of what they want to cling onto. As far as Putin is concerned Russia is "up" in this war.






  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,159 ✭✭✭ParkRunner


    Are there any other bad guys with guns you wish death upon or just Russians?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,251 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Holding the Russians at the current lines seems too big an ask when the reality of the situation is that the Russians are actually making progress in the Donbass.

    I'm highly sceptical of these western commitments of heavy arms. Seems it's popular and very easy to promise when you don't really believe Ukraine can hold out and thus your commitments will never have to be honored.

    Hope i'm wrong on that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,023 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    I see you're back with this again.

    Russian soldiers are systematically slaughtering, murdering, torturing and raping Ukrainians. You won't find many people sympathising with them for obvious reasons.

    The fact that you are repeatedly "concerned" about this, but don't express the same concern for the people being blown to pieces by them, is starting to tell it's own story.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    They aren't making progress bar bakhmut they are failing,if bakhmut Falls soon they will have achieved a 1% increase of the territory they held 12 months ago,

    Just look at the sheer number of trenches they have built along the coastline of Crimea it suggests that they are preparing a last Stand on the beaches of Crimea or they are afraid the Ukrainians are going to attempt an amphibious assault on the Crimean peninsula and catch them in a pincher,

    Most of the other fortifications are being constructed close to Crimea via Kherson,

    I think they know if the Ukrainan start a mass counter offensive the Russian lines will collapse and chaos will ensue



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,075 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Probably more like what the Russians think they can cling on to. I've little doubt in my mind that the Russians would very much like to control the entire territory of what is recognised as Ukraine. At the very least, the idea of Kyiv being populated by a people who now want nothing to do with Russia to be a complete anathema to Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,114 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Well on a Telegram channel comment fest on that video, a few people asked if he was dead and the reply was another video being posted, presumably featuring Ti Balls as lead character and the rest of his muddied mates from the encounter.

    So if the reply I saw was accurate, it might be he survived and is this guy:

    I certainly hope so.

    Post edited by cnocbui on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I remember thinking it was remarkable and shocking that civilians lived through the assault and obliteration of Mariupol at the beginning of the war. They hid in basements with no power, heat, water or communications. That siege lasted 3 months.

    Bakhmut is all of that but worse. The Battle for Bakhmut is now in its 7th month and has gone right through the bitterly cold winter months and there are still several thousand civilians, including an estimated 57 children living there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,159 ✭✭✭ParkRunner


    I have repeatedly expressed concern and horror at the deaths of Ukrainians in this war and condemned the war brought about by Putin. My position as always is to hope for peace rather than the slaughter of any soldier. The desire for slaughter and death on this thread is concerning



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    I don't think he survived,he was in a trench possibly with one other while he was getting pummeled machine grenade launcher and 20 mm cannon fire while he had an AK ,

    As I said when I posted the video balls of Titanium,but unless that bmp and it's crew was taken out I don't see how he or they could have walked away considering it seemed no other Ukrainian forces were close by .

    Maybe we'll get another video showing a longer version and we get to see what actually happened next,

    I get the feeling in this case the Netflix movie won't have a sequel.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,037 ✭✭✭jmreire


    No, not just Russians, but any other nationalities' either that are helping them in their murderous illegal campaign. And you? What do you wish for them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,184 ✭✭✭85603


    Leading the charge?

    There aren't even any Challengers on the ground in Ukraine.

    There are French amx-10s (tank killers) and Czech, Slovenian, Moroccan and Greek tanks however.

    Canadian Leopards were delivered to the Polish border recently. And Polish Leopards are in Ukraine now.

    Post edited by 85603 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,109 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Looked like there was movement in the trench behind him at one point in the video.

    Is it possible the orcs could have run out of ammo and simply ****ed off leaving him and anyone else alive?

    Whatever the final outcome, that video must be one of the most powerful posted here - a soldier fighting for his life, his brother's lives and for the lives of everyone in his country.

    Dead or alive, that man exemplifies courage under fire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,959 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Have you? Perhaps you could include a reference.

    Lasting peace can only be achieved through the 'slaughter' of the invading Russian forces. The major obstacle to peace is the Russian military presence in Ukraine. Just as the obstacle to peace in Europe in 1944 was the German army.

    Russia has through its constant violation of peace treaties such as Budapest shown it only has respect for overwhelming military force.

    Putin doesnt give two hoots aboit your Hopium - the only language he understands is the crippling of his army. And that involves death and slaughter.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,463 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    The majority on this thread desires a peaceful russian withdrawal and the end to all hostilities with Ukraine becoming sovereign again with 0 deaths on either side.

    Below that is the desire for the invaders to lose in the fastest way possible without taking any Ukrainian lives.

    If that means that 100,000 invaders die per Ukrainian, so be it, people will be unapologetic about that. Every invader that is stopped from fighting brings the end of the war and peace closer.

    If you're serious about wishing for peace, outline your peace plan for everyone and then we'll see how committed to peace you really are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,159 ✭✭✭ParkRunner




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,159 ✭✭✭ParkRunner


    I don’t think anyone has the solution at this time. Are Russia going to withdraw to the border? Highly unlikely. Is a Ukrainian offensive likely? Yes, when that will be, what it will achieve and at what cost who knows.

    Our own country was occupied by a foreign force and it ended with a split country as we all know without a full return of territory. Ruling out any option shouldn’t be done at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,463 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    So given the lack of option 1, you can now empathise with those celebrating russian defeats and reduction in invader fighting capacity?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,159 ✭✭✭ParkRunner


    Not really. In the event of a slaughter of Russian forces will that alone bring lasting peace? I think that’s unlikely. In the long term a diplomatic solution will need to be found



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4 slavaslavcoleslaw


    lets all hold hands and hope this ends soon..

    don't mean to rain on the hope parade, but inaction is supporting Russia... it's what they want..

    it's very easy for them to end this, by pulling out of Ukraine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,924 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    I for one welcome the death of as many orcs as are needed in order to liberate Ukraine.

    Could not give two sh*ts how many that may be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,075 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The interesting thing about many of these people who 'just want peace' is that they're placing obligation of offering the olive branch on the invaded rather than invader. Not that it would be the first time in history that an invaded state has had to sue for peace and settle for a loss of territory, but in this case there are some incorrect assumptions underpinning the argument like, 1) that Ukraine is about to be militarily defeated, 2) that Russia acts in good faith or 3) that Russia would be even interested in a lasting peace.

    Ultimately, this is all up to the Ukrainians. Zelenskyy cannot prosecute a war if his people don't want to fight it, just as the Afghan National Army succumbed in almost no time to the Taliban, despite having all this supposed training and gear.

    But the Ukrainian people do (by and large) want to fight Russia off. That only leaves the question of whether the West should keep supplying military aid. There are those who say that by supplying all of this aid, the suffering is only prolonged. What these people completely fail to understand is the suffering exacted by withdrawing that aid and the unthinkably bloody, brutal ethnic cleansing, i.e. a systematic genocide, that would follow across the entirety of Ukraine in order to ensure that it never strayed from Russia's dominion ever again.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,326 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I've seen a couple of Ukrainian forces guys say that a lot, if not most of those staying were given the opportunity to leave and go to the Ukrainian side of things long ago and throughout, but they're staying for the Russian forces to take the place as they support them. They called them "waiters" or "stayers" or something like that.

    Now I'm quite sure there are enough people who are either Ukrainian supporters or neutral folks who have stayed because blown to hell as it is it's still their home. I'd say a fair number of elderly folks who've been there since the egg would number among them, but whether people want to acknowledge or not, there are a fair percentage of Russian supporters in the Donbass region who actually do want to be "Russian". After all there's been a hot/cold civil war going on there for the past decade and you couldn't have that without support from both sides on the ground. No matter if one believes [insert side here] has fomented such partisan division it had to have fertile ground for it to grow on. Otherwise it wouldn't be much of a civil war. After all, if Ulster had been 95% Loyalist, or 95% Republican the Troubles would have been a small footnote, if it would have happened at all.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,159 ✭✭✭ParkRunner


    In reality has an invading force ever just pulled out after a short period of war? I can’t think of any examples. Do posters honestly think that a Ukrainian offensive to the border will be the ultimate solution and will end the conflict?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,924 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    There are about 75000 Ukrainian refugees in Ireland.

    A poll taken in 2011 showed 49% of Ukrainians had relatives in Russia (that's 36,000 at a minimum)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainians

    I am sure when their relatives are forcibly conscripted against their will, trucked to the front lines and killed, the majority of refugees in Ireland will certainly not be rejoicing in the death of their family members.

    It seems the majority of boards members will though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,075 ✭✭✭✭briany


    @ParkRunner

    Do posters honestly think that a Ukrainian offensive to the border will be the ultimate solution and will end the conflict?

    Not that I think a Ukrainian offensive to push Russia out of Ukraine is imminent, but if one were to happen, Russia wouldn't have much means to make significant inroads back into that territory, if current speed of advancement is anything to go by. They'd have to significantly up the ante, if you know what I mean, and that would put the world into a place I don't think Putin wants to go as it puts his own survival in great jeopardy.

    At this stage, the conflict is never going to end because there is too much hatred between the sides, even if there are phases of no physical hostilities, e.g. the Armenians and the Azeri.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,742 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    In the end diplomacy will be needed. Not now because you can't negotiate in good faith with Putin and any truce would just give the Russians respite, a chance to reinforce their front lines and reorganize their forces.

    I don't see a peace with Putin ever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,184 ✭✭✭85603


    It might just be this thread. There are a few keyboard based special forces badasses in here. Meal team 6.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,075 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Putin doesn't regard Ukraine as a real country. He regards it as historically-Russian land which was made into its own polity by idealistic Russian leaders of the past who saw borders as something of waning importance. This is from the horse's mouth,

    Therefore, modern Ukraine is entirely the product of the Soviet era. We know and remember well that it was shaped – for a significant part – on the lands of historical Russia. To make sure of that, it is enough to look at the boundaries of the lands reunited with the Russian state in the 17th century and the territory of the Ukrainian SSR when it left the Soviet Union.


    The Bolsheviks treated the Russian people as inexhaustible material for their social experiments. They dreamt of a world revolution that would wipe out national states. That is why they were so generous in drawing borders and bestowing territorial gifts. It is no longer important what exactly the idea of the Bolshevik leaders who were chopping the country into pieces was. We can disagree about minor details, background and logics behind certain decisions. One fact is crystal clear: Russia was robbed, indeed.

    Putin regards Ukraine, or at least a great swathe of it, as being rightfully Russia's. He could apparently tolerate it when that territory essentially existed as a Russian vassal, but he will be damned if he's going to let control of it slip away to the West. As Julia Ioffe points out, here , Putin wants Ukraine because he wants Ukraine. There's no compromise or negotiation that is going to make him settle for a goal short of this, and therefore the only way to prevent him from getting the country is if it becomes impossible for him to have.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement