Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Marvel Studios’ Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,414 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I think the thing about the passage of time in the Quantum Realm is that there are different areas/sub-sections. Where Scott was trapped they were trying to collect quantum energy so were in a particular area of it, whereas Janet was trapped in basically the bottom area of the QR where time seems to travel at the same rate.

    Time moves differently in the QR, but also within the QR itself.

    As for why the Council of Kangs care that the exile died, they said that the Avengers have begun tampering with the Multiverse, which threatens them all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I dont think they're talking about killing Kang as tampering with the multiverse - he was just a guy in theirs. They're talking about Wanda and Strange.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,414 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Yes, but I think it's all connected. It's not just that Wanda, Loki, Dr.Strange etc have started to affect the Multiverse, but also Ant-Man killing the exiled Kang was the impetus to bring all the Kangs together because the Avengers, with killing the exiled Kang and affecting the Multiverse, are now showing themselves to be a threat to all Kangs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,260 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Seen this today. It was OK. An average film really there was some good laughs in it but not many and it did all look great. It certainly was no where no as good as "Black Panter Wakanda Forever"do.

    The run time was not bad but they could easily have cut 10minutes from the middle of it where there is nothing going on and it might have made for an even better film.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,920 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    some cursing.. the critical drinker, gives his thoughts on the movie... as I said, some cursing, but good points.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭Fred Astaire


    An offensively bad piece of sh*t. Just when you think this creatively bankrupt franchise cannot sink any lower, it has reached deep into the darkest depths of the septic tank and pulled this whopper out.

    Particular sh*t-stained praise for the VFX, which is absolutely disgraceful. Like how can the biggest movie studio around put out movies that look like some teenager put together half the scenes on his crusty old laptop. It's genuinely embarrassing.



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 7,809 Mod ✭✭✭✭delly


    Hmm, if I was to review this in terms of another form of media, I'd class it as Nicki Minaj song lyrics. Random stuff inserted that really makes little contextual sense, but gotta get those dollar bills.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,291 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    Saw it tonight and enjoyed it. Then again, I went in with very low expectations. But some fun to be had.

    Woman beside me left after 20 minutes and never came back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Makes some accurate criticisms but in parts it is like he didn't even watch the movie - which seems to be a regular feature of most these novelty youtube accounts no matter the movie. Just trying to shoehorn reactions for clicks whether they make sense or not.

    Not sure if its his normal schtick to get engagement but people going out of their way to attack female characters is just boring at this stage. He complains that all the female characters are all smart and strong yet has absolutely no issue with the male characters having the exact same traits. Also seems weirdly surprised that a young girl was written to be more likeable than a teenager - has he ever encountered a teenager?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The Critical Drinker is one of those YouTube creators who likes to go to the anti-woke well. While I haven't watched that above video I can take a swing that the female character ranting is par for the course with him. Whether he believes in his opinions is debatable, outrage and negativity always gets more views.

    Decades of Male Power Fantasy cinema, a whole steroid boosted genre of it in the 1980s, yet amazing how suddenly these so-called film enthusiasts get terribly upset at the merest degree of parity.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,920 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    that's a fair criticism, i will tread wisely in that particular account. waters.. etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,920 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    it's funny though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    He actually completely ignores that one of the plot points that is built on throughout the movie is that one of the female characters isn't naturally great at everything. It looks like key parts of it might have been edited out for time but they show and tell you it several times.

    On the film enthusiasts of that ilk in general, I can only imagine them if Alien was released today - it would be deemed the woke-ist of woke movies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    No worries about posting, parts were funny and he has some justified criticisms of the movie.

    Just had to call that part out as it is tiring to hear it everytime there is a strong female character or two in a movie/show



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,505 ✭✭✭brianregan09


    Sounds like a rough 1st date hope you didn't pay for her :D



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Critical Drinker does has good criticisms in his videos its a pity he has sold out and got on the lazy anti-woke bandwagon. I hate the screenshot he has included in the title for the video though, seems like a bit like a spoiler that the character was returning from a previous movie.

    I've heard the box office described as a box office disappointment even though they have seemed to do better than their critics predicted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I have wondered why Ripley or Sarah Connor gets a pass with these people, and I think it might be as simple that the films predated the zeitgeist we now live in; so the anti-woke types saw them before social media or whenthey became obsessed with all things Woke - the films getting a pass 'cos they came from a different era. As you suggest, if Aliens came out in 2022 you'd have the usual types in arms over Ripley trumping a squad of marines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭nix


    No he actually praises those characters as "strong female leads" done right, Drinker doesnt have an issue with female leads, he takes issue with the laziness of todays female leads, who are automatically great at everything and never show any sign of struggle/progression as they're just automatically amazing, the negative traits are left to any men around them or inherited by the male counterpart they're replacing. I tend to agree with him in that regard, seriously, point me to a female character in anything Disney of late that would counter that arguement.

    He also to hates the term "woke", but yeah continue to assume what hes saying instead of trying to listen ;)




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    As pointed out in my OP, I'd have no issues with him focusing on the female characters for those traits if it wasnt for the fact the male characters in this movie are written the exact same or in an even more 'lazy' way and yet he completely ignores them.

    Scott is similarly as great as everything as Hope, with Hope having a much more rounded backstory as to why she is that way - daughter of genius superheroes who spent years working on the technology and training growing up, including years for heist that Scott ends up pulling off after a few days training.

    Hank and Janet have the exact same backstory being a tag team genius superhero couple, with it making far more sense that Janet is stronger at this point having needed to survive for decades in the quantum realm while Hank sat around at home.

    Kang, like Thanos, is the new male most powerful character in the universe where we don't see any 'progression' - as you said, he is 'automatically' that way.

    We're just told in Bill Murray's brief cameo that he is smart, rich, and powerful - nothing earned at all.

    All the background characters, both male/female/alien, are all as instantly great as each other with their powers.

    That leaves on Cassie, who they beat us over the head isn't good at using the suit for most of the movie and we see clear progression with her. As for not having 'negative traits' for female characters, in the video he openly complains how unlikeable she is, acting spoiled etc - unlike most teenage heroes in the MCU who are usually incredibly likeable. Another female, Janet, is the one who causes the whole movie narrative with her negative trait of lying to her family.

    Drinker doesn't have a leg to stand on here, he went out of his way to attack the female characters for issues that are similarly or more pervasive in the male characters. What his issues with women are I dont know but he clearly has plenty of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭Fred Astaire


    The Cassie character is so badly written. The emotional core of the movie is Scott and Cassie, but we don't know this version of Cassie. She is basically a completely new character to the Cassie we knew before because her character is so drastically different now. A plucky, rebellious, activist getting in trouble with the law? Smart to the level of being able to build Stark/Pym level technology as a teenager in a basement? Able to venture into the Quantum Realm for the first time and be barely phased and hyper competent? Disposes of multiple soldiers and Modok with ease? Not the sweet, gentle girl from before helping to keep Ant-Man's story grounded. Nope, now shes just another great female character who can do everything.

    And worse? We are just told about her character in the first 10 minutes, not shown. So there is nothing to attach to. The emotional core of this movie is Scott and this random new girl who is great at everything. 10 minutes of being told about Cassie and then we are straight into the action.

    It's utterly hilarious that they make her the one to build the machine - clearly that should be Janet, who, suffering from some PTSD or survivors guilt, can't leave the Quantum Realm well enough alone. But nah, some teenage girl needs to know more about the Quantum Realm in her spare time from her day job of helping homeless and embarassing police officers.

    And the aliens immediately trust her, to the point where she walks over and tells them not to worry about Scott, it's ok guys, he's my Dad. What? Is she not even remotely phased by being in this new universe? Just making pals with the alien people right from the get go.

    I also love how this girl has time to stand still in battle and repeatedly monologue with her father, exchanging traditionally wonderful Marvel quips because now she has to be a quip machine too, like every single other person in this world.

    Then they quite hilariously have her give this big call to arms speech - when many of the people she is summoning won't know who she is, while the leader of the rebellion is in the same room as her. Why the hell would the other one not give that speech? So bad.

    And of course, she reunites with Scott on the battlefield, being as good as he is with virtually no training, after beating numerous soldiers, beating Modok and giving him just the bestest pep talk to turn his life around. And she is immediately excellent at being big - because why not.

    This movie is filled with utter bile, and Cassie is one of the chief contributors to this vomit-filled mess. You could write a thesis on how bad this thing is. An embarrassing joke.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Did your desire to rant about a female character make you ignore key parts of the movie where most of this is explained?

    She has aged what 8-10 years or so since Ant-man 2 and is now an older teenager so obviously she is a completely different character than the child we saw previously. They go out of their way to highlight that given Scott's time away he doesn't even really know her - they don't want or expect the audience to.

    Cassie didn't build that tool on her own, they repeatedly said she worked on it with Hank and Hope - the two people who built the original gateway. She gives the overview but Janet blames the others for the build.

    It isn't surprising she isn't overly phased by the quantum realm as she isn't a normal teenager just dumped in there. As a child she was attacked in her bedroom by a super powered villain and loved having a giant ant as a pet nor phased by Thomas the Tank engine exploding out of her house. She also lived through half of the world disappearing, aliens attacking, and the multiple other earth threatening event during her lifetime. To top it off she probably heard the general idea of what is in the quantum realm from the others and also many wild, weird stories from Scott and other Avengers she might have met.

    The aliens don't trust her, she has already drunk 'the ooze' so she can communicate with them. Even then there is no evidence they believe her and trust him, as they hold him prisoner until they scan him and prove he is telling the truth.

    She isn't automatically great at being small, they show her repeatedly failing at it before finally getting better. As for 'excellent at being big', there isn't any skill to it, you just wave around and crush things and try not to fall asleep.

    It must be painful to watch every movie sitting there distracted by rage towards female characters for existing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭Fred Astaire


    Post edited by johnny_ultimate on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭Fred Astaire


    Why would you wonder why Sarah Connor gets a pass?

    She spends the first movie absolutely terrified, only able to defeat the Terminator with Reese basically doing all the work. In the intervening time between the two movies, a PTSD ridden Sarah is insitutionalised and becomes obsessed with training so she can defend herself better incase he comes back.

    Remarkably clear arc - goes from effectively useless to extremely capable over the span of two movies. Doesn't start off great at everything. Still makes mistakes in the second movie. Very flawed character.

    Identical situation with Ripley, who is relatively useless in the first movie (compared to her capabilities in Aliens) and relies on her surroundings and quick intuition to defeat the Alien. If Aliens came out in 2022 it would be just as loved because there is a clear progression in Ripleys abilities, and she doesn't start off being the best right off the bat.

    Would have thought this really straightforward, but it seems that some people cannot make the distinction between two of the best written characters (not just female characters) of all time, and the current crop of flawless, snarky, amazing female characters who are great at everything immediately without struggling or needing to grow. Instead, better off to pretend that there is no difference.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 31,417 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Mod note: Just to be clear, personal abuse will not be tolerated here. Keep it civil, no matter how heated the conversation may be. Thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I dont think Cassie was that skilled at the beginning she was only successfully fighting enemies with 30 minutes to go. At some level Marvel movies are kids movies so of course they are going to have the only young character do cool stuff.

    As for Critial Drinker and similar youtubers going after female characters, its just their shtick to get loads of views, I wouldnt take it seriously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭silverharp



    supposedly the film is expected to have a 70% drop which would be the second worst drop for a Marvel movie. It would make the film a financial meh , depending how they do their accounting

    https://www.thewrap.com/ant-man-quantumania-record-box-office-weekend-drop/

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,721 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    Marketing can only take you so far. Word of mouth made Avatar tWoW the 3rd highest grossing film of all time and word of mouth has killed this film.

    This will be lucky to hit 600m at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    Saw this tonight and I enjoyed. Some of the CG is **** awful but overall I enjoyed the world of the Quantum Realm but I think the movie should have taken part over a longer period of time than one day, give the characters time to actually from bonds, the final battle would have had a lot more impact of there was a sense of connection with the people of the QR.

    I really wish the Ant-Man franchise stuck to its own rules. In the first film Lang escapes the QR by going large but here he bigging up and shrinking down within the QR. Pretty sure in the first film it's established that the helmet is needed for breathing at ant size. It's just nitpicks but it bothers me when they can't stick to their own internal logic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Yes, the helmet was needed cos shrunk down, human lungs can't absorb oxygen molecules anymore as they're now too big relative to the tiny lungs. Was always a neat little bit of deference towards reality from a series not generally inclined towards it.

    Honestly it's a little irritation how now all the helmets, visors and headwear have become CGI and "nanobot" style. This the same? Just seems like a lazy way to indulge actors (presumably) cranky about wearing the costume, while ensuring scenes can have faces on screen. IIRC Downey Jr was always a bit truculent about wearing the iron man suit. It's especially egregious when you got Love and Thunders eff'in awful CGI.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    Yep all the helmets are nanotech until they need to show us the metaphorical cracked one



Advertisement
Advertisement