Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1252725282530253225333690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    OK, and what parts of Ukraine should be given up?

    You do realise that since March/April 22 that Ukraine has liberated much more land since then?

    You do know that Russia has lost this war, the only thing that remains to be seen is whether can Ukraine win it. If not then there will be a stalemate and some sort of peace treaty.


    Also, even in the event of a peace treaty how can we guarantee Ukraine's borders, whatever form they may be? Can you answer this point as its very important.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    There is always this tension in the thread, people with various bias arguing whether Ukrainian resistance is successful or not or whether it is futile going forward or if they can get outright victory. For me it's not important because they have no choice anyway, the choice is death on the battlefield or death under occupation or enslavement and possible death under occupation for a Ukrainian. From a western perspective the calculation is even easier, a Russia that hates you and is confident or a Russia that hates you and is weakened. The prospect of victory seems irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 297 ✭✭vimalandrew


    I want to tell the reality. From what I read from my home Indian media. NATO and European Union were doing so many things against Russia. There is a lot of religious thing involved here.

    Vatican influenced the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople and made him declare that Ukrainian Orthodox Church is separate from Russian Orthodox Church. So that Catholic church can infiltrate into Ukrainian church as it did into other orthodox churches in previous centuries. This is the final provocation Russia occupied Ukraine.

    Now we can go back to 10th century. Byzantine empire was the gloriest empire and Constantinople was its capital. Byzantine or Eastern orthodox church was the largest church in the world. Holy land was occupied by Mohammedans with the support of Antioch and Alexandrian patriarchates which are Oriental orthodox different from Byzantine and catholic. With the blessing of Pope in Rome, European crusaders started marching to liberate holy lands from Muslims. Instead they march to Constantinople, the largest city in the world; looted and destroyed the city. As a result Byzantine empire declined and also the Eastern orthodox church. This helped Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed to conquer Constantinople in 14th century. After this Europe flourished, prospered and now is a beautiful garden. All this happened by using the propaganda- Pope in Rome is the successor of Apostle Peter.

    Now historians and scholars have found one thing. this list of bishops from apostle Peter is fake created by Roman catholic church after the Council of Chalcedon in AD 451. Byzantine Orthodox church in Constantinople also created fake list of bishops beginning from Apostle Andrew after the Council. The only church which has the exact list of bishops beginning from Apostolic times is the Church of Antioch. This revelation led to the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI.

    Scholars have pointed out that it is better to be part of an independent orthodox church. This is because Antiochian patriarchate survived with the help of Islamic Caliphate and majority of that area is converted to Islam. So Eastern orthodox chrisitianity is the best for a Christian. But if Vatican tries to infiltrate and create problems for the prosperity of Europe, then the issue starts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Kramatorsk has been shelled again today by Russia after striking an apartment block last night ,

    The previous day they shelled a grave yard in the same area , killing Ukrainians in their homes ,in their schools and their hospital,and now attacking the already dead





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,012 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    What do you think should be done at present?

    Less weapons sent? More?

    Or something else



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,076 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Well unfortunately the US support is inadequate and highly qualified. And that's not just my opinion, it's also that of several formerly senior US military commanders.

    The HIMARS were geo fenced and their range limited.

    The Abrams to be supplied are not from US stocks, they are coming from the manufacturer. This means getting tanks from allies, shipping them to the US, fully dismantling them and rebuilding them from scratch, minus any capabilities the US wants to hold back, like their secret armour (if the tanks have it). This is why it's going to take so long. They can do two tanks a day and the process including checks, callibration and testing, takes two weeks.

    The GDLSB long range munitions are not coming from US stocks, they will manufacture them frrom scratch because the US wants to limit their useful capability by leaving out normal features like the laser guidance. Also they will likely geofence them as they did with the HIMARS

    And Biden helpfully said 'no F-16s.' and cluster munitions.

    The Orcs are supposedly assembling a 500,000 strong invasion force. When it crosses into Ukraine, I suspect they will finally commit a significant proportion of their large aircraft fleet to a swamping and destruction of air defences in an all or nothing effort. I think all this time, they probably have been fixing a lot of aircraft that were unusable.

    So the US supply chain is deliberately slow because they first have to spend time manufacturing most of the sophisticated stuff because what they are sending is all special Ukraine specific versions that have been suitably neutered and with secret bits left off them.

    Pilots should be training in F-15s now, not F-16s. The lead time is so long that if the training isn't done, 'just in case', instead of 'no F-16s', Ukraine could be in deep trouble if the Orcs have been fixing their planes and commit to using most of them in an aerial and ground blitzkrieg.

    The US said it will do everything necessary for Ukraine to defend itself and prevail, and IMO, they are a very long way off from doing that because their manufacture from scratch approach means the lead times are excessive and artificially extended. If something happens rapidly, the stuff needed to counter it needs to already be in the country or Poland and Ukrainians need to be trained, not on a spec sheet on the computer screen of a purchasing officer in some US factory.

    I have to give a shout out to Poland for possibly being worried and on to this problem. They now seem almost desperate to train Ukrainians on the Leopards and want to accelerate the trining regime and shorten it to just two weeks.

    If they are worried, I'm worried. We might have fallen ito a trap of underestimating the Orcs in the same way they underestimated the west's resolve and response and Ukriane.

    This is a summary from a week of topics on a Telegram channel, the gist of which is that something's up:

    #event_digest February 1, 2023.

    🔹 There will be a new wave of invasion of the horde: the GUR reported what task Gerasimov will try to complete in March.

    🔹The threat of an offensive from Belarus: intelligence told what Lukashenka decided.

    🔹Poland wants to halve the training of Ukrainian defenders on the Leopard so that the equipment is on the battlefield as quickly as possible.

    🔹The threat to Kyiv and the role of Belarus: what a vile offensive Russia is preparing for the spring and whether it will be successful.

    🔹A military analyst has denied the fake about the F-16 fighter.

    🔹Mobilization in Ukraine: what types of summonses and where they can be handed.

    🔹The EU wants to teach twice as many Ukrainian soldiers to fight against Russia - media.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭20Wheel


    Is it WION thats spouting such shyte?

    Wouldnt surprise me.

    Putin is a dictator. Putin should face justice at the Hague. All good Russians should work to depose Putin. Russias war in Ukraine is illegal and morally wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,012 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Reason #387 for Russia invading Ukraine, but not being responsible for it. Religious gobbledegook.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 853 ✭✭✭mikewest




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @cnocbui

    The Abrams to be supplied are not from US stocks, they are coming from the manufacturer. This means getting tanks from allies, shipping them to the US, fully dismantling them and rebuilding them from scratch, minus any capabilities the US wants to hold back, like their secret armour (if the tanks have it). This is why it's going to take so long. They can do two tanks a day and the process including checks, callibration and testing,


    That's not true,

    Export Abrams and older Abrams don't come with the depleted uranium mesh in it's armor,they won't have to be stripped and rebuilt minus any capabilities,

    Where are you reading that



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,012 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Hopefully they can really start manufacturing these things in large numbers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,076 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I said 'if they have it'. It's not even remotely close to being the main issue.

    One official mentioned it is likely that the Biden administration would use the USAI process to purchase Abrams from allies, repair them, and then send them to Ukraine. This process could last months and even years.

    Can you imagine how long it's going to take to get allies to consider, debate, legislate and then act, just to get hold of the tanks in the first place? That is going to be several months alone, if done really quickly.

    And here's a piece on what 'from the manufacturer' really means: https://www.cnet.com/culture/before-the-battlefield-making-the-armys-abrams-tank/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Thanks for the thorough response. It's clear the US are holding back and personally that is unfortunate but I guess I can see why from their perspective they might have some competing priorities. I think they have been stung in the past by oversupplying untrained allies who failed to fully utilize the hardware. They claim that they are providing what they believe will be effective capability and so far in this war at least they have been right 100% of the time, even predicting the invasion when others refused to. They are never going to give their hand away, exposing their strategic technological advantages unless they have to. Lets be honest, the US ,second only to the Ukrainians themselves, are the main reason that Ukraine is still in the fight and will continue to be. However, Ukraine pales in comparison to US interests in the western pacific for example, they have an iron in every fire and exposing some tactical or strategic weakness accidentally in Ukraine could jeopardise their advantage elsewhere (i.e. China). Also, I can see why there may be a continued US frustration with decades of european under investment in defense capability, whilst relying on US superiority to protect their geopolitically aligned interests, all while occasionally decrying US imperialism. This too is a game, even between allies. I can see US reticence to immediately come to the rescue here, within europe itself, again, without at least putting serious pressure on supposed european leadership to basically pull even half of its own weight. For example, as much as we complain about the German response here, France actually has invested over decades in a modern military and yet they lie on the sidelines as usual, trying to take a superior stance of non aggression which as a mask for self preservation and cowardice, slipped a century ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    If the us wanted they could ask Poland to transfer a few of theirs which can be replaced in a later order,

    The Abrams was used to get the Germans on board to allow the transfer of leopards to Ukraine from themselves and elsewhere



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,621 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Either go to wartime production of artillery shells and artillery pieces and supply Ukraine with enough artillery so that they have superiority in that area (currently are outshelled more than 10-to-1 and its causing much attrition)

    Otherwise pressure both sides for negotiations and some kind of settlement. Without enough artillery Ukraine will lose more territory. Some may take solace in the fact that the gains over the past 6 months have been minimal, measured in 10s of kms - but outside of the densely populated & built-up Donbass the terrain is much more open, flat and more sparsely populated. If this conflict goes on long enough that the Russians reach the Kramatorsk-Slayvansk line of defence, it really is the last good line of defence before the Dnieper.

    Its time to sh*t or get off the pot - either fully commit to supply Ukraine with the works (large numbers of tanks, APCs, artillery, MLRS, AA) even if it risks emptying western countries' stocks, or push for a ceasefire and negotiations. The current system of dripfeeding arms just prolongs the conflict and the destruction & loss of life. Ukraine has a demographic crisis on the way unless they can reverse that massive gap between 16 and 35, another year of conflict eats into those numbers further.

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    That article is dates 2013 ,and sales of Abrams to foreign allies is at all time high,it's likely that the 30 tanks already exist ,but the Americans don't want to send them, instead they baithed the Germans to allow export of their tanks directly to Ukraine saving the US from having to send any tanks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭20Wheel


    France is doing plenty too. But also not shouting about it.

    And what is this Europe pressed to carry at least half its weight echo chamber guff. Consider that the greater part of the continent redesigned its entire economy to cut out rus oil and gas.

    Then the literal millions of refugees housed. The double edged sanctions. The billions in loans and grants. Then the small books worth of military hardware given.

    Putin is a dictator. Putin should face justice at the Hague. All good Russians should work to depose Putin. Russias war in Ukraine is illegal and morally wrong.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Was that hindustan news by any chance that is Kremlins mouthpiece and repeats the same propaganda and lies as the russian ministry of defense and TASS does.

    Maybe India should worry about the regime next door to them instead of supporting the regime next to Europe.

    Remember it might come to the day that China comes in full force,and i gurantee you Russia wont help you then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,775 ✭✭✭Homelander


    That's a new one. It actually made me laugh.

    "To get a better understanding of this conflict, we must first visit the religious landscape of the 11th century...."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,541 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Tbh I think the discussion of Abrams is kinda moot. It was a political step to unlock the Leopards. The Germans not wanting to be seen as aggresive warmongers in any way shape or form. Which is understandable. So the Americans pledge some Abrams and then supply them in the slowest possible manner since the details of how they're provided is of little political importance compared with the declaration that they'll be delivered. I'd honestly be surprised if we see a single Abrams rolling around Ukraine this year.

    The GLSDBs "not coming from stocks" is a bit misleading though I think. Since the Americans have thousands of the M26 rockets lying around then a special adapter is added to snap the small diameter bomb to it. So it shouldn't take that long. They've been announced as being in the next package so clearly there are some already made. They were only proposed to the Pentagon by Saab/Boeing last November so it seems they can be produced relatively quickly. This is just me speculating though.

    With regards to the Americans hard coding a range limit to their Himars. Yeah thatss worrying. Supplying Ukraine with 150km missiles then neutering their ability to use them like they were supposed to seems like the height of stupidity to me but who knows. However I can think of a few things that could counter that.

    1. The rocket component itself with the GLSDB does not actually fly the full distance. It carries the warhead high and far enough at which point the bomb detaches and glides the rest of the way. A possibility for it to bypass this hard limit on the other GMLRS rockets.
    2. The Ukranians also have several MLRS systems from the germans brits and Italians I believe. M270's and MARS. It's possible these units don't have this limit applied to them I guess?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,498 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    So you’ve a problem with Russians being called orcs rather than a problem with Russians invading, raping, murdering, kidnapping, maiming children, women and men. Right. I suppose they shouldn’t fight back either because no one should be expected to stand up to the Russian regime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,012 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The first part - okay

    But this part "Otherwise pressure both sides for negotiations and some kind of settlement."

    This isn't a war over "differences", one side is trying to conquer, annihilate and subjugate the other. The attacker cannot be trusted with any treaty or any peace, ever. It's entirely up to the defender, and they have signalled any wish to "settle" by rewarding the attacker with their land and people yet.

    So option 1 it is then. The only question there is whether to go all-in, or do as they are doing now which is support in stages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    The words "absolute fucking gibberish" are thrown around a lot these days...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,076 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The meal choices they will be offered, how they react, and what they decide to do when presented with them, would be worthy of a TV program. I might even be prepared to pay to watch it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭NeutralHandle


    Right I'll avoid the ableist perjorative, but say that this interpretation of me is based on imagination, a kinda slotting people into preconceived boxes, and not based on anything I actually said or expressed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,621 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    "conquer, annihilate, subjugate" - which is it? Some posts say theyre fighting for their lives because Putin will exterminate every Ukrainian, others say its a landgrab for all of Europe & Poland is next. Some say its about restoring the USSR - which is it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Some say it's all a plot by the CIA to discredit putin,

    And putin is fighting Nazis in Ukraine only after a year he hasn't been able to find a single Ukrainian Nazi



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,798 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It could be all three.

    They will exterminate any Ukrainian they cannot subjugate.

    A subjugated Ukraine is then their colony, to plunder, and strengthen themselves from its resources.

    Ukraine is the stepping stone.

    Didn't someone in the 1940s engage in extermination, landgrabs and restoring the 'greatness' of their country and empire...

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,076 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Would you have a link for this 10:1 outshelling? The Ukrainians are using 90,000 a month, so, yeah, a link?

    France and Australia announced on Monday (Feb 1) that they would collaborate on a multi-million dollar project to produce artillery shells for Ukraine, CNN reported.

    “Several thousand 155-millimeter shells are going to be manufactured in common, with an unprecedented partnership between Australia and France,” said Sébastien Lecornu, Defense Minister of France, at a press conference in Paris.

    According to Lecornu, the French arms company Nexter will partner with Australian companies, which will provide the powder for the shells.

    “This forms part of the ongoing level of support that both France and Australia are providing Ukraine to make sure that Ukraine is able to stay in this conflict and be able to see it concluded on its own terms,” Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles added.

    CNN points out that neither minister would specify quantities beyond “several thousand” artillery shells, but they indicated this would be a long-term collaboration.

    Add to this the fact Ukraine have set up their own factory for mortars and soviet calibre shells and the US is increasing their manufacturing by six fold, eventually making 90,000 a month, but only after a year or so, and the 300,000 shells the US is taking from stockpiles in Israel and South Korea, hopefully they will have enough in the short term. I'll bet that with their greater range and accuracy and sophisticated drone targeting and fire correction, every Ukraine fired shell is probably worth multiple from the Orcs in terms of effectiveness.

    Apparently France has also set up an ongoing supply program for Ukraine to the tune of $200 million.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement