Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Galway traffic

Options
1243244246248249253

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 461 ✭✭rustyfrog


    GTS review is happening this year. Both councils still have their eyes and ears covered and insist the road will happen... so it'll revolve around the ring road again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 461 ✭✭rustyfrog


    The only way the road can go ahead is if it's bundled with an absolute overhaul of the road network within it, with priority given to public and active travel.

    They need to pull in all available resources to work on that and quickly. All the public and active travel staff they can hire and borrow.

    It'll test the claimed intention to "free up" the city from being car-centric. IMO the Salthill cycleway was the litmus test of that political steel and they quickly crumbled.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I really don't think so.

    Cork, Limerick, Dublin & Waterford have all had their transport strategy reviews completed over the last 2 years, Galway is the last one. Each and every one followed the same pattern of prescribing a massive shift to PT & AT as the main thrust of the strategy. While there are still road projects happening, the transportation strategies have become more focused on sustainable modes.

    If the roads happen, they happen, but they become a footnote rather than the cornerstone, of the transportation strategies.

    It also won't be up to the councils for a lot of the decisions. It will fall to TFI, NTA, TII etc. The councils will have their voice, sure, but it won't be a veto.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Some clarifications from Pauline O'Reilly

    First tweet of the thread below and a link out to threadreader for any that want to read it as a webpage





  • Registered Users Posts: 4,915 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    ya I agree, that would probably be an easier sell first and then a decade later go for a pedestrianised solution for the Centre



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,915 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Ya if they were a bit clever about it - this is exactly the way they should be approaching it alright. They need to be aiming 3-4 multiples of the Modal Shares the original 2016 study had. If they had 25% modal share for public transport and 20% for cycling (these by modern European standards are metrics many European Citys have NOW - not for 15-20years time) then maybe they could get it over the line.



  • Registered Users Posts: 614 ✭✭✭GBXI


    What do you mean "get it over the line"? The whole things is held up because a group of "environmentalist", representing nobody but themselves, took a case against it and ABP decided not to fight that case. All the major players want this road built but there are some experienced legal challengers doing what they can to block it.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Point of fact, the whole thing is held up because ABP didn't do something they were required to do so now they have to go back and do that.

    Twist it whatever way you want, but that's the truth as laid out in the high court hearings.

    Are we not allowed to point out mistakes by Govt agencies now or something?



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,037 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    There is literally no point engaging with that poster. They offer nothing apart from long, meandering, senseless posts without anything to factually back them up. They then turn into a schoolchild when challenged and just back out of the discussion until their next meandering ramblings come along.



  • Registered Users Posts: 746 ✭✭✭topcat77


    This decision could be a winner for everyone!

    What could happen? Galway get's approval for the ring road only if they created an extensive and robust active travel and public transport infrastructure. Not a sod of earth moved until is been independently verified that it has done so.

    The road advocates and AT/PT advocates are now both happy?

    I'm i such a dreamer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,915 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Over the line! Lock in stuff legally like adding a bus lane to the Quincentenary Bridge in both directions the night before the Ring Road opens. (That will connect in with the existing BUS Lanes on Sean Mulvoy Road and Moneenageisha Road that will open in 2024) - Bus and cycle priority on the N59. Bus and cycle ONLY Network connecting Ballybrit and Parkmore (have seen this in industrial area's of Europe that I have travelled for work). Convert multi-storey car parks in the City centre into apartments. The list is endless because we are starting from such a low base. They need to show that they will dramatically reduce car journeys within the City.

    Its held up because it was a very poor engineering solution in the first place, how ABP approved it initially is beyond me after reading the car traffic projections and modal share from ARUP. It really was an example of project that would run to a standstill.



  • Registered Users Posts: 461 ✭✭rustyfrog


    Simply not true.

    The process is delayed because ABP didn't do their job - that was challenged by multiple groups. It'll likely ultimately be scrapped because it goes against a policy that all the major political parties agreed on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 461 ✭✭rustyfrog




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yup, thats covered under the Public Spending Code (PSC) which must take the CAP into account for the funding of everything



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The city councils strategy of submitting planning applications for developments in locations with no bus services, footpaths or safe cycling links keeps blowing up in their face with rejection after rejection after rejection from ABP due to the lack of infrastructure and the fact that anything built would force the use of cars.




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,843 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    It’s as if she doesn’t just want to kill any chance of ever being elected in Galway, she wants to bury it too!

    I wonder did she ever practice as a Solicitor? She’ll need to get the books down again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,921 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Let's see how that translates to votes for anti-car Councillors in the June '24 local elections.

    Spoiler - It won't.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,843 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    There must be at least 25 - 30 people in that “crowd”. Their biggest yet :-)

    Your one running that rabble said on Prime Time that she moved back to Galway 6 years ago. It’d be great if she considered moving again….



  • Registered Users Posts: 461 ✭✭rustyfrog


    Does anyone know if the Galway City Council's traffic control centre is staffed and operational? What hours? Do they take manual control during congestion?

    Some or the junctions in the city often seem hugely inefficient, everyone waiting for the green cycle to finish for an empty approach. It's incredibly frustrating.

    A person directing traffic at the junction would get things moving; like the Gardai during race week. I believe we have the tech and setup to do this remotely but I've seen no evidence of it happening. Everything seems to be on timers.

    If they have reliable data feeding into this, the system should be able to learn from the manual overrides and get smarter every day.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    When all routes are maxed for capacity and you have junctions with RAB's where you can't control the throughput, there's little you can do to improve things.

    All junctions need to be controlled in order to be able to control the flow.

    That being said the control would involve switching between presets that would control a number of junctions, as you mention, timers. There wouldn't be anyone sitting there flicking the lights for gains of a few seconds though.

    As for Gardai, they are paid for the time during race week and it's not cheap. Given the amount of personnel required to manage traffic just for the race course, having enough for the whole city and all junctions, would be a bonkers waste of resources and with all routes at max capacity, it wouldn't make any difference.



  • Registered Users Posts: 461 ✭✭rustyfrog


    I don't believe it wouldn't make any difference. The Bishop O Donnell road junctions at the Rahoon Road and Gleann Dara often have long tailbacks on the main road (going either direction) and a clear run when you finally get through.

    University Rd / Newcastle / UHG is another junction where there's long waits for empty approaches.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I used to experience the same thing when I used to come in the Monivea road. When the RAB was at Briarhill, I'd fly in and get through it pretty quick.

    The folks coming in the dual carriageway were screwed though, because it was Monivea rd setting the throughput for those lanes. Only way it was fixed was with a junction, so now coming in the Monivea rd is wayyyy slower than it used to be and the higher priority is set to the dual carriageway arms. As a result the throughput of the whole junction is far higher.

    The additional capacity of those new junctions has been swallowed up though so the congestion is just worse now because its spread across all arms of the junction as opposed to 1 or 2 or 3



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,360 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    It would help the huge issue of people running lights and blocking up junctions which has a massive knock-on effect on city gridlock. But would be cheaper to implement enforcement of the existing rules.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I mean its great TD's are talking about public transport in the Dail, but.....priorities 🤦‍♂️




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,170 ✭✭✭crusd


    Why can adequate road infrastructure not be put in place for a future where the internal combustion engine is no longer the power source of choice for individual transport, and a future where renewable sources are not the dominant source of energy used to power the grid?

    There are two sides at play who both have no vision of a future based on anything other than what they currently know. One who thinks the only option for transport is cars using internal combustion engines, and the other who think the only option is public transport or bicycle for all city travel.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,821 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    the other who think the only option is public transport or bicycle for all city travel.

    Sorry hold up, nobody has that point of view. What utter twaddle. Literally nobody, anywhere, has ever stated that.

    The private car has its use and its place. That being said, its the most inefficient mode of transport in terms of moving a large volume of people around the city.

    You can prioritise moving large amounts of people or you can prioritise moving cars, but you can't prioritise both, as evidenced by the existing situation in the city road network.

    SQR, Cross city link, the Dublin Rd plans, etc are indicators of how to increase the capacity of the road network by utilising more sustainable and higher capacity modes. Prioritising these modes leads to modal shift which in turn frees up capacity on the existing network for those who absolutely have no choice, but to drive.

    Add in well serviced P&R's, commuter rail, protected bike lanes, permeability for pedestrians etc, and at the same time increase parking costs, add a congestion charge, remove on-street parking, etc and you'll have more capacity on the road network than you'll know what to do with.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,170 ✭✭✭crusd


    Overall demand in the city is going to continue to increase. A lot of future demand will be taken by PT and bike lanes etc, but people like the option of individual transportation and there will always be a proportion of journeys that will require individual transport. We have got to plan now for a future city of probably closer to 150k, probably even more when the likes of Oranmore, Claregalway, Barna and even Moycullen at this stage are de facto city suburbs, not commuter towns as they are treated. If a successful programme of public transport and bike lanes was to be implemented achieving the goal of reducing the number of daily journeys we would in all likelihood end up with city streets just as clogged, if not more so than today. Netherlands supposedly has the public transport options that we want, has the bike infrastructure etc. but only has about 25% fewer km travelled by car per person. It is not difficult to see how population increase will erode much of the benefits.

    The plans you outline are a great start but will in effect only at best leave us standing still unless a way can be found to take the necessary journeys that don’t need be in the city centre away from the city centre. And this is not just journeys bypassing the city. It is trips from where people live to where people work at the times that they need to not at the time that suits the public transport system. There will never be the critical mass of population to have adequate pt options in place to get the shift worker from Knocknacarra to Ballybrit for 11pm at frequency and end to end journey time that makes it a viable option for most. At end of shifts these journeys coincide with the busiest times for deliveries and commuters. Keeping them away from city centre when you can is a no brainer.

    it is also pointed out that a low proportion of journeys commence or terminate in the Connemara region so therefore a bypass is not warranted. This does not take into account that Connemara is in effect a virtual peninsula with access only through Galway city (or a circuitous route via Headford) due to the bay and lake. What future necessary actions to take traffic off city centre streets will in effect do is move some of the daily required unavoidable car journeys that from the city centre area to the quincentennial bridge( aside the bridge is really city centre at this stage). Combined with population demographics, a not trivial proportion of the population will have connectivity further cut off and a significant tourist destination will be hamstrung by the ability to get people in.

    It is argued that all building roads do is make more room for cars to fill. In a situation where demographics were static this is valid and better pt, bike and pedestrian infrastructure would resolve the issues Galway faces currently and building a new orbital route would just make room for more cars. But Ireland is looking at a future with a population of 7-8million+, Galway 150k++. Solving todays problems will not do anything for tomorrows population. Technology will take care of the climate change impacts of car ownership through use of alternative energy. The current capacity problem can be taken care of through adequate public transport and other alternative transport options. The only way to meet the future capacity requirements however is increased capacity.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 461 ✭✭rustyfrog


    The current capacity problem can be taken care of through adequate public transport and other alternative transport options. The only way to meet the future capacity requirements however is increased capacity.

    Increased public transport = increased capacity.

    Relying on the private car to carry the increased capacity is problematic as journeys will still bottleneck through the city. Additional roads just buy you a few years until you quickly hit capacity issues again.

    It's taking 10 years to add a cycle lane on the Old Dublin Road. With no commitment or solid plans to radically change the road space allocation within the city while opening this additional ring road, we'll be back to gridlock very quickly.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement