Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Leinster Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread XII (The Byrne Supremacy)

Options
1448449451453454990

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,500 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Except for the example given of the guy who did? This seems like far too much of a generalisation, tbh.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    I don’t believe the Sam Illo thing is a regular thing. Guys just wouldn’t turn that down.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19 irishUnder20s2023


    1 player in what?

    Many many more players have turned down moves elsewhere.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19 irishUnder20s2023


    IRFU doesnt want provinces offering 18 year olds full contracts.

    it would break the current system that keeps costs down for all the provinces.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    TBF, I don't think there are multiple examples of players who Leinster wanted to keep from recent years who were enticed away elsewhere. Obviously there are a lot of guys who come through the Leinster system in other teams academies over the last few years, but generally they've been players who Leinster weren't willing to offer a full academy deal to for example.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19 irishUnder20s2023


    the vast vast majority of leinster underage players prefer to play for Leinster and go to college in Dublin, even if that means a year in the sub-academy. Do you really think lads from Michaels or Blackrock want to go to college in Limerick or Belfast?

    Just like lads from Limerick want to play for Munster.

    And lads from Cork want to go to UCC and play for Munster.

    Hardly controversial.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Yea, i’d say they were pretty much always guys leinster didnt want.

    My assumption was that the IRFU strongly discourages actual poaching and its relatively rare.

    For ulster, munster, connacht to get guys leinster actually might want to keep that are in their sub academy, they would really have to offer more than just an academy deal (as its a pittance) but i really doubt that the irfu would let that happen wholesale.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No, there's no way that would realistically be of benefit to Irish rugby.

    As @irishUnder20s2023 's says above, it would just lead to wage inflation, with unproven players getting more than they deserve, which would lead to upward pressure through all the contracts above that.

    It would also serve to dilute what is actually a key strength of Irish rugby, the provincialism and the attachment people have to the provinces.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,558 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    There are very few examples. And Leinster don't get it wrong too often.

    The last miss one could consider they had was Tadgh Beirne. And I could see why they made the decision at the time. He spent the majority of his academy years injured and Ross Molony was rated in the academy and we had some grizzled if a bit limited second rows on the books at the time (Triggs, McCarthy etc) He also had Matt "what's an academy?" O'Connor as a coach for his final 2 academy years.

    Some players just need to go elsewhere to thrive for a whole bunch of reasons much as some Leinster fans don't like it. But I think Beirnes immediate impact at Scarlets did make Leinster sit back and wonder how the hell they let a player of that calibre go



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, I think it's probable that you could argue both Cian Prendergast and Paddy Patterson would count as misses? Patterson was in the Leinster system and they let him go, but to me he's a better player than Nick McCarthy. Jury is out as to whether Cormac Foley (1 year younger than Patterson) will be a better player, but right now Patterson is progressing faster.

    On Prendergast, Leinster are stacked in the back row (and were even more stacked at that time), and I do think he's flourished as least partially because of the game time he's gotten (already has 38 appearances, mostly starts for Connacht), but anytime you've a 22-year old international player it's fair to say he's of good quality and to me counts as a miss too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭Must love hardship


    You could throw out a few more names: Andrew Conway, Felix Jones , Jeremy Loughman, oli Jager, potentially Karl Martin?

    It's impossible for Leinster to Retain every player that comes through the sub academy or academy.. but you have to say they are doing an excellent job of retaining the vast majority of them currently..

    I actually thought Karl Martins route is a potentially a very smart one. Go to France young, spend 3 years in the Academy and get Jiff qualified. Opens up prospects to come back to Ireland, go to England or play in France then later..



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nah, not in all cases. Maybe in the case of Karl Martin, and possibly on Loughman, but not with Conway, Jones or Jager in my view.

    Andrew Conway had played 42 times for Leinster by the time he left for Munster (aged 22), and had started big games including Heineken Cup, Challenge Cup Final and the Pro12 final in the season before he left.

    Felix Jones was in the Leinster academy, and wasn't getting game time. He was roughly similar age to the significantly more talented Rob Kearney who arrived on the scene a few years earlier. I don't think many ever lamented him going, though he was a good player.

    I would say on Loughman you're probably right - he was in the Leinster academy, but as a tighthead, and didn't really progress. He wasn't going to get a contract with Leinster when he was sent on a development contract to Munster. They'd probably like to have him now, but back then he was in a long queue for gametime.

    Oli Jager - no, don't agree. Don't think he's of international standard as a tight head.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,316 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Cooney is potentially a miss, but who knows if he would ever have fit in at Leinster.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,558 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    In terms of misses I classify it as players who would easily be in and around first team consistently if they'd stayed.

    With Patterson only time will tell. I do think he's better than Nick but I think Foley will come good. And Patterson doesn't get ahead of McGrath or JGP just yet.

    Similar Prendergast has picked up a cap or 2. But I don't see him getting in a Leinster back row with Doris, Conan, Baird, VDF or Connors. He'd be competing against Ruddock and Penny for whatever minutes are going. It would be good to have him. But I think he'd be a luxury player for us. I do question why he wasn't given a shot in the academy however.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,319 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Ah these lists of ones that got away always assume the player would have got to the levels they are at if they stayed at Leinster, sometimes a player needs a different environment to shine. Beirne for instance would never have got the game time he got in Wales if he stayed so whilst it’s possible he might have reached those heights I think it’s likely he wouldn’t have.

    it’s real hindsight stuff but doesn’t take the journey into account.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,558 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    We backed a 1 year younger Luke McGrath which was absolutely the correct decision with the benefit of hindsight. McGrath has more international caps than Cooney.

    Both are similar passers of the ball insofar as it's average at best for an international 9.

    McGrath a better defender and leader with Cooney a stronger kicker.

    One could say maybe we should have moved on one of Boss or Reddan but both were still in and around the international scene by the time Cooney moved on and were playing good rugby. Big ask to keep 4 senior 9s

    But if you asked me to pick between one of Cooney or McGrath I'm picking Luke McGrath 11 times out of 10



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,353 ✭✭✭Dave_The_Sheep


    McGrath has more international caps than Cooney.

    But that's big bad Johhny Sexton's fault, the bully.

    "You turned her against me!" vibes, admittedly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,558 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,051 ✭✭✭✭Interested Observer


    Cooney had started to get decent gametime in Schmidt's last season, I'm not going to trawl through match reports or anything but he played plenty in the league and then was in the squad for the knockout games in all the Challenge Cup knockouts. Then the MOCalypse happened, his minutes fell off a cliff, he got fed up and left. He's clearly an excellent player so I don't really see how he wouldn't have fit in.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Looking at the URC table - The Sharks could do Leinster a big favour this weekend by beating the Stormers.

    They are playing their game in hand tomorrow and if the Stormers lose it starts to make the run in a bit easier.

    Means Leinster would only need another 10 points from the remaining 5 games to lock up 1st place.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,423 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Loughman was in the academy with Oisin Heffernan, who also was released. Even if Loughman was seen as a loose head the road to match time was limited. The move to Munster worked out for him.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,156 ✭✭✭Serbian


    Don't need to trawl through match reports, his profile is still on the Leinster site. He played in 13 league games and 3 Amlin Cup games in Schmidt's last season. He played 6 games in the two seasons after Schmidt left.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,423 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Some decent looking academy prospects on show last night. It will be interesting to watch the 20's as it progresses. Very excited to see who stcjs their paw up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,423 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Stormer beat the Sharks. I was hoping they would lose. They are doing quiet well and will be formidable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭Zeugnis


    Connacht had a serious TH problem and do not have the money to recruit in the regular market - it's runt of the litter stuff in terms of IRFU funding. They took a risk on Illo, but it seems to be paying off. He's third in the pecking order behind Finlay and Jack Aungier, has had a start and four other appearances. I'd argue that is a decent amount of exposure for a prop who is effectively in the second year of the Academy. IMO it's only now that we're starting to see him ready to emerge in the senior environment, and he'll get more minutes before the season is out. He has just extended his contract for another two years, so it would appear all parties are happy with the arrangement.

    I'm not saying that there should be a broad license to pillage players from other provinces, but I don't see anything wrong with some competition at Academy level. Connacht have never filled their academy with local players, it is de facto a landing field for the exiles program, and has always recruited also from Leinster because there is such an abundance of riches.

    Is this a big problem for Leinster? Hardly, - both starting U20 THs since Illo have also been Leinster players (Rory Maguire 2022, Paddy McCarthy this year). Illo's peer on that U20 front row, Temi Lasisi, has a grand total of 1 minute under his belt for Leinster, he's mostly playing AIL (nothing wrong with that, Illo has been playing with Buccaneers), and and now has to fight for game time with Jack Boyle...



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,423 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I don't blame Connacht. What can they do? The loss of Aungier and Salanoa is being felt atm. Clarkson has not made many improvements. So Leinster have a gap at tight head. I do think Clarkson will be a decent player in the future.

    Ala'Alatoa should be extended. The union should not this from happening. Because of the losses Leinstet have incurred.



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭Zeugnis


    I certainly agree that Ala'Alatoa should be extended. Bear in mind that Clarkson is still only 22, so don't write him off yet, but Leinster have that gap, which you referred to, deriving from the departure of Aungier/Salanoa simultaneously. Aungier left with clean hands as Leinster thought they were keeping RS - think you can blame that whisperer Eddie O'Sullivan for his departure to Munster. Aungier played his best game of the year against the Lions, worth a look, gives us hope that he may still kick on significantly.

    Post edited by Zeugnis on


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,316 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    How many top level THs get recognised as early as U20 level and go on to deserve that recognition?

    It could be 10 years before a TH actually reaches his peak.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    Very true, but they are recognised early on for potential. Sure most irish men don't hit physical maturity until mid 20s.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,423 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Some lads you can see have from an early age. Marty Moore and Furlong looked to be ready in their early 20's



Advertisement