Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1266626672669267126723690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,924 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,924 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    I hope Elon does not follow James Vasquez, the Starlink antennas are clearly visible on his vehicle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,463 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    For that money, Ukraine could have built 5 walls and kept russia out surely. russians don't have ladders and angle grinders, do they?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Actually on the whole embassy construction how does planning work,,

    Can planning inspectors rock and carry out a full inspection of the site or is there some kind of exemption once it's considered foreign soil,

    Or would it be only access by invitation only from a foreign government and restrictions on what and where they can inspect



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,143 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭junkyarddog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭TheRepentent


    STOP TRIGGERING ME 😂 She's another dope....The Republican Party , the party of w@ankers for w@nkers ! Big fans of Russia due to ManBaby Trump being funded by them.


    Not too sure about the rumours that Trump had stopped the Ruzzian invasion earlier by regularly preforming fellatio on Putin (while dressed as a goat no less!!)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,120 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Because the US doesn't want to send any - period - so deliberately dragging it out seems the next best thing.

    They have thousands of the things, but refuse to pull 30 from existing stocks. They have hundreds sitting in a dry bit of desert, with presumably at least the hulls and turrets in reasonable condition, but this is their actual plan: Manufacture them from sratch.

    They are going to get 30 tanks from an ally and have them ship them to the US. You can imagine the delay in said ally country for their political process to talk about agree to it and negotiate a best deal for themselves. That alone will take months. Then they have to actually get them to a port and ship them to the US. and then ship them to the factory where the process in this article will take place.

    The US Marines have recently stopped using Abrams so there is a good supply of their cast offs that are pretty much good to go. Australia has 59 surplus to requiremants M1A1s in very good nick that the US could easily persuade them to part with, especially since they have a large order of M1A2s in the pipeline for delivery next year.

    The US is messing and makes Scholz look obliging and quick to make decisions, when it comes to tanks.

    Which is all very weird given numerous senior political and military figures in the US who have said the US should be supplying more and a lot faster.

    The 70 Bradleys might be just as effective and they are already next door, so that's one thing the US can certainly be applaude for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,120 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I never ever thought I would defend a Republican, but Mitch McConnell and Liz Cheney are not like the Magas and appear to be keener to support Ukraine than Biden.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 7,946 [Deleted User]


    On Bakhmut, could it be the case Ukraine has delivered months of supplies to Ukrainians there and they could survive being surrounded for months, time for the Spring offensive to join them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It depends on what you believe,

    According to social media accounts and on here bakhmut is completely surrounded,out of ammunition, Dire situation, critical situation, evacuate ,cuff off ,

    And yet day after day we see actual reports from people on the ground suggesting that all of these accounts social media or other are wrong and just repeating what the Russians want repeated that after 7 months of bakhmut is going to fall , Bakhmut still holds will likely keep holding,

    But it's all down to what you believe from people who obviously have little knowledge of what's actually happening on ground



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,742 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Could be that. Not at all clear what is going on now but it seems that not withdrawing is a big risk.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,939 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I don’t know if it is as simple as that. Demand for M1s has been high for a while, tanks such as the former Marine ones will be likely some of the first refurbished. Morocco, Poland and the US Army have been getting them as fast as they are coming off the production lines, the ones in Sierra likely are not in a condition where you can just put gas in them and give them a jump start. I’m fairly sure the Aussies would rather wait for the replacement tanks to show before making the current ones available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,120 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui



    Officially the luckiest person on the planet that day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,120 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    And the argument that the US would be putting itself in grave danger of being under equipped should a Mexican drug cartel, or Canada, attack, if they took 30 from the ±8,000 in US inventory, I don't find convincing.

    Not to mention where the greatest need lies at this point in time, vis a vis needing to supply other customers as a priority.

    Australia hasn't fielded a single tank since about 1972. The idea that they will need 59 before the new ones arrive next year is unconvincing. They could send 30 and still have 29 just in case. I'm sure the 46 F-18's they arent using could be called back into service to plug the tank gap, should they send some.

    I wasn't suggesting the ones in dry storage were good to go, I was suggesting that they would be a more practical source of donor hulls and turrets than getting them from overseas allies and all that involves. The refurbishment process I have seen described suggests the hull and turret are about the only parts that aren't replaced in the manufacturing process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,120 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Slovakia is considering handing over 10 Soviet-made MiG-29 fighter jets to Ukraine, Slovak Defense Minister Jaroslav Nad' said in an interview with the Associated Press.

    So far, Slovakia has provided Ukraine with arms worth around €168 million. They are mainly heavy weapons from the times of communist Czechoslovakia. The equipment sent to Ukraine includes S-300 air defence systems, helicopters, ammunition for Grad multiple guide launchers, as well as armoured vehicles.

    If Ukraine had gotten just half of the things that have been considered, they'd be sorted by now. Poland have been considering sending their Mig-29s since Feb last year, but they seem to want an offer of brand new F-16s, one for one, in exchange.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Seanmadradubh




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    If the Azov fighters lasted 80 days or whatever in Mariupol then Bakhmut would be a cakewalk. This time Ukraine can keep the pocket open for as long as they need.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    This is it,

    Unless you follow social media then you get a different story



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,391 ✭✭✭Field east




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,759 ✭✭✭weisses




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,391 ✭✭✭Field east


    What’s all this talk about a country being a buffer between AAnd B . Eg Ukr between Ru and Europe. It’s a wery, very weak argument when you consider how far some ornaments can reach . Buffer zones are ABSOLUTLY useless when it comes to damaging / cutting/ blowing up underwater supply/service lines. Cyber attacks is another very good example. There is a very big buffer between England and Ru yet a number of Ru citizens. Have been ‘popped off’ by Ru apparently by being poisoned, falling off a bridge, etc, etc. Under cover agents/ special/partisan groups can also do a lot of damage.

    IMO cyber attacks will be where a large part of wars in the future will be fought. The ultimate, main objective of any war is to weaken the ‘opposition’ or regime change. Can easily be done by constant cyber attacks, spreading mis information , cutting cables, etc, etc, etc.

    the major advantages are relatively cheaper to carry out and little or no loss in life



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    How often do you hear of a bin truck full of mines,

    Something manic touched on very recently .

    squeaky bum time




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Azov were starving in tunnels beneath Azovstal. If they could have retreated instead and continued to fight from another line of defence it would have been infinitely better for the war effort.

    Also leaving supplies inside Bakhmut at a time when Ukrainian supplies of ammunition are not exactly abundant, is not a good idea. Tactical retreat of all equipment, then manpower, to the next line of defence (Chasiv Yar) would make far more sense than staying in Bakhmut.

    at current rate of advance, even if they somehow managed to keep supply lines open (Wagner almost physically closed routes to west), Russians would still advance through most of the city in a few weeks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,391 ✭✭✭Field east




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,781 ✭✭✭macraignil


    It has happened a number of times now that russian advances in Bakhmut have been reversed by Ukrainian armed forces making counter attacks and the Ukrainians have also said they may leave Bakhmut if holding it is costing them too much. At current rates of advance the russian military is going to cripple itself in trying to take Bakhmut. The estimates below show for all of the russian losses listed they have got a gain of 61square miles in February or just 0.026% of Ukraine. Why would the Ukrainians run away when conditions are not right yet for a counteroffensive and they can sit in prepared positions and destroy the russian army from the one place? They may be taking losses themselves but it is very likely russian losses are much greater and that is the reason that Bakhmut still holds.

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If the Russian rate of attrition really was that bad they should have burned through all their fighting force by now.

    And yet the much hyped next wave of mobilization hasnt yet happened.

    We will never get the true figures for losses on either side, even after the war is done. But the Ukrainians likely will have lost more simply due to having far less artillery compared to the Russians. Until that situation is rectified (western allies - give Ukraine more SPGs and shells!), Ukraine are fighting a losing battle.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,460 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    Russian media reporting that in the last few hours approximately 50 Ukranian saboteurs crossed the border into Russia and have taken civilians hostage in the village of Sushany in the Bryansk region

    Supposedly there is an ongoing firefight with local police right now.

    Putin declaring it a terrorist attack and convening security council.


    https://twitter.com/Faytuks/status/1631241870234865665



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement