Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

What's the point?

1246789

Comments

  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 21,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Mods should just ensure posters "Don't be a dick", it's that simple.

    Unless we're all assimilated by the Borg there will always be threads that aren't to our taste, but we can ignore those that don't interest us. No one should be trying to get threads moved or shut down to suit their own sensibilities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 642 ✭✭✭DaithiMa


    When woke ideology enables convicted male rapists to claim to be female so they get sent to women's prisons it's not pigeonholing the issue, it is both horrifying and hilarious all at once that we have ended up in that situation. Let's be honest, some of the gender identity nonsense is the absolute pinnacle of 'woke'.

    That's why it is important to keep highlighting the absolute ridiculousness of it all and that is why it was fun to watch the poster girl for that particular strand of wokeness, Nicola Sturgeon, squirm when reality struck. That issue is a perfect fit for the Wokism thread imo.

    Maybe some of those who once bought into the madness are suffering from a sort of buyer's remorse now that they see real life ramifications from the ideology they cheerleaded and they don't like to see that pointed out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,084 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    It’s just our role to keep threads in some sort of order and trolls at the gate.

    And to judge the "merit" of a thread, don't forget that part.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭raclle


    There's been more activity in AH in the last few weeks than there has been in the last 20 years. The fact a thread has been made about it speaks volumes. @and in the morning Diamonds of Frost has made some valid points which you should take on board.



  • Posts: 2,264 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They're doing the job a wet week. Lessons learned and all that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,153 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    You are hammering home the point I’m making.

    If After Hours is shooting the breeze and lighthearted posts then posts like yours and the discussion you are referring to, don’t belong there. It’s highly charged political stuff which is always going to read as very angry.

    While you may feel the topic is suited to Wokeism thread, is the Wokeism thread suited to the After Hours Forum?

    There’s absolutely nothing lighthearted about the topic, there’s nothing lighthearted about your post, that’s clear.

    After Hours may need to find it’s identity, someone else mentioned that it’s currently a “one captures all” forum but it needs a direction. it’s either lighthearted or it’s not.

    Thats one for the Mods.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 962 ✭✭✭thegame983


    Agreed. It's objectively funny.

    I would also say that the 'wokism' thread shouldn't be a place to debate the various issues. It's simply a place to laugh at the absurdity of it all.

    Wokes will infiltrate and try to derail the thread. Just ignore them.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 21,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    If it's not suited to AH why did you used to post in it?

    Ironically, the only angry people in that thread are defenders of woke ideology. But then, that's why they want it moved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,126 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    What’s to infiltrate exactly? It’s a thread on a public forum where anyone who’s interested can contribute to it, or not, or bypass it completely or regard it whatever way they want, up to and including forming and expressing the opinion that it doesn’t belong in AH.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 642 ✭✭✭DaithiMa


    You don't think it's light hearted, fair enough.

    I do, and those two Sturgeon interviews that struck a chord with you are possibly two of the funniest clips I have watched for a long time.

    These woke ideologies must be lampooned at every possible opportunity, otherwise what crazy laws are going to get passed in the future.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,153 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    I posted in it yesterday or the day before.

    And there are angry people on both sides of any of those debates, that is going to be just par for the course.

    That s why my opinion is that it might be better suited to Politics or Current Affairs as by definition, it does not fit.

    By definition of complaining about woke things and vice Versa , it’s going to get political which is at odds at what people were complaining about nonsense threads being closed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,126 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    the only angry people in that thread are defenders of woke ideology


    I dunno if you’re only dipping in and out of the thread that you don’t see it, but that’s definitely not true. Only a couple of posts previous to the recent closure was the whole thing about trigger warnings, and that’s only the most recent example.

    Anyone new coming into the thread could be forgiven for thinking the thread was a catharsis for people who wanted to rant about the latest obscure thing which popped up in their social media feeds, much less ‘funny haha’ silliness, and more ‘how dare they?’ sort of stuff that is designed to wind people up who take that stuff seriously.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 21,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    But AH has always had serious threads too. One posted started a thread about a traumatic childhood experience and others posted about their own life-changing events. That stated in AH. There's a thread on Connor McGregor, should that be moved to a sport's forum? Sophie Toscan du Plantier, is there a crime forum? T.D.s, should that be moved to Politics?

    But you haven't answered, if you don't think the thread belongs in AH why do you post in it?



  • Posts: 7,522 ✭✭✭ Ramona Lively Pension


    I’ve read 10 pages of that thread so far and it’s about as much craic as a funeral.

    I’ve asked for the other mods opinions here because it’s a long running thread but that doesn’t make it exempt from moderating.

    Obviously if you like the thread you’ll want it open and if you can’t stand it you want it closed (or are indifferent). The fact anyone arguing for either is ridiculous because you’ll never agree with each other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    You are being insincere. You know full well that the thread would turn into the same old cesspit as any CA thread these days. It also has no place in Politics because issues relating to the entertainment sector would be off topic. The thread has been one of few that housed people simply disagreeing on matters without turning nasty, because the primary idea to list news that seem ridiculous to posters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,482 ✭✭✭Princess Calla


    There was also a thread "my wife is dying" there was talk of moving it at the time , but the consensus was "don't be a d1ck" and the thread brought out the absolute best in posters.

    Seriously it really shouldn't be this difficult. Just don't be a d1ck!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,153 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    I don’t think the question is relevant to be honest. If it was somewhere else I’d probably post in it, if the topic was interesting.

    it’s back to the point as to what the identity of After Hours is. Yes, you are right that there has been a mix of threads in the past , there’s one there at the moment about pensions!



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 21,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    I saw those posts. The whole point of the thread is to laugh at excessive wokism.

    Trigger warnings on everything is excessive, it's akin to trying to have a thread closed or moved.

    Adults should be able to decide what media they consume, if they can't trigger warnings aren't really much use.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 21,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Ah, here now! You yourself were in there arguing for trigger warnings. Why not take your own advice?

    The fact anyone arguing for either is ridiculous because you’ll never agree with each other.




  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 21,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    It is relevant when you're calling for it to be moved. If you genuinely don't think it belongs in AH why do you contribute?

    What should be allowed in AH?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Surely the only purpose of mods is to remove any potentially libelous comments and stop people being abusive to others on the thread as long as that isn't happening they should leave thread alone no matter how nonsensical they are.


    The Wokeism thread should have been kept open it was a busy thread that gathered lots of discussion and was humorous at times.Generally the only people in that thread that were causing trouble were AnCappaillDorcha but he was almost certainly doing it to get the thread locked (as he has now achieved) and he's just deeply unpleasant in every thread he appears on so he should have just been banned from the thread and the thread should have been left go on.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 21,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    I’ve read 10 pages of that thread so far and it’s about as much craic as a funeral.

    In your opinion, so you're now back to deciding if a thread has merit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,712 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    I got barred from AH for a week, unless that change, for the crime of the century.

    It was to ask what mod in the CT forum seems to put up posts that are not in accordance to medical advice. Then I thought maybe that poster is correct and I suggested that poster could be a mod in the COVID-19 forum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    Maybe check how many unique posters want it closed vs how many reported posts you got from same posters.



  • Posts: 7,522 ✭✭✭ Ramona Lively Pension


    The reported posts alone are not really a deciding factor in if it stays closed they just triggered the review tbh.

    Its also not a popularity contest of number of people who want it open vs those that don’t.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 21,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Well you certainly want it closed. The timing is rather suspect after you couldn't argue your point and announced you were leaving the thread.

    I'll give you one thing though, you must hold the record for the most contentious new mod, you took off out of the traps like a greyhound on speed.



  • Posts: 7,522 ✭✭✭ Ramona Lively Pension


    What I do or don’t want alone doesn’t matter. I’ve asked for all mods to weigh in and so it will be a group decision not mine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,126 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    My point wasn’t about trigger warnings themselves, I was responding to your comment that the only angry people in that thread are defenders of woke ideology. That’s what I was saying clearly wasn’t true, because it isn’t, given the posters OTT reaction to what was just the latest example of wokery.

    The thread is littered with examples of posters taking the whole wokery thing far too seriously, well beyond the point of treating it as a joke or being able to have a laugh about it. It comes off like it’s only supposed to be a laugh and it’s not supposed to be taken seriously when anyone questions what is patently BS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭raclle


    This is the way things used to be run until now.

    So it all boils down to your own personal opinion?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 21,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    I don't see a lot of angry posts in it at all, it's mostly just discussion of the validity of the latest woke measure.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement